R. Raphe, et al., “Histopathologic Characteristics of Incidental Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Liver Transplantation,” Transplantation Proceedings, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2010, pp. 505-506. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.01.034
-
TITLE:
Incidentally Discovered HCC (iHCC) in Explant Liver-Histopathologic Features and Clinical Outcome
AUTHORS:
Renumathy Dhanasekaran, Davinderbir S. Pannu, Alpna Limaye, Ivan Zendejas, Roberto J. Firpi, Consuelo Soldevila-Pico, Giuseppe Morelli, Virginia C. Clark, Amitabh Suman, David R. Nelson, Roniel Cabrera
KEYWORDS:
Incidental; HCC; Recurrence; Survival
JOURNAL NAME:
Journal of Cancer Therapy,
Vol.4 No.2A,
February
28,
2013
ABSTRACT:
Incidentally discovered hepatocellular carcinomas (iHCC) are tumors which are discovered on the explanted liver which were not present on imaging prior to transplant. The natural history, histopathologic characteristics and prognosis of iHCC are not clearly defined. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed to compare the characteristics of iHCC and established HCC within Milan criteria (eHCC) in patients who underwent liver transplantation at our center between 2000 and 2010. Results: During the study period a total of 975 adult patients were transplanted in our center; 124 (12.7%) patients had eHCC and 26 (2.6%) patients had iHCC. A larger number of patients with iHCC (73.1%) had ascites when compared to eHCC (41.3%) (p = 0.035). Patients with iHCC had a higher mean bilirubin (p 0.001) and mean INR (p = 0.05) than patients with eHCC. Around 70% of patients with iHCC had a Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score greater than 15 at the time of listing while only 25% of patients with eHCC had a MELD greater than 15 at listing (p 0.001).The mean alphafetoprotein (AFP) in patients with iHCC was significantly lower (11.6 ± 16.5) than the patients with eHCC (564.9 ± 2180; p = 0.024). In patients with iHCC, 30.8% had a multiple tumors and 23% had bilobar involvement. The average number of tumors was 1.6 and the cumulative tumor size was 2.1 cm (SD 1.4). The cumulative tumor size in iHCC was significantly smaller than in eHCC (mean 3.9 cm) (p = 0.035). American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T1 tumor stage was found in 58% of patients with iHCC and 48.4% of patients with eHCC (p = 0.829).The median survival was 9.47 years for iHCC (95% CI 7.0 - 11.9) and 8.7 years (95% CI 6.1 - 11.4) for eHCC (p = 0.328). While none of the patients with iHCC had recurrence of HCC, the incidence of recurrence in patients with eHCC was 6.4%. Conclusion: iHCC occurred in patients with more advanced liver disease than eHCC. AFP was usually not elevated in patients with iHCC. The cumulative tumor size of iHCC was smaller than eHCC but around a third of iHCC were multifocal, supporting the theory of multicentric hepatic carcinogenesis. Survival of patients with iHCC was similar to patients with eHCC and recurrence was not noted in patients with iHCC.
Related Articles:
Clinical Analysis of Central Pontine Myelinolysis after Liver Transplantation
Zhixin Wang, Ruiyao Zhang, Kai Qu, Yanyan Zhou, Wei Chen, Xinsen Xu, Fandi Meng, Jichao Wei, Minghui Tai, Jingyao Zhang, Lingqiang Zhang, Chang Liu, Yuelang Zhang
DOI:
10.4236/oalib.1100759
1,811 Downloads 2,256 Views Citations
Pub. Date:
July
8,
2014
Detection of Portal Venous Gas by Ultrasonography after Liver Transplantation: A Possible Early Sign of Bacterial Translocation
Takanobu Shigeta, Seisuke Sakamoto, Shunsuke Nosaka, Akinari Fukuda, Hiroyuki Kanazawa, Hajime Uchida, Ikumi Hamano, Mureo Kasahara
DOI:
10.4236/ojots.2012.23004
3,518 Downloads 7,486 Views Citations
Pub. Date:
August
10,
2012
Donors’ Quality of Life after Live Liver Transplantation and Social Support: A Correlation Study
Yefeng Lu, Yan Yang, Yan Wang, Aiping Zhao, Longzhi Han, Xiaosong Chen, Jianjun Zhang, Qiang Xia
DOI:
10.4236/health.2014.610111
4,414 Downloads 5,575 Views Citations
Pub. Date:
April
2,
2014
Invasion of Artificial Vascular Graft into Duodenal Bulb after Living Donor Liver Transplantation
Yu-Ju Hung, Kuo-Hua Lin, Chen-Te Chou, Chih-Jan Ko, Ping-Yi Lin, Chia-En Hsieh, Hsu-Heng Yen, Yao-Li Chen
DOI:
10.4236/ss.2015.62012
2,900 Downloads 3,338 Views Citations
Pub. Date:
February
15,
2015