Upanishads (Easwaran, E. (Trans.)) (1987). Nilgiri Press. In F. Baird, & R. Heimbeck (Ed.), Asian Philosophy: Philosophical Classics Volume VI (2006, pp. 9-82). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: The Epistemological Double Standard Inherent in Christian Metaphysical Beliefs

  AUTHORS: Randall S. Firestone

  KEYWORDS: Comparative Religion, Hinduism, Christianity, Metaphysics, Epistemology, Philosophy of Religion, Christian Metaphysics, Problems with Christian Metaphysical Beliefs, Hinduism vs. Christianity, Comparing Hinduism and Christianity, Comparing Hindu and Christian Metaphysical Beliefs

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Philosophy, Vol.4 No.3, August 6, 2014

  ABSTRACT: This paper uses comparative religion to critique Christian claims of possessing exclusively true metaphysical beliefs. In so doing, this paper takes a different approach than most other challenges to Christian metaphysical beliefs. Instead of directly responding to Christian arguments supporting their views, this paper challenges the Christian by pointing out that their grounds for rejecting the metaphysics of other religions will necessarily undermine the grounds of their own beliefs. Specifically, the paper takes the metaphysical beliefs of Hinduism, which has a metaphysics that appears both significantly different from and contrary to Christian dogma, and demonstrates that the same types of epistemological arguments that a Christian would almost certainly have to use against a Hindu can just as fruitfully be used to demonstrate the weaknesses, inconsistencies, and lack of evidential foundation that are prevalent in Christian metaphysical beliefs.