Endogenous Knowledge and Morphological Characterization of Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Accessions Found in Some Agricultural Areas of Gabon ()
1. Introduction
Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) originates from Latin America and is increasingly grown in tropical and subtropical regions. In the tropics, it is the primary source of calories [1] (Dixon et al., 2002) and the source of income for small farmers. It is considered one of the main sources of carbohydrates, being a staple food mainly for people in Latin America and Africa [2] (Alvarez et al. 2007), which use both tuberosilic roots as a rich source of starch and, the leaves as source of protein, minerals and vitamins [3] (Ceballos, 2012). The crops were introduced in Gabon after the first world war by cultivars returning from Congo [4] (Raponda-Walker and Sillans, 1961).
Due to its easy cultivation, year-round availability, and tolerance to extreme ecological and biotic stress conditions, a wide variety of cassava genotypes can be found in the growing areas [5] (Lozano, 1985), [6] (Nweke et al.,1994), [1] (Dixon et al., 2002). The diversity is due to the fact that genotypes respond differently to different climatic and biotic factors, while also the constant exchange of genetic material among cassava farmers [7] (Maroya, 1997). Some of these characters can be relevant for varietal improvement and breeding programs. Indeed, [8] (Fukuda and Guevara, 1998) indicated that the evaluation of the existing genetic variability is necessary and must be based on appropriate and recognized descriptors.
According to [9] (Hahn, 1979), the movement of cassava plant material between producers not only preserves and protects varietal diversity, but also provides indications of the preferences of farmers for cassava in a country or agro-ecological zone.
To better express these preferences, producers distinguish the different cassava genotypes by local names that are generally descriptive of the physical characteristics of the plants, such as the color of certain organs, size and type of foliage, yield potential and production cycle etc. These names may also describe the original source of the genotype or indicate an event that coincides with the introduction of the genotype [7] (Maroya, 1997). Despite their significance, these names are of little use in a botanical classification of different varieties because the same variety can have several names from one village to another or from one ethnical group to another.
To our knowledge, few studies on the analysis of endogenous knowledge and phenotypic characterization of cassava varieties have been done in Gabon except for some unpublished works by the Ministry of Agriculture describing some varieties in a non-exhaustive way.
The aim of this study is to identify the morphological characteristics of cassava accessions encountered in agricultural areas of Gabon. Specifically, this work aims to inventory cassava accessions present in the areas surveyed, identify key criteria for recognition of accessions, and analyze morphological variability within the cassava accessions encountered.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Site Selection Criteria and Data Collection Methodology
The study was carried out between 2018 and 2020 in some agricultural areas of the provinces of Woleu Ntem, Ngounié, Ogooué-lolo, Moyen Ogooué, Nyanga and Haut-Ogooué in Gabon including seven (7) departments (Figure 1). The choice of locations and farmers was made not only on the basis of accessibility, but also their ability to identify different accessions in local languages.
Figure 1. Location of prospected sites for the study.
Data were collected during expeditions from the different sites through the application of participatory research appraisal tools and techniques, such as direct observation, group discussions, individual interviews, and field visits using a questionnaire following [10] (Adjatin et al., 2012), [11] (Kombo et al., 2012). In each village, interviews were conducted with the help of a local translator and groups surveyed were made of 5 to 10 farmers of both sexes and of different ages identified and assembled with the assistance of the local farmers’ associations and the chief of the village involved in the study to facilitate the organization of the meetings and the collection of data according to [11] (Kombo et al., 2012).
2.2. Measured Parameters
Seventeen variables were determined, including 12 qualitative and 06 quantitative. Three plants/accessions were measured and observed. All of its measurements and observations were made according to the criteria defined by [12] (Fukuda et al., 2010). Qualitative variables are essentially the color of the apical leaves (CAL), the shape of the central leaflet (SCL), the color of the leaf vein (CLV), the petiole color (CP), the color of the stem cortex (CSC), color of mature leaf (CML), the color of stem epidermis (CSE), color of end branches (CEB), external color of the root (ECR), the color of root cortex (CRC) and the color of root pulp (CRP). For quantitative variables, the number of lobes (NL), length of petiole (LP), distance between leafs scars (DLS), height of first branch (HFB), diameter at the neck of the main stem (DNS) and angle of first branch (AFB).
