1. Introduction
The Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) introduced the zeta function 
	
	(1)
and showed that the zeta function can also be expressed in terms of prime numbers having the form 
	
	(2)
where the product runs through all the primes 
. The equation (2) is known as the Euler product formula for the zeta function. The derivation of Equation (2) can be found in reference [1].
Bernhard Riemann (1826-1866) a famous German mathematician studied the zeta function having the complex form 
	
	(3)
Using the definite integral 
	
	(4)
where 
 is the gamma function defined 
	
	(5)
one can represent the Riemann zeta function in the integral form 
	
	(6)
as demonstrated in the reference [2] (25.5.1).
The Riemann zeta function arises in many areas of physics and engineering. In mathematics it is studied in number theory, probability and statistics. The zeros of the zeta function are closely related to the spacing and occurrence of prime numbers.
In Section 2, there is a review of known properties of the Riemann zeta function. In Section 3, properties of the Dirichlet eta function are examined. In Section 4, it is shown that all zeros of the eta function contain the zeros of the zeta function. A review of known locations where the eta function is zero is given in Section 4. This is followed by representing eta as a function of the complex variable 
 where 
. The claim that all nontrivial zeros of the zeta function must lie along the line 
 is examined in detail.
2. The Zeta Function at Integer Values
It can be demonstrated that at the even integers 
, for 
 
	
	(7)
where 
 are the Bernoulli numbers, references [1]-[3]. The zeta function evaluated at the odd integers 
, for 
 can be represented 
	
	(8)
where 
 are the Euler numbers and 
 are polygamma functions, reference [4].
Riemann also provided a functional equation for the zeta function which can be expressed in either of the forms 
	
	(9)
or 
	
	(10)
where 
 is the gamma function from equation (5), references [1] [2].
The Riemann reflection formula for the zeta function is given by 
	
	(11)
Make note that the gamma function in the above relations is never zero.
The functional equations (9) and (10) can be used to extend the definition of the zeta function to the region 
, references [1] [5]. Observe that in the special case 
 the series becomes the harmonic series which slowly diverges. Also in the complex plane where 
 it can be shown that 
	
	(12)
where 
 are the Stieljes constants. This equation shows that the zeta function has a simple pole at 
 with residue 1. Reference [2] (25.2.4).
3. The Dirichlet Eta Function
The Dirichlet eta function is defined 
(13)
The eta function is related to the zeta function by 
	
	(14)
references [6] [7]. The eta function is a converging alternating series and is sometimes referred to as the alternating zeta function. Note that the zeros of the eta function will include all the zeros the Riemann zeta function.
Using the integral (4) the eta function can be expressed in the integral form 
	
	(15)
see reference [3].
The equation (14) shows the Riemann zeta function can be represented in terms of the Dirichlet eta function by 
	
	(16)
references [6] [7]. An Euler transformation, references [6], can be applied to the Dirichlet eta function on the right-hand side of equation (16) to represent the Riemann zeta function by a series which is globally convergent. This representation of the Riemann zeta function has the form 
	
	(17)
which converges for all 
.
Some special values of the Dirichlet eta function are 
	
	
reference [3], where 
 are the Bernoulli numbers.
4. Zeros of the Zeta Function
The Euler product formula (2) with 
 replaced by 
 implies that in the region 
 the zeta function is never zero. In the region 
 the functional equation (10) can be employed to show that at the negative even integers 
 for 
 the zeta function is zero since 
	
	(18)
This is because the sine function in this equation has the value zero. In general, 
for nonpositive integers one can show 
 where 
 are Bernoulli numbers. Reference [3]. Any zeros of the zeta function determined by the equation (18) are called the trivial zeros of the zeta function. All other zeros are called nontrivial zeros.
There are no nontrival zeros of the zeta function for 
. There are no zeros on the line 
 and by the reflection formula there are no zeros on the line 
. If other zeros exist they must lie in the region 
 and 
. This region is called the critical region and any zeros in this region are called nontrivial zeros. The Riemann hypothesis is that all nontrivial 
zeros of the zeta function must lie on the line 
. This line is called the critical line. 
The equation (14) can be used to show that whenever 
, then 
. The factor 
 in equation (14) is zero at the points 
, for all nonzero integer values for 
 and represents additional zeros for the eta function.
5. The Zeta Function in the Complex Domain
For 
 one finds 
 and for 
 in the critical region where 
 one can demonstrate that the real and imaginary parts of the equation (13) can be expressed 
	
	(19)
where 
, for 
. These series are convergent for 
 and 
 in the critical strip.
Observe that 
 and 
 so the Cauchy-Riemann equations 
are satisfied. This shows 
 is a holomorphic function which satisfies 
. This implies that if 
 for some value of 
, then its conjugate 
 satisfies 
. Hence, the zeros of the zeta function are symmetric about the 
-axis. The equation 
 is satisfied if both the real part 
 and imaginary part 
 of the eta function are zero simultaneously.
6. Graphical Display of Zeta Function Roots 
Instead of examining graphs of each the functions 
 and 
 to find points where they are both zero simultaneously, we undertake an examination of a function associated with the sum of squares with the real and imaginary parts of the eta function.
Define the function 
	
