Comparison of an alveolar expansion technique and buccal guttering technique in the extraction of mandibular third molar. A Pilot Study

Babatunde. O. Akinbami, Lucky. I. Ofomala
DOI: 10.4236/ojst.2011.13016                

Abstract

Background: The over-ambitious use of surgical drills for almost every case of third molar impaction is on the increase in most established oral surgery centers. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the severity of post operative symptoms of swelling and pain that accompany the use of surgical drill in the buccal guttering technique and the non application of drill in an alveolar expansion technique. Methods: Consecutive patients with bilateral impacted lower third molars not associated with pericoronitis were included in the study, a total of 10 patients were included in the study. Extraction of both impacted third molars was done consecutively on the same day under local anaesthesia. Post operative morbidities that were assessed clinically are swelling and pain. Results: A total of 10 patients, 70% were females and males were 30%. Age range was 27 - 35 yrs.Out of the eight patients that had the two different techniques, 7 preferred the use of the alveolar expansion technique in which drill was not used. There were statistically significant differences in swellings between these two techniques, (p < 0.01) but no statistically significant differences in pain (p > 0.01). Conclusions: To avoid excessive swelling and pain from over-ambitious cut-ting of soft tissues and drilling of bone, alveolar expansion technique should be considered first in pa-tients with less dense bone.

Keywords

Alveolar Expansion Technique; Mandibular; Third Molar; Extraction

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Friedman, J.W. (2007) The prophylactic extraction of third molars: A public health hazard. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 1554-1559. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2006.100271
[2]	Güven, O., Keskin, A. and Akal, U. K. (2000) The inci-dence of cysts and tumors around impacted third molars. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 29, 131-135.
[3]	Gülicher, D. and Gerlach, K.L. (2001) Sensory impair-ment of the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves following removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Interna-tional Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 30, 306-312. doi:10.1054/ijom.2001.0057
[4]	Hupp, J. R. (2006) Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery, 5th Edition, Mosby Johnson.
[5]	Sisk, A.L., Hammer, W.B., Shelton, et al. (1987) Com-plications following removal of impacted third molar. The role of the experience of the surgeon. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 45, 906. doi:10.1016/0278-2391(87)90437-X
[6]	Garcia-Garcia, A. (2005) Coronectomy: A questionable procedure. Letter to the editor. Journal of Oral and Max-illofacial Surgery, 63, 723.
[7]	Benediktsdóttir, I.S., Wenzel, A., Peterson, J.K., et al. (2004) Mandibular third molar removal: Risk indicators for extended operation time, post operative pain, and complications. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pa-thology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 97, 438-446. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.10.018
[8]	Garcia-Garcia, A. (2006) Is coronectomy really preferable to extraction? British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 44, 75. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.02.015
[9]	Rozkovcova, E., Markova, M. and Dolejsi, J. (1999) Studies on agenesis of third molars amongst populations of different origin. Sbornik Lekarsky, 100, 71-84.
[10]	Absi, E.G. and Shepherd, J.P. (1993) Comparison of morbidity following the removal of lower third molars by the lingual split and surgical bur methods. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 22, 149-153.
[11]	Garcia, G.A., Gude, S.F., Gandara, R.J. and Gallas, T.M. (1997) Trismus and pain after removal of impacted lower third molars. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 55, 1223-1226.
[12]	Ali, A., Cunliffe, D.R. and Watt-Smith, S.R. (2000) Sur-gical emphysema and pneumomediastinum complicating dental extraction. British Dental Journal, 188, 589-590.
[13]	Gargallo-Albiol, J., Buenechea-Imaz, R. and Gay-Escoda, C. (2000) Lingual nerve protection during surgical re-moval of lower third molars. a prospective randomised study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 29, 268-271. doi:10.1034/j.1399-0020.2000.290407.x
[14]	Peterson, L., Ellie, E., Hupp, J. and Tucker, M. (2003) Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery. 4th Edition, Mosby, Saint Louis.
[15]	Pogrel, M.A. and Kaban, L.B. (1993) Injuries to the inte-rior alveolar and lingual nerves. Journal of the California Dental Association, 21, 50.