SCIRP Mobile Website
Paper Submission

Why Us? >>

  • - Open Access
  • - Peer-reviewed
  • - Rapid publication
  • - Lifetime hosting
  • - Free indexing service
  • - Free promotion service
  • - More citations
  • - Search engine friendly

Free SCIRP Newsletters>>

Add your e-mail address to receive free newsletters from SCIRP.


Contact Us >>

WhatsApp  +86 18163351462(WhatsApp)
Paper Publishing WeChat
Book Publishing WeChat

Article citations


C. C. Coughlin, J. V. Terza and V. Arromdee, 1987. “State Characteristics and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment within the United States: Minimum Chi-Square Conditional Logit Estimation. Working papers Series,” Working Paper 1987-006B/, Research Division, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 1989.

has been cited by the following article:

  • TITLE: State Based Determinants of Inward FDI Flow in the US Economy

    AUTHORS: Lucyna Kornecki, EM. Ekanayake

    KEYWORDS: Inward FDI Flow; State Based Determinants; U.S. Economy

    JOURNAL NAME: Modern Economy, Vol.3 No.3, May 22, 2012

    ABSTRACT: Inward foreign direct investment (FDI) represents an integral part of the U.S. economy. The flow of international capital has been a key factor expanding economy. The inward U.S. FDI constitutes important factor contributing to output growth in the U.S. economy. This paper investigates factors affecting the inward FDI flow among fifty states of the United States. The analysis uses annual data for the period from 1997 to 2007. The study identifies several state-specific determinants of FDI and investigates the changes in their importance during the study period. Our results show that among the major determinants, the real per capita income, real per capita expenditure on education, FDI related employment, research and development expenditure, and capital expenditure are found to have a significant positive impact on FDI inflows. There is also evidence that the share of scientists and engineers in the workforce exerts a small positive impact on inward FDI flow. In addition, per capita state taxes, unit labor cost, manufacturing density, unionizetion, and unemployment rate exert a negative impact on FDI inflows.