Diversity Leadership: Influence of Ethnicity, Gender, and Minority Status

Jean Lau Chin

Adelphi University, New York, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/ojl.2013.21001                

Abstract

Leadership research is often silent about how race and ethnicity influence the exercise of leadership and does not include the experiences of racial/ethnic minority leaders. Leaders from five racial/ethnic groups within the US were surveyed on their endorsement of leadership dimensions as defined by the GLOBE studies and the influence of their race, ethnicity and gender on the exercise of leadership in this exploratory study. While all leaders endorsed common leadership dimensions, cultural variation emerged on a factor consistent with a humane orientation and collaborative leadership style. Leaders of color and women leaders strongly embraced their ethnic and gender identities compared with White male leaders. These social identities together with lived experiences associated with minority status were perceived as influencing their exercise of leadership, presenting both challenges and strengths. Differences in the leadership profile of this diverse leadership sample with the Anglo group in the GLOBE studies suggest the importance of examining diversity in leadership. Conceptualizations of leadership need to be inclusive of the social identities and lived experiences that leaders and followers both bring to the contexts of leadership.

Keywords

Diversity Leadership; Social Identities and Leadership; Minority Status and Leadership

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 801-823. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.003
[2]	Ayman, R., & Korabik, K. (2010). Leadership: Why gender and culture matter. American Psychologist, 65, 157-170. doi:10.1037/a0018806
[3]	Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
[4]	Chin, J. L. (2010). Introduction to the special issue on diversity and leadership. American Psychologist, 65, 150-156. doi:10.1037/a0018716
[5]	Chin, J. L., & Sanchez-Hucles, J. (2007). Diversity and leadership. American Psychologist, 62, 608-609. doi:10.1037/0003-066X62.6.608
[6]	Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[7]	Den Hartog, D. N., & Dickson, W. (2004). Leadership and culture. In A. T. J. Antonakis (Ed.), The nature of leadership (pp. 249-278). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[8]	Eagly, A. E. (2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradiction. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 1- 12. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00326.x
[9]	Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. I. (2007). Throught the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
[10]	Eagly, A. H., & Chin, J. L. (2010). Diversity and leadership in a changing world. American Psychologist, 65, 216-224. doi:10.1037/a0018957
[11]	Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
[12]	Eagly, A., Mahijani, M., & Konsky, B. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125- 145. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.125
[13]	Fassinger, R. E., Shullman, S. L., & Stevenson, M. R. (2010). Toward an affirmative lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender leadership paradigm. American Psychologist, 65, 201-215. doi:10.1037/a0018597
[14]	Fung, H. H., Ho, Y. W., Tam, K.-P., Tsai, J., & Zhang, X. (2011). Value moderate age differences in relationship orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 994-999. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.009
[15]	Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1994). Cross-cultural comparison of leadership prototypes. Leadership Quarterly, 5, 121-134. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(94)90024-8
[16]	Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2007). Asking the right questions about leadership: Discussion and conclusions. American Psychologist, 62, 43-48. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.62.1.43
[17]	Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[18]	House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[19]	Kao, H. S., Sinha, D., & Wilpert, B. (1999). Management and cultural values: The indigenization of organizations in Asia. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[20]	Lester, S. (1999). An introduction to phenomenological research. Stan Lester Developments, Taunton. http://www.sld.demon.co.uk/resmethy.pdf
[21]	Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1991). Leadership and information processing. London: Routledge.
[22]	Ospina, S., & Foldy, E. (2009). A critical review of race and ethnicity in the leadership literature: Surfacing context, power and the collective dimensions of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 876- 896. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.005
[23]	Pittinsky, T. L. (2010). A two-dimensional model of intergroup leadership: The case of national diversity. American Psychologist, 65, 194- 200. doi:10.1037/a0017329
[24]	Ragins, B., Townsend, B., & Mattis, M. (1998) Gender gap in the executive suite: CEOs and female executives report on breaking the glass ceiling. Academy of Management Executive, 12, 28-42.
[25]	Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
[26]	Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of Management, 15, 251-289. doi:10.1177/014920638901500207