New Asymptotical Stability and Uniformly Asymptotical Stability Theorems for Nonautonomous Difference Equations ()
Received 15 April 2016; accepted 4 June 2016; published 7 June 2016

1. Introduction
Difference equations usually describe the evolution of certain phenomena over the course of time. These equations occur in biology, economics, psychology, sociology, and other fields. In addition, difference equations also appear in the study of discretization methods for differential equations. Realizing that most of the problems that arise in practice are nonlinear and mostly unsolvable, the qualitative behaviors of solutions without actually computing them are of vital importance in application process. The stability property of an equilibrium is the very important qualitative behavior for difference equations. The most powerful method for studying the stability property is Liapunov’s second method or Liapunov’s direct method. The main advantage of this method is that the stability can be obtained without any prior knowledge of the solutions. In 1892, the Russian mathematician A.M. Liapunov introduced the method for investigating the stability of nonlinear differential equations. According to the method, he put forward Liapunov stability theorem, Liapunov asymptotical stability theorem and Liapunov unstable theorem, which have been known as the fundamental theorems of stability. Utilizing these fundamental theorems of stability, many authors have investigated the stability of some specific differential systems [1] - [9] .
We know that several results in the theory of difference equations have been obtained as more or less natural discrete analogues of corresponding results of differential equations, so Liapunov’s direct method is much more useful for difference equations. Actually, some authors have utilized the methods for difference equations successfully [10] - [20] . Using the method, S. Elaydi [10] and J.P. Lasalle [11] gave the classical Liapunov stability theorem for autonomous difference equations. In [12] [13] , the authors extended the technique to generalized nonautonomous difference equations and put forward the classical Liapunov stability theorem for nonautonomous difference equations. In [14] - [17] , the direct approach was extended to some special delay difference systems to investigate the stability properties. In [18] - [20] , how to construct Liapunov function for difference system or hybrid time-varying system was exploited.
Consider the following nonautonomous difference system
(1.1)
where
,
is continuous in x and
. As shown in [12] [13] , using Liapunov’s direct method to study the asymptotical stability of the zero solution of system (1.1) relies on the existence of a positive definite Liapunov function
which has indefinitely small upper bound and whose variation
along the solution of system (1.1) is negative definite.
Sometimes it is not easy to determine the positive definite Liapunov function for a given equations in applications. If we further require that the function has indefinitely small upper bound besides its negative definite variation, the work would become more difficult to do. In this paper, we weaken the Liapunov function to positive definite and also weaken the negative definite variation to semi-negative definite on orbits of Equations (1.1), then we put forward a new Liapunov asymptotical stability theorem for difference Equations (1.1) by adding to extra conditions on the variation. Subsequently, provided that all the conditions of our new asymptotical stability theorem are satisfied, we obtain a new uniformly asymptotical stability theorem of nonautonomous difference equations if the Liapunov function has an indefinitely small upper bound.
2. Some Lemmas
In this section, we introduce the following lemmas, which play a key role in obtaining our results.
Lemma 1 Suppose that there exists a function
satisfying the following conditions:
(i)
,
is
with respect to the second argument x,
(ii) the sequence
, and
(iii)
exists.
Then, there exists a positive integer sequence
with
as
such that
.
Proof. We first prove that for arbitrary constant
there exists a sufficient large integer
for every positive integer
such that
(2.1)
Suppose that this conclusion of inequality (2.1) does not hold, then there exist
such that for arbitrary
there exists a positive integer
such that
(2.2)
By the continuity of
, we obtain that either
or
. Without loss of generality, we only consider the first case. For the above
, there exists a positive integer increasing sequence
such that
for arbitrary
. Let
denote a constant. By the discrete analogue fundamental theorem of calculus [10] , we get
![]()
Note that
is a positive integer increasing sequence and
, then the above inequality contradicts
to the exists of
Therefore, the conclusion of (2.1) is proved.
Denote
with
By the conclusion of (2.1), for each i, there exists a sufficiently large
such that
(2.3)
for each positive integer
. Then we can select special
and construct an increase sequence
. This implies
as
and ![]()
Lemma 2 Assume that there exists a function
satisfying the following conditions:
(i)
,
is
with respect to the second argument,
(ii) the sequence
, and
(iii)
exists.
Then, for each fixed r
, there exists a positive integer sequence
with
as
such that
![]()
Proof. We first prove that for arbitrary constants
there exists a sufficient large integer
such that for every
there exists
(2.4)
The case of
is proved by (2.1) in the proof of Lemma 2.1. Suppose that inequality (2.4) holds in the case of
but is not true in the case of r. Then there exist constants
such that for arbi-
trary
there exists a positive integer
such that
. Similarly to the state-
ment below inequality (2.2), there exists a positive integer sequence
such that
.
Let
denote the maximum integer not exceeding x and
denote a constant. Same as above, without loss of generality, we only consider the case
. By the discrete analogue fundamental theorem of calculus [10] , we get
(2.5)
where
.
(2.6)
where
.
If
and
, from inequality (2.5), we obtain
(2.7)
If
and
, from inequality (2.6), we obtain
(2.8)
Inequalities (2.7) and (2.8) imply that
(2.9)
Since
as
, we select
. This leads to a contradiction because of the inductive assumption for (2.4) in the case of
. Therefore, the conclusion of (2.4) is proved.
Similarly to the second part of the proof of Lemma 2.1, for each r
, we can construct a sequence
with
as
such that
This completes the proof of Lemma 2.2.
According to Lemma 2.2 we prove the following result.
Lemma 3 Assume that there exists a function
satisfying the following conditions:
(i)
,
is
and
is uniformly continuous with respect to the second argument x,
(ii) the sequence
, and
(iii)
exists.
