Survival Probability of the Quantum Walk with Phase Parameters on the Two-Dimensional Trapped Lattice ()

Clement Ampadu, Meltem Gönülol, Ekrem Aydıner

?stanbul University Theoretical Physics Group, Department of Physics, ?stanbul University, ?stanbul, Turkey.

31 Carrolton Road, Boston, MA, USA.

**DOI: **10.4236/jqis.2013.32010
PDF
HTML XML
3,334
Downloads
5,983
Views
Citations

?stanbul University Theoretical Physics Group, Department of Physics, ?stanbul University, ?stanbul, Turkey.

31 Carrolton Road, Boston, MA, USA.

We investigate the time dependence of the survival probability of quantum
walks governed by Fibonacci walks with phase parameters on the trapped
two-dimensional lattice. We have shown that the survival probability of the
quantum walk decays with time obey to the stretched exponential law for all
initial states of walkers. We have also shown that stretched exponential decay
parameter *β* can be arranged by phase parameter combination. Obtained numerical results
show that phase parameters can be used as a control parameter to determine the
decay rate of the survival probability of the quantum walk.

Keywords

Share and Cite:

Ampadu, C. , Gönülol, M. and Aydıner, E. (2013) Survival Probability of the Quantum Walk with Phase Parameters on the Two-Dimensional Trapped Lattice. *Journal of Quantum Information Science*, **3**, 51-56. doi: 10.4236/jqis.2013.32010.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the quantum walk on the trapped lattice has been intensively investigated due to importance applications in quantum information and computing. Therefore, many theoretical and experimental studies have been carried out to understand the effect of the trapping states on the quantum walk. For example, Agliari [1] considered a continuous-time quantum walk propagating on Erdos-Renyi random graphs in the presence of a random distribution of traps, and showed that the survival probability exhibits an exponential character which fluctuates depending on the trap concentration. Zahringer et al. [2] implemented a quantum walk using trapped ions. They used an experimental technique to determine the probability distribution along a line in phase space. It is shown that instabilities in the trapping frequency leads to decoherence and by change in the coupling strength due to high phonon numbers. Schimitz et al. [3] implemented the proof of principle for the quantum walk of one ion in a linear ion trap. It is shown that quantum interference enforces asymmetric, nonclassical distributions in the highly entangled degrees of freedom (of coin and position states). Xue et al. [4] implemented a multi-step quantum walk for a single trapped ion with interpolation between quantum and random walk by randomizing the generalized Hadamard coin flip phase. It is shown that the distribution of the walker spreads over unbounded position space rather than being folded back on itself. Agliari et al. [5] studied the continuous time quantum walk focusing on trapping processes on a ring and show that when the traps are arranged periodically the survival probability decays asymptotically, when the traps are arranged to form a cluster the survival probability decays exponentially, on the other hand for randomly distributed traps the survival probability decays algebraically. Eckert et al. [6] implemented the quantum walk with a neutral atom trapped in a ground state of optical potentials by using the concept of spatially delocalized quibits, that is, a coin defined through the presence of the atom in one out of two trapping potentials. It is shown that the shaking of the trap position on the quantum walk leads to a flat distribution in the transition from quantum to classical in the intermediate. Wojcik et al. [7] studied changing a phase at a single point in a discrete quantum walk. For certain values of this phase change and the internal coin-state of the walker it is shown the distribution exhibits the localization phenomenon. Altmann et al. [8] studied chaotic scattering, it is shown that noise enhances the trapping of trajectories in scattering systems. In particular, they show that weak noise leads to a slower decay of the survival probability. Karksi et al. [9] implemented a quantum walk on the line with single neutral atoms by deterministically delocalizing them over the sites of a one-dimensional spin-dependent optical lattice. For symmetric and asymmetric quantum walks, it is shown that the distribution is double peaked with large amplitude close to the edges of the distribution. Xu [10] studied coherent exciton dynamics modeled by continuous-time quantum walks on long-time range interacting cycles in which the distribution is shown to display a power law. Muelken et al. [11] in their quest for signatures of coherent transport studied exciton trapping in the continuous-time quantum walk, and show that the survival probability displays different decay domains. Finally, Gonulol et al. [12,13] shown that the time dependence of the survival probability of quantum walkers has a piecewise stretched exponential character depending on the density of traps.

