Szumacher, E., Catton, P., Jones, G., Bradley, R., Kwan, J., Cherryman, F., & Nyhof-Young, J. (2007). Helping learners in difficulty—The incidence and effectiveness of remedial programmes of the medical radiation sciences programme at University of Toronto and the Michener Institute for applied sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 36, 725-734. - References

Browse Menu >>

Browse Subjects >>

Computer Science & Communications

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

- Open Access
- Peer-reviewed
- Rapid publication
- Lifetime hosting
- Free indexing service
- Free promotion service
- More citations
- Search engine friendly

Free SCIRP Newsletters>>

Add your e-mail address to receive free newsletters from SCIRP.

Contact Us >>

customer@scirp.org

+86 18163351462(WhatsApp)

1655362766

Paper Publishing WeChat

Book Publishing WeChat

(or Email:book@scirp.org)

Article citations
More>>

Szumacher, E., Catton, P., Jones, G., Bradley, R., Kwan, J., Cherryman, F., & Nyhof-Young, J. (2007). Helping learners in difficulty—The incidence and effectiveness of remedial programmes of the medical radiation sciences programme at University of Toronto and the Michener Institute for applied sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 36, 725-734.

has been cited by the following article:

TITLE: Clinical Reasoning: Where Do We Stand on Identifying and Remediating Difficulties?

AUTHORS: Marie-Claude Audétat, Stuart Lubarsky, Jean-Guy Blais, Bernard Charlin

KEYWORDS: Clinical Reasoning; Remediation; Clinical Reasoning Difficulties; Faculty Development

JOURNAL NAME: Creative Education, Vol.4 No.6A, June 14, 2013

ABSTRACT: Ten to fifteen percent of medical trainees have academic difficulties, the majority of which are cognitive in nature, including clinical reasoning. Many obstacles impede the rapid identification of clinical reasoning difficulties in medical learners. This article reviews the literature on detection and remediation of clinical reasoning difficulties, and offers specific, practical steps for accurately diagnosing and quickly resolving identified problems with clinical reasoning. Faculties need to become more involved in the development and establishment of tools for encouraging direct observation of the development of clinical reasoning in medical learners, and for strengthening the teachers’ pedagogical competencies.