[1]
|
Aulagnier, P. (1975). The Violence of Interpretation. From Pictogram to Statement. Paris: PUF.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203361290
|
[2]
|
Bardin, L. (1977). The Content Analysis. Paris: PUF.
|
[3]
|
Beillerot, J., Blanchard-Laville, C., & Mosconi, N. (1996). Towards a Clinic of “Rapport au Savoir” (Relationship to Knowledge). Paris: L’Harmattan.
|
[4]
|
Brunet, F., Bui-Xuan, G., & Bluteau, S. (2001). Teaching and Animating the Adapted Physical Activities for People with Intellectual Disabilities. In J. Bilard, G. Ninot, & A. Varray, (Dir), Teaching Adapted Physical Activities (pp. 134-142). Revue EPS, No. 55.
|
[5]
|
Blanchard-Laville, C. (2001). Teachers between Pleasure and Suffering. Paris: PUF.
|
[6]
|
Bourdieu, P. (1980). The Practical Sense. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
|
[7]
|
Bru, M. (1992). The Didactic Variations in the Organization of learning Conditions. Toulouse: South University Editions.
|
[8]
|
Carnus, M. F. (2002). Beliefs, Conceptions, Intentions and Effective Practices in the Teaching of Gymnastics. In J. F. Robin, & A. Durny, (Eds.), Current Work in Gymnastics and Acrobatic Activities (pp. 160-164). Dossier EPS, 57, Paris. Paris: Editions Revue EPS.
|
[9]
|
Carnus, M. F. (2003). Didactic Analysis of the Decision-Making Process of Teachers in Physical and Sports Education. A Study of Crossed Cases. In C. Amade-Escot, (Ed.), Didactic of Physical Education, State of Research (pp. 193-224). Paris: Editions EPS.
|
[10]
|
Carnus, M. F. (2009). The Teacher’s Decision in Clinical Didactic. A Case Study in Physical Education. In A. Terrisse, & M. F. Carnus, (Dir), Clinical Didactic of Physical and Sports Education, Which Issues of Knowledge (pp. 63-81)? Bruxelles: De Boeck.
|
[11]
|
Carnus, M. F. (2013). Teacher Is Not Master in His/Her Own Institution. In M. F. Carnus, & A. Terrisse, (Ed.), Clinical Didactic of Physical and Sports Education, Teachers Entity in Question (pp. 23-32). Paris: Revue EPS.
|
[12]
|
Carnus, M. F., & Terrisse, A. (2013). Clinical Didactic of Physical and Sports Education, Teacher’s Entity in Question. Paris: Revue EPS.
|
[13]
|
Ciccone, A. (2012). The Unconscious Psychic Transmission, Projective Identification and Phantasm of Transmission. Paris: Dunod.
|
[14]
|
Freud, S. (1927). The Future of an Illusion. Paris: PUF.
|
[15]
|
Freud, S. (1985). Construction in the Analysis. In Results, Ideas, Problems (pp. 269-283). Paris: PUF.
|
[16]
|
Gomez, J. F. (2004). An Educator in Walls. Anti-Pedagogical Poem for the XXI Century. Paris: Téraèdre.
|
[17]
|
Haber, S. (2012). Freud and Social Theory. Paris: La Dispute.
|
[18]
|
Jourdan, I. (2006). Relation to the Body, Relation to Sports and Artistic Physical Activities and Professional Logic: Two Case Studies in Initial Training in Physical and Sports Education. Aster, 42, 57-78.
|
[19]
|
Klein, M., & Riviere, J. (1978). Love and Hatred. Paris: Payot.
|
[20]
|
Loizon, D. (2004). The Clinical Analysis of the Experience of Teachers and Knowledge Transmission: Clinical Research in Educational Sciences, Contribution for an Analysis of Teaching Practices, 5th Congress of l’AECSE. Paris: CNAM.
|
[21]
|
Mucchielli, R. (1975). Content Analysis. Paris: ESF.
|
[22]
|
Robert, M., & Carnus, M. F. (2013). Nonverbal Ostensive Forms in Gymnastics, Constitutive of Professional Signature of Two PE Teachers. In M. F. Carnus, & A. Terrisse, (Dir). Clinical Didactic of Physical and Sports Education. Teachers Entity“le sujet enseignant” in Question (pp. 81-92). Revue EPS (Eds.).
|
[23]
|
Rouzel, J. (2004). The Daily Practices in Special Education. Paris: Dunod.
|
[24]
|
Terrisse, A., & Carnus, M. F. (2009). Clinical Didactic of Physical and Sports Education: What Stakes of Knowledge? Bruxelles: De Boeck University.
|
[25]
|
Vandermersch, B., & Chemema, R. (2009). Dictionary of Psychoanalysis. Paris.
|