Long-Term Re-Admission after Hospital Discharge in Patients Admitted with Acute Heart Failure: The Prognostic Value of the Six-Minute Walk Test Distance
Dakaboué Germain Mandi1*, Dangwé Temoua Naïbé2, Joel Bamouni3, Rélwendé Aristide Yaméogo4, Yibar Kambiré5, Koudougou Jonas Kologo1,5, Georges Rosario Christian Millogo1,5, Nobila Valentin Yaméogo1,5, Anna Thiam Tall1,5, Patrice Zabsonré1,5
1Department of Cardiology, Teaching Hospital of Yalgado Ouedraogo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
2Faculty of Human Health Sciences, University of N’Djamena, N’Djamena, Chad.
3Superior School of Health Sciences, University of Ouahigouya, Ouahigouya, Burkina Faso.
4University of Normandie, UNIHAVRE-UNIROUEN-UNICAEN, CNRS, UMR IDEES, Le Havre, France.
5Training and Research Unit of Health Sciences, University Ouaga I Professeur Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1104841   PDF    HTML   XML   817 Downloads   1,987 Views   Citations


Background: We sought the value of the six-minute walk test distance in predicting re-admission in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) in the department of cardiology, Yalgado Ouédraogo University Hospital, Ouaga-dougou, Burkina Faso. Methods: We did a prospective observational study in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure and who underwent a 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) at their discharge from hospital. The primary end-point was hospital re-admission for heart failure de-compensation. Results: Sixty-one patients (52% females, mean age 46.9 ± 14.1 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 32.4 ± 8.2%, mean 6-MWT distance 336.3 ± 65 meters) were followed-up for a 277.6 ± 129.8 days’ period. Twenty-one patients (45.3 percent person-years) were re-admitted. Re-admitted patients had shorter 6-MWT distance (p = 0.007) and were more likely to die than those who were not re-admitted (RR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.13 - 2.62, p = 0.003). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that re-admission was independently predicted by shorter 6-MWT distance (p < 0.001), New York Heart Association class III (p = 0.03), older age p = 0.03) and lower LVEF (p = 0.02). Conclusion: Distance covered during the six-minute walk test is an independent predictor of hospital re-admission for heart failure decompensation in patients with chronic heart failure.

Share and Cite:

Mandi, D. , Naïbé, D. , Bamouni, J. , Yaméogo, R. , Kambiré, Y. , Kologo, K. , Millogo, G. , Yaméogo, N. , Tall, A. and Zabsonré, P. (2018) Long-Term Re-Admission after Hospital Discharge in Patients Admitted with Acute Heart Failure: The Prognostic Value of the Six-Minute Walk Test Distance. Open Access Library Journal, 5, 1-11. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1104841.

1. Introduction

Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a major public health concern [1] [2] , and remains a severe disease with poor outcome despite huge progress in its management [2] [3] . Its prognosis is strongly correlated with the functional capacity [4] [5] . Assessing functional capacity is a key step for cardiac rehabilitation intervention which contributes to reducing cardiovascular events and re-hospitalizations in patients with CHF. Cardiopulmonary exercise test is known as the “gold standard” method to assess the functional capacity [6] . The value of peak oxygen uptake (VO2) derived from the cardiopulmonary exercise testing provides an important prognostic information in patients with CHF [7] . Data have demonstrated the important prognostic value of both peak VO2 and six-minute walk test (6-MWT) in predicting cardiac morbidity and mortality in patients with CHF [8] [9] [10] . Moreover, it has been shown that CHF patients with a 6-MWT distance < 300 meters had an increase in mortality and morbidity [11] [12] [13] [14] . However, peak VO2 is more difficult to perform in the field, expensive and not available particularly in some low-income countries with less equipped health facilities. Conversely, the 6-MWT which is safe, simple, well accepted by the patients, and probably better correlate with patient’s symptoms [15] [16] [17] , could be a low-cost alternative for the prescription of aerobicexercise in patients with CHF [18] . The assessment of the prognostic importance of 6-MWT distance is not common in Sub-Saharan African (SSA) patients with CHF. Thus, the present study aims to assess for the first time the value of the 6-MWT distance in predicting heart failure readmission in those patients in Burkina Faso.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Population

