Differences in Survival Rates between Different Patterns of Unstable Pertrochanteric Femoral Fractures

Amir Herman, Yair Landau, Alexander Hazanov, Tal Segev, Ran Thein, Nachshon Shazar

Department of Anesthesiology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer Israel.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel;.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Medical Leadership Program, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel;.
Department of Vascular Surgery, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel..

DOI: 10.4236/ojo.2013.36049                

Abstract

Background: Unstable pertrochanter femur fractures are common in orthopedic practice. They pose a surgical challenge in both reduction and fixation. The fixation devices used are based on hip intramedullary nailing with femur head lag screw or blade. The aim of this paper is to compare different types of unstable pertrochanter fractures. Materials & Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 386 unstable pertrochanter femur fractures surgically treated in our hospital from 2000 to 2009. These included 62 (16.1%) unstable pertrochanter fractures with fractured lesser trochanter (31.A2-2, 31.A2-3); 63 (16.3%) reverse oblique fractures (31.A3-1), 51 (13.2%) transverse fractures (31.A3-2), 145 (37.6%) comminuted fractures (31.A3-3) and 65 (16.8%) subtrochanter fractures. We compared survival rates between fracture types. The clinical characteristics, surgery immediate outcome (e.g., tip apex distance, reduction quality), and long term results, i.e., complications were also compared between fracture types. Results: Survival analysis showed that the fracture types can be grouped into low and high risk fracture types. The former group included, reverse oblique and comminuted fractures. Lesser trochanter, transverse and subtrochanter fractures were included in the high risk group. The survival estimates for five years were 64.6% and 49.3% for the low and high risk fracture types, respectively (p value = 0.008). Multivariate survival analysis showed that the hazard ratio for the high risk fracture group was 1.9 (95% CI = 1.37-2.67). No differences were found between unstable pertrochanter femur fractures with regards to clinical and epidemiology characteristics. Optimal tip apex distance (TAD) of less than 25 mm was found in 66.7%, 57.1% and 66.7% of lesser trochanter, reverse oblique and sutrochanter fractures, respectively. TAD of less than 25 mm was found in 81.2% of both transverse and comminuted fractures (p value = 0.032). No statistically significant differ-ence was found between fracture types, in regards to complication or revision rates. Conclusions: Survival rates were higher in patients suffering from reverse oblique or comminuted pertrochanteric fractures. No differences were found between fracture types, in regards to clinical and other outcome parameters.

