Why Us? >>

  • - Open Access
  • - Peer-reviewed
  • - Rapid publication
  • - Lifetime hosting
  • - Free indexing service
  • - Free promotion service
  • - More citations
  • - Search engine friendly

Free SCIRP Newsletters>>

Add your e-mail address to receive free newsletters from SCIRP.


Contact Us >>

WhatsApp  +86 18163351462(WhatsApp)
Paper Publishing WeChat
Book Publishing WeChat
(or Email:book@scirp.org)

Article citations


C. Karunakaran, R. Dhanalakshmi, P. Gomathisankar and G. Manikandan, “Enhanced Phenol-Photodegradation by Particulate Semicondustor Mixtures: Interparticle Electron-Jump,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 176, No. 1-3, 2010, pp. 799-806. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.105

has been cited by the following article:

  • TITLE: Evaluation of TiO2, ZnO, CuO and Ga2O3 on the Photocatalytic Degradation of Phenol Using an Annular-Flow Photocatalytic Reactor

    AUTHORS: Flavia Cristina Sertori Paschoalino, Matheus Paes Paschoalino, Elizabete Jordão, Wilson de Figueiredo Jardim

    KEYWORDS: Phenol; TiO2; ZnO; CuO; Ga2O3; Heterogeneous Photocatalysis

    JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Physical Chemistry, Vol.2 No.3, August 31, 2012

    ABSTRACT: Even with rigorous environmental regulations, phenol still is a major contaminant. One possible solution is the use of heterogeneous photocatalysis due to low chemical addition, feasibility and reliability to be implanted on cost-effective industrial process. TiO2 is the most employed photocatalyst because of its favorable (photo) chemical properties and ZnO is considered one of the best alternative for that. Other oxides were tested in lesser proportions, like CuO and Ga2O3. When the photocatalyst is dispersed as slurry, higher degradation rates are achieved due to high solid to liquid contact area when compared with supported form. The aim of this work was to develop a batch recirculating photocatalytic reactor and evaluate its efficiency when assisted by the photocatalysts TiO2 P25, ZnO, CuO and β-Ga2O3. TiO2 achieved 95% mineralization after 200 min reaction in an average degradation rate of 0.68 mg·L﹣1·min﹣1 and ZnO was less efficient (0.41 mg·L﹣1·min﹣1). Ga2O3 and CuO presented poor performance, mainly due to low surface area for the CuO syntesized and the absorption of the UV radiation by the reactor walls, decreasing Ga2O3 activity. Degradation intermediates were detected in diverse concentrations and at different operational times for each oxide tested, which indicate different degradation mechanisms.