It can be seen from the brief review that, in these studies, the focus is on how the traps affect the distribution of the survival probability of the usual quantum walk governed by Hadamard, Grover or Fourier coin operators. Recently, the quantum walk with phase parameters has been considered by a number of authors, see [14] for example. In this study, they proposed a different coin operator with parameters that alters the phase of the states of the walk on the line, and they show that the parameters in the coin operators affects the resulting probability distribution of quantum walk. The variance and shape of the probability distribution of states of the quantum walk depending on the phase parameters may be valuable results in point of view of the theory of quantum computation. Therefore in this paper we will study the survival probability of quantum walk with phase parameters on the two dimensional trapped lattice. To this end, we consider usual quantum walk with a special parametrization of the Fibonacci coin operator [15] and define the coin operator as where is a two-dimensional generalizetion of the Fibonacci operator of and is the diagonal phase adjustment. We show that the survival probability of the quantum walk with phase parameters on the trapped two dimensional lattice decays with time as the stretched exponentially for different initial states of walkers. We have also shown that stretched exponential decay parameter β of the walk can be arranged by phase parameter combination.

This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we define the quantum walk on the square lattice with phase parameters. We also present in this section the time evolution for a single-particle walk as well as multi-particle walk in which the particles are distinguishable. In Section 3, we derive the survival probability using the exact numeration method of [18]. To account for randomization, we also calculate the mean survival probability in this section. In Section 4 the numerical analysis of the survival probability to determine how the traps affect its distribution is given. Section 5 is devoted to the conclusions.

2. The Quantum Walk with Phase Parameters on the Square Lattice

We consider the discrete-time quantum walk on the square lattice with boundary conditions. The coin space of a single walker is given by where corresponds to the chirality states left, right, up, and down respectively. In this paper we will put,

(1)

The position space is given by. The Hilbert space of the total system is given by. Recall that the evolution of the walk is given by, where is the shift operator, is the identity operator and is the coin operator governing the walk. In this paper we will take, where is a two-dimensional generalization of the Fibonacci operator and is the diagonal phase adjustment. In particular, diagonal phase adjustment can be defined as, where;

(2)

Denote the total number of sites on the lattice by, then the shift operator is given by,

(3)

We shall write the wave function of the walker at time as,

(4)

with. We define the state of the particle by,

(5)

where for represent probability amplitudes of the particle at site at time, depending on the chirality state of the particle. In terms of the initial state, the evolution of the walk is given by. The density operator of the quantum walk is given by. In terms of the density operator we can write the probability distribution of the walker at time as,

(6)

We should note that can be written as,

(7)

which is standard in papers on the quantum walk instead of the representation above involving the density operator.

On the other hand, single particle quantum walks can be easily generalized multi-particle quantum walks if the particles are assumed as uncorrelated, non-interacting and distinguishable. The multi-particle walk has been investigated by the author of the present paper [16,17]. The case where indistinguishability plays a role has also been considered. For simplicity in this study we consider walkers which are non-interacting distinguishable particles and they are initially uncorrelated. If we assume the particles are distinguishable and are initially uncorrelated the Hilbert space is given by

(8)

or

(9)

where is the Hilbert space of the walker for. The evolution of the -particle walk in which indistinguishability does not play a role is given by, where is the same for each walker. The initial state of the particles is written as

(10)

Alternatively, Equation (10) is given by a tensor product of the single walker initial states as

(11)

where for is the particle state with chirality, and position (recall we are assuming that there are sites on the square lattice). In terms of, the evolution of the walk is given by. Using the reduced density operator we can write the probability distribution of a single walker at time by

(12)

where. in Equation (12) represents the probability of a single walker at site at time when the walker starts from site at. The set is the set of transition probabilities from to of a single particle, which is the same interpretation given by Equation (6).

