TITLE:
Prospects of the Interdisciplinary & Systemic Approaches
AUTHORS:
Oleg N. Yanitsky
KEYWORDS:
Actor, Biosphere, Globalization, Ecology, Hybridization, Interdisciplinary Ap-proach, SBT-System, Science, Systemic Approach, Russia
JOURNAL NAME:
Creative Education,
Vol.11 No.6,
June
30,
2020
ABSTRACT: Drawing on the long-term studies of the relationships between the natural, social and technical sciences, on my participation in the three international projects and the own empirical investigations of natural and technological disasters, I came to the following conclusions. First, a mono-disciplinary approach to modern multisided transformations has become outdated. Second, all modern events including critical situations have systemic character. Third, any systemic events or processes should be studied by the interdisciplinary approach. Four, the modern world has nonlinear, uncertain and unpredictable character. Five, any environment has double i.e. passive-active nature, therefore when its carrying capacity is overcoming it usually transforming into a multisided actor. Six, recently the situation has aggravated by the still ill-studied process of transformation of the Biosphere into the sociobiotechnosphere (hereafter the SBT-system). Seven, its feedback in relation of humanity is ill-studied as well. Eight, this SBT-system may have various degrees of integrity, from the chaotic, over complex and hybrid till a full systemic character. Nine, various metabolic processes are the main“integrator”of natural and social sciences. Ten, any environment has its own carrying capacity. In sum, if one takes into account the above considerations, the systemic and interdisciplinary approaches are the best way to making the models of future SBT-systems. But at the same time, in our tightly integrated world,the systemic and interdisciplinary approaches have their limits because these approaches are only the scientific but not the political instruments.