SEM evaluation of apical intraradicular dentine cleanliness and degree of erosion after the application of three irrigating solutions

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:555KB) PP. 171-175
DOI: 10.4236/ojst.2013.32030    3,623 Downloads   5,198 Views  


Aims: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of 37% phosphoric acid, 12% nitric acid, 17% EDTA in endodontic smear layer removal and degree of erosion in the apical third of endodontic canals. Methods and Material: One hundred and four extracted single-rooted human teeth were randomized into four groups (n = 26) and instrumented using ProTaper Universal Ni-Ti rotary instruments. Each canal was irrigated with one of the following solutions: 37% phosphoric acid, 12% nitric acid, 17% EDTA, 5.25% NaOCl (control). All specimens were then irrigated with 5 mL distilled water and dried with sterile paper points. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-WhitneyU statistical tests were used. Results: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluation showed no significant differences among test reagents in smear layer removal. However, the efficacy of 12% nitric acid and 17% EDTA in removing the smear layer was significantly greater than 5.25% NaOCl (control). Degree of erosion could not be evaluated. Conclusion: Protocols used in this study were not sufficient to completely remove the smear layer in the apical third of shaped root canals.

Cite this paper

Mancini, M. and Cianconi, L. (2013) SEM evaluation of apical intraradicular dentine cleanliness and degree of erosion after the application of three irrigating solutions. Open Journal of Stomatology, 3, 171-175. doi: 10.4236/ojst.2013.32030.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] McComb, D. and Smith, D.C. (1975) A preliminary scanning electron microscopic study of root canals after endodontic procedures. Journal of Endodontics, 1, 238-242. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80226-3
[2] Mader, C.L., Baumgartner, J.C. and Peters, D.D. (1984) Scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smeared layer on root canal walls. Journal of Endodontics, 10, 477-483. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(84)80204-6
[3] Torabinejad, M., Handysides, R., Khademi, A.A. and Bakland, L.K. (2002) Clinical implications of the smear layer in endodontics: A review. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology Endodontics, 94, 658-666. doi:10.1067/moe.2002.128962
[4] Clark-Holke, D., Drake, D., Walton, R., et al. (2003) Bacterial penetration through canals of endodontically treated teeth in the presence or absence of the smear layer. Journal of Dentistry, 31, 275-281. doi:10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00032-0
[5] Shahravan, A., Haghdoost, A.A., Adl, A., et al. (2007) Effect of smear layer on sealing ability of canal obturation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Endodontics, 33, 96-105. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.007
[6] Economides, N., Liolios, E., Kolokuris, I., et al. (1999) Long-term evaluation of the influence of smear layer removal on the sealing ability of different sealers. Journal of Endodontics, 25, 123-125. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80010-7
[7] Mello, I., Robazza, C.R., Antoniazzi, J.H., et al. (2008) Influence of different volumes of EDTA for final rinse on smear layer removal. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology Endodontics, 106, 40-43. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.06.019
[8] Baumgartner, J.C. and Mader, C.L. (1987) A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of four root canal irrigation regimens. Journal of Endodontics, 13, 147-157. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80132-2
[9] Calt, S. and Serper, A. (2002) Time-dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures. Journal of Endodontics, 28, 17-19. doi:10.1097/00004770-200201000-00004
[10] Niu, W., Yoshioka, T., Kobayashi, C. and Suda, H. (2002) A scanning electron microscopic study of dentinal erosion by final irrigation with EDTA and NaOCl solutions. International Endodontic Journal, 35, 934-939.
[11] Torabinejad, M., Cho, Y., Khademi, A.A., Bakland, L.K. and Shabahang, S. (2003) The effect of various concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on the ability of MTAD to remove the smear layer. Journal of Endodontics, 29, 233-239. doi:10.1097/00004770-200304000-00001
[12] Jacques, P. and Hebling, J. (2005) Effect of dentin conditioners on the microtensile bond strength of a conventional and a self-etching primer adhesive system. Dental Materials, 21, 103-109. doi:10.1016/
[13] Miyasaka, K. and Nakabayashi, N. (1999) Combination of EDTA conditioner and phenyl-P/HEMA self-etching primer for bonding to dentin. Dental Materials, 15, 135-157. doi:10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00025-1
[14] Pérez-Heredia, M., Ferrer-Luque, C.M. and González- Rodríguez, M.P. (2006) The effectiveness of different acid irrigating solutions in root canal cleaning after hand and rotary instrumentation. Journal of Endodontics, 32, 993-997. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2006.05.016
[15] Eick, J.D., Robinson, S.J., Byerley, T.J., Chappell, R.P., Spencer, P. and Chappelow, C.C. (1995) Scanning transmission electron microscopy/energy-dispersive spectroscopy analysis of the dentin adhesive interface using a labeled 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate analogue. Journal of Dental Research, 74, 1246-1252. doi:10.1177/00220345950740060201
[16] Torabinejad, M., Khademi, A.A., Babagoli, J., et al. (2003) A new solution for the removal of the smear layer. Journal of Endodontics, 29, 170-175. doi:10.1097/00004770-200303000-00002
[17] Ayad, M.F. (2001) Effects of rotary instrumentation and different etchants on removal of smear layer on human dentin. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 85, 67-72. doi:10.1067/mpr.2001.112792
[18] Khedmat, S. and Shokouhinejad, N. (2008) Comparison of the efficacy of three chelating agents in smear layer removal. Journal of Endodontics, 34, 599-602. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.023
[19] Crumpton, B.J., Goodell, G.G. and McClanahan, S.B. (2005) Effects on smear layer and debris removal with varying volumes of 17% REDTA after rotary instrumentation. Journal of Endodontics, 31, 536-538. doi:10.1097/01.don.0000148871.72896.1d
[20] Teixeira, C.S., Felippe, M.C. and Felippe, W.T. (2005) The effects of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: An SEM analysis. International Endodontic Journal, 38, 285-290. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00930.x
[21] Zehnder, M. (2006) Root canal irrigants. Journal of Endodontics, 32, 389-398. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.014
[22] Ciucchi, B., Khettabi, M. and Holz, J. (1989) The effectiveness of different endodontic irrigation procedures on the removal of the smear layer: A scanning electron microscopic study. International Endodontic Journal, 22, 21-28. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.1989.tb00501.x
[23] Saito, K., Webb, T.D., Imamura, G.M. and Goodell, G.G. (2008) Effect of shortened irrigation times with 17% ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid on smear layer removal after rotary canal instrumentation. Journal of Endodontics, 34, 1011-1014. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2008.05.014
[24] Lui, J.N., Kuah, H.G. and Chen, N.N. (2007) Effect of EDTA with and without surfactants or ultrasonics on removal of smear layer. Journal of Endodontics, 33, 472- 475. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2006.12.007
[25] De-Deus, G., Paciornik, S., Pinho Mauricio, M. and Prioli, R. (2006) Real-time atomic force microscopy of root dentin during demineralization when subjected to chelating agents. International Endodontic Journal, 39, 683-692. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01128.x

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.