3. Survival Probability

In [18] the exact numeration method was used to calculate the survival probability in the classical random walk. This method was used by the authors in [12] to calculate the survival probability of quantum walkers on a Cayley graph of the cyclic group of size with absorbing trapped sites. In this section we adapt the exact numeration method to the square lattice to calculate the survival probability. We assume every untrapped site is occupied by a walker. At each step, the walkers perform a classical random walk on the square lattice, for which the probability of finding the particle at site is calculated with the sum of the corresponding probabilities at its nearest neighbor sites divided by four. The survival probability at time t is given by,

(13)

Here enumerates a particular independent initial configuration of the system. Note that or, where is the number of traps on the square lattice and is the trapping density. We take the lattice sites at. If site is a trapping site, we let, so that the summation above is not restricted to the untrapped sites. We also assume that the initial configurations on the walkers are such that the walkers occupy all the untrapped sites. To account for randomization we calculate the mean survival probability,

(14)

where denotes the number of different configurations. Recall we assumed the walkers are distinguishable and uncorrelated, so the evolution of the Mparticle walk is equivalent to a single-particle walk with an ensemble of initial configurations. So by quantum computation of the single-particle distribution, the classical survival probability is useful.

4. Numerical Analysis of the Survival Probability of M-Walkers with Phase Parameters

In this section we numerically analyze the dynamics of the survival probability in the two-dimensional multiparticle quantum walk with phase parameters. Firstly, we investigate the survival probability for three different initial states with fixed phase parameters. Initial chirality states of untrapped cites are chosen as in the first case, , in the second case sequentially and in the last case, randomly chosen either of or. We call them left, sequential and mixed initializations respectively. In numeric simulations, the number of sites on the square lattice is taken to be. To account for random distribution of traps, a statistical configurational average of the mean survival probability is calculated over different independent realizations of the initial system with different configurations. We should remark that the coin operator governing the walk is given by, where is a two-dimensional generalization of the Fibonacci operator and is the diagonal phase adjustment (see Section 2 for details).

Survival probability of QW are plotted in Figures 1(a)-(c) for left, sequential and mixed initializations and for different trap densities and with arbitrary fixed phase parameters. Figures are plotted in the double logarithmic scale. We see that the survival probability decreases in time and is less at higher trap densities. All different initializations show same behavior and the survival probability is seen to exhibit a linear dependence on time in the double logarithmic scale. When we fit the lines to the curves in the time regime, line fits obey the Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts stretched exponential function [19] which is given by,

(15)

where exponent determines the decay rate of the sur-

Figure 1. The time dependence of the survival probability in the QW for trap densities phase parameters with the initializations (a) left, (b) sequential, (c) mixed.

vival probability. Figure 1 shows that the survival probability of the Fibonacci walk with phase parameters evaluate with time as stretched exponential obey to Equation (1). As it can be seen form Figure 1, there’s no qualitatively different dynamical regime in decay of the survival probability of the quantum walk for long time regime. Whereas, in Ref. [12], authors have found that the time decay of the survival probability of the Hadamard walk in the trapped space has qualitatively different dynamical regime for different initial configuration of the walker states. They have explained the time crossover behavior in dynamical regime as transition from Rosenstock to the Donkser and Varadhan regime. In short time regime in Figure 1, the numerical error appears which may probably cause from insufficient statistical average due to lack of computational ability of our personal computer. If the time crossover was being in the survival probability it would be appear for example at the trap density. Indeed, the survival probability curves for all trap densities and different initial configurations systematically show the linear behavior in the double logarithmic scale for relatively long time regime. Furthermore, the numerical anomaly of the survival probability lines in the short time regime can be affected by the phase parameter. On the other hand, Figure 1 does not clearly give any information about depending of the decay parameters on phase parameters while it gives some information about depending of the exponent on the trap density. Therefore, in order to clarify the trap density dependence of the decay rate for different initializations and fixed phase parameters, is plotted versus the trap density in Figure 2. It can be seen from this figure that stretched exponential parameter of the survival probability of quantum walk depends on trap density. Indeed it exhibits almost a linear dependence on trap density for all different initializations and fixed phase parameters . Clearly increases with increasing trap density. Similar behavior for Hadamard walk on the one dimensional randomly trapped lattice has been observed in the Donkser and Varadhan regime in Ref. [12].

