Cohen-Almagor, R. (2017b). The Monopoly of Jewish Orthodoxy in Israel and Its Effects on the Governance of Religious Diversity. In A. Triandafyllidou, & T. Modood (Eds.), The Problem of Religious Diversity (pp. 250-272). Edinburgh University Press.
https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474419086.003.0011

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Coercion

  AUTHORS: Raphael Cohen-Almagor

  KEYWORDS: Autonomy, Coercion, Freedom, Oppression, Paternalism

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Philosophy, Vol.11 No.3, August 24, 2021

  ABSTRACT: Coercion involves two or more parties who are in conflict and whose relationships are complex and uneasy. Generally speaking, people resent coercion and, when possible, rebel against it. This paper differentiates between circumstantial coercion and person-based coercion, between coercion and brute forms of oppression, and between benevolent and malevolent coercion. Government interference to combat murder for family honour serves as a clear example of benevolent coercion. The paper further discusses the coercer’s intentions and specifically addresses the issues of paternalistic coercion, coercion via third-party, and self-coercion. Two further distinctions are offered: between internalised and designated coercion, and between coercion enforced by a minority versus coercion imposed by a majority.