2.3. Statistical Analysis of Data
The matrix of data composed of the means of quantitative variables and the different modalities of qualitative variables was used to carry out a Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The variables that contribute most to axis formation were defined as active variables and the rest as additional variables. An Ascending Hierarchical Classification (AHC) then allowed to classify accessions into homogeneous groups according to the Ward method using a similarity index of the Euclidean distance. These multivariate analyses were performed using the XLSTAT 2022 software.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Characteristics of the Prospected Area
The data related to the villages and socio-cultural groups, characteristics of the farms, age distribution and gender approach are respectively presented in Tables 1-3.
Table 1. List of prospected villages and socio-cultural groups.
Number |
Villages |
Departements |
Provinces |
Socio-cultural groups |
1 |
Makongola |
Lolo-Bouenguidi |
Ogooué Lolo |
Nzebi |
2 |
Mayang |
Lolo-Bouenguidi |
Nzebi |
3 |
Aéroport |
Lolo-Bouenguidi |
Massango |
4 |
Ngoungui |
Lolo-Bouenguidi |
Pouvi |
5 |
Camp militaire |
Lolo-Bouenguidi |
Massango |
6 |
Mabimbi |
Lolo-Bouenguidi |
Akélé |
7 |
Ikembelé |
Lolo-Bouenguidi |
|
Akélé, Massango, Nzébi |
8 |
Makongola |
Lolo-Bouenguidi |
Nzébi |
9 |
Kounadémbé |
Lolo-Bouenguidi |
Massango |
10 |
Mokabo |
Douya Onoye |
Ngounié |
Mitsogo |
11 |
Moukidi |
Douya Onoye |
Punu |
12 |
Mouila |
Douya Onoye |
Punu, Nzébi |
13 |
Mouyamba |
Louetsi Wano |
Massango |
14 |
Lebamba |
Louetsi Wano |
Nzébi |
15 |
Adzabikat |
Woleu |
Woleu Ntem |
Fang |
16 |
Elop |
Woleu |
17 |
Abang-Medoumou |
Woleu |
18 |
Essong Medzome |
Woleu |
19 |
Mbam Assengma |
Woleu |
20 |
Nzela Bola |
Ogooué et Lacs |
Moyen
Ogooué |
Nzébi/Woumbou |
21 |
Koungoule |
Ogooué et Lacs |
Echira/Fang |
22 |
Lobi-Mbigou |
Ogooué et Lacs |
Massango |
23 |
Mbolet |
Ogooué et Lacs |
Akélé/Nzébi |
24 |
Issala II |
Ogooué et Lacs |
Massango |
25 |
Mitoné |
Ogooué et Lacs |
Mièné/Fang |
26 |
Massika |
Ogooué et Lacs |
Punu/Mitsogo |
27 |
Mouroumbi |
Mougoutsi |
Nyanga |
Punu |
28 |
Mabotsa |
Mougoutsi |
Loumbou |
29 |
Manfila |
Mougoutsi |
Loumbou |
30 |
Moumbatsi |
Mougoutsi |
Punu |
31 |
Payilou |
Mougoutsi |
Punu |
32 |
Mouhanzi |
Mougoutsi |
Loumbou |
33 |
Bidembe |
Mougoutsi |
Punu |
34 |
Gorde |
Mougoutsi |
Punu |
35 |
Ilama |
Mougoutsi |
Punu |
36 |
Midjongou |
Mougoutsi |
Punu |
37 |
Ossolé |
Plateaux |
Haut-Ogooué |
Téké |
38 |
Odjouma |
Plateaux |
39 |
Ampou |
Plateaux |
40 |
Akou |
Plateaux |
41 |
Souba |
Plateaux |
42 |
Abouyi |
Plateaux |
43 |
Eau clair |
Plateaux |
Table 2. Characteristics of the farms found in agricultural areas.