Keywords

Intertrochanteric Fractures; Survival; Fracture Classification

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	S. Cummings, S. M. Rubin and D. Black, “The Future of Hip Fractures in the United States: Numbers, Costs, and Potential Effects of Postmenopausal Estrogen,” Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research, Vol. 252, 1990, pp. 163-166.
[2]	K. Koval, G. B. Aharonoff, A. S. Rokito, T. Lyon and J. D. Zuckerman, “Patients with Femoral Neck and Intertrochanteric Fractures: Are They the Same? Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research, Vol. 330, 1996, pp. 166-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199609000-00020
[3]	Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium, “Orthopaedic Trauma Association Classification, Database and Outcomes Committee,” Journal of Orthopedic Trauma, Vol. 20, No. 10 (S1), 2007, pp. 31-42.
[4]	D. Lindskog and M. R. Baumgaertner, “Unstable Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures in the Elderly,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2004, pp. 189-190.
[5]	M. Parker and H. H. Handoll, “Gamma and Other Cephalocondylic Intramedullary Nails versus Extramedullary Implants for Extracapsular Hip Fractures in Adults,” Cochrane Database Systematic Review, Vol. 3, 2008, p. CD93.
[6]	C. Sadowski, A. Lübbeke, M. Saudan, N. Riand, R. Stern and P. Hoffmeyer, “Treatment of Reverse Oblique and Transverse Intertrochanteric Fractures with Use of an Intramedullary Nail or a 95° Screw-Plate: A Prospective, Randomized Study,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am), Vol. 84, No. 3, 2002, pp. 372-381.
[7]	S. Bridle, A. D. Patel, M. Bircher and P. T. Calvert, “Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Femur, a Randomized Prospective Comparison of the Gamma Nail and the Dynamic Hip Screw,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Br), Vol. 73-B, No. 2, 1991, pp. 330-334.
[8]	B. Giraud, E. Dehoux, N. Jovenin, K. Madi, A. Harisboure, G. Usandizaga, et al., “Pertrochanteric Fractures: A Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Dynamic Screw Plate and Intramedullary fixation,” Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Reparatrice de l’Appareil Moteur, Vol. 91, No. 8, 2005, pp. 732-736. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0035-1040(05)84484-8
[9]	D. Hardy, P. Y. Descamps, P. Krallis, L. Fabeck, P. Smets, C. L. Bertens and P. E. Delince, “Use of an Intramedullary Hip-Screw Compared with a Compression HipScrew with a Plate for Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures: A Prospective, Randomized Study of One Hundred Patients,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am), Vol. 80, No. 5, 1998, pp. 618-630.
[10]	K. Leung, W. S. So, W. Y. Shen and P. W. Hui, “Gamma Nails and Dynamic Hip Screws for Peritrochanteric Fractures: A Randomized Prospective Study in Elderly Patients,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am), Vol. 74-B, No. 3, 1992, pp. 345-351.
[11]	J. Madsen, L. Nass, A. K. Aune, A. Alho, A. Ekeland and K. Stromsoe, “Dynamic Hip Screw with Trochanteric Stabilizing Plate in the Treatment of Unstable Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Comparative Study with the Gamma Nail and Compression Hip Screw,” Journal of Orthopedic Trauma, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1998, pp. 241-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199805000-00005
[12]	C. Mainds and R. J. Newman, “Implant Failures in Patients with Proximal Fractures of the Femur Treated with a Sliding Screw Device,” Injury, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1989, pp. 98-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(89)90151-4
[13]	E. Osnes, C. M. Lofthus, J A. Falch, et al., “More PostOperative Femoral Fractures with the Gamma Nail than the Sliding Screw Plate in the Treatment of Trochanteric Fractures,” Acta Orthopedica Scandinavica, Vol. 72, No. 3, 2001, pp. 252-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00016470152846574
[14]	J. Pajarinen, J. Lindahl, O. Michelsson, V. Savolainen and E. Hirvensalo, “Pertrochanteric Femoral Fractures Treated with a Dynamic Hip Screw or a Proximal Femoral Nail; a Randomised Study Comparing Postoperative Rehabilitation,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Br), Vol. 87, No. 1, 2005, pp. 76-81.
[15]	S. Papasimos, C. M. Koutsojannis, A. Panagopoulos, P. Megas and E. Lambiris, “A Randomised Comparison of AMBI, TGN and PFN for Treatment of Unstable Trochanteric Fractures,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Vol. 125, No. 7, 2005, pp. 462-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-005-0021-5
[16]	P. Radford, M. Needoff and J. K. Webb, “A Prospective Randomized Comparison of the Dynamic Hip Screw and the Gamma Locking Nail,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Br), Vol. 75-B, No. 5, 1993, pp. 789-793.
[17]	C. Rogmark, L. Flensburg and H. Fredin, “Undisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures—No Problems? A Consecutive Study of 224 Patients Treated with Internal Fixation,” Injury, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2009, pp. 274-276.
[18]	M. Saudan, A. Lubbeke, C. Sadowski, N. Riand, R. Stern and P. Hoffmeyer, “Pertrochanteric Fractures: Is There an Advantage to an Intramedullary Nail? A Randomized, Prospective Study of 206 Patients Comparing the Dynamic Hip Screw and Proximal Femoral Nail,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vol. 16, No. 6, 2002, pp. 386-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200207000-00004
[19]	I. Schipper, E. W. Steyerberg, R. M. Castelein, F. H. W. M. van der Heijden, P. T. den Hoed, A. J. H. Kerver and A. B. van Vugt, “Treatment of Unstable Trochanteric Fractures: Randomised Comparison of the Gamma Nail and the Proximal Femural Nail,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Br), Vol. 86-B, No. 1, 2004, pp. 86-94.
[20]	R. Simmermacher, A. M. Bosch and C. H. Van der Werken, “The AO/ASIF-Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN): A New Device for the Treatment of Unstable Proximal Femur Fractures,” Injury, Vol. 30, No. 5, 1990, pp. 327-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(99)00091-1
[21]	D. Lundy, “Subtrochanteric Femoral Fractures,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Vol. 15, No. 11, 2007, pp. 663-671.
[22]	A. L. F. Afsari, E. Lindvall, A. Infante, H. C. Sagi and G. J. Haidukewych, “Clamp-Assisted Reduction of High Subtrochanteric Fractures of the Femur,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am), Vol. 92, No. S1 (Part 2), 2009, pp. 1913-1918. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.01563
[23]	M. Baumgaertner, S. L. Curtin, D. M. Lindskog and J. M. Keggi, “The Value of the Tip-Apex Distance in Predicting Failure of Fixation of Peritrochanteric Fractures of the Hip,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am), Vol. 77, No. 7, 1995, pp. 1058-1064.
[24]	M. Forte, B. A Virnig, M. F. Swiontkowski, M. Bhandari, R. Feldman, L. E. Eberly and R. L. Kane, “Ninety-Day Mortality after Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture: Provider Volume Matter?” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am), Vol. 92, No. 4, 2010, pp. 799-806. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.01204
[25]	D. J. Donegan, A. N. Gay, K. Baldwin, E. E. Morales, J. L. Esterhai and S. Mehta, “Use of Medical Comorbidities to Predict Complications after Hip Fracture Surgery in the Elderly,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am), Vol. 92, No. 4, 2010, pp. 807-813. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.00571
[26]	T. Barton, R. Gleeson, C. Topliss, R. Greenwood, W. J. Harries and T. J. S. Chesser, “A Comparison of the Long Gamma Nail with the Sliding Hip Screw for the Treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2 Fractures of the Proximal Part of the Femur: A Prospective Randomized Trial,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am), Vol. 92, No. 4, 2010, pp. 792-798. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.00508
[27]	T. Davis, J. L. Sher, A. Horsman, M. Simpson, B. B. Porter and R. G. Checketts, “Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures—Mechanical Failure after Intrenal Fixation,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Br), Vol. 72-B, No. 1, 1990, pp. 26-31.
[28]	S. Larsson, S. Friberg and L. Hansson, “Trochanteric Fractures, Influence of Reduction and Implant Position on Impaction and Complications,” Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research, Vol. 259, 1990, pp. 130-139.
[29]	M. Güvena, U. Yavuzb, B. Kadiogluc, B. Akmand, V. Kilincoglue, K. ünayc and F. Altintas, “Importance of Screw Position in Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures Treated by Dynamic Hip Screw,” Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, Vol. 96, No. 1, 2010, pp. 21-27.