[1]
|
Asay, L. & Orgill, M. (2010). Analysis of essential features of inquiry in articles published in The Science Teacher. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 57-79. doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9152-9
|
[2]
|
Ashley, C. (2011). Avenues to Inspiration. Science Scope, 35, 24-30.
|
[3]
|
Barrow, L. (2010). Encouraging creativity with scientific inquiry. Creative Education, 1, 1-16. doi:10.4236/ce.2010.11001
|
[4]
|
Boden, M. (2001). Creativity and knowledge. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey, & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in education (pp. 95-102). London: Continuum.
|
[5]
|
Boden, M. (2004). The creative mind: myths and mechanisms. New York: Routledge.
|
[6]
|
Bohm, D. (1998). On creativity. London: Routledge.
|
[7]
|
Brent, D., Sumara, D., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2008). Engaging minds: Changing teaching in complex times. New York: Routledge.
|
[8]
|
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
|
[9]
|
Craft, A. (2001). Little C creativity. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey, & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in education. New York: Continuum International.
|
[10]
|
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1994). The domain of creativity. In D. Feldman, M. Csikszentmihalyi, & H. Gardner (Eds.), Changing the world: A framework of the study of creativity (pp. 135-158). Westport, CT: Praeger.
|
[11]
|
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.
|
[12]
|
Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1011-1026.
doi:10.3758/BF03196731
|
[13]
|
Drayton, B., & Falk, J. (2001). Tell-tale signs of the inquiry oriented classroom. NASSP Bulletin, 85, 24-34.
doi:10.1177/019263650108562304
|
[14]
|
Di Trocchio, F. (1997). Il genio incompress. Milan: Mondadori.
|
[15]
|
Egan, K. (1990). Romantic understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
|
[16]
|
Einstein, A. & Infeld, L. (1938). The evolution of physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
[17]
|
Feynman, R. (1995). Six easy pieces. Reading, MA: Helix Books.
|
[18]
|
Feldman, D., Czikszentmihalyi, M., & Gardner, H. (1994). Changing the world: A framework for the study of creativity. Westport, CT and London: Praeger.
|
[19]
|
Gardner, H. (1993a). Multiple intelligences. The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
|
[20]
|
Gardner, H. (1993b). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.
|
[21]
|
Gardner, H. (2004). Changing minds: The art and science of changing our own and other people’s minds. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
|
[22]
|
Gardner, H. (1997). Extraordinary minds. New York: Harper Collins.
|
[23]
|
Gardner, H. (2010). Five minds for the future. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
|
[24]
|
Gaut, B. (2003). Creativity and imagination. In B. Gaut & P. Livingston (Eds.), The creation of art (pp. 268-293), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
[25]
|
Ginsberg, H. & Opper, S. (1969). Piaget’s theory of intellectual development: An introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
|
[26]
|
Girod, M. (2007). A conceptual overview of the beauty and aesthetics in science. Studies in Science Education, 43, 38-61.
doi:10.1080/03057260708560226
|
[27]
|
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2005). Romantic understanding and science education. Teaching Education, 16, 23-32.
doi:10.1080/1047621052000341590
|
[28]
|
Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Stefanich, G. (2001). Imagination in science education. Contemporary Education, 71, 23-29.
|
[29]
|
Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Fotinos, N. (2007). Imaginative thinking and the learning of science. Science Education Review, 6, 15-22.
|
[30]
|
Heisenberg, W. (1971). Physics and beyond. London: Allen & Unwin.
|
[31]
|
Holton, G. (1996). Einstein, history, and other passions. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
|
[32]
|
Jackson, P. (1998). John Dewey and the lessons of art. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
|
[33]
|
Jenkins, E. (1996). The “nature of science” as a curriculum component. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 137-150.
doi:10.1080/0022027980280202
|
[34]
|
Kind, P., & Kind, V. (2007). Creativity in science education: Perspectives and challenges for developing school science. Studies in Science Education, 43, 1-37. doi:10.1080/03057260708560225
|
[35]
|
Klassen, S. (2006). The application of historical narrative in science learning: The Atlantic Cable story. Science & Education, 16, 335- 352.
|
[36]
|
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
|
[37]
|
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
|
[38]
|
Lunn, M., & Nobel, A. (2008). Revisioning science “love and passion in the scientific imagination”: Art and science. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 793-805.
doi:10.1080/09500690701264750
|
[39]
|
Mannheim, K. (1972). Ideology and utopia. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
|
[40]
|
Maslow, A. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
|
[41]
|
Mathewson, J. (1999). Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators. Science Education, 83, 33-54.