No |
Province |
Departement |
Exploitation |
Total |
Area (ha) |
Harvest (month) |
Cutting (month) |
1 |
Haut Ogooué |
Plateaux |
Cooperative |
0 |
- |
≥8 |
≥8 |
Personal |
31 |
≤1 |
|
2 |
Moyen Ogooué |
Ogooué et Lacs |
Cooperative |
0 |
- |
≥12 |
12 |
Personal |
15 |
≤1 |
|
3 |
Woleu Ntem |
Woleu |
Cooperative |
4 |
≥5 |
≥6 |
≥8 |
Personal |
2 |
≤1 |
|
4 |
Nyanga |
Mougoutsi |
Cooperative |
3 |
≥10 |
≥8 |
≥8 |
Personal |
19 |
≤1 |
|
5 |
Ogooué Lolo |
Lolo Bouéguidi |
Cooperative |
0 |
- |
≥8 |
≥8 |
Personal |
20 |
≤1 |
|
6 |
Ngounié |
Doya/Louétsi wano |
Cooperative |
0 |
- |
≥12 |
≥8 |
Personal |
16 |
≤1 |
|
Total |
6 |
8 |
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cooperative |
7 (6.36%) |
[5 - 22] |
[6 - 12[ |
[8 - 12] |
|
|
|
Personal |
103 (93.64) |
≤1 |
Table 3. Age distribution of respondents and gender approach.
|
Characteristics |
Ages |
Total |
Women |
Men |
[30 - 55[ |
60 (54.55%) |
50 (54.95%) |
10 (52.63%) |
[55 - 77] |
50 (45.45%) |
41 (45.05%) |
9 (47.37%) |
Total |
110 (100%) |
91 (82.73%) |
19 (19.27%) |
Except Haut Ogooué (Plateaux Department) and Woleu Ntem (Woleu Department) where only one dominant socio-cultural group is found, the rest of the prospected area is composed of farmers from two (2) to nine (9) socio-cultural groups (Table 1). This can be explained by the fact that those two departments are populated by only one ethnic group (Fang for Woleu Department and Téké for Plateaux Department), which is not the case for the other prospected area, where the highest socio cultural group diversity was found in the Department of Ogooué and lacs.
Out of the six (6) provinces and the seven (7) departments surveyed, 93.64% are personal farms (planting area ≤ 1 ha) against 6.36% of cooperatives (planting area between 5 and 22 ha) found only in Nyanga and Woleu Ntem provinces (Table 2). Similar results were observed by [13] (Amadi et al., 2020) where farms use less than 1ha and 80% - 82% did not belong to a cooperative society in Imo state of Nigeria. In this study, the presence of cooperatives is justified by the implementation of the PDAR (“Projet de Développement Agricole et Rural”), with the help of IFAD (International Fund for Agricultural Development). The project plans on developing nurseries for peanuts, plantains and cassava, and promoting the creation and organization of local farming cooperatives, while providing the facilities for the transformation and commercialization of farm products.
Regarding age and gender approach, 54.55% of farmers are under 55 years old and 45.45% are aging between 55 and 77 years old, with women representing 82.73% of active farmers (Table 3). Similar results suggest that cassava farming is practiced more by women than men [14] (Nwaobiala et al., 2019), [15] (Claudette and Roger, 2022). Also, the average age of cassava farmers across Cameroon regions is 42.2 years [15] (Claudette and Roger, 2022), lower than the average of 53.5 years observed in agricultural areas of Gabon and confirmed by [16] (Mouketou et al., 2023).
3.2. Endogenous Knowledge: Key Criteria for Recognition of
Cassava Accessions by Farmers
Group discussions, individual interviews with cassava producers, and field visits using a questionnaire were done to determine the recognition criteria. The major criteria are presented in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Major criteria for recognition of cassava accessions by producers. CSE: color of the stem exterior, CEB: color of end branches, CML: color of mature leaf, ECR: External color of the storage root, PC: petiole color, CAL: color of apical leaves, SCL: shape of central leaflet.
