Halawi, M.J., Jongbloed, W., Baron, S., Savoy, L., Cote, M.P. and Lieberman, J.R. (2020) Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Are Not a Valid Proxy for Patient Satisfaction in Total Joint Arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty, 35, 335-339.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.033

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Preliminary Report on Phenom® Femoral Component in Total Hip Replacement: The Correlation between Outcome Scores in a Cross-Seccional Study

  AUTHORS: Elmano de Araújo Loures, Jose Ricardo Barroso Vitoi, Daniel Naya Loures, Victor Henrique Coelho, Adriano Fernando Mendes Junior, Valeria Romero

  KEYWORDS: Osseointegration, Total Hip Replacement, Hip Prosthesis, Patient-Reported Outcome Scales, Functional Scores

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Orthopedics, Vol.11 No.4, April 14, 2021

  ABSTRACT: Background: The main purpose of the present study was to assess the short term performance of a cementless femoral stem in total hip replacement. Methods: Cross-sectional observational study of a 48-patient cohort with Phenom? femoral stems implanted between June 1, 2014 and September 1, 2018, to determine clinical performance, stability, and radiographic osseointegration. Patients were followed-up from 13 to 76 months (mean: 44.5 months) and assessed using the Harris Hip Score-HHS, the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-HOOS and radiographs. Results: All stems were radiologically stable. Mean Harris Hip Score was 89.8 and the HOOS was 80.4. No statistical differences were observed among patients with different diagnoses. Conclusions: The short-term results revealed satisfactory clinical outcomes and radiological signs of implant stability in all cases. Using two functional scores was useful in detecting biases and a low to moderate agreement was found between the scores.