From December 1, 2013 to march 31, 2014, we prospectively enrolled into the study, consecutive patients with CHF who attended the inpatients’ unit of the department of cardiology, Yalgado Ouédraogo University Hospital. The diagnosis of heart failure was based on the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology on the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure [19] [20] . Patients hospitalized for congestive heart failure regardless of the etiology, with random left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 45% and under 70 years old and who were in stable clinical condition at discharge, were included. Non-inclusion criteria comprised acute coronary syndrome ( 180/100 mmHg), musculoskeletal and neurologic disorders forbidding physical exercise. We did an age cut-off of 70 years due to the fact that patients > 70 years old have more frequent physical and mental disabilities and other comorbidities which preclude walk. Enrolled patients received individualized medical treatment of heart failure accordingly [angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (93.4%), digoxin (36.1%), spironolactone (100.0%), loop diuretic (100.0%), beta blockers (4.9%), amiodarone (14.8%), antiplatelet (42.6%), vitamin K antagonists (57.4%)] including dietary prescriptions.

2.2. Six-Minute Walk Test

We used the American Thoracic Society’s guidelines [21] , to obtain the 6-MWT distance measurements at the time of hospital discharge. The 6-MWT was administered on a flat rectangular floor with a track length of 82 meters. The track was marked every three meters so that the total distance walked can be easily calculated. Patients were instructed to walk as far as possible at their own pace according to their tolerance to exercise in the allotted time of six minutes. The 6-MWT was performed under the control of a study physician who provided encouraging comments to the patients during the test. They were allowed to stop and rest or reduce their walking speed in case of discomfort. Prior to the test, patients observed a 10-minutes rest sitting near the starting point of the walk. The test procedures were explained to all patients in advance. After six minutes had elapsed, patients were instructed to stop walking and the total distance walked was recorded to the nearest meter (m) forward.

2.3. Study Process

On the eve of their discharge from hospital and prior to enrollment into the study, an oral informed consent was obtained from all study subjects. Thereafter, patients were assessed clinically. LVEF was obtained by echocardiography using either the Teichholz’s method or Simpson’s 2D formula in case of regional wall geometric or motion abnormalities and a trial fibrillation [22] as appropriate.

A pre-test was performed in order to familiarize patients with the floor. On discharge day, an enrollment 6-MWT was performed. Patients were counseled on their health and given more information on their illness and therapeutic prescriptions. Outpatient’s follow-up appointments were scheduled by cardiologists every one to three months’ period (depending on the severity of their symptoms) during which clinical check-ups were done and treatment adjusted as needed. Outcomes of interest included mortality and hospital readmissions resulting from worsening CHF during the observational follow-up period. Data on readmissions and deaths were collected prospectively by checking the in-hospital admission registry and patients’ health records. In some cases, phone contact was used to catch those information from the patients or their relatives.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data on all patients consecutively enrolled during the four months’ recruitment period were analyzed through EPI INFO version 7 and R version 3.2.2 software. Continuous variables were reported as means ± SD and categorical data as percentages. Differences between variables were determined using Fisher’s exact, Chi square and Student tests accordingly. The 6-MWT distance was randomly dichotomized into ≤300 meters and >300 meters for the curves presentations purposes. Kaplan-Meier method was used to construct curves and log-rank test to compare hospital re-admission for heart failure between 6-MWT distance stratified groups. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the relative risk of hospital re-admissions for heart failure decompensation. We used Martingales and Schoenfeld residuals tests to assess respectively the log-linearity and proportional hazard assumptions. The backward elimination procedure according to Akaike’s information criterion (AIC), [23] was used to strengthen the model. Statistical significance was defined as a two-tailed p-value of < 0.05.

2.5. Ethical Aspects

The Research Ethics Committee of Yalgado Ouédraogo University Hospital approved the study protocol. The study was conducted in patients who gave their informed consent in accordance with the internationally established principles for Good Clinical Practice, which had their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association.

3. Results

Overall, sixty-one patients with CHF were included in analysis process. Two patients discontinued the test due dyspnea and fatigue associated with cramps. No serious adverse event occurred during the 6-MWT process and one patient was lost to follow-up. The mean age was 46.9 ± 14.1 years (extremes: 21 - 70). Thirty-two patients (52%) were female. The mean LVEF was 32.4% ± 8.2% (extremes: 13 - 45). The mean 6-MWT distance was 336.3 ± 65 meters (extremes: 194 - 480). Patients’ baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1.

