Existence and Uniqueness for the Boundary Value Problems of Nonlinear Fractional Differential Equation ()
1. Introduction
This paper considers the following boundary value problems of fractional order differential equations
(1.1)
where
is the Caputo fractional derivative,
is continuous function and
are real constants.
Fractional order Differential equations have recently proved to be valuable tools in the modeling of many phenomena in various fields of science and engineering. Applications can be found in fields of control, porous media, eletromagnetic, etc. (see [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] ). There has been a significant progress in the investigation of fractional differential equations in recent years, The readers are referred to the monographs of Oldham and Spanier [1] , Miller and Ross [2] , Podlubny [3] , Hilfer [5] and the papers of Agarwal et al. [6] , El-Sayed [7] [8] [9] [10] , Benchohra et al. [11] [12] , Yu and Gao [13] [14] , Zhang [15] , He [4] and the others references therein [16] - [23] .
Recently some basic theory for the initial value problems of fractional differential equations involving Riemann-Liouville differential operator (
) has been discussed by Lakshmikantham et al. [24] [25] [26] . In a series of papers (see [6] [11] ), the authors considered some classes of boundary value problems for differential equations involving Riemann-Liouville and Caputo fractional derivatives of order
and
.
This paper generalizes the results of the papers above [6] and presents some existence theorems for the boundary value problems (BVP) (1.1). Two theorems are based on the Banach fixed point theorem, and the others are based on Schau- der’s fixed point theorem and Leray-Schauder type nonlinear alternative. An example is given to demonstrate the application of our main results.
2. Preliminaries
Some notions and Lemmas are important in order to state our results. Denote by
the Banach space of all continuous functions from J into R with the norm
.
Definition 2.1 ( [6] [11] ) The fractional order integral of the function
is defined by
(2.1)
where
is the gamma function.
Definition 2.2 ( [6] [11] ) For a function h given on the interval [a,b], the
- th Caputo fractional-order derivative of
is defined by
(2.2)
where
and
denotes the integer part of
.
A solution of the problem (1.1) is defined as follows.
Definition 2.3 A function
that satisfies (1.1) is called a solution of (1.1).
Lemma 2.1 ( [15] ) Let
, then the differential equation
has solutions
Lemma 2.2 Let
, then
.
In particular, when
,
,
for some
.
Proof. By (2.1), (2.2),
where
.
Lemma 2.3 ( [27] ) The relation
(2.3)
is valid in following case
.
As a consequence of Lemmas 2.1, Lemmas 2.2 and Lemmas 2.3, the following result is useful in what follows.
Lemma 2.4 Let
,
, and let
be continuous. A function
is a solution of the fractional BVP
(2.4)
if and only if
is a solution of the fractional integral equation
(2.5)
Proof. Assume
satisfies (2.4), then Lemma 2.2 implies that
.
And the following simple calculation can be obtained by (2.4)
,
Hence Equation (2.5). Conversely, it is clear that if
satisfies Equation (2.5), then Equations (2.4) hold.
3. Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions
In this section, Our first result is based on the Banach fixed point theorem (see [28] ).
Theorem 3.1 Assume that
(H1) There exists a function
such that
If
(3.1)
Then the BVP (1.1) has a unique solution on J.
Proof. Transform the problem (1.1) into a fixed point problem. Consider the operator
defined by
(3.2)
The Banach contraction principle is used to prove that T has afixed point.
Let
. Then
,
Thus
Consequently, by (3.1) T is a contraction operator. As a consequence of the Banach Fixed point theorem, T has a fixed point which is the unique solution of the problem (1.1). The proof is completed.
In Theorem 3.1, if the function
is replaced by a constant L > 0, the second result follows.
Theorem 3.2 Assume that
(H2) There exists a constant L > 0 (i.e.
), such that
If
(3.3)
Then the BVP (1.1) has a unique solution on J.
The third result is based on Schauder’s Fixed point theorem.
Theorem 3.3 Assume that
(H3) The function
is continuous.
(H4) There exists a constant M > 0, such that
(3.4)
Then the BVP (1.1) has at least one solution on J.
Proof. Schauder’s Fixed point theorem is used to prove that T defined by (3.2) has a fixed point. The proof will be given in several steps.
Step 1: T is continuous.
Let
be a sequence such that
in
. Then for each
then
Since f is a continuous function, it can be shown that
And hence
Step 2: T maps the bounded sets into the bounded sets in
.
For any
, it can be shown that there exists a positive constant
such that
.
In fact,
, by (3.2) and (H4)
Thus
where
Step 3: Tmaps the bounded sets into the equicontinuous sets of
.
Let
,
be abounded set of
as above, and
.
Then
As
, the right-hand side of the aboveinequality tends to zero. As a consequence of Steps 1 to 3 together with the Arzelá-Ascoli theorem,
is completely continuous.
Step 4: A priori bounds.
Let
, it shall be shown that the set is bounded.
Let
, then
for some
. Thus
,
By the condition (H4) and Step 2,
Thus for every
,
This shows that the set
is bounded. As a consequence of Schauder’s fixed point theorem, T has a fixed point which is a solution of the problem (1.1).
In Theorem 3.3, if the condition (H4) is weakened, the fourth result can be obtained, which is a more general existence result (see [6] ).
Theorem 3.4 Assume that (H3) and the following conditionshold.
(H5) There exist a functional
and a continuous and nondecreasing
, such that
(H6) There exists a number K > 0, such that
(3.5)
Then the BVP (1.1) has at least one solution on J.
Proof. Consider the operator T defined by (3.2),
, let
meets
, then from (H5) and (H6),
By (H6), there exists K such that
. Let
, the operator
is completely continuous. Through proper selection of D, there exists no
such that
for some
.
Therefore, T is Leray-Schauder type operator (see [6] ), so that it has a fixed point
in
, which is a solution of the BVP (1.1).
4. An Example
For the boundary value problem
(4.1)
Take
.
Let
Then
(4.2)
Hence the condition (H1) holds with
. It can be checked that condition (3.2) is satisfied with
. In fact,
(4.3)
only if
(4.4)
For example,
, then
,
,
,
. Then
(4.5)
Then by Theorem 3.1 the boundary value problem (4.1) has a uniquesolution on
for the values of
.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their valuable suggestions and comments, which improved the completeness of the paper. Research of J. Song is funded by the High-level Talents Project of Guangdong Province Colleges and Universities (2013-178). Research of Z. Zeng is funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China (S2012010010069). These supports are greatly appreciated.