In Gabon, more than 85% of farmers distinguish different cassava accessions based on the morphological characteristics, origin and introducer (Figure 2). The seven (7) morphological characteristics are the color of the stem exterior (CSE), the color of end branches (CEB), the color of mature leaf (CML), the external color of the storage root (ECR), the petiole color (PC), the color of apical leaves (CAL) and the shape of central leaflet (SCL). The analysis of morphological characteristics in various organs showed variations within the studied accessions. Color appears to be the most representative and similar results were obtained by [17] (Asare et al., 2011), [18] (Doussouh et al., 2016), [19] (Nadjiam et al., 2016), [20] (Djaha et al., 2017). In addition, [21] (Agre et al., 2016) have reported that farmers use the colors of the leaves and stems to identify the cassava cultivars. Also, the inter-ethnic union through filiate links or by purchasing cuttings would have favored this exchange of accessions. Hence, the presence of cultivars bearing names of their origins (Ongali, Akiéni) or people (Nzaou, Pauline) who would have introduced them into a locality. According to [22] (Delêtre, 2010) and [20] (Djaha et al., 2017), this designation often leads to confusion since the same accession may have different names depending on the area of cultivation but also the language.
3.3. Variability of Diversity in the Prospected Provinces
In total, 211 accessions were recorded in the six (6) provinces prospected, where the highest number of 51 accessions were found in Haut Ogooué, 44 in Ogooué Lolo, 42 in Moyen Ogooué and 39 in Nyanga (Table 4). Except for Haut Ogooué, where 86.27% of the accessions are bitter, the rest of the provinces cultivate more than 56% of sweet accessions.
Table 4. Variability of the number of local cassava accessions by provinces.
No |
Provinces |
Total accessions |
Sweet accessions (%) |
Bitter accessions (%) |
1 |
Haut Ogooué |
51 |
7 (13.73%) |
44 (86.27%) |
2 |
Moyen Ogooué |
42 |
31 (73.80%) |
12 (26.19%) |
3 |
Woleu Ntem |
14 |
8 (57.14%) |
6 (42.86%) |
4 |
Nyanga |
39 |
30 (76.92%) |
9 (23.08%) |
5 |
Ogooué Lolo |
44 |
25 (56.82%) |
19 (43.18%) |
6 |
Ngounié |
21 |
14 (66.67%) |
7 (33.33%) |
Total |
6 |
211 |
115 (54.50%) |
97 (45.50%) |
High levels of accession diversity, however, do not necessarily imply high levels of genetic diversity since out of the 211 recorded accessions, only 98 were different to each other. The distinctness can arise from a combination of environmental and recognition factors. Different collection sites may have resulted in capturing unique genotypes or phenotypes, contributing to the distinct count. Variability in environmental conditions (e.g., soil type, climate) where accessions were collected can lead to phenotypic differences, even among genetically similar plants. The initial sample size may have included duplicates or closely related accessions that were not genetically distinct, leading to a higher number and less distinct accessions when duplicates are removed.
There are several mechanisms through which diversity can be increased locally, the most important of which is the dissemination of accessions alongside the flow of people. This was confirmed by [22] (Delêtre, 2010) in its works on manioc diversity in Gabon. Exchanges of cuttings between farmers were extremely frequent in the prospected areas and represented the principal medium for farmers to acquire new accessions. But repeated and independent introductions of the same accession in a village, or the simple deformation of the original name while the accession passes down the generations and circulates among farmers, can generate synonymies, thereby artificially increasing diversity. This was also confirmed by [22] (Delêtre, 2010).
The observed higher level of bitter accessions in Haut Ogooué province compare to the other provinces can be explained by the dietary habits. In fact, in Plateaux Department, cassava sticks and fufu are staple foods, and adequate preparation before eating are therefore crucial steps for reducing the natural hydrocyanic acid [23] (Montagnac et al., 2009). In the other provinces, in addition to above mentioned staple food, cooked cassava tuber is used which may justify the presence of 56% to 77% of sweet accessions.
3.4. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
Multivariate analyses are statistical methods used in diversity analysis. In this study, multivariate analyses were used to elucidate the nature and degree of divergence of cassava accessions collected in different agro-ecological zones of Gabon. The PCA, applied to the 98 accessions on the basis of 17 morphological variables (11 qualitative and 6 quantitative), results in a low variability (25.12%) within the accessions analyzed and revealed by the first two axes. The data might have low inherent variability, suggesting that the traits do not change much across observations. It suggests that many qualitative characters are correlated or redundant, they may not contribute significantly to overall variance and the PCA may capture only a small amount of the total variability. This variability is lower than that observed by [24] (Ephrem et al., 2014) in the Central African Republic and [21] (Djaha et al., 2017) in Côte d’Ivoire. Indeed, these authors obtained variabilities of 55% and 63.84%, respectively.