The mean follow-up period was 277.6 ± 129.8 days (extremes: 2 - 403 days) with a total follow-up time of 16932 days (46.4 years). At the end of follow-up, 21 patients (45.3 percent person-years) were re-admitted to hospital for heart failure decompensation and 14 patients had died. Re-admitted patients had shorter 6-MWT distance (p = 0.007) and were more likely to die than those who were not re-admitted (RR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.13 - 2.62, p = 0.003). In univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, re-admission was associated with shorter 6-MWT distance both as continuous and dichotomized (≤300 m) variables (p < 0.001), older age (p = 0.03) and NYHA class III (p = 0.01) as shown in Table 2.

In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model including all variables

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of all 61 patients with chronic heart failure.

NYHA: New York Heart Association, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; TAPSE: tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion; SPAP: systolic pulmonary arterial pressure; *Including idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and myocarditis; 6-MWT: 6-minute walk test.

Table 2. Univariate Cox regression analysis predictors of re-admission in patients with chronic heart failure.

HR: hazard ratio; CI: confident interval; NYHA: New York Heart Association, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; TAPSE: tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion; 6-MWT: 6-minute walk test.

associated with re-admission in univariate analysis, there was no violation of assumption when the dependent variable was re-admission. Both 6-MWT distance as continuous and dichotomized (≤300 m) variables, NYHA class III, lower LVEF and older age independently predicted re-admission for heart failure decompensation (Table 3). The proportion of study patients re-admitted for heart failure was significantly lower in patients whose 6-MWT distance was >300 m (p < 0.001) during the follow-up period (Figure 1).

4. Discussion

We currently demonstrated that 6-MWT distance at the time of hospital discharge was an independent predictor of re-admission in sub-Saharan African patients with CHF. This finding is consistent with data from studies with various cut-off levels of 6-MWT distance depending of CHF patients’ clinical characteristics. The SOLVD sub-study [10] , was the first to show in 898 patients with

Table 3. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards ratio regression analysis predictors of re-admission in all 61 patients with chronic heart failure.

AIC: Akaike’s information criterion; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confident interval; NYHA: New York Heart Association, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; 6-MWT: 6-minute walk test, p: p value.

Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier readmission-free curves in patients stratified by 6-minute walk test distance ≤ 300 meters and >300 meters.

NYHA class II and III heart failure that 6-MWT distance and left ventricular ejection fraction were strongly connected with death and heart failure hospitalization rates during follow-up. In a prospective cohort study carried out by Tabata et al. [24] in Japan in 252 CHF patients, 103 were readmitted within 3 years. 6-MWT distance at the time of discharge was significantly shorter in re-admitted patients than non-re-admitted patients (P < 0.001) and was a significant predictor of re-admission (P <0.001). In 1996, Cahalin et al. [25] conducted a study in 45 patients with advanced heart failure (age = 49 ± 8 years; LVEF = 0.20 ± 0.06) who underwent a 6-MWT during cardiac transplant evaluation and demonstrated a significant correlation (r = 0.64, p < 0.001) between peak VO2 and the walking distance. Moreover, they noticed that a 6-MWTdistance ambulated less than 300 m predicted an increased likelihood of death or pre-transplant hospital admission within six months. Similar results reported prognostic value of a shorter 6-MWT distance in the literature [26] - [31] . Alahdab et al. [14] prospectively evaluated the usefulness of the 6 MWT in predicting mortality and heart failure re-hospitalization in 200 American African patients with acute decompensated heart failure and found that 6-MWT distance ≤ 200 m was the strongest predictor of heart failure re-hospitalization (adjusted HR = 1.62, p = 0.015). Thus, 6-MWT distance could help to stratify the severity of heart failure.

However, some conflicting observations have been raised regarding the usefulness of 6-MWT in predicting outcomes in heart failure patients [32] [33] . However, these findings were mostly reported in patients without advanced HF contrasting with our study patients’ baseline characteristics. To us, the 6-MWT distance remains an interesting tool that could help to evaluate outcomes in patients with CHF despite discrepancies between series.

As reported in this present study, higher NYHA class at discharge, lower LVEF and older age are well known to predict hospital re-admission for heart failure decompensation [34] [35] .

