Construction of Three Quadrature Formulas of Eighth Order and Their Application for Approximating Series ()
1. Introduction
We consider the three-parameters families
,
,
of quadrature formulas for the integral
. These quadratures are linear combinations of the quadrature investigated in papers [1] - [3]
respectively. The error estimates are calculated in dependence of the parameters
,
,
and then in some natural restrictions on them these are investigated the quadrature formulas of the 8th order. The desired con- clusions are made by means of properties of Peano kernels using substantially well-known error formulas. We construct the only one quadrature formula of the eight order which belongs to the family
, the only one quadrature formula of the eight order too, which belongs to the family
and the only one quadrature for- mula of the eight order too, which belongs to the family
. Because of the Peano kernels for these qua- dratures have different signs, for functions whose 8th derivative is either always positive or always negative we use these quadrature formulas to get good bounds on
. So, by suitable choice of parameters one can increase quadrature order from two or four respectively to eight.
2. The Three-Parameters Family of Quadrature Formulas 
We consider family of quadrature formulas
given by
(1)
for integral
. This family generalizes the family
discussed in [1] , here it is enough to put
,
,
.
For arbitrary
,
,
the quadrature formula
is of the second order. The error
for the polynomials
is equal
![]()
![]()
![]()
If a triple
is a root of the polynomial
the range of quadrature
formula increases. These triples we can write in the form
with
![]()
where
. Then every
is of the fourth order, and moreover
![]()
![]()
![]()
If the pair
is a root of the polynomial
then the range of
quadrature increases as before. We can write these pairs in the form
where
![]()
for
.
Every quadrature
is of the six order but we must restrict the interval for
. The quadrature
nodes belongs to interval
only for
. Graphs of the functions
![]()
and
are presented on the Figure 1.
In this case we have
![]()
![]()
![]()
The six order Peano kernel
where
. This
kernel is a periodic function with period h and on every interval
is symmetrical respect to
its midpoint. So, it is enough to define it on the interval
:
(2)
The kernel
is negative for
and positive for
. After numerical calculation we conclude that
,
(see Figure 2).
The integral of the six order Peano kernel takes form
![]()
(see Figure 3).
From Peano theorem (see [5] ) the error
(3)
for any function
and
, where
. Moreover, using Peano theorem we can prove the following:
Theorem 1. If
,
, function
, and
has constant sign on interval
, then
(4)
if
is non-negative on interval
, and
(5)
if
is non-positive on interval
.
Proof. Assume that
. From the formula (3), because of
and
, we have
![]()
Similarly
![]()
because of
and
. □
The function
has one root
. Lets put
,
. The quadrature
formula
is of the eight order and
![]()
![]()
The eight order Peano kernel
where
. This kernel
is a periodic function with period h and on every interval
symmetrical with respect to its
midpoint. So us for
, it is enough to define it on the interval
:
(6)
(see Figure 4).
This kernel
is non-negative, moreover
![]()
From the Peano theorem (see [5] ) we obtain for any function
the expression on the error
(7)
where
.
3. The Three-Parameter Family of Quadrature Formulas ![]()
We consider the family of quadrature formulas of the form
(8)
where
![]()
,
,
is the trapezoidal rule, and
,
,
are para-
meters. Particular cases
and
are investigated in the paper [2] and
,
. We are proved that
and
with
![]()
![]()
where
and
(see Figure 5) are of the six order. If we define the error
we can compute for the polynomials ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
where
![]()
![]()
![]()
So, for every
the quadrature
is of the six order. Let
![]()
With
the range of quadrature formula increases. The quadrature
is of the eight order but the expression
takes a very complicated form.
The eight order Peano kernel
where
. This kernel
is a symmetrical function respect to the point
, so it is enough to define it on the interval
:
(9)
where
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
and
. On the Figure 6 we have graphs of the kernels
for
. For any n the kernel
is non-positive, moreover the integral
![]()
in the case
and
![]()
Figure 6. Graphs of the kernels
for n = 4, 5, 6.