The lower variability observed in this work can be explained by not only the higher exchange rate of accessions between farmers, but also similarities observed within accessions bearing different names from one agricultural zone to another. Duplicates in cassava were often highlighted by several authors in numerous collections throughout the world [17] (Asare et al., 2011), [25] (N’Zue et al., 2014), and different accessions can have the same name or several names can be assigned to one accession [26] (Elias et al., 2011). Exchanges of cuttings between farmers were extremely frequent in the prospected areas, and represented the principal medium for farmers to acquire new accessions [22] (Delêtre, 2010). But, repeated and independent introductions of the same accession in a village, or the simple deformation of the original name while the accession passes down the generations and circulates among farmers, can generate synonymies, thereby artificially increasing diversity [22] (Delêtre, 2010) (Figure 3).
![]()
Figure 3. Distribution of variables and accessions in plan 1 - 2 revealed from the PCA for the 98 cassava accessions.
3.5. Ascending Hierarchical Classification (AHC)
The ascending hierarchical classification of the 98 accessions based on qualitative (11) and quantitative (6) traits classified into three groups with similar characteristics as a function of the variable (Figure 4). The genetic similarity for the 17 traits ranged from zero to three hundred, with a mean similarity of 300. The cassava accessions were grouped into three distinct clusters with similarities of 54.59. Similar results were observed by [20] (Djaha et al., 2017) and [25] (N’Zue et al., 2014). Nevertheless, in their work on cassava accessions, [27] (Ampong-Mensah, 2000) in Ghana and [28] (Bolamba et al., 2024) in RD Congo obtained four homogeneous groups.
The main Characteristic of the three groups where based on the height of the first branching (HFB), the angle of the first branching (AFB), the length of the petiole (LP), the distance between leafs scars (DLS), and the diameter at the neck of the main stem (DNS) (Table 5) and on qualitative traits (Table 6). Group I and 2 contain 45 accessions each and Group 3 contains 8 accessions. The AHC shows a strong phenotypic organization based essentially on the five (05) quantitative variables mentioned above. Similar results were reported by [20] (Djaha et al., 2017). However, [17] (Asare et al., 2011) found that the length of the central lobe and the color of the petiole are the most relevant variables for distinguishing cassava accessions in Ghana. This contradiction could be explained by the difference between the two places of collection and the environmental conditions.
Branching can influence the number of tuber produced and breeding for optimal branching can enhance yield potential. Accessions with specific branching habits may have better air circulation and reducing disease incidence. Understanding branching can help in developing appropriate agronomic practices for different environments. Utilizing the genetic variability within the accession groups helps in selecting diverse parental lines, which can enhance the potential for heterosis (hybrid vigor). Hybridization between different accession groups can
Figure 4. Ascending hierarchical classification of the 99 accessions found in the agricultural zones of Gabon.
Table 5. Characteristic of groups from the Ascending Hierarchical Classification.
Variables |
Group 1 |
Group 2 |
Group 3 |
N |
45 |
45 |
8 |
HFB |
78.62 ± 10.24b |
136.63 ± 27.10a |
0c |
AFB |
115.13 ± 11.59a |
85.83 ± 9.92b |
0c |
PL |
20.38 ± 3.19a |
15.07 ± 3.34b |
21.13 ± 3.34b |
DLS |
4.07 ± 1.79a |
3.39 ± 1.15b |
2.75 ± 1.25b |
DNS |
2.82 ± 0.69a |
2.57 ± 0.67a |
2.38 ± 0.46a |
On the lines, the averages followed by the same letter are statistically identical to the threshold α = 5%; Mean error type. N: number of accessions, HFB: height of first branching, AFB: angle of first branching, PL: petiole length, DLS: distance between leafs scars, DNS: diameter at the neck of the main stem.
