Measuring Public School Competition from Private Schools: A Gravity-Based Index

Kaustav Misra, Guangqing Chi
DOI: 10.4236/jgis.2011.34027                

Abstract

This research develops a gravity-based index of public school competition from private schools within local markets. Proponents of educational reform often call for policies to increase competition between schools. A major hurdle for researchers examining this issue is to determine a workable definition of “competition” by which they can measure the degree of competition within local markets. This study addresses this challenge by developing a school competition index for public schools in the Jackson metropolitan area of Mississippi, USA that considers the enrollments in public schools and the enrollments in their neighboring private schools, as well as the distances between them. The school competition index reveals the degree of competition for each public school based on its spatial location relative to peer private schools operating within its service area. This methodology can be useful for evaluating competition in other markets and redefining the traditional market structure.

Keywords

Public School, Gravity-Based Index, Market, Competition, Education

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	S. Baldi, Y. Jin, M. Skemer, P. J. Green and D. Herget, “Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Science and Mathematics Literacy in an International Context,” National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC., 2007.
[2]	E. A. Hanushek and L. Woessmann, “Do Better Schools Lead to More Growth? Cognitive Skills, Economic Outcomes, and Causation,” Working Paper 14633, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, 2009.
[3]	J. R. Betts, “Returns to Quality of Education,” Economics of Education Series 1, Economics of Education Thematic Group, The World Bank, Washington, DC., 1999.
[4]	C. R. Belfield and H. M. Levin, “The Effcets of Competition Between Schools on Educational Outcomes: A Review for the United States,” Review of Educational Research, Vol.72, No. 2, 2002, pp. 279-341. doi:10.3102/00346543072002279
[5]	C. M. Hoxby, “Do Private Schools Provide Competition for Public Schools?” NBER Working Paper Series, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, 1994.
[6]	J. F. Couch, W. F. Shughart and A. Williams, “Private School Enrollment and Public School Performance,” Public Choice,Vol. 76, No. 4, 1993, pp. 301-312. doi:10.1007/BF01053301
[7]	C. M. Newmark, “Another Look at Whether Private Schools Influence Public School Quality: Comment,” Public Choice, Vol. 82, No. 3-4, 1995, pp. 365-73. doi:10.1007/BF01047704
[8]	W. Sander, “Private Schools and Public School Achievement,” Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 34, No. 4, 1999. pp. 697-709. doi:10.2307/146413
[9]	M. V. Borland and R. M. Howsen. “Students’ Academic Achievement and the Degree of Market Concentration in Education,” Economics of Education Review, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1992, pp. 31-39. doi:10.1016/0272-7757(92)90019-Y
[10]	C. Jepsen, “The Role of Aggregation in Estimating the Effects of Private School Competition on Student Achievement,” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2002, pp. 477-500. doi:10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00530-2
[11]	R. Mcmillan, “Competition, Parental Involvment, and Public School Performmance,” National Tax Association, Washington, DC., 2001, pp. 150-155.
[12]	C. R. Geller, D. L. Sjoquist and M. B. Walker, “The Effect of Private School Competition on Public School Performance in Georgia,” Public Finance Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2006, pp. 4-32. doi:10.1177/1091142105283631
[13]	R. Arum, “Do Private Schools Force Public Schools to Compete?” American Sociological Review, Vol. 61, No. 1, 1996, pp. 29-46. doi:10.2307/2096405
[14]	R. G. Hubbard and A. P. O’Brien, “Principles of MicroEconomics,” 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall, Boston, 2008.
[15]	W. Tobler, “A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region,” Economic Geography, Vol. 46, 1970, pp. 234-240. doi:10.2307/143141
[16]	A.S. Fortheringham. Spatial Structure and Distancedecay Parameters. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. Vol. 71, No. 3, 1981, pp. 425-436.
[17]	J. G. Koenig, “Indicators of Urban Accessibility: Theory and Application,” Transportation, Vol. 9, 1980, pp. 145-172. doi:10.1007/BF00167128
[18]	R. W. Shephard, “Proof of the Law of Diminishing Returns,” Zeitschrift fur Nationalokonomie, Vol. 30, 1970, pp. 7-34. doi:10.1007/BF01289990
[19]	J. Garreau, “Edge City: Life on the New Frontier,” Doubleday, New York, 1991.
[20]	X. Dong, M. E. Ben-Akiva, J, L. Bowman and J. L. Walker, “Moving from Trip-Based to Activity-Based Measures of Accessibility,” Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2006, pp. 163-180. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2005.05.002
[21]	C. Wheeler, “A Note on the Spatial Correlation Structure of County-Level Growth in the US,” Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2001, pp. 433-449. doi:10.1111/0022-4146.00225
[22]	J. H. Knorring. “Basic Human Decision Making: An Analysis of Route Choice Decisions by Long-Haul Truckers,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Princeton University, Princeton, 2003.