Zumbansen, P. (2013). Law and Legal Pluralism: Hybridity in Transnational Governance. In P. Jurcys, P. F. Kjaer, & R. Yatsunami (Eds.), Regulatory Hybridization in the Transnational Sphere (pp. 49-70). Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Global Law Firms in Real-World Contexts: Practical Limitations and Ethical Implications

  AUTHORS: Eve Darian-Smith

  KEYWORDS: Global Law Firms, Globalization, Neoliberalism, Democracy, Social Resistance, Global Inequality

  JOURNAL NAME: Beijing Law Review, Vol.6 No.1, March 18, 2015

  ABSTRACT: This article argues that despite the rise in the numbers of global law firms in recent years, the future of these firms should not be assumed given escalating levels of economic (and legal) uncertainty. These uncertainties are the result, in part, of growing global and regional conflicts, terrorism, environmental degradation, pandemics, forced migrations, trade embargoes and so on which are in turn linked to global inequalities and disparities of wealth between and within the global south and global north. It is argued that global law firms, as the “lubricators of global capitalism”, should pay attention to the localized real-world impacts of finance, development and trade that their legal work enables. This is important not only to ensure the future security and revenues of global law firms, but more importantly to ensure democratic aspirations and the stability of democratic institutions around the world.