Table 6. Classification of cassava accessions by group from the ascending hierarchical classification.
|
Accessions |
CAL |
SCL |
CLV |
PC |
CML |
CSE |
CCS |
CEB |
ECR |
CRC |
CRP |

|
Adzoro |
Dark green |
Lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Dark brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Dark brown |
White |
White |
Abegué |
Dark green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Dark brown |
Pink |
White |
Adjura |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Green |
Yellowish-green |
Dark green |
Dark brown |
Dark green |
Green-purple |
Dark brown |
Pink |
White |
Afuba mbong |
Purplish green |
Other |
Reddish-green M |
Red |
Dark green |
Cream |
Dark green |
Green-purple |
Dark brown |
Pink |
White |
Attend demain |
Dark green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Green |
Yellowish-green |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Light brown |
Pink |
White |
Beenvome |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Light brown |
White |
White |
Dibutu |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Green |
Reddish-green |
Dark green |
Dark brown |
Dark green |
Purple |
Light brown |
White |
White |
Dicongu |
Purple |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Purple |
Purple green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Purple |
Light brown |
Pink |
White |
Dicure |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Light brown |
White |
White |
Dimbuanda |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Green |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Orange |
Green-purple |
Dark brown |
White |
White |
Dipandinu |
Light green |
Lanceolate |
Green |
Red |
Light green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green |
Light brown |
White |
White |
Dogo mbong |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Green |
Reddish-green |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Light brown |
White |
White |
Ewo |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green-purple |
Dark brown |
White |
White |
Fula |
Dark green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Green |
Yellowish-green |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Dark brown |
White |
White |
Gbaze |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Green |
Reddish-green |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Light brown |
White |
White |
Gnéghé |
Light green |
Lanceolate |
Green |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green |
Light brown |
White |
White |
Gungu |
Light green |
Lanceolate |
Green |
Yellowish-green |
Dark green |
Dark brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Light brown |
White |
White |
Kagnia |
Dark green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green M |
Red |
Dark green |
Dark brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Dark brown |
White |
White |
Kungu |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green-purple |
Dark brown |
White |
White |
Kwata |
Purplish green |
Lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Greenish-red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Dark brown |
White |
White |
Landura |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green-purple |
Cream |
White |
White |
Madame violet |
Purple |
Lanceolate |
Reddish-green M |
Purple |
Purple |
Dark brown |
Dark green |
Purple |
Dark brown |
Pink |
White |
Mambikini |
Purple |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green |
Dark brown |
White |
White |
Matadi |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Light brown |
White |
White |
Mbomo |
Dark green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green M |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Dark brown |
White |
White |
Mbudu |
Purple |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Purple |
Purple green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Purple |
Dark brown |
Pink |
White |
Mbwoyi |
Purple |
Lanceolate |
Reddish-green M |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green-purple |
Dark brown |
Pink |
White |
Messamoro mecom |
Dark green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Greenish-red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Dark brown |
White |
White |
Modzomba |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Green |
Yellowish-green |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Light brown |
White |
White |
Muduma |
Purple |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Purple |
Dark brown |
White |
White |
Muvèpre |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Green |
Reddish-green |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Dark brown |
Pink |
White |
Ndambu |
Dark green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Dark brown |
Dark green |
Green-purple |
Light brown |
White |
White |
Ngonabera |
Purple |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Purple |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green-purple |
Dark brown |
White |
White |
|
Nombre |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Purple green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green-purple |
Dark brown |
White |
White |
Nsut mbong |
Purple |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green M |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green-purple |
Dark brown |
Pink |
White |
Nziéni |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Green |
Yellowish-green |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green-purple |
Dark brown |
White |
White |
Obira |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green M |
Red |
Dark green |
Dark brown |
Light green |
Green |
Dark brown |
White |
