Effect of Summer Supplementary Feeding on Cattle Performance in Low Rainfall Grassland Savanna, South Darfur, Sudan ()
1. Introduction
Most of the tropical pasture grassland is infertile and large portions occur in dry/arid areas, where there are li- mited options for improving pasture and animal nutrition [1] . Native pastures are usually dominated by course grasses, that are only palatable and nutritious when young, and native legumes are scarce. Animal weight gains are usually high in the early wet season when grasses are young, but in early dry season when pasture growth stops and quality declines, animal loss weight [2] .
Properly managed grassland in tropical zones has the potential to improve forage quality and increase her- bage yields several-folds over that of naturalized grazing lands. The most important factors in cattle feed- ing are the quality of energy-supplying constituents, total digestible nutrients and total digestible proteins [3] .
A 400 Kg animal requires about 0.4 Kg of total protein daily, for maintenance. In addition to maintenance requirements, 0.5 Kg of protein is needed per Kg of live weight gain. The percentage protein required in the feed of the most cattle can be provided by herbage of improved pastures during the favorable season of plant growth [4] .
It is useful to quantify the extends to which cattle are affected by either nutrition, disease or other environ- mental factors, especially when large fluctuations in the quantity and quality of available forage occur, as they do in seasonally dry tropical and sub-tropical areas. Weight per se does not reflect an animal’s condition: an animal with a large frame may have a higher body weight when at a low level of body reserves [5] than another animal with a smaller frame but abundant reserves.
For monitoring of individual animal seasonal weight changes, usually the measuring of changes in weight or heart girth techniques is used, especially in areas where it is difficult to establish a scale weighing balance [6] . Condition scoring provides a quick, cheap and easy method of comparing herds of cattle or individual animals under different management systems, experimental treatments, seasons or environment [7] . A highly positive correlation existed in condition score among animals of the same age, sex, live weight and carcass weight [8] . In the law rainfall grassland savanna of western Sudan, a drastic drop in grass quality especially during the dry season usually resulted in the body weight lost and thus animal emaciation, thus against this fact, this study was formulated to draw the effect supplementary feeding on cattle performance raised on dry summer grassland feeding in south Darfur.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Site of Study
The experiment was conducted at Ghazal Gawazat Range and Animal Production Research Station in the belt of Western Sudan, South Darfur (Latitude 11˚28'N; Longitude 25˚57'E at an altitude of 485 m above sea level). The year is divided into three seasons: summer (March to June), autumn (July to October) and winter (Novem- ber to February).
2.2. Experimental Animals
Forty-five (45) cross-bred Baggara cattle (zebu type) herd consisting of bulls, heifers, dry and milking cows and early weaned calves of various age were used in this experiment. The animals were born and raised at the re- search station, with a good health condition. They were randomly grouped into four dry summer supplementary feeding systems: Groundnut haulm (G1), Stover (G2), Groundnut cake (G3) and controlled group (G4) with no supplementary feeding allowance. These supplements were offered in one evening meal at a rate of 1.5 Kg/head/ day, 2.0 Kg/head/day and 1.0 Kg/head/day for G1, G2 and G3 respectively.
They were divided into four (4) experimental groups each of eleven (11) to twelve (12) animals. Each group according to sex consists of male (M) and female (F) animals of different age-grouops. According to age, the animals were grouped as Zero (0) for mature animals (2.5 - 5 years), One (1) as suckling calf, Two (2) as wean- ers, Three (3) as yearlings and Four (4) as 1 - 2.5 years age groups.
Each group was introduced to a grazing paddock from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm for daily grazing. Each group re- mained in the corresponding paddock for four months. The grazing was started on the first of March 2004 and completed in June 2005. The total grazing period was 16 months (64 weeks), starting with an adaptation period that lasted for two weeks.
