Hollis, B.W. (2004) Editorial: The determination of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D: No easy task. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 89, 3149-3151.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2004-0682

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Comparison between different methods of estimation of vitamin D

  AUTHORS: Mrinal Pal, Subinay Datta, Amit Kumar Pradhan, Lekha Biswas, Joydeep Ghosh, Partha Mondal, Rajarshi Rahut, Arghya Ray Chaudhuri, Sourav Sau, Soumi Das

  KEYWORDS: Vitamin D; High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography; Chemiluminescent Immunoassays; Enzyme Immunoassays

  JOURNAL NAME: Advances in Biological Chemistry, Vol.3 No.5, October 24, 2013

  ABSTRACT: Background: Vitamin D is not only important for bone health but can also affect the development of several non-bone diseases. These findings have increased the need for determining vitamin D status in a convenient and cost-effective way. In order to determine the better method for detecting vitamin D status, we have estimated blood vitamin D in three methods such as high-pressure liquid chromatography, chemiluminescent immunoassays and enzyme immunoassays. Method: Two hundred and sixteen subjects irrespective of age and sex were studied for blood vitamin D in all the three methods over a period of 2 years. Result: The statistical analysis showed that values of vitamin D obtained by chemiluminescent immunoassays (r = 0.978, p