Dorr, B. J., Green, R., Levin, L., Rambow, O., Farwell, D., Habash, N., Helmreich, S., Hovy, E., Miller, K. J., Mitamura, T., Reeder, F., & Siddharthan, A. (2004). Semantic Annotation and Lexico-Syntactic Paraphrase. Proceedings of the LREC 2004 Workshop on Building Lexical Resources from Semantically Annotated Corpora, Lisbon, 47-52.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Is This a Paraphrase? What Kind? Paraphrase Boundaries and Typology

  AUTHORS: Marta Vila, M. Antònia Martí, Horacio Rodríguez

  KEYWORDS: Paraphrasing; Paraphrase Boundaries; Paraphrase Typology

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, Vol.4 No.1, March 18, 2014

  ABSTRACT: A precise and commonly accepted definition of paraphrasing does not exist. This is one of the reasons that have prevented computational linguistics from a real success when dealing with this phenomenon in its systems and applications. With the aim of helping to overcome this difficulty, in this article, new insights on paraphrase characterization are provided. We first overview what has been said on paraphrasing from linguistics and the new lights shed on the phenomenon from computational linguistics. Under the light of the shortcomings observed, the paraphrase phenomenon is studied from two different perspectives. On the one hand, insights on paraphrase boundaries are set out analyzing paraphrase borderline cases and the interaction of paraphrasing with related linguistic phenomena. On the other hand, a new paraphrase typology is presented. It goes beyond a simple list of types and is embedded in a linguistically-based hierarchical structure. This typology has been empirically validated through corpus annotation and its application in the plagiarism-detection domain.