Received 27 March 2016; accepted 15 July 2016; published 18 July 2016

1. Introduction
All graphs considered in this paper are finite undirected simple graphs. For a graph G, let
and
denote the sets of vertices and edges of G, respectively. For a vertex
, let
and
denote the subset of
incident with the vertex x, and the degree of the vertex x in G, respectively. We denote
the maximum degree of vertices of G. A simple path with
edges is denoted by
. A simple cycle with
edges is denoted by
.
For an arbitrary finite set A, we denote by
the number of elements of A. The set of positive integers is denoted by
. An arbitrary nonempty subset of consecutive integers is called an interval. An interval with the minimum element p and the maximum element q is denoted by
. We denote
and
the sets of even and odd integers in
, respectively. An interval D is called a h-interval if
.
A function
is called a proper edge t-coloring of a graph G, if all colors are used, and no two adjacent edges receive the same color. The minimum value of t for which there exists a proper edge t-coloring of a graph G is denoted by
. If
, and
is a proper edge t-coloring of a graph G, then let
. A proper edge t-coloring
of a graph G is called an interval t-coloring of G if for any
, the set
is a
-interval. A graph G is interval colorable if it has an interval t-coloring for some positive integer t. The concept of interval edge coloring of graphs was introduced by Asratian and Kamalian [1] . In [1] [2] , the authors showed that if G is interval colorable, then
.
For any
, we denote by
the set of graphs for which there exists an interval t-coloring. Let
. For any graph
, the minimum and the maximum values of t for which G has an interval
t-coloring are denoted by
and
, respectively. For a graph
, let
.
A proper edge t-coloring a of a graph G is called a interval cyclic t-coloring of G, if for any
, at least one of the following two conditions holds:
1)
is a
-interval,
2)
is a
-interval.
A graph G is interval cyclically colorable if it has a cyclically interval t-coloring for some positive integer t. This type of edge coloring under the name of “p-coloring” was first considered by Kotzig [3] , and the concept of cyclically interval edge coloring of graphs was explicitly introduced by de Werra and Solot [4] .
For any
, we denote by
the set of graphs for which there exists a interval cyclic t-coloring. Let
. For any graph
, the minimum and the maximum values of t for which G has a cyclically
interval t-coloring are denoted by
and
respectively. For a graph
, let
.
It is clear that for any
,
and
. Note that for an arbitrary graph G,
. It is also clear that for any
, the following inequality is true:
![]()
Let T be a tree. Kamalian [5] [6] showed that
,
was an interval, and provided the exact values of the parameters
and
. Kamalian [7] [8] also proved that
. Some interesting results on cyclically interval t-colorings and related topics were obtained in [3] [4] [9] - [14] . For any integer
, Kamalian [13] proved that
, determined the set
, and provided the following theorem.
Theorem 1 (R. R. Kamalian [13] ) For any integers
and
,
if and only if
![]()
In this paper, we provide a new proof of the theorem. The terms and concepts that we do not define can be found in [15] .
2. Main Result
Proof of Theorem 1. Suppose that, in clockwise order along the cycle
, the vertices of
are
and the edges of
are
, where
for
, and
. Since
and
![]()
We know that if
or
![]()
then
.
First we prove that if
and
![]()
then
.
Case 1. n is odd.
For any
, let
![]()
It is easy to check that
is a cyclically interval t-coloring of
.
Case 2. n is even.
For any
, let
![]()
If
is odd, then let
![]()
For any
, let
![]()
It is easy to check that, in each case,
is a cyclically interval t-coloring of
.
Now let us prove that if
,
and
, then
![]()
By contradiction. Suppose that there are
,
,
and
![]()
such that
has a cyclically interval
-coloring
.
Case 1.
is odd.
Clearly,
. Let
and
be two edges of
such that
and
. Without loss of generality, we may assume
. Let
be the subgraph induced by
, and ![]()
be the subgraph induced by
, respectively. Since
is even and
is a cyclically interval
-coloring of
, then
and
are all even. So we have that
is even, a contradiction.
Case 2.
is even.
Let H be the graph removing from the graph
the edges with the colors except 1 and
, and
the graph removing from the graph H all its isolated vertices.
Case 2.1.
is connected.
Let F be the subgraph of
induced by
, where
and
are the two pendant edges of
.
Clearly,
. If
is odd, then
. Since
is a cyclically interval
-
coloring of
, then
is a interval
-coloring with
. So we have
, a contradiction.
If
is even, then
. Since
is a cyclically interval
-coloring of
, then
is a interval
-coloring. So we know that
is odd, and then
is odd, a con- tradiction.
Case 2.2.
is a graph with m connected components,
.
Suppose that, in clockwise order along the cycle
, the m connected components of
are
. Without loss of generality, we may also assume that
and
.
Clearly,
and
. Let
,
and
. Let
be the subgraph induced by
,
and L4 be the subgraph induced by
, respectively. Let
or
,
say
. Since
is a cyclically interval
-coloring of
, then
is a interval
-
coloring with
. So we have
, a contradiction.
Now let
and
. Since
is a cyclically interval
-coloring of
, then
and
are all interval
-coloring. So we have
, a con-
tradiction. □
Acknowledgements
We thank the editor and the referee for their valuable comments. Research of Y. Zhao is funded in part by the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province of China under Grant No. A2015106045, and in part by the Institute of Applied Mathematics of Shijiazhuang University.
NOTES
![]()
*Corresponding author.