Bourcier, J. and Bismuth, S. (2006) La judiciarisation et l’exercice de la médecine générale en 2005: Réflexions à propos d’une enquête auprès de 136 médecins généralistes de la région Midi-Pyrénées. Thèse d’exercice de Médecine. Faculté des sciences médicales Rangueil, Toulouse.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: The Influence of Legal Proceedings on French General Practice: A Qualitative Study

  AUTHORS: Aurélia Nachbauer, Humbert de Fréminville

  KEYWORDS: Consultation, Managed Care, Risk Assessment, Doctor-Patient Relationship, Primary Care, Medical Errors

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.2 No.6, June 4, 2014

  ABSTRACT: Legal proceedings are becoming increasingly common in our society and especially in medicine. This raises the question as to whether General Practitioners (GPs) are concerned by this phenomenon. This study explores the impact of proceedings on the feelings and behaviors of different doctors. A qualitative semi-structured interview with 13 French GPs based on grounded theory was performed. A thematic analysis with major themes was then performed. This survey shows that lawsuits have little impact on the daily practice of GPs. Defensive medicine is practiced in certain specific situations: the treatment given, a patient known or perceived to be litigious. GPs attach importance to information and communicating to the patient. The primary concern of GPs remains their patients. They are not subject to daily anxiety over the risk of lawsuits.