Heart girth, body weight and height were monthly measured with the hand using scaled measuring tape. Monthly measurements and condition scores were carried according to the method described by [5] were recorded.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
The experimental data analysis were performed using SPSS software [9] and the effects of supplementary feed- ing (summer, autumn and winter) on body performance were subjected to Two-ways Analysis of Variance, and the treatment means were tested for significance [10] .
3. Results
The effect of supplementary feeding and type of sex is on body weight (Table 1). The final live body weight and weight changes (Kg per month) was significantly (P < 0.05) different between the treatments. Group (1) supple- mented with groundnut cake obtained the best final live body weight (170.48 Kg) then group (2) supplemented with groundnut haulms, (G3) Stover and (G4) natural grazing, obtained a final live body weights of 159.75, 156.83 and 150.42 Kilograms respectively.
Also live body (changes/Kg/month) for groundnut cake (38.18 Kg) was significantly (P < 0.05) better than groundnut haulms (24.08 Kg), Stover (20.25 Kg) and natural grazing (19.17 Kg). Females were significantly (P < 0.05) performed better than males in final and body weight changes. Also the results revealed that there was an interaction of feeding systems and type of sex in final body weight (Table 1).
The results showed that, there was a significant difference (P < 0.05) in body length, height, leg length and dewlap length between the four treatments. G3 treated with groundnut cake and G4 which was kept under natu- ral grazing performance was better far in these parameters than G1 and G2 supplemented with groundnut haulm and Stover respectively (Table 2). On the other hand, heart girth, neck length and condition score showed no significance differences among the four groups of supplements, but the treatment effect was significantly dif- ferent (P < 0.05) in type of sex. Female animals showed a better performance in the performance traits under investigation, that is, treatment sex interaction (Table 2).
Also the results showed a significant differences P (<0.001) in all the trait performance under study between type of sex and age groups. Females significantly reported better body measurements in terms of heart girth
![]()
Table 1. Effect of supplementary feeding and type of sex on body weight changes.
a, b, c and d = Values on the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05). SEM = Standard Error. NG = Natural Grazing. GNC = Ground Nut Cake. LSD = Least Significant. NS = Not Significant Difference. * = Significant at (P < 0.05). G1 = Groundnut Haulm, G2 = Stover, G3 = Groundnut Cake, G4 = Natural Grazing.
(115.51 cm), body length (92.82 cm) and height (111.51 cm) than males which reported a heart girth of (111.16 cm), a body length of (85.01 cm) and a height of 105.88 cm (Table 3). On the other hand, age groups with re-
![]()
Table 2. Body traits performance on type of sex.
G1 = Groundnut Hulls; G2 = Stover; G3 = Ground Nut Cake; G4 = Natural Grazing. a, b, c, d, and e = Values with different superscripts are significantly dif- ferent; Values with similar superscripts are not significantly different. * = significant at (P < 0. 05); ** = significant at (P < 0. 01); *** = significant at (P < 0. 001).
![]()
Table 3. Body traits performance of type of sex and age group effect.
a, b, and c = Values on the same row with different superscripts differ significantly. NS = Not Significant; LSD = Least Significant Difference. * = significant at (P < 0. 05); ** = significant at (P < 0. 01); *** = significant at (P < 0. 001).
spect to the parameters under study showed a highly significant difference (P < 0.001) among the age group’s types. Mature animals had better heart girth (121.89 cm) than yearlings (116.02 cm), 1 - 2.5 yr (115.72 cm) and weaner’s age groups (108.05 cm). Also as revealed by results sex-age group interaction with regards to the trait performance measurements, showed no significant differences in all possible types of interactions (Table 3).
Body weight changes with respect to age groups showed highly significant differences (P < 0.05) in initial and final body weights (Table 3). Mature animals showed better initial live body weight (148.71 Kg), than other age groups. Also this implies for final live body weight and body weight changes (Kg per month) among the age groups. There was no interaction between the feeding system and age groups interaction.