Then, there exists a positive integer sequence
with
as
such that
(2.10)
Proof. Let us first prove
(2.11)
Suppose that this is not true. Then there exist a constant c > 0 and a strictly increasing integer sequence ![]()
such that
as
and
,
. By the uniform continuity of
, there exists a constant
, when
for any
, then
. From the above inequalities, we get
. This is a contradiction to (2.4). Then equation (2.11) is proved.
The result of (2.11) implies the boundedness of
on
. It follows that
is
uniformly continuous on the same domain. And as shown above, we obtain
Then we see recursively that
(2.12)
On the other hand, by Lemma 2.2, there exists a sequence
with
as
such that
(2.13)
From (2.12) and (2.13) we easily get (2.10). The proof of Lemma 2.3 is complete .
3. New Asymptotical Stability and Uniformly Asymptotical Stability Theorems
In this section, we propose and prove the new asymptotical stability and uniformly asymptotical stability theorems of system (1.1). First of all, we introduce a special class of function and then give the definition of positive definite function. Subsequently, we introduce the various stability notions of the equilibrium point
of system (1.1). These definitions are very useful for obtaining our results besides the above Lemmas.
Definition 1 A function
is said to be class of K if it is continuous in
, strictly increasing, and
.
Definition 2 The function
is positive definite if there exists a function
such that
![]()
for all
.
Definition 3 Let
be an initial condition of system (1.1) and
be a solution such that
. The equilibrium point
of system (1.1) is said to be:
(i) Stable if given
and
there exists
such that
implies
for all
, uniformly stable if
may be chosen in dependent of
.
(ii) Attracting if there exists
such that
implies
, uni-
formly attracting if the choice of
is independent of
.
(iii) Asymptotically stable if it is stable and attracting, and uniformly asymptotically stable if it is uniformly stable and uniformly attracting.
Theorem 1 Consider nonautonomous difference Equations (1.1), where
is
with respect to the second argument x and satisfies
. Suppose that there exists a
positive definite function
such that
(i)
,
(ii)
, where
,
(iii)
is bounded on the set
,
(iv)
, where the func- tion
defined by Definition 1.
Then the zero solution of system (1.1) is asymptotically stable.
tion
with
satisfies ![]()
By condition (ii) we know that
is monotonically nonincreasing. Hence the
exists.
From condition (iii) we know that
is bounded, which implies that
is uniformly con- tinuous. According to Lemma 3, there exists a integer sequence
with
as
such that
(3.1)
According to the definition of function
and Equation (3.1), we get
, which implies
(3.2)
Now we prove
(3.3)
Suppose that (3.3) is not true. Then there exist a constant
and an integer sequence
with
as
such that
. Then, by the definition of positive definite ![]()
(3.4)
On the other hand, by (3.2) there is an integer j such that
. This is because V is continuous with respect to the second argument and
Thus, by condition (ii),
for all
. Clear,
for sufficiently large l such that
, which contradicts to the definition of v given
by (3.4). Therefore, (3.3) is proved. According to Definition 3, we obtain that the zero solution of system (1.1) is asymptotically stable.
In addition to the hypotheses of Theorem 1, we can obtain that the zero solution of system (1.1) is uniformly asymptotically stable if
has an indefinitely small upper bound as in the classical Liapunov asymptotical stability theorem of nonautonomous difference equations.
Theorem 2 Provided that the hypotheses of Theorem 1 are satisfied, the zero solution of system (1.1) is uniformly asymptotically stable if positive definite function
has an indefinitely small upper bound.
Proof. Since
is positive definite and has an indefinitely small upper bound, there exist functions
such that
for all
. For each
, there exists a
such that
. Denote
and
, then we have
for all
. If
this is not true, then there exists a
such that
and
imply
. However,
implies that
for
. Then we obtain that
![]()
This is a contradiction. Since all the conditions of Theorem 1 are satisfied, the zero solution of system (1.1) is
asymptotically stable. Therefore, for the above
,
, there exists
when
.
4. Example
In this section, we provide an example to illustrate the feasibility of our results.
Example 4.1. Consider the following difference equations
(4.1)
where
and
. Obviously,
f is C1 with respect to
on
and satisfies
Denote
and
. This function which satisfies
is clearly positive definite on
and is
along the solutions of system (4.1), and
(4.2)
Moreover,
![]()
For
and
, we obtain
, then the zero solution of system (1.1) is stable. At the same condition, we also get
![]()
Now, we calculate
. For
, we have
![]()
Then we get
, which means that
is bounded on the set
. Now, we only need to verify the example whether satisfies condition (iv) of
Theorem (3.1). Denote
,
. Then
is a class of K function. From the above analysis, we obtain
![]()
Then,
![]()
Thus condition (iv) of Theorem (3.1) is fulfilled. The zero solution of Example 4.1 is asymptotical stable. Inequation (4.2) implies that
has an indefinitely small upper bound. Then the zero solution of Example 4.1 is also uniformly asymptotically stable.
We also can utilize Polar coordinate transformation to prove the above conclusion. Let
and
, then system (4.1) transforms the following form:
(4.3)
The square of the first equation adding the square of the second equation in system (4.3) yields
![]()
Denote
and we get
Under the conditions of
and
, we obtain
and
. By Definition 3, we obtain the zero solution of the
original system (4.1) is asymptotical stable and uniformly asymptotically stable. This confirm the correctness of utilizing Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 3.2 to judge Example 4.1.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.31170338), the General Project of Educational Commission in Sichuan Province (Grant No.16ZB0357) and the Major Project of Sichuan University of Arts and Science (Grant No.2014Z005Z).
NOTES
![]()
*Corresponding author.