Study Limitations

The small size of our study population and the lack of some variables in the analysis process such as NT-proBNP, hemoglobin concentration and renal dysfunction [27] [29] may have affected the statistical power of our findings. Compliance to medications which is known to be a risk factor for re-admission in patients with heart failure [36] was not assessed. However, these results gave a prognostic importance of the 6-MWT distance in Sub-Saharan African patients with CHF.

5. Conclusion

In Sub-Saharan African patients with CHF, shorter 6-MWT distance at the time of hospital discharge strongly predicted re-hospitalization for heart failure decompensation. Thus, the 6-MWT distance can be an indicator of the evolution of CHF patients. Those patients could greatly benefit from cardiac rehabilitation program at least to improve their quality of life. Therefore, setting-up such cardiac rehabilitation programs in SSA health facilities is needed.


We gratefully acknowledge all subjects enrolled in this study. Many thanks to the Cardiology department medical staff members for their technical support during the study. We also thank Dr Juste Aristide GOUNGOUNGA from Aix-Marseille University (France) for his statistical support in this work.


All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Ho, K.K., Pinsky, J.L., Kannel, W.B., et al. (1993) The Epidemiology of Heart Failure: The Framingham Study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 22, 6A-13A.
[2] Roger, V.L. (2004) Trends in Heart Failure Incidence and Survival in a Community-Based Population. JAMA, 292, 344.
[3] Levy, D., Kenchaiah, S., Larson, M.G., et al. (2002) Long-Term Trends in the Incidence of and Survival with Heart Failure. The New England Journal of Medicine, 347, 1397-1402.
[4] Cohn, J.N. and Rector, T.S. (1988) Prognosis of Congestive Heart Failure and Predictors of Mortality. American Journal of Cardiology, 62, 25A-30A.
[5] Pilote, L., Silberberg, J., Lisbona, R., et al. (1989) Prognosis in Patients with Low Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after Myocardial Infarction. Importance of Exercise Capacity. Circulation, 80, 1636-1641.
[6] Balady, G.J., Arena, R., Sietsema, K., et al. (2010) Clinician’s Guide to Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Adults: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 122, 191-225.
[7] Mancini, D.M., Eisen, H., Kussmaul, W., et al. (1991) Value of Peak Exercise Oxygen Consumption for Optimal Timing of Cardiac Transplantation in Ambulatory Patients with Heart Failure. Circulation, 83, 778-786.
[8] Zugck, C. (2000) Is the 6-Minute Walk Test a Reliable Substitute for Peak Oxygen Uptake in Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy? European Heart Journal, 21, 540-549.
[9] Myers, J. (1998) Clinical, Hemodynamic, and Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test Determinants of Survival in Patients Referred for Evaluation of Heart Failure. Annals of Internal Medicine, 129, 286.
[10] Bittner, V. (1993) Prediction of Mortality and Morbidity With a 6-Minute Walk Test in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction. Journal of the American Medical Association, 270, 1702.
[11] Shah, M.R., Hasselblad, V., Gheorghiade, M., et al. (2001) Prognostic Usefulness of the Six-Minute Walk in Patients with Advanced Congestive Heart Failure Secondary to Ischemic or Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy. American Journal of Cardiology, 88, 987-993.
[12] Arslan, S., Erol, M.K., Gundogdu, F., et al. (2007) Prognostic Value of 6-Minute Walk Test in Stable Outpatients with Heart Failure. Texas Heart Institute Journal, 34, 166-169.
[13] Davies, E.J., Moxham, T., Rees, K., et al. (2010) Exercise Training for Systolic Heart Failure: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. European Journal of Heart Failure, 12, 706-715.
[14] Alahdab, M.T., Mansour, I.N., Napan, S., et al. (2009) Six Minute Walk Test Predicts Long-Term All-Cause Mortality and Heart Failure Rehospitalization in African-American Patients Hospitalized with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure. Journal of Cardiac Failure, 15, 130-135.
[15] Olsson, L.G. (2005) Six Minute Corridor Walk Test as an Outcome Measure for the Assessment of Treatment in Randomized, Blinded Intervention Trials of Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review. European Heart Journal, 26, 778-793.
[16] Guyatt, G.H., Sullivan, M.J., Thompson, P.J., et al. (1985) The 6-Minute Walk: A New Measure of Exercise Capacity in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 132, 919-923.