In order to further investigate and clarify the phase parameter dependence of the decay parameter we will consider different phase combination for quantum walk on the two dimensional randomly trapped lattice. However here we have considered only left initialization since it has been shown in Figures 1 and 2 that the stretched exponential parameter of survival probability almost linearly increases with increasing trap density for all initializations at fixed phase parameters. For four different combination of the parameter, the time dependence of the survival probability of quantum walk has been plotted in Figures 3(a)-(d) in the double logarithmic scale for several trap densities. For the trap den-

Figure 2. Dependence of the decay parameter on the trap density, for phase parameters

in the cases of the left, sequential and mixed initializations.

Figure 3. The time dependence of the survival probability in the QW for trap densities and phase parameters (a); (b); (c)

; (d).

sities and, we have chosen different phase parameter combinations in Figure 3(a) as, in Figure 3(b) as, in Figure 3(c) as and finally in Figure 3(d) as. As it can be seen from all subfigures of Figure 3, the time behavior of the survival probability of the Fibonacci walks with different phase combination on the trapped space obey to stretched exponential law. Furthermore, this figures also shows that time dependence of the survival probability of walks are affected by phase combinations. Indeed, it clearly seems that the survival probability curves in Figures 3(a) and (b) are quite different that of Figures 3(c) and (d). To see the phase parameter dependence of the stretched exponential parameter, we have plotted survival probability for the different phase combinations at fixed trap densities in Figure 4. As it can be seen that the slopes of the survival probability curves for the three different phase combination fixed density in Figure 4(a). For example, while the curves for the phase combinations and are almost coincident, they are quite different for the phase combinations and. Similar behavior for different phase combination at fixed trap density value appears in Figure 4(b). These numerical results demonstrate that the stretched exponential parameter of the survival probability of the quantum walks depends on the combination of the phase parameters.

In Figure 5 the phase parameter dependence of the is given for several combinations of the phase parameters which used in Figures 3 and 4. As it can be seen this

Figure 4. The time dependence of the survival probability in the QW for different phase parameters and fixed trap densities (a); (b)

Figure 5. The time dependence of the decay parameters on the trap density for different phase parameters.

figure that the decay parameter dramatically changes due to phase combination. For all different phase parameters the decay parameter almost linearly increases with increasing trap density.

These results show that the phase variables of the coin operator of walkers can be used as an control parameter to adjust the decay rate of the survival probability of the quantum walk on the trapped lattice for all initial states of walkers.

5. Conclusion

In this study, the coin operator was taken to be a parametrization of the usual quantum walk governed by a two-dimensional generalization of the Fibonacci operator and by adapting the exact numeration method of Havlin et al. [18] we have calculated the survival probability in a two-dimensional quantum walk with phase parameters on a trapped lattice. We have shown that the survival probability of the quantum walk decays with time obey to the stretched exponential law for all initial states of walkers. On the other hand we have shown that stretched exponential decay parameter can be arranged by phase parameter combination. Obtained numerical results provide that phase parameters can be used as an control parameter to determine the decay rate of the survival probability of the quantum walk.

6. Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the Istanbul University under Project No: 28432.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

[1] | E. Agliari, “Trapping of Continuous-Time Quantum Walks on Erdös-Rényi Graphs,” Physica A, Vol. 390, No. 11, 2011, pp. 1853-1860. |

[2] | F. Zahringer, G. Kirchmair, R. Gerritsma, E. Solano, R. Blatt and C. F. Roos, “Realization of a Quantum Walk with One and Two Trapped Ions,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 104, No. 10, 2010, Article ID: 100503. |

[3] | H. Schmitz, R. Matjeschk, Ch. Schneider, J. Glueckert, M. Enderlein, T. Huber and T. Schaetz, “Quantum Walk of a Trapped Ion in Phase Space,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 103, No. 9, 2009, Article ID: 090504. |

[4] | P. Xue, B. C. Sanders and D. Leibfried, “Quantum Walk on a Line for a Trapped Ion,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 103, No. 18, 2009, Article ID: 183602. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.183602 |

[5] | E. Agliari, O. Mülken and A. Blumen, “Continuous-Time Quantum Walks and Trapping,” International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2010, pp. 271279. |

[6] | K. Eckert, J. Mompart, G. Birkl and M. Lewenstein, “Oneand Two-Dimensional Quantum Walks in Arrays of Optical Traps,” Physical Review A, Vol. 72, No. 9, 2005, Article ID: 012327. |

[7] | A. Wojcik, T. Luczak, P. Kurzynski, A. Grudka, T. Gdala, and M. Bednarska-Bzdega, “Trapping a Particle of a Quantum Walk on the Line,” Physical Review A, Vol. 85, No. 1, 2012, Article ID: 012329. |

[8] | E. G. Altmann and A. Endler, “Noise-Enhanced Trapping in Chaotic Scattering,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 105, No. 24, 2010, Article ID: 244102. |

[9] | M. Karski, L. Förster, J. M. Choi, A. Steffen, W. Alt, D. Meschede and A. Widera, “Quantum Walk in Position Space with Single Optically Trapped Atoms,” Science, Vol. 325, No. 5937, 2009, pp. 174-177. |

[10] | X. Xu, “Coherent Exciton Transport and Trapping on Long-Range Interacting Cycles,” Physical Review E, Vol. 79, No. 1, 2009, Article ID: 011117. |

[11] | O. Mülken, A. Blumen, T. Amthor, C. Giese, M. ReetzLamour and M. Weidemueller, “Survival Probabilities in Coherent Exciton Transfer with Trapping,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 99, No. 9, 2007, Article ID: 090601. |

[12] | M. Gönülol, E. Aydiner, Y. Shikano and O. E. Müstecaplioglu, “Survival Probability in a One-Dimensional Quantum Walk on a Trapped Lattice,” New Journal of Physics, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2011, Article ID: 033037. |

[13] | M. Gönülol, E. Aydiner and O. E. Müstecaplioglu, “Decoherence in Two-Dimensional Quantum Random Walks with Traps,” Physical Review A, Vol. 80, No. 2, 2009, Article ID: 022336. |

[14] | M. Villagra, M. Nakanishi, S. Yamashita and Y. Nakashima, “Quantum Walks on the Line with Phase Parameters,” IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, Vol. E95-D, No. 3, 2012, pp. 722-730. |

[15] | C. Ampadu, “Limit Theorems for the Fibonacci Quantum Walk,” arXiv:1108.5198, 2011. |

[16] | C. Ampadu, “M-Particle Quantum Walks with DeltaInteraction,” arXiv: 1105.6076, 2011. |

[17] | C. Ampadu, “Localization of M-Particle Quantum Walks,” arXiv: 1106.5234, 2011. |

[18] | S. Havlin, G. H. Weiss, J. E. Kiefer and M. Dishon, “Exact Enumeration of Random Walks with Traps,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, Vol. 17, No. 6, 1984, p. L347. |

[19] | J. C. Phillips, “Stretched Exponential Relaxation in Molecular and Electronic Glasses,” Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 59, No. 9, 1996, p. 1133. |

Journals Menu

Contact us

+1 323-425-8868 | |

customer@scirp.org | |

+86 18163351462(WhatsApp) | |

1655362766 | |

Paper Publishing WeChat |

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.