Prevalence and Antimicrobial Sensibility Profile Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis Isolated from Women in Brazzaville
Mireille Jeanine Sita Maboundou Bitsi1*, Esther Nina Ngoyi Ontsira2,3, Tanguy Mieret2,4, Bonaventure Max Lazare Peneme1, Victange Venceslas Géraud Nionia5, Fils Landry Mpele2,6, Narcisse Ngangoue7, Junior Patrick Sergy Bissoko1
1Technical and Scientific Faculty, Marien NGOUABI University, Brazzaville, Congo.
2Health Sciences Faculty, Marien NGOUABI University, Brazzaville, Congo.
3Bacteriology-Virology Laboratory, University Hospital Center, Brazzaville, Congo.
4National Public Health Laboratory, Brazzaville, Congo.
5Gynecology-Obstetrics Department, Referral Hospital Center of Mfilou, Brazzaville, Congo.
6UNDP Laboratory, Brazzaville, Congo.
7Laboratory of the Clinic Medico Chirurgical COGEMO, Brazzaville, Congo.
DOI: 10.4236/ojmm.2024.144018   PDF    HTML   XML   100 Downloads   627 Views  

Abstract

Background: Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum are opportunistic pathogens frequently encountered in the female genital tract. They are involved in various infections that can lead to serious complications such as pregnancy complications, spontaneous abortions, bacterial vaginosis, salpingitis, and infertility. Syndromic management is common, but monitoring antibiotic sensitivity is crucial to limit the emergence and spread of resistant strains. Methodology: A descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted at the Clinique Médico-Chirurgicale COGEMO in Brazzaville between January 2019 and December 2021, involving 162 sexually active women followed up in the gynecology-obstetrics department. Duplicate endocervical samples were collected and analyzed using the Mycoplasma AF Genital System kit (Liofilchem) to identify Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum, as well as their sensitivity profiles to fluoroquinolones, macrolides, and tetracyclines. Results: The prevalence of genital mycoplasmas was 21.6%. Ureaplasma urealyticum was detected in 10.49% of the samples, Mycoplasma hominis in 3.08%, and co-infections in 8.02%. Women infected with Ureaplasma urealyticum were generally in a couple, aged 28 to 37 years, unemployed, and asymptomatic. For Mycoplasma hominis, the profile was similar but with a wider age range of 18 to 47 years. Mycoplasma hominis showed high resistance to pefloxacin (80%), erythromycin (60%), tetracycline (60%), and doxycycline (60%). In co-infections, resistances were 61.4% for erythromycin and 53.85% for tetracycline. Ureaplasma urealyticum showed a sensitivity significantly higher than 20% for all tested antibiotic molecules. Conclusion: This study highlights the high prevalence of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum in the female genital tract and their concerning resistance to antibiotics. Mycoplasma hominis shows high resistance while Ureaplasma urealyticum presents better sensitivity, though still notable. The variability of observed sensitivity profiles underscores the need for personalized therapeutic approaches based on updated data to protect women’s reproductive health.

Share and Cite:

Bitsi, M. , Ontsira, E. , Mieret, T. , Peneme, B. , Nionia, V. , Mpele, F. , Ngangoue, N. and Bissoko, J. (2024) Prevalence and Antimicrobial Sensibility Profile Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis Isolated from Women in Brazzaville. Open Journal of Medical Microbiology, 14, 230-245. doi: 10.4236/ojmm.2024.144018.

1. Introduction

Genital mycoplasmas, specifically Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum, are small bacteria lacking a cell wall, capable of multiplying autonomously [1]-[3]. Ureaplasma urealyticum belongs to the genus Ureaplasma and is characterised by its ability to hydrolyse urea. It relies heavily on this metabolic pathway to produce energy. While Mycoplasma hominis belongs to the Mycoplasma genus and is capable of metabolising arginine to produce energy [4]. These microorganisms are frequently encountered in the genital tract of asymptomatic sexually active women of reproductive age. Genital colonization by these bacteria varies worldwide, with rates ranging from 20% to 30% for Mycoplasma hominis and from 60% to 80% for Ureaplasma urealyticum [5] [6]. These bacteria are implicated in numerous pathologies and are generally associated with pelvic inflammatory diseases, endometritis, salpingitis, chorioamnionitis, as well as severe complications such as spontaneous abortions, infertility, prematurity, and low birth weight [7]-[9]. Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum play a significant role among the agents responsible for sexually transmitted infections, posing major public health problems.

Epidemiological data on mycoplasma infections vary according to the study population, socio-