Jarrow, R. (1992) Market Manipulation, Bubbles, Corners, and Short Squeezes. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27, 311-336. - References

Browse Menu >>

Browse Subjects >>

Biomedical & Life Sciences

Business & Economics

Chemistry & Materials Science

Computer Science & Communications

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Engineering

Medicine & Healthcare

Physics & Mathematics

Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

- Open Access
- Peer-reviewed
- Rapid publication
- Lifetime hosting
- Free indexing service
- Free promotion service
- More citations
- Search engine friendly

Free SCIRP Newsletters>>

Add your e-mail address to receive free newsletters from SCIRP.

Contact Us >>

customer@scirp.org

+86 18163351462(WhatsApp)

1655362766

Paper Publishing WeChat

Book Publishing WeChat

(or Email:book@scirp.org)

Article citations
More>>

Jarrow, R. (1992) Market Manipulation, Bubbles, Corners, and Short Squeezes. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27, 311-336.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2331322

has been cited by the following article:

TITLE: Reallocating the Right to Choose the Delivery Grade in Futures Markets

AUTHORS: Shantaram Hegde, Sankarshan Basu, Sunil K. Parameswaran

KEYWORDS: Futures Valuation, Market Manipulation

JOURNAL NAME: Theoretical Economics Letters, Vol.9 No.4, March 29, 2019

ABSTRACT: We study the futures valuation and market manipulation implications of reallocating the right to choose the delivery grade from the short to the long futures position and show that the futures price will converge to the price of the most expensive-to-deliver grade asset at delivery. The shifting of the delivery grade option to the long has the potential to mitigate excessive selling of futures contracts in a crisis, thus contributing to price stabilization. However, it may distort the incentives for the longs, leading to large futures and “corner and squeeze” trades to raise the delivery time spot price above the locked-in futures price.