Why Us? >>

  • - Open Access
  • - Peer-reviewed
  • - Rapid publication
  • - Lifetime hosting
  • - Free indexing service
  • - Free promotion service
  • - More citations
  • - Search engine friendly

Free SCIRP Newsletters>>

Add your e-mail address to receive free newsletters from SCIRP.


Contact Us >>

WhatsApp  +86 18163351462(WhatsApp)
Paper Publishing WeChat
Book Publishing WeChat
(or Email:book@scirp.org)

Article citations


Intrator, O. and Intrator, N. (2001) Interpreting Neural-Network Results: A Simulation Study. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 37, 373-393.

has been cited by the following article:

  • TITLE: Predicting the Underlying Structure for Phylogenetic Trees Using Neural Networks and Logistic Regression

    AUTHORS: Hassan W. Kayondo, Samuel Mwalili

    KEYWORDS: Artificial Neural Networks, Logistic Regression, Phylogenetic Tree, Tree Statistics, Classification, Clustering

    JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Statistics, Vol.10 No.2, April 3, 2020

    ABSTRACT: Understanding an underlying structure for phylogenetic trees is very important as it informs on the methods that should be employed during phylogenetic inference. The methods used under a structured population differ from those needed when a population is not structured. In this paper, we compared two supervised machine learning techniques, that is artificial neural network (ANN) and logistic regression models for prediction of an underlying structure for phylogenetic trees. We carried out parameter tuning for the models to identify optimal models. We then performed 10-fold cross-validation on the optimal models for both logistic regressionand ANN. We also performed a non-supervised technique called clustering to identify the number of clusters that could be identified from simulated phylogenetic trees. The trees were fromboth structuredand non-structured populations. Clustering and prediction using classification techniques weredone using tree statistics such as Colless, Sackin and cophenetic indices, among others. Results from 10-fold cross-validation revealed that both logistic regression and ANN models had comparable results, with both models having average accuracy rates of over 0.75. Most of the clustering indices used resulted in 2 or 3 as the optimal number of clusters.