Lakoff, G. (2008). The Neural Theory of Metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Metaphor Handbook. Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511816802.003

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Cognitive Science Could Be Used in Legal Reasoning—Take Smith v. Van Gorkom Case as an Example

  AUTHORS: Rongrong Zhou

  KEYWORDS: Reasoning, Metaphor, Holfeldian Analysis, Framing

  JOURNAL NAME: Psychology, Vol.7 No.13, November 18, 2016

  ABSTRACT: The newer research finds that our conceptualization and reasoning are grounded in our bodily experience and shaped primarily by patterns of perception and action. We use metaphor to understand the conceptions. Conceptual structures form the basic understanding of the scenario. Holfeldian analysis provides an interpretation of the categories of different entities. The framing and schema drives people’s minds into divergent directions. Smith v. Van Gorkom case is used to interpret the cognitive process.