White |
Omonoyimi |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green M |
Red |
Dark green |
Dark brown |
Light green |
Purple |
Dark brown |
Pink |
White |
Onana |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Light green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green-purple |
Light brown |
White |
White |
Ongania |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Green |
Green |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green |
Light brown |
Pink |
White |
Ononeberé |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Green |
Reddish-green |
Dark green |
Dark brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Dark brown |
White |
White |
Opipi |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Dark brown |
White |
White |
Opupu |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green M |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Light brown |
White |
White |
Pauline |
Light green |
Lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green |
Dark brown |
White |
White |
Yabwa |
Purple |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green M |
Purple |
Purple green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green-purple |
Dark brown |
Pink |
White |

|
Alen mbong |
Dark green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green M |
Purple |
Dark green |
Dark brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Dark brown |
Pink |
White |
Bilongu |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Purple |
Dark brown |
Pink |
White |
Bilongu bi pahe |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Orange |
Green |
Light brown |
Cream |
White |
Buadra |
Purplish green |
Lanceolate |
Green |
Greenish-red |
Dark green |
Dark brown |
Light green |
Green |
Light brown |
Pink |
White |
Bvodi-Bvodi |
Dark green |
Lanceolate |
Green |
Greenish-red |
Dark green |
Cream |
Light green |
Green |
Light brown |
Pink |
White |
Dimuma |
Dark green |
Lanceolate |
Green |
Greenish-red |
Dark green |
Cream |
Light green |
Green |
Dark brown |
Pink |
White |
Erhorla |
Light green |
Lanceolate |
Green |
Greenish-red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green |
Dark brown |
Pink |
White |
Ilaboue |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Green |
Greenish-red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Light brown |
Cream |
White |
Kobkob |
Purplish green |
Ovoid |
Green |
Red |
Dark green |
Dark brown |
Light green |
Green |
Dark brown |
Cream |
White |
Konongo |
Purple |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Greenish-red |
Purple green |
Dark brown |
Dark green |
Purple |
Dark brown |
Pink |
White |
Langoli |
Purplish green |
Lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Dark brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Dark brown |
Cream |
White |
Lenjangua |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Light green |
Dark brown |
Light green |
Green |
Light brown |
Pink |
White |
Mabila |
Purplish green |
Lanceolate |
Reddish-green M |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green-purple |
Light brown |
Cream |
White |
Madame jaune |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Light green |
Orange |
Light green |
Green-purple |
Dark brown |
Yellow |
Yellow |
Madjanga |
Purple |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green M |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green-purple |
Dark brown |
Cream |
White |
Mambia |
Light green |
Obovate-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Cream |
Light green |
Green-purple |
Light brown |
Cream |
White |
Matzoma |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Light green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green-purple |
Dark brown |
Cream |
White |
Motombi |
Light green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green-purple |
Dark brown |
Cream |
White |
Mouabi |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Light green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green |
Light brown |
Cream |
White |
Mugula-Mugula |
Purplish green |
Lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Reddish-green |
Dark green |
Dark brown |
Light green |
Green |
Light brown |
Cream |
White |
Munievu |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Green |
Greenish-red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Dark brown |
Cream |
White |
|
Mupose |
Purplish green |
Lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green |
Light brown |
Cream |
White |
Mureké |
Light green |
Lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Greenish-red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green |
Dark brown |
Pink |
White |
Musala |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green M |
Red |
Light green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green |
Dark brown |
Cream |
White |
Musavu guibi |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green-purple |
Dark brown |
Cream |
White |
Ngudji |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green-purple |
Dark brown |
Cream |
White |
Nguya |
Purple |
Lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Light green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Light brown |
Cream |
White |
Ngwali |
Purplish green |
Obovate-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green |
Light brown |
Cream |
White |
Nkulu |
Dark green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Green |
Green |
Dark green |
Dark brown |
Light green |
Green |
Dark brown |
Cream |
White |
Nzaou |
Purplish green |
Lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green-purple |
Cream |
Cream |
White |
Nzora |
Purplish green |
Lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Purple |
