O. Ray, “The Revolutionary Health Science of Psychoendoneuroimmunology: A New Paradigm for Understanding Health and Treating Illness,” In R. Yehuda and B. McEwen, Eds., Biobehavioral Stress Response: Protective and Damaging Effects: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1032, New York Academy of Sciences, New York, 2004, pp. 35-51.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: The Status of the “Biopsychosocial” Model in Health Psychology: Towards an Integrated Approach and a Critique of Cultural Conceptions

  AUTHORS: Andrew R. Hatala

  KEYWORDS: Biopsychosocial Model; Health Psychology; Culture; Sociomatics; Psychosocial Genomics

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Medical Psychology, Vol.1 No.4, October 31, 2012

  ABSTRACT: The current status of the “Biopsychosocial” Model in health psychology is contested and arguably exists in a stage of infancy. Despite original goals, medical researchers have developed theoretical and empirical integrations across bio-psycho-social domains only to a limited extent. This review article addresses this issue by making connections across research findings in health psychology and related medical fields in order to strengthen the associations across bio-psycho-social domains. In particular, research in sociosomatics, neuroplasticity and psychosocial genomics are introduced and explored. The role of “culture” as conceived of within the Biopsychosocial Model is also ambiguous and somewhat problematic. Arthur Klienman’s conceptions of culture as what is at stake for individuals in their local social and moral worlds is adopted to offer a critique of previous perspectives of culture and question its role amidst bio-psycho-social domains. Overall, a multilevel integrative or ‘holistic’ perspective is advanced to strengthen the Biopsychosocial Model for use within health psychology and biomedical research. In the end, some clinical implications are discussed.