Site Visits in Family Medicine: Stakeholders Perspectives on How Site Visits Can Be Improved to Maximize Preceptor Support and the Quality of Medical Student and Resident Supervision

Colla J. MacDonald, Edward Seale, Douglas Archibald, Madeleine Montpetit, David Tobin, Michael Hirsh, Martha McKeen

Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2013.46A006                

Abstract

In 2012, the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Ottawa conducted a study to identify stakeholder’s perspectives of site visits and how they can be improved to support preceptors and provide the best learning experience for medical students and residents. Two data sources were utilized to address the research questions: interviews with stakeholders (both focus group and individual interviews) and online surveys with preceptors. The findings assert that establishing a process for site visits to maximize preceptor support and the quality of medical student and resident supervision is a complex process. Perceptions of quality site visits for all stakeholders were strongly linked to: 1) having clear expectations; 2) making site visits a priority and supplying the necessary support and resources; 3) supporting preceptors to be better teachers; 4) the quality and timeliness of preceptor feedback from residents and medical students; 5) involving the medical student and resident in the site visit process; and 6) an integration and collaboration among curriculum, faculty development and evaluation resources. As researchers continue to build site visit recipes based on theory and reflection of practical experiences, the resulting insights will enable all stakeholders in family medicine programs to make more informed decisions to positively impact the quality of the site visit experience, support preceptors in being better teachers and improve the quality of the supervision of residents and medical students. This study takes one step toward building a broad base of theoretical knowledge informed by practical experiences on site visits.

Keywords

Site Visits; Family Medicine; Preceptor; Resident; Medical Student; Rural Community Site; Urban Community Site; Quality Standard

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Bhagia, J., & Tinsley, J. A. (2000) The mentoring partnership. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 75, 535-537.
[2]	Bianchi, F., Stobbe, K., & Eva, K. (2008) Comparing academic performance of medical students in distributed learning sites: The Mc Master experience. Medical Teacher, 30, 67-71. doi:10.1080/01421590701754144
[3]	Casimiro, L., MacDonald, C. J., Thompson, T.-L., & Stodel, E. J. (2009). Grounding theories of W(e)Learn: A framework for online interprofessional education. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 23, 390-400.
[4]	Chew, L. D., Watanabe, J. M., Buchwald, D., & Lessler, D. S. (2003). Junior faculty’s perspectives on mentoring. Academic Medicine, 78, 652. doi:10.1097/00001888-200306000-00022
[5]	Denz-Penhey, H., Shannon, S., Murdoch, J. C., & Newbury, J. W. (2005). Do benefits accrue from longer rotations for students in Rural Clinical School? Rural Remote Health, 2, 414.
[6]	Elzubeir, M., & Rizk, D. (2002) Evaluating the quality of teaching in medical education: are we using the evidence for both formative and summative purposes? Medical Teacher, 24, 313-319. doi:10.1080/01421590220134169
[7]	Farell, S. E., Digioia, N. M., Broderick, K. B., & Coates, W. C. (2004) Mentoring for clinician-educators. Academic Medicine, 11, 1346-1350.
[8]	Langlois, J. P., & Thach, S. B. (2003) Bringing faculty development to community-based preceptors. Academic Medicine, 78, 150-155. doi:10.1097/00001888-200302000-00009
[9]	Latessa, R., Beaty, N., Colvin, G., Landis, S., & Janes, C. (2008) Family medicine community preceptors: Different from other physician specialties? Family Medicine, 40, 96-100.
[10]	MacDonald, C. J., Stodel, E. J., Thompson, T.-L., & Casimiro, L. (2009). W(e)Learn: A framework for interprofessional education. International Journal of Electronic Healthcare, 5, 33-47. doi:10.1504/IJEH.2009.026271
[11]	MacDonald, C. J., & Thompson, T. L. (2005). Structure, content, delivery, service, and outcomes: Quality e-learning in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 6. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/237/321
[12]	MacDonald, C. J., Stodel, E. J., Farres, L. G., Breithaupt, K., & Gabriel, M. A. (2001). The demand-driven learning model: A framework for web-based learning. Internet and Higher Education, 4, 9-30. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00045-8
[13]	Malik, R., Bordman, R., Regehr, G., & Freeman, R. (2007). Continuous quality improvement and community-based faculty development through an innovative site visit program at one institution. Academic Medicine, 82, 465-468. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31803ea942
[14]	Moser, S. E., Dorsch, J. N., & Kellerman, R. (2004). The RAFT approach to academic detailing with preceptors. Family Medicine, 36, 316-318.
[15]	Pololi, L. H., & Knight, S. M. (2005). Mentoring in academic medicine. A new paradigm? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20, 866-870. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.05007.x
[16]	Pololi, L. H., Knight, S. M., Dennis, K., & Frankel, R. M. (2002). Helping medical school faculty realize their dreams: An innovative, collaborative mentoring program. Academic Medicine, 77, 377-384. doi:10.1097/00001888-200205000-00005
[17]	Sargent, J. R., Osborn, L. M., Roberts, K. B., & DeWitt, T. G. (1993). Establishment of primary care community experiences in community pediatrician’s offices: Nuts and bolts. Pediatrics, 91, 1185-1189.
[18]	Skeff, K. M., Stratos, G. A., Mygdal, W., DeWitt, T. A., Manfred, L., Quirk, M., Roberts, K., Greenberg, L., & Bland, C. J. (1997). Faculty development, a resource for clinical teachers. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 12, S56-S63. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.12.s2.8.x
[19]	Stearns, J. A., Hemesath, K., & Londo, R. A. (2000) Goal setting for community preceptorships. Family Medicine, 32, 161-162.
[20]	Steinert, Y. (2005). Staff development for clinical teachers. The Clinical Teacher, 2, 104-110. doi:10.1111/j.1743-498X.2005.00062.x
[21]	Steinert, Y., Mann, K., Centeno, A., Dolmans, D., Spencer, J., Gelula, M., & Prideaux, D. (2006). A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Medical Teacher, 28, 497-526. doi:10.1080/01421590600902976
[22]	Suzewits, J. (2002) Preceptor site visit. Family Medicine, 34, 240-241.
[23]	Thompson, T. L., & MacDonald, C. J. (2005). Community building, emergent design and expecting the unexpected: Creating a quality eLearning experience. The Internet and Higher Education, 8, 233-249. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.06.004
[24]	Veitch, C., Underhill, A., & Hays, R. B. (2006). The career aspirations and location intentions of James Cook University’s first cohort of medical students: A longitudinal study at course entry and graduation. Rural Remote Health, 6, 537.
[25]	Wilkerson, L., & Irby, D. M. (1998). Strategies for improving teaching practices: A comprehensive approach to faculty development. Academic Medicine, 7, 387-396. doi:10.1097/00001888-199804000-00011