	(20)
where 
 is a positive scale constant. Observe that the function 
 has the value of 0 when the sum of squares is zero. Whenever the sum of squares is greater then zero, the function 
 satisfies 
.
Figure 1 illustrates the equation (20) in the special case 
 and 
.
Figure 1. Plot of 
 vs 
, for 
, with 
 and 
.
Observe in Figure 1 that for a fixed value of 
 the zeros of the zeta function are displayed at values of 
 where the sum of squares 
 equals zero. This occurs whenever 
 and 
 are zero simultaneously. 
Some additional examples of graphs of the function 
 with scale 
 and selected values of 
 and 
 are illustrated in Figures 2-4.
Examine Figure 2 and Figure 4 where 
 and 
 and make note that 
 for the range of 
 selected. In Figure 3, the function 
 has many values of 
 where 
. These figures suggest the following might be true in the critical region 
 and 
 
(i) 
 for all 
 while 
 and
(ii) 
 for all 
 while 
If the above is true then the zeros of the Riemann zeta function within the critical region must lie on the critical line 
.
Another illustration to support the above observation is Figure 5 which illustrates a close up of the function 
 around 
 for 
 values of 0.4, 0.5, 0.6 and scale factor 
. Observe that 
 has a zero while 
 and 
 are not zero indicating the sum of squares are positive for these values of 
 and 
. 
Figure 2. Plot of 
 for 
.
Figure 3. Plot of 
 for 
.
Figure 4. Plot of 
 for 
.
Figure 5. Plot of 
 for 
.
The remainder of this paper will present evidence to support the above observation by developing the sum of squares into a form amenable for analysis.
7. Introduction to the Series 
 and 
Observe that by addition of the equations (19) one can express 
 in the form 
	
	(21)
In a similar fashion one can show by subtraction of the equations (19) and after simplification there results 
	
	(22)
Using the identity 
 the Equations (21) and (22) can be expressed in the form
	
	(23)
where 
	
	(24)
and 
	
	(25)
The Equations (23) can be added and subtracted to obtain the relations 
	
	(26)
The following Figure 6 & Figure 7 are sketches of the functions 
 for selected values of 
 and 
.
(a)                                            (b)
Figure 6. (a) 
 for 
; (b) 
 for 
. 
Figure 7. Plot of 
 and 
 for 
 and 
.
8. Summary
Examing the zeta function in the complex plane 
 we have found
(i) There are no zeros in the region 
 
(ii) There are trivial zeros at 
, 
 
(iii) There are no nontrivial zeros in the region 
 
(iv) There are no zeros on the lines 
 and 
 
(v) The critical region 
 remains to be investigated. In the next section let us examine the statements that in the critical region
	
	(27)
because if they are true then the zeros of the Riemann zeta function within the critical region must lie on the critical line 
.
9. The Sum of Squares Analysis
The representations of 
 and 
 in the Equations (26) allows one to obtain the expression 
	
	(28)
which we will employ to analyze the equations (27). Consider the following cases. 
Case 1: 
 which implies 
 and 
 for all 
 
When 
 the equation (28) reduces to 
	
	(29)
Make note that the functions 
 and 
 are oscillating functions so that when these functions are squared, there results a spike in the graph of the right-hand side when these function intersect and are zero simultaneously. The equation (29) is the equation which defines the values for 
 where the right-hand side is zero. If 
 represents a zero of the right-hand side when 
 
then a zero of the zeta function has the form 
. G.H. Hardy and J.E. 
Littlewood, reference [8], showed there are an infinite number of values for 
 which make the right-hand side of equation (29) equal to zero.
In this case the t-values producing the zeros of the zeta function must lie on the critical line 
 where 
 must satisfy the equation 
	
	(30)
For values of 
 that do not satisfy the Equation (29) we obtain the equation 
	
	(31)
since all the terms are squared.
If 
 and 
 are simultaneously zero then the equations (26) become 
	
	
which implies that the values of 
 which satisfy the equations 
	
	
simultaneously will also provide the roots of the zeta function on the critical line. 
Case 2: 
 with 
 and 
 lying in the critical strip, 
Consider next the case where the right-hand side of equation (28) is zero for some value of 
 and 
, then the equation (28) becomes 
	
	
which implies 
 and 
 and consequently one finds that 
	
	
which represents a sum of squares different from zero for those values of 
 and 
 in the critical strip which create a zero for the right-hand side of equation (28).
If the right-hand side of equation (28) is greater than zero for some value of 
 and 
 in the critical strip, say 
	
	(32)
where 
 is a positive constant, then it can be demonstrated that 
	
	
For example, let 
 denote nonzero constants and consider the following cases
1) If 
 and 
, then 
 and 
 
2) If 
 and 
, then 
 and 
 
3) If 
 and 
, then 
 and 
so that in all cases the sum of squares is some constant which is greater than zero for all values of 
 and 
 producing a nonzero right-hand side 
. 
Therefore the sum of squares 
 is always greater then zero for all values of 
 and 
 in the critical region when 
.
10. Conclusions
Instead of examining the functions 
 and 
 we have elected to examine the sum of squares 
 using graphics associated with the function 
	
	
where 
 is a scale factor. We have demonstrated that for 
 in the critical strip 
(i) 
 for all 
 while 
 and
(ii) 
 for all 
 while 
so that the zeros of the Riemann zeta function within the critical region must lie on the critical line 
. The solutions 
 obtained by solving the equation 
	
	(33)
produce the zeta function roots 
. The right-hand side of the above 
equation (33) represents oscillations and so one can get an understanding of the infinite number of roots predicted by G.H. Hardy.
The above analysis is suggested as an alternative way to study the Riemann hypothesis that all zeros of the zeta function must have the form 
.