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199901)83:1<33::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-Z
|
[42]
|
McAllister, J. (1996). Beauty and revolution in science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
|
[43]
|
McAllister, J. W. (1997). Laws of nature, natural history, and the description of the world. Princeton: Voordracht Institute for Advanced Study (Conference lecture).
|
[44]
|
McComas, W. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 53-72). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
[45]
|
Medawar, P. (1967). The art of the soluble: Originality in science. Middlesex: Penguin Books.
|
[46]
|
Medawar, P. (1979). Advice to a young scientist. New York: Harper & Row.
|
[47]
|
Medawar, P. (1984). Pluto’s republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
|
[48]
|
Merten, S. (2011). Enhancing science education through art. Science Scope, 35, 31-35.
|
[49]
|
Miell, D., & Littleton, K. (2004). Collaborative creativity: Contemporary perspectives. London: Free Association Books.
|
[50]
|
Miller, A. (2001). Einstein, Picasso: Space, Time, and the Beauty That Causes Havoc. New York: Basic Books.
|
[51]
|
Moravcsik, M. J. (1981). Creativity in science education. Science Education, 65, 221-227. doi:10.1002/sce.3730650212
|
[52]
|
Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107-120. doi:10.1080/10400419.2003.9651403
|
[53]
|
Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692-720. doi:10.1002/tea.10105
|
[54]
|
Pink, D. (2005). A whole new mind. New York: Riverhead Trade.
|
[55]
|
Planck, M. (1933). Where is science going? London: Allen & Unwin.
|
[56]
|
Ricchiuto, J. (1996). Collaborative creativity. Cleveland, OH: Oakhill Press.
|
[57]
|
Robinson, K. (2001). Out of our minds. Learning to be creative. Chichester: Capstone.
|
[58]
|
Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston, MA: Houghton, Mifflin.
|
[59]
|
Root-Bernstein, R. (1996). The sciences and arts share a common creative aesthetic. In A. Tauber (Ed.), The elusive synthesis. Aesthetics and science (pp. 49-82). Boston, London: Kluwer.
doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1786-6_3
|
[60]
|
Root-Bernstein, R. (2002). Aesthetic cognition. International Studies in Philosophy of Science, 16, 61-77.
doi:10.1080/02698590120118837
|
[61]
|
Rowlands, S. (2011). Discussion article: Disciplinary boundaries for creativity. Creative Education, 2, 47-55.
doi:10.4236/ce.2011.21007
|
[62]
|
Schmidt, A. (2011). Creativity in science: Tensions between perceptions and practice. Creative Education, 2, 435-445.
doi:10.4236/ce.2011.25063
|
[63]
|
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 610-645.
doi:10.1002/sce.10128
|
[64]
|
Shapira, O., & Liberman, N. (2009). Why thinking about distant things can make us more creative. URL (last checked 3 February 2012).
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=an-easy-way-to-increase-c#comments
|
[65]
|
Shepard, R. (1988). The imagination of the scientists. In K. Egan, & D. Nadaner (Eds.), Imagination and education (pp. 153-185). New York: Teachers College Press.
|
[66]
|
Simonton, D. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
doi:10.1017/CBO9781139165358
|
[67]
|
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). Creating a vision of creativity: The first 25 years. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 2-12.
doi:10.1037/1931-3896.S.1.2
|
[68]
|
Tauber, A. (1996). The elusive synthesis. Science and aesthetics. Boston, London: Kluwer. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1786-6
|
[69]
|
Tolstory, I. (1990). The knowledge and the power: Reflection on the history of science. London: Canongate.
|
[70]
|
Trefil, J. (2003). The nature of science: An A-Z guide to the laws and principles governing the universe. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
|
[71]
|
Van’t Hoff, J. (1967). Imagination in science. New York: Spriger- Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-87040-8
|
[72]
|
Vernon, P. (1970). Creativity: Selected readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
|
[73]
|
Watts, M. (2001). Science and poetry: Passion vs prescription in school science? International Journal of Science Education, 23, 197-208.
doi:10.1080/09500690120685
|
[74]
|
Whitehead, A. (1957). The aims of education. New York: Free Press.
|
[75]
|
Woolgar, S. (1988). Science: The very idea. London: Routledge.
|
[76]
|
Zenasni, F., Besancon, M., & Lubart, T. (2011). Creativity and tolerance of ambiguity: An empirical study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 61-73. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01080.x
|