Aristotle’s Definition of Place and of Matter ()
Abstract
The accuracy of Aristotle’s definition of place is defended in terms of his form-matter theory. This theory is in turn defended against the objectionable notion that it entails matter is ultimately characterless.
Share and Cite:
Drum, P. (2011) Aristotle’s Definition of Place and of Matter.
Open Journal of Philosophy,
1, 35-36. doi:
10.4236/ojpp.2011.11006.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
|
[1]
|
Aristotle (1952). On generation and corruption. In R. M. Hutchins (Ed.), H. H. Joachim (Translate), The works of Aristotle volume 1 (pp. 407-441). Chicago, IL: William Benton.
|
|
[2]
|
Aristotle (1952). Physics. In R. M. Hutchins (Ed.), R. P. Hardie and R. K. Gaye (Translate), The works of Aristotle volume 1 (pp. 257-355). Chicago, IL: William Benton.
|
|
[3]
|
Cohen, S. (1996). Aristotle on nature and incomplete substance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
|
[4]
|
Lewis, F. A. (2008). What’s the matter with prime matter?. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 34, 123-146.
|
|
[5]
|
Sorabji, R. (1988). Matter, Space and Motion. London: Duckworth.
|