[1]
|
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). An exploratory study of the knowledge base for science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 673-699.
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199709)34:7<673::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-J
|
[2]
|
Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
[3]
|
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 1-12.
doi:10.1023/A:1015171124982
|
[4]
|
Atkin, J., & Karplus, R. (1962). Discovery of invention? Science Teacher, 29, 45.
|
[5]
|
Baird, J. R., & Northfield, J. R. (1992). Learning from the PEEL experience. Melbourne: Monash University Printing.
|
[6]
|
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond, & G. Skyes (Eds.), Teaching as a learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
|
[7]
|
Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85, 536-553.
doi:10.1002/sce.1022
|
[8]
|
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5, 7-74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102
|
[9]
|
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded ed.). Washington DC: National Academies Press.
|
[10]
|
Briscoe, C. (1991). The dynamic interactions of beliefs, role metaphors, and teaching practices: A case study of teacher change. Science Education, 75, 185-199. doi:10.1002/sce.3730750204
|
[11]
|
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Scotter, P. V., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications (p. 49). Colorado: Colorado Springs.
|
[12]
|
Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. J. (2006). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools: Developing fundamental knowledge and skills for teaching (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Perrill Prentice Hall.
|
[13]
|
Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 815-843. doi:10.1002/tea.20171
|
[14]
|
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
|
[15]
|
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
|
[16]
|
Donovan, M. S., & Bransford, J. D. (2005). How students learn—Science in the classroom. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
|
[17]
|
Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
|
[18]
|
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. (1998). Learning in science: From behaviorism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B. J. Fraser, & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_1
|
[19]
|
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
|
[20]
|
Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expanding the 5E model: A proposed 7E model emphasizes “transfer of learning” and the importance of eliciting prior understanding. [Teacher Practitioner]. The Science Teacher, 70, 56-59.
|
[21]
|
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a National Sample of Teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915-945. doi:10.3102/00028312038004915
|
[22]
|
Guskey, T. R. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 84, 748-749.
|
[23]
|
Horizon Research (2002). Inside the classroom interview protocol. URL (last checked 2 January 2013).
http://www.horizon-research.com/insidetheclassroom/instruments/obs.php
|
[24]
|
Johnston, K. (1991). High school science teachers; conceptualisations of teaching and learning: Theory and practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 14, 65-78. doi:10.1080/0261976910140108
|
[25]
|
Karplus, R. (1977). Science teaching and the development of reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14, 169-175.
doi:10.1002/tea.3660140212
|
[26]
|
Kelly, G. J. (2007). Discourse in science classrooms. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
[27]
|
Llewellyn, D. (2005). Teaching high school science through inquiry: A case study approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: NSTA Press & Corwin Press.
|
[28]
|
Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
|
[29]
|
Luft, J., Bell, R. L., & Gess-Newsome, J. (2008). Science as inquiry in the secondary setting. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2008.00238.x
|
[30]
|
Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J. J., & Czerniak, C. M. (2000). Assessing teachers’ beliefs about their science teaching context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 275-292.
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200003)37:3<275::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-2
|
[31]
|
Marshall, J. C., Horton, B., Igo, B. L., & Switzer, D. M. (2009). K-12 science and mathematics teachers’ beliefs about and use of inquiry in the classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 575-596. doi:10.1007/s10763-007-9122-7
|
[32]
|
Marshall, J. C., Horton, B., & Smart, J. (2009). 4E × 2 instructional model: Uniting three learning constructs to improve praxis in science and mathematics classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 501-516. doi:10.1007/s10972-008-9114-7
|
[33]
|
Marshall, J. C., Horton, B., Smart, J., & Llewellyn, D. (2008). EQUIP: Electronic quality of inquiry protocol. URL (last checked 2 January 2013). http://www.clemson.edu/iim
|
[34]
|
Marshall, J. C., Smart, J., & Horton, R. M. (2010). The design and validation of EQUIP: An instrument to assess inquiry-based instruction. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 299-321. doi:10.1007/s10763-009-9174-y
|
[35]
|
Marshall, J. C., Smart, J., Lotter, C., & Sirbu, C. (2011). Comparative analysis of two inquiry observational protocols: Striving to better understand the quality of teacher facilitated inquiry-based instruction. School Science and Mathematics, 111, 306-315.
doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00091.x
|
[36]
|
Marzano, R. J. (2006). Classroom assessment and grading that work. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
|
[37]
|
Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
|
[38]
|
McDonald, S., Criswell, B., & Dreon, O. (2008). Inquiry in the chemistry classroom: Perplexity, model, testing, and synthesis. In J. Luft, R. L. Bell, & J. Gess-Newsome (Eds.), Science as inquiry in the secondary setting. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
|
[39]
|
Mellado, V. (1998). The classroom practice of preservice teachers and their conceptions of teaching and learning science. Science Education, 82, 197-214.
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199804)82:2<197::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-9
|
[40]
|
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case learning applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
|
[41]
|
Moje, E. B. (1995). Talking about science: An interpretation of the effects of teacher talk in a high school classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 349-371.
doi:10.1002/tea.3660320405
|
[42]
|
Morge, L. (2005). Teacher-pupil interaction: A study of hidden beliefs in conclusion phases. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 935-956. doi:10.1080/09500690500068600
|
[43]
|
Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
|
[44]
|
Moscovici, H., & Holdlund-Nelson, T. (1998). Shifting from activitymania to inquiry. Science and Children, 35, 14-17.
|
[45]
|
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (2006). Making a difference in quality teaching and student achievement. URL (last checked 23 October 2006). http://www.nbpts.org/resources/research
|
[46]
|
National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
|
[47]
|
National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
|
[48]
|
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578.
doi:10.3102/00346543066004543
|
[49]
|
Sawada, D., Piburn, M., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., Bloom, I., & Judson, E. (2000). Reformed teaching observation protocol (RTOP). Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.
|
[50]
|
Schmidt, W. H., McNight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (2002). A splintered vision: An investigation of US science and mathematics education. URL (last checked 2 January 2013).
http://lsc-net.terc.edu/do/conference_material/6783/show/use_set-oth_pres.html
|
[51]
|
Smylie, M. A., Allensworth, E., Greenberg, R. C., Harris, R., & Luppescu, S. (2001). Teacher professional development in Chicago: Supporting effective practice: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
|
[52]
|
Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 324-328.
|
[53]
|
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
|
[54]
|
Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 963-980.
doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<963::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-0
|
[55]
|
Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 137-158.
doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<137::AID-TEA1001>3.0.CO;2-U
|
[56]
|
Van Zee, E. H., Iwasyk, M., Kurose, A., Simpson, D., & Wild, J. (2001). Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 159-190.
doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<159::AID-TEA1002>3.0.CO;2-J
|
[57]
|
Vanosdall, R., Klentschy, M., Hedges, L. V., & Weisbaum, K. S. (2007). A randomized study of the effects of scaffolded guided-inquiry instruction on student achievement in science. Paper Presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April 2007, 31 p.
|
[58]
|
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 3-118. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2
|
[59]
|
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (Expanded 2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
|
[60]
|
Windschitl, M. (2008). What is inquiry? A framework for thinking about authentic scientific practice in the classroom. In J. Luft, R. L. Bell & J. Gess-Newsome (Eds.), Science as inquiry in the secondary setting. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
|
[61]
|
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
|