Sturdee, D.W. and Panay, N. (2010) International menopause society writing group. Recommendations for the management of postmenopausal vaginal atrophy. Climacteric, 13, 509-522. - References

Browse Menu >>

Browse Subjects >>

Computer Science & Communications

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

- Open Access
- Peer-reviewed
- Rapid publication
- Lifetime hosting
- Free indexing service
- Free promotion service
- More citations
- Search engine friendly

Free SCIRP Newsletters>>

Add your e-mail address to receive free newsletters from SCIRP.

Contact Us >>

customer@scirp.org

+86 18163351462(WhatsApp)

1655362766

Paper Publishing WeChat

Book Publishing WeChat

(or Email:book@scirp.org)

Article citations
More>>

Sturdee, D.W. and Panay, N. (2010) International menopause society writing group. Recommendations for the management of postmenopausal vaginal atrophy. Climacteric, 13, 509-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13697137.2010.522875

has been cited by the following article:

TITLE: Tolerability and hydrating effects of an anti-aging gynaecological collagen cream in women in menopause

AUTHORS: Andrea F. D. Di Stefano, Milko M. Radicioni, Andrea Vele, Anna Mancarella Eberhardt, Giorgio Caccia, Francesca Focanti, Enrica Salvatori

KEYWORDS: Skin Hydration; Vaginal Moisturiser; Skin Viscoelasticity; Corneometer; Cutometer; Perineum

JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol.4 No.3, February 21, 2014

ABSTRACT: Background and Aims: A gynaecological cream containing collagen, phytocollagen, hyaluronate and vitamins was investigated in women in menopause. Methods: The cream was daily applied to the vaginal mucosa and the perineal skin as well as to the abdominal skin (healthy skin used as control) for 1 week and then on alternate days for other 2 weeks. Skin hydration and viscoelasticity were measured at baseline and after 8 and 21 days by Corneometer? CM 825 and Cutometer? MPA 850, respectively. The product use comfort and the moisturising of the vaginal mucosa were evaluated by the volunteers through a questionnaire and a visual analogue scale, respectively. Results: The local tolerability was excellent for nearly all of the volunteers (90% - 95%) and according both to dermatologist’s and gynaecologist’s evaluation. Related adverse reactions had a frequency of 15% (10% vulvovaginal burning sensation and 5% vulvovaginal discomfort). The topical hydration increased both in the perineal and the abdominal skin. Hydration increase vs. baseline was more marked on day 8 than on day 21 and was significant in the abdominal skin (p-value