The Relationship between Recurrent Spine Surgery and Employment Status
Mohammad Sami Walid, Nadezhda Zaytseva, Moataz Abbara, Azhar Abdullah
DOI: 10.4236/ojmn.2012.21003   PDF    HTML     3,485 Downloads   7,437 Views   Citations


Background: What is the quantitative relationship between repeated surgical intervention and unemployment in the spine surgery population? And, does the literature pay sufficient attention to this important aspect of spine surgery outcome? Methods: This was a retrospective review of 905 patients of working age undergoing one of three types of spine surgery. The index surgery at the time of the study was either on the cervical or lumbar spine. We retrospectively collected data on patients’ employment status and history of prior spine surgery. In this study, history of prior spine surgery was coded using two nominal (categorical) variables: The number of previous spine surgeries (0, 1, 2, ≥3) and the variability of location of previous spine surgeries (cervical, lumbar). We also looked into scientific publications related to spine surgery and probed “employment” and “reoperation” awareness in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In addition, we queried some common factors that are known to play an important role in exacerbating the unemployment problem, such as opioid (ab)use and depression. Results: The unemployment rate was 19.4% among males and 34.8% among females. Unemployment rate correlated with the number of previous spine surgery (r = 0.077, p = 0.020), opioid use (r = 0.080, p = 0.017) and being on antidepressants (r = 0.119, p = 0.000). The unemployment rate was sta-tistically different (χ2 = 10.656, p = 0.014) among patients with different numbers of previous spine surgeries: 25.6% of de novo patients versus 28.1% of patients with one previous spine surgery, 32.7% of patients with two previous spine surgeries and 48.7% of patients with three or more previous spine surgeries. Females had significantly higher unemployment rate if they had three or more previous spine surgeries in their past (31.4%, 34.4%, 46.2% versus 83.3%, χ2 = 21.841, p = 0.000). Unemployment rate was as high as 90% in female patients with ≥3 surgeries on different regions of the spine and receiving antidepressants. Among randomized controlled trials addressing spine surgery in humans and published in English, 10.4% of reported studies mentioned opioids in their text, 4.1% (23/566) mentioned reoperation, 1.4% (8/566) mentioned employment, and none mentioned antidepressants. Conclusion: Females’ employment status is more sensitive to repeated surgical intervention, regardless of the part of the spine being targeted, reaching close to ten times the general population’s unemployment rate (83.3% versus 8%). On the other hand, a small percentage of randomized controlled trials pertaining to spine surgery deals with employment issues and reoperation rate in their outcome analysis.

Share and Cite:

M. Walid, N. Zaytseva, M. Abbara and A. Abdullah, "The Relationship between Recurrent Spine Surgery and Employment Status," Open Journal of Modern Neurosurgery, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2012, pp. 11-15. doi: 10.4236/ojmn.2012.21003.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] D. C. Cherkin, R. A. Deyo, J. D. Loeser, T. Bush and G. Waddell, “An International Comparison of Back Surgery Rates,” Spine, Vol. 19, No. 11, 1994, pp. 1201-1206.
[2] D. T. Gray, R. A. Deyo, W. Kreuter, S. K. Mirza, P. J. Heagerty, B. A. Comstock and L. Chan, “Population-Based Trends in Volumes and Rates of Ambulatory Lumbar Spine Surgery,” Spine, Vol. 31, No. 17, 1964, pp. 1957-1963. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000229148.63418.c1
[3] U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. November 4, 2011.
[4] P. J. Watson, C. K. Booker, L. Moores and C. J. Main, “Returning the Chronically Unemployed with Low Back Pain to Employment,” European Journal of Pain, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2004, pp. 359-369. doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.11.003
[5] P. L. Sanderson, B. D. Todd, G. R. Holt and C. J. Getty, Compensation, Work Status, and Disability in Low Back Pain Patients,” Spine, Vol. 20, No. 5, 1995, pp. 554-556. doi:10.1097/00007632-199503010-00009
[6] M. S. Walid and N. Zaytseva, “The Relationship of Unemployment and Depression with History of Spine Surgery,” Perm Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2011, pp. 19-22.
[7] M. S. Walid, J. S. Robinson, M. Abbara, A. Tolaymat and J. S. Jr. Robinson, “De Novo Spine Surgery as a Predictor of Additional Spine Surgery at the Same or Distant Spine Regions,” German Medical Science, Vol. 9, 2011, p. 20.
[8] Disability Statistics. Council of Disability Awareness 2010.
[9] S. E. Back, R. L. Payne, A. H. Wahlquist, R. E. Carter, Z. Stroud, L. Haynes, M. Hillhouse, K. T. Brady and W. Ling, “Comparative Profiles of Men and Women with Opioid Dependence: Results from a National Multisite Effectiveness Trial,” American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2011, pp. 313-323. doi:10.3109/00952990.2011.596982
[10] M. Tournier, A. Cougnard, S. Boutouaba-Combe and H. Verdoux, “Duration of Antidepressant Drug Treatment and Its Determinants in France,” Encephale, Vol. 37, Suppl. 1, 2011, pp. S36-S41. doi:10.1016/j.encep.2010.06.007
[11] E. Stranges, C. A. Russo and B. Friedman, “Procedures with the Most Rapidly Increasing Hospital Costs, 2004-2007,” Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, 2006-2009.
[12] R. A. Deyo and Y. J. Tsui-Wu, “Descriptive Epidemiology of Low-Back Pain and Its Related Medical Care in the United States,” Spine, Vol. 12, No. 9, 1987, pp. 264-268. doi:10.1097/00007632-198704000-00013

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.