Irmak, C., Kramer, T. and Sen, S. (2017) Choice under Incomplete Information on Incumbents: Why Consumers with Stronger Preferences Are More Likely to Abandon their Prior Choices. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27, 264-269.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2016.06.002

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Incomplete Information Choice on Incumbents, Cognitive Ability and Personality

  AUTHORS: Sergio Da Silva, Raul Matsushita, Mauricio Ramos

  KEYWORDS: Choice under Incomplete Information, Prior Choices, Preference Strength, Cognitive Dissonance, Motivated Reasoning, Cognitive Reflection, HEXACO Personality Model, Behavioral Economics

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Access Library Journal, Vol.6 No.6, June 5, 2019

  ABSTRACT: In choices under incomplete information on incumbents, consumers with stronger preferences are more likely to reinforce their prior choices with motivated reasoning. However, in situations where incomplete information is restricted only to the prior choice, consumers with stronger preferences are more likely to abandon, not reinforce, their prior choices due to cognitive dissonance. Here, we consider how cognitive ability and personality traits mediate such interplay between motivated reasoning and cognitive dissonance. We set an experiment to show that consumers with a stronger System 2 are more likely to engage in motivated reasoning to reinforce the prior choice and thus suffer less cognitive dissonance. Cognitive dissonance can, however, overcome motivated reasoning for those cognitively poor consumers who are more emotional, less humble, less extraverted and less conscientious.