Appropriation and Educational Uses of Mobile Phones by Students and Teachers at a Public University in Mexico


This article presents a study on appropriation and educational uses of cell phones. For the research, a random sample of 954 students and 246 teachers was selected, representing respectively 12% and 24% of the total population in two facilities of UABC in Ensenada, Mexico. Our survey showed that 97% of teachers or students have some kind of cell phone or smartphone. However, we observed that one of every four interactions with the mobile device had a concrete educational purpose. We also found that in general the educational use of the cell phone is mainly aimed to establish communication between the students and to access information via Internet. However, in spite of its limitations, our results show that the cell phone is a technological tool with great pedagogical potential. We suggest that institutional policies are necessary in order to tap that the cell phone potential to adequately support the teaching-learning process.

Share and Cite:

Organista-Sandoval, J. and Serrano-Santoyo, A. (2014) Appropriation and Educational Uses of Mobile Phones by Students and Teachers at a Public University in Mexico. Creative Education, 5, 1053-1063. doi: 10.4236/ce.2014.512119.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Aguilar-Barceló, J. G., & Ramírez-Angulo, N. (2007). Hábitos de consumo de las tecnologías de información en los estudiantes universitarios de Tijuana. Revista Universitaria de la UABC, 5, 34-40.
[2] Aparici, R. (2011). Principiospedagógicos y comunicacionales de la educación 2.0 Revista Digital la educ@ción, No. 145, 1-14.
[3] Brown, T. (2005). Beyond Constructivism: Exploring Future Learning Paradigms. Education Today, Issue 2, 1-11.
[4] Cooper, D. (2012). Canalys: More Smartphones than PCs Shipped in 2011.
[5] Crovi, D. D., Garay, C. L. M., López, G. R., & Portillo, S. M. (2011). Uso y apropiación de la telefonía móvil. Opiniones de jóvenes universitarios de la UNAM, la UACM y la UPN. Revista Derecho a Comunicar, 3, 54-73.
[6] Cuesta, M., & Herrero, F. J. (2010). Introducción al muestreo. Depto. de Psicología, Universidad de Oviedo.
[7] Duart, J. M., Gil, M., Pujol, M., & Castaño, J. (2008). La universidad en la sociedad red: usos de Internet en educación superior. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel.
[8] Herrera, J. A., Lozano, F. G., & Ramírez, M. S. (2008). Competencias aplicadas por los alumnos para el uso de dispositivos m-learning. Trabajo presentado en el XVII Encuentro Internacional de Educación a Distancia: virtualizar para educar.Guadalajara, Jalisco.
[9] Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2007). Motivation and Mobile Devices: Exploring the Role of Appropriation and Coping Strategies. Alt-f, Research in Learning Technology, 15, 247-258.
[10] Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will Mobile Learning Change Language Learning? ReCALL, 21, 157-165.
[11] Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2009). Literature Review in Mobile Technologies and Learning (Report no.11). Future Lab Series, University of Birmingham.
[12] Ramírez, M. S. (2008). Dispositivos de mobile learning para ambientes virtuales: Implicaciones en el diseño y la enseñanza. RevistaApertura, 8, 82-96.
[13] Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A Theory of Learning for the Mobile Age. In R. Andrews, & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of E-Learning Research (pp. 221-247). Thousand oaks, California: SAGE.
[14] Treviño, E. F., & Millán, O. A. (2007). La influencia de la telefonía celular en el entorno social de los jóvenes universitarios en Tampico Tamaulipas (México). Trabajo presentado en el Foro Internacional sobre Comunicación e Xuventude. Galicia, España.

Copyright © 2022 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.