Cream |
Cream |
White |
Opwata |
Purplish green |
Lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Dark brown |
Light green |
Green-purple |
Dark brown |
Cream |
White |
Otsiémi |
Purplish green |
Lanceolate |
Green |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green |
Dark brown |
Cream |
White |
Ovèakima |
Purplish green |
Lanceolate |
Reddish-green M |
Red |
Dark green |
Dark brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Dark brown |
Pink |
White |
Oyendzé |
Purplish green |
Lanceolate |
Green |
Red |
Dark green |
Dark brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Dark brown |
Cream |
White |
Six mois |
Purplish green |
Obovate-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green |
Dark brown |
Cream |
White |
Tsarimedju |
Dark green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Green |
Green |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Dark brown |
Cream |
White |
Tsarimekani |
Dark green |
Lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Greenish-red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Dark brown |
Cream |
White |
Tseba |
Purplish green |
Lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Light green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green |
Light brown |
Cream |
White |
Vivre |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Greenish-red |
Dark green |
Dark brown |
Light green |
Green |
Light brown |
Cream |
White |
Voila |
Purplish green |
Lanceolate |
Green |
Red |
Light green |
Cream |
Light green |
Green |
Dark brown |
Cream |
White |
Wume |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Reddish-green |
Purple green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green-purple |
Dark brown |
Cream |
White |
Yakaka |
Purplish green |
Lanceolate |
Green |
Greenish-red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green |
Light brown |
Cream |
White |
Yala |
Purplish green |
Lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green |
Dark brown |
Pink |
White |
Yeme |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Green |
Greenish-red |
Dark green |
Cream |
Dark green |
Green |
Light brown |
Cream |
White |

|
Kayuoyo |
Purplish green |
Lanceolate |
Green |
Yellowish-green |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green |
Dark brown |
Cream |
White |
Ilongu |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Reddish-green |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Dark brown |
Pink |
White |
Mbuangue |
Purplish green |
Lanceolate |
Reddish-green M |
Yellowish-green |
Light green |
Light brown |
Light green |
Green |
Light brown |
Cream |
White |
Musavu sakme |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green-purple |
Light brown |
Cream |
White |
Mutuku |
Purplish green |
Lanceolate |
Green |
Yellowish-green |
Light green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Light brown |
Cream |
White |
Nzambe sakme |
Purplish green |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Green |
Yellowish-green |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green-purple |
Dark brown |
Cream |
White |
Ondumu |
Purplish green |
Oblang-lanceolate |
Reddish-green L |
Red |
Dark green |
Orange |
Light green |
Green |
Light brown |
Cream |
White |
Ongali |
Purple |
Elliptic-lanceolate |
Green |
Red |
Dark green |
Light brown |
Dark green |
Green |
Light brown |
Cream |
White |
CAL: color of apical leaves, SCL: shape of central leaflet, PC: petiole color, CML: color of mature leaf, CLV: color of leaf vein, CSE: color of stem epidermis, CCS: color of cortex stem, CEB: color of end branches, ECR: External color of the storage root, CRC: color of the root cortex, CRP: color of root pulp.
create new varieties with improved traits. This is particularly useful in developing cassava that is resilient to environmental stresses. Understanding the genetic makeup of the accession groups can aid in mapping traits of interest and developing targeted breeding strategies. Maintaining a diverse gene pool through these accession groups ensures the conservation of genetic resources, which is vital for long-term breeding success.
The analysis of qualitative characteristics in various organs showed variations within the studied accessions. Color appears to be the most representative and distinctive trait [17] (Asare et al., 2011) and [21] (Agre et al., 2016).
4. Conclusion
The study of the agro-morphological diversity of the 211 cassava accessions found in the prospected area in Gabon and their structuring on the basis of 17 descriptors showed variability with only 98 accessions clearly identified, indicating a high number of duplicates. This diversity was structured in 3 groups characterized by the height of the first branching, the angle of the first branching, the length of the petiole, the distance between leafs scars and the diameter at the neck of the main stem. This observed genetic variability between accessions is important for varietal breeding work. Breeding programs can effectively utilize the identified cassava accession groups to develop improved varieties that meet agricultural demands and environmental challenges.
Acknowledgements
Mr. Jonathan MBOULOU ELLA, Regional Director of Agriculture Woleu-Ntem and Ogooué-Ivindo, Mr. Serge ABESSOLO MBA, Director of Project PDAR/FIDA and the personnel, Mr. Edouard MASSALA, Regional Director of Agriculture Ngounié-Nyanga, Mr. BOUNGUILI Etienne, Provincial Director of Agriculture Ogooué-Lolo, Mr. Sévérin Arnaud BIBANG, Provincial Director of Agriculture Nyanga, Mr. Marius NZAOU, Provincial Director of Agriculture Moyen-Ogooué and Ms. Prisca IKOUELE IKOUETE, Agricultural Sector Plateaux. All of them for facilities and logistics.