How Employees See Their Roles: The Effect of Interactional Justice and Gender
Naoki Ando, Satoshi Matsuda
DOI: 10.4236/jssm.2010.32035   PDF    HTML     7,873 Downloads   13,611 Views   Citations


This study examines whether the perceived boundary between in-role and extra-role behaviors varies depending on workplace conditions, emphasizing how interactional justice influences an employee’s role definitions. We collect data through a questionnaire survey and adopt Tobit regressions for hypothesis testing. The study results indicate that perceived interactional justice enlarges the breadth of an employee’s role definitions. In addition, the positive impact of interactional justice on an employee’s role definition is strong when a supervisor-subordinate dyad comprises different genders.

Share and Cite:

N. Ando and S. Matsuda, "How Employees See Their Roles: The Effect of Interactional Justice and Gender," Journal of Service Science and Management, Vol. 3 No. 2, 2010, pp. 281-286. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2010.32035.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] E. W. Morrison, “Role Definitions and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Importance of the Employee’s Perspective,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37, No. 6, 1994, pp. 1543-1567.
[2] D. A. Hofmann, F. P. Morgeson and S. J. Gerras, “Climate as a Moderator of the Relationship between Leader- member Exchange and Content Specific Citizenship: Safety Climate as an Exemplar,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88, No. 1, 2003, pp. 170-178.
[3] D. Kamdar, D. J. McAllister and D. B. Turban, “All in a Day’s Work: How Follower Individual Differences and Justice Perceptions Predict OCB Role Definitions and Behavior,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 91, No. 4, 2006, pp. 841-855.
[4] M. A. Vey and J. P. Campbell, “In-Role or Extra-Role Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Which Are we Measuring?” Human Performance, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2004, pp. 119-135.
[5] L. J. Williams and S. E. Anderson, “Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviors,” Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1991, pp. 601-617.
[6] J. A. M. Coyle-Shapiro, I. Kessler and J. Purcell, “Exploring Organizationally Directed Citizenship Behavior: Reciprocity or ‘It’s my Job?” Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2004, pp. 85-106.
[7] L. Van Dyne and J. A. LePine, “Helping and Voice Extra-Role Behaviors: Evidence of Construct and Predictive Validity,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 41, No. 1, 1998, pp. 108-119.
[8] J. Brockner, Y. R. Chen, E. A. Mannix, K. Leung and D. R. Skarlicki, “Culture and Procedural Fairness: When the Effects of What you Do Depend on How you Do it,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2000, pp. 138-159.
[9] R. H. Moorman, G. L. Blakely and B. P. Niehoff, “Does Perceived Organizational Support Mediate the Relationship between Procedural Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior?” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 41, No. 3, 1998, pp. 351-357.
[10] P. Blau, “Exchange and Power in Social Life,” Wiley, NY, 1964.
[11] M. A. Konovsky and S. D. Pugh, “Citizenship Behavior and Social Exchange,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37, No. 3, 1994, pp. 656-669.
[12] J. G. Holmes, “The Exchange Process in Close Relationships: Microbehavior and Macromotives,” In: M. J. Lerner and S. C. Lerner, Eds., The Justice Motive in Social Behavior, Plenum, NY, 1981, pp. 261-284.
[13] J. L. Farh, R. D. Hackett and L. Liang, “Individual-Level Cultural Values as Moderators of Perceived Organizational Support-Employee Outcome Relationships in China: Comparing the Effects of Power Distance and Traditionality,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2007, pp. 715-729.
[14] L. Y. Sun, S. Aryee and K. S. Law, “High-Performance Human Resource Practices, Citizenship Behavior, and Organizational Performance: A Relational Perspective,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2007, pp. 558-577.
[15] J. L. Farh, P. C. Earley and S. C. Lin, “Impetus for Action: A Cultural Analysis of Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Chinese Society,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42, No. 3, 1997, pp. 421-444.
[16] R. H. Moorman, “Relationship between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Do Fair- ness Perceptions Influence Employee Citizenship?” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 76, No. 6, 1991, pp. 845-855.
[17] R. Folger and M. A. Konovsky, “Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1, 1989, pp. 115-130.
[18] E. A. Lind and T. R. Tyler, “The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice,” Plenum, NY, 1988.
[19] J. Kickul, L. K. Gundry and M. Posig, “Does Trust Matter? The Relationship between Equity Sensitivity and Perceived Organizational Justice,” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 56, No. 3, 2005, pp. 205-218.
[20] R. Pillai, T. A. Scandura and E. A. Williams, “Leadership and Organizational Justice: Similarities and Differences across Cultures,” Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 30, No. 4, 1999, pp. 763-779.
[21] R. J. Bies and J. S. Moag, “Interactional Justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness,” Research on Negotiation in Organization, Vol. 1, 1986, pp. 43-55.
[22] S. S. Masterson, K. Lewis, B. M. Goldman and M. S. Taylor, “Integrating Justice and Social Exchange: The Differing Effects of Fair Procedures and Treatment on Work Relationships,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, No. 4, 2000, pp. 738-748.
[23] B. P. Niehoff and R. H. Moorman, “Justice as a Mediator of the Relationship between Methods of Monitoring and Organizational Citizenship Behavior,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36, No. 3, 1993, pp. 527-556.
[24] D. L. Kidder, “The Influence of Gender on the Performance of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors,” Journal of Management, Vol. 28, No. 5, 2002, pp. 629-648.
[25] A. Eagly, S. J. Karau and M. G. Makajhani, “Gender and the Effectiveness of Leaders: A Meta-Analysis,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 117, No. 1, 1995, pp. 125-145.
[26] M. M. Suazo, W. H. Turnley and R. R. Mai-Dalton, “Characteristics of the Supervisor-Subordinate Relationship as Predictors of Psychological Contract Breach,” Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2008, pp. 295-312.
[27] C. W. Allinson, S. J. Armstrong and J. Hayes, “The Effects of Cognitive Style on Leader-Member Exchange: A Study of Manager-Subordinate Dyads,” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 74, No. 2, 2001, pp. 201-220.
[28] J. L. Pearce and H. B. Gregersen, “Task Interdependence and Extrarole Behavior: A Test of the Mediating Effects of Felt Responsibility,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 76, No. 6, 1991, pp. 838-844.
[29] D. L. Shapiro, E. H. Buttner and B. Barry, “Explanations: What Factors Enhance their Perceived Adequacy?” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 58, No. 3, 1994, pp. 346-368.
[30] J. Nunnally, “Psychometric Theory,” 2nd Edition, McGraw- Hill, NY, 1978.
[31] A. Delios and W. J. Henisz, “Japanese Firms’ Investment Strategies in Emerging Economies,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2000, pp. 305-323.
[32] B. J. Tepper, D. Lockhart and J. Hoobler, “Justice, Citizenship, and Role Definition Effects,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86, No. 4, 2001, pp. 789-796.
[33] M. E. Gordon, L. A. Slade and N. Schmitt, “The ‘Science of the Sophomore’ Revisited: From Conjecture to Empiricism,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1986, pp. 191-207.
[34] D. H. McKnight, V. Choudhury and C. Kacmar, “Developing and Validating Trust Measures for E-Commerce: An Integrative Typology,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2002, pp. 334-359.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.