Both feeding systems and seasonal changes showed a significant (P < 0.05) better performance in average live body weight, heart girth, height, and body length (Table 4) which reveals that supplementary feeding effect was significantly related to the body traits performance. In wet summer and in winter live body weights (174.56 and 174.20 Kg respectively), heart girth (117.76 and 117.50 cm) and condition score (1.75 and 1.56) for G3 supple- mented with groundnut cake was much better than dry summer performance in these parameters (Table 4).
4. Discussion
In the tropics and sub-tropics, stock keeping largely depends on the herbage yield of grazing lands, which is di- rectly affected by the amount of the rainfall [11] . Intensive and continuous stocking reduced regrowth potentials and encourages inferior and less acceptable grasses in terms of quality. During dry season animals are allowed to spread out, scavenging for the sparse low quality grasses. Thus a marked loss in live weight changes, emacia- tion and as such loss in animal score condition occurs [12] [13] . In the present study, despite the fact that the animals were assigned to the same range vegetation type on dry summer, wet and winter grazing, the animals exhibited seasonal variations in their live body weight, heart girth and condition score, this could probably being
![]()
Table 4. Dry summer supplementary feeding and seasonal effects on body traits performance of Baggara cattle.
a, b, and c = values on the same row with different superscripts differ significantly. *(P < 0.05); NS = Not Significant; LSD = Least Significant Difference; SEM = Stander Error. G1 = Groundnut Haulm; G2 = Stover; G3 = Groundnut Cake; G4 = Natural Grazing.
attributed to the fact that groundnut cake has a higher percentages of protein (35.5%) when compared to ground- nut haulms (8.1%), Stover (4.2%) and range grasses (4.9%), as reported by [14] . This is in line with [15] who reported an increase in body live weight of beef cattle as dry summer supplementation of leguminous grasses. On the other hand, those groups of animals supplemented with Stover, are more or less equal in average weights to natural grazing group with no supplementation.
The body traits measurements, heart girth, height, and condition score were not significantly affected by sea- sonal changes or feeding system. This is likely to be due to the fact that, the experimental animals are not uni- form in age-groups. In the groundnut cake supplemented groups perform better than other groups in body length and height. This agrees with [16] that the intake of tropical grass may decline remarked ably when crude protein percentage goes below 6%. This leads to sub-optimum level of nitrogen for the rumen flora, which requires an increase in the amount of feed ingested for improvement of animal performance when grazing such forages to maintain better performance [17] .
The season affected the average live body weight, heart girth, and condition score examined in this study. However the magnititude of those seasonal effects were attributed to nutritional status of grassland. In wet summer, the average body weight, heart girth, and condition score, showed the best performance than in the cool winter season, which comes next, then dry summer with its supplementary feeding effects in terms of body weight gain improvement. This due to the fact that during the rainy season, the range vegetation is well estab- lished and the protein content is significantly high when compared with other two seasons. In winter, the fiber content of the range species progressively increases and the protein content reduces towards the drier season. That is, why there is a progressive loss in body weight and condition score towards the dry season in summer. Thus the performance in average body weight, heart girth and condition score during the wet summer progres- sively increase as a compensatory growth, with a slight decline in weight and condition score towards the cool season as pasture value decline. This finding goes with view that when the dry season begins the animal expe- riences a period weight loss, before the onset of the next favorable season i.e. autumn [18] . This is agrees with the finding of [2] and [19] who found that, animal weight gains are usually higher in the wet season when grasses are young, but in the dry season, when pasture growth stops and quality declines, animal weights also decline.
5. Conclusion
It can be concluded that, the dry summer supplementary feeding is only able to raise up the cattle performance to their performance during winter season, that is, in terms of average weight obtained, weight change, heart girth and condition score. The supplemented groups during summer developed a high compensatory growth rate during wet summer, as average weight, and body condition tends to increase when pasture is green, and show a decline trends by the onset of summer when grasses value reduces.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a grant-in-aid from University of Juba and the Former Directorate of Animal Re- sources Research Cooperation, Khartoum, Sudan.
NOTES
*Corresponding author.