[17] Lee, R., Chan, Y.-H., Wong, J., et al. (2007) The 6-Minute Walk Test Predicts Clinical Outcome in Asian Patients with Chronic Congestive Heart Failure on Contemporary Medical Therapy: A Study of the Multiracial Population in Singapore. International Journal of Cardiology, 119, 168-175.
[18] Carvalho, E.E.V., Costa, D.C., Crescêncio, J.C., et al. (2011) Heart Failure: Comparison between Six-Minute Walk Test and Cardiopulmonary Test. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 97, 59-64.
[19] Swedberg, K., Cleland, J., Dargie, H., et al. (2005) Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure: Executive Summary (Update 2005). The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. European Heart Journal, 26, 1115-1140.
[20] Nieminen, M.S., B?hm, M., Cowie, M.R., et al. (2005) Executive Summary of the Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Heart Failure. The Task Force on Acute Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. European Heart Journal, 26, 384-416.
[21] Crapo, R.O., Casaburi, R., Coates, A.L., et al. (2002) ATS Statement: Guidelines for the Six-Minute Walk Test. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 166, 111-117.
[22] Lang, R.M., Bierig, M., Devereux, R.B., et al. (2005) Recommendations for Chamber Quantification: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, Developed in Conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a Branch of the European Society of Cardiology. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 18, 1440-1463.
[23] Akaike, H. (1998) Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle. In: Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike, Springer, New York, 199-213.
[24] Tabata, M., Shimizu, R., Kamekawa, D., et al. (2014) Six-Minute Walk Distance Is an Independent Predictor of Hospital Readmission in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure. International Heart Journal, 55, 331-336.
[25] Cahalin, L.P., Mathier, M.A., Semigran, M.J., et al. (1996) The Six-Minute Walk Test Predicts Peak Oxygen Uptake and Survival in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure. Chest, 110, 325-332.
[26] Roul, G., Germain, P. and Bareiss, P. (1998) Does the 6-Minute Walk Test Predict the Prognosis in Patients with NYHA Class II or III Chronic Heart Failure? American Heart Journal, 136, 449-457.
[27] Ingle, L., Rigby, A.S., Carroll, S., et al. (2007) Prognostic Value of the 6 Min Walk Test and Self-Perceived Symptom Severity in Older Patients with Chronic Heart Failure. European Heart Journal, 28, 560-568.
[28] Rostagno, C., Olivo, G., Comeglio, M., et al. (2003) Prognostic Value of 6-Minute Walk Corridor Test in Patients with Mild to Moderate Heart Failure: Comparison with Other Methods of Functional Evaluation. European Journal of Heart Failure, 5, 247-252.
[29] Wegrzynowska-Teodorczyk, K., Rudzinska, E., Lazorczyk, M., et al. (2013) Distance Covered during a Six-Minute Walk Test Predicts Long-Term Cardiovascular Mortality and Hospitalisation Rates in Men with Systolic Heart Failure: An Observational Study. Journal of Physiotherapy, 59, 177-187.
[30] Rubim, V.S.M., Drumond Neto, C., Romeo, J.L.M., et al. (2006) Prognostic Value of the Six-Minute Walk Test in Heart Failure. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 86, 120-125.
[31] Zielińska, D., Bellwon, J., Rynkiewicz, A., et al. (2013) Prognostic Value of the Six-Minute Walk Test in Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Literature Review. Rehabilitation Research and Practice, 2013, Article ID: 965494.
[32] Opasich, C. (2001) Six-Minute Walking Performance in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Heart Failure; Is It a Useful Indicator in Clinical Practice? European Heart Journal, 22, 488-496.
[33] Guazzi, M., Dickstein, K., Vicenzi, M., et al. (2009) Six-Minute Walk Test and Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: A Comparative Analysis on Clinical and Prognostic Insights. Circulation: Heart Failure, 2, 549-555.
[34] Aizawa, H., Imai, S. and Fushimi, K. (2015) Factors Associated with 30-Day Readmission of Patients with Heart Failure from a Japanese Administrative Database. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 15, 134.
[35] Ponikowski, P., Voors, A.A., Anker, S.D., et al. (2016) 2016 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the Special Contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. European Heart Journal, 37, 2129-2200.
[36] Packer, M., Bristow, M.R., Cohn, J.N., et al. (1996) The Effect of Carvedilol on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure. The New England Journal of Medicine, 334, 1349-1355.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.