Yang, J., Lee, J.Y., Park, Y., Baek, K and Choi, J. (2010) Adsorption of As(III), AS(V), Cd(II), Cu(II), and Pb(II) from Aqueous Solutions by Natural Muscovite, Separation Science and Technology, 45, 814-823.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01496391003609023

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Removal of Pb(II) from Aqueous Solutions by Zeolites, Porcelanite and Sands: Correlation of Morphology and Chemical Composition to Batch Removal Efficiency

  AUTHORS: Fawwaz Jumean, Lucia Pappalardo, Hani Khoury

  KEYWORDS: Zeolites, Sands, XRF, SEM, Pb(II) Removal

  JOURNAL NAME: American Journal of Analytical Chemistry, Vol.6 No.4, March 10, 2015

  ABSTRACT: Chemical compositions of natural zeolites, porcelanite (opal-CT) and local sands were determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and correlated with their Pb(II) removal efficiencies. Zeolites and porcelanite were from the Mikawer, Aritain and Hannon areas in Jordan. Sands (white, red and yellow) were from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The effect of Pb(II) concentration and zeolite dosage on removal efficiency was investigated at 25.0°C using the batch equilibrium method. Commercial kaolinite, silica and alumina were also studied for comparison. Removal efficiencies, in mg Pb(II)/g adsorbent, were: 76.9, 52.7 and 42.1 for Hannon, Mikawer and Aritain zeolites, respectively; 58.2 for porcelanite; 29.7, 11.0 and 8.5 for yellow, red and white sand, respectively; 7.2, 3.3 and 1.3 for kaolinite, silica and alumina, respectively. XRF data indicate that adsorbents with intermediate molar ratios of Si/Al, in the range 2.70 - 2.93, are most efficient in Pb(II) removal. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of adsorbents suggest that morphology, in addition to chemical composition, plays a key role. In particular, a combination of factors, including shapes and sizes of crystals, channels in zeolites and pores in porcelanite, appear to favor removal of Pb(II).