![]()
if
. From the Peano theorem (see [5] ) we obtain for any function
the expression on the error
(10)
where
and
for all n.
A Complex Quadrature Formula ![]()
Let
, the step
and the nodes
. The integral
can be written in the form
, where
. To each integral
we apply the quadrature (8):
(11)
where now
,
,
,
. Next we define
(12)
Obviously
. For every
, the quadrature formula
is of the six order and
is of the eight order. The Peano kernel for the quadrature formula
is a periodic function with period k and on every interval
is symmetrical with respect to its midpoint. The quadrature formula (12) has
nodes.
Because of Peano kernels for quadrature formulas
, ![]()
have different signs, we have the following theorem.
Theorem 2. If function
, and the derivative
has constant sign on interval
, then
(13)
if
is non-negative on the interval
, and
(14)
if
is non-positive on the interval
.
Proof. Assume that
. From the formula (7) we have
![]()
because of
and
. Similarly from the formula (10):
![]()
because of
and
. □
4. The Three-Parameter Family of Quadrature Formulas ![]()
We consider the family of quadrature formulas of the form
(15)
where
![]()
,
,
is the midpoint rule, and
,
,
are parameters. Parti-
cular cases
and
are investigated in the paper [3] and
,
. We are proved that
and
with
![]()
![]()
where
![]()
are of the six order. If we define the error
we can compute for the polynomials ![]()
![]()
![]()
where
![]()
![]()
![]()
So, for every
the quadrature
is of the six order. Let
![]()
(see Figure 7).
With
the range of quadrature formula increases. The quadrature
is of the eight order but the expression
takes a very complicated form.
The eight order Peano kernel
where
. This kernel is a symmetrical function respect to the point
, so it is enough to define it on the interval
:
(16)
where
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
and
. On the Figure 8 we have graphs of the kernels
for
. For any n the kernel
is non-negative, moreover the integral
(17)
where
![]()
Figure 8. Graphs of the kernels
for n = 4, 5, 6.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
and
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
From the Peano theorem (see [5] ) we obtain for any function
the expression on the error
(18)
where
and
for all n.
Theorem 3. If function
, and the derivative
has constant sign on interval
, then
(19)
if
is non-negative on the interval
, and
(20)
if
is non-positive on the interval
.
Proof. Assume that
. From the formulas (10) and (18):
![]()
because of
and
and
![]()
because of
and
. □
5. Series Estimation
The sum of a series
(21)
can be approximated by a finite sum
. The error of this estimation can be represented as the sum of the series ![]()
Therefore, if we have a method of estimating the sum of an infinite series, then this method will enable us to estimate the error of the N-term approximation. One way to estimate the sum of the series is to take into conside- ration the fact that a series can be viewed as an integral over an infinite domain
(22)
for some function
for which
for all n. Therefore, if for a given series, we know
an explicitly integrable function
with this property, then we can take the value
of the integral as an estimate for s.
Theorem 4. We assume that the function f is such that
1) f is either positive and decreasing, or negative and increasing.
2)
is convergent.
3)
.
4)
is either positive or negative on
.
5)
.
6)
.
Under this assumptions, if
then
(23)
where
![]()
![]()
If
, then we get a similar inequality, but with the right-hand side instead of the left-hand side, and vice versa.
Proof. First, from the inequalities (19) we have:
![]()
We can rewrite this inequality in an equivalent form:
(24)
In this inequality we put:
,
,
,
so
![]()
![]()
Because of
![]()
than passing with n to
in the inequality (24) we obtain
![]()
We complete the first part of the proof by adding the term
to the both sides of this inequality.
Let
. From the inequalities (19) we have:
![]()
We rewrite this inequality in an equivalent form:
![]()
and put:
,
,
,
. Passing with
to
we obtain
(25)
because of
![]()
We complete the proof by adding the term
to the both sides of the inequality (25). □
Acknowledgements
We thank the editor and the referee for their comments.