Erratum to “The Riemann Hypothesis-Millennium Prize Problem” [Advances in Pure Mathematics 6 (2016) 915-920]


The original online version of this article (Durmagambetov, A.A. (2016) The Riemann Hypothesis-Millennium Prize Problem. Advances in Pure Mathematics, 6, 915-920. 10.4236/apm.2016.612069) unfortunately contains a mistake. The author wishes to correct the errors in Theorem 2 of the result part.

Share and Cite:

Durmagambetov, A. (2016) Erratum to “The Riemann Hypothesis-Millennium Prize Problem” [Advances in Pure Mathematics 6 (2016) 915-920]. Advances in Pure Mathematics, 6, 1053-1056. doi: 10.4236/apm.2016.613077.

Theorem 1. Let the function be limited on every finite interval, and (x) is

continuous and limited on every finite interval then


Corollary 1. Let the function, , then



Our goal is to use this theorem on the analogs of zeta functions. We are interested in the analytical properties of the following generalizations of zeta functions:





Let N be the set of all natural numbers and ―the set of all natural numbers without

Below we will always let, this limitation is introduced only to simplify the calculations. Considering all the information above let us rewrite

For the function let us apply the results obtained by Muntz for the zeta function representation. With the help of the given definitions we formulate the analog of Muntz theorem.

Lemma 1. Let the function

then (8)


PROOF: According to the theorem conditions we have


Lemma 2. Let the function







PROOF: Follows from computing of integrals.

Lemma 3. Let the function


, then



PROOF: Computing the sums , we have


Theorem 2. Let the function


, then


PROOF: Using Corollary 1. we have







From the last equation we obtain the regularity of the function as s satisfied

Theorem 3. The Riemann’s function has nontrivial zeros only on the line;

PROOF: For, we have


Applying the formula from the theorem 2


estimating by the module


Estimating the zeta function, potentiating, we obtain


According to the theorem 1 limited for z from the following multitude


similarly, applying the theorem 2 for we obtain its limitation in the same multitude. For the function we have a limitation for all z, belonging to the half-plane Re(s) > 1/2 + 1/R. similarly, applying the theorem 2 for we obtain its limitation in the same multitude and finally we obtain:


These estimations for prove that zate function does not have zeros on the half-plane due to the integral representation (3) these results are projected on the half-plane for the case of nontrivial zeros. The Riemann’s hypothesis is proved.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Euler, L. (1988) Introduction to Analysis of the Infinite. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
[2] Chebyshev, P.L. (1946) Selected Mathematical Works. Gostekhizdat, Moscow. [In Russian]
[3] Riemann, G.F.B. (1972) On the Number of Prime Numbers Less than a Given Quantity. Chelsea, New York.
[4] Titchmarsh, E.C. (1986) The Theory of the Riemann Zeta Function. 2nd Revised (Heath-Brown) Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[5] Ray, D. and Singer, I.M. (1971) R-Torsion and the Laplacian on Riemannian Manifolds. Advances in Mathematics, 7, 145-210.
[6] Bost, J.-B. (1987) Fibres determinants, determinants regularises et measures sur les espaces de modules des courbes complexes. Séminaire Bourbaki, 152-153, 113-149.
[7] Kawagoe, K., Wakayama, M. and Yamasaki, Y. (2008) The q-Analogues of the Riemann zeta, Dirichlet L-Functions, and a Crystal Zeta-Function. Forum Mathematicum, 20, 126.
[8] Müntz, Ch.H. (1992) Beziehungen der Riemannschen ζ-Funktion zu willkurlichen reellen Funktionen. Matematisk Tidsskrift. B, 39-47.
[9] Baibekov, S.N. and Durmagambetov. A.A. (2016) Infinitely Many Twin Primes.
arXiv:1609.04646 [math.GM]

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.