Lornoy, W., Becaus, I., Billiouw, J.M., Sierens, L., Van Malderen, P. and D’Haenens, P. (2000) On-Line Haemodiafiltration. Remarkable Removal of β2-Microglobulin. Long-Term Clinical Observations. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 15, 49-54.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.ndt.a027964

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: What Is the Difference between Post- and Pre-Dilution in On-Line Haemodiafiltration in the Removing of Median-Molecular-Weight Toxins?

  AUTHORS: Konstantinos S. Mavromatidis, Irini M. Kalogiannidou, Ploumis S. Passadakis

  KEYWORDS: Haemodiafiltration, Pre-Dilution, Post-Dilution, β2-Microglobulin, Prolactin

  JOURNAL NAME: Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, Vol.11 No.3, March 23, 2023

  ABSTRACT: Introduction: β2-microglobulin and prolactin are medium-molecular-weight toxins. We believe that the rate of removal of these molecules, using filters with two different surfaces, in post- and pre-dilution haemodiafiltration, will be of interest to the literature. Methods: We studied, in 12 haemodialyzed patients, the removal of those, with filter with surface of 2.5 m2 (Group A) or 2.1 m2 (Group B) with post-dilution haemodiafiltration, and with a filter with surface 2.5 m2 with pre-dilution (Group C). Results: Satisfactory removal of β2-microglobulin (best with post-dilution) was found, and a good rate of removal of prolactin without the filter surface played a role in both cases. Conclusion: The elimination of β2-microglobulin in post-dilution is not affected by the filter surface area. Pre-dilution achieves removal of β2-microglobulin, less than that of post-dilution. Prolactin was removed satisfactorily regardless of the filter surface in post-dilution, and its removal appears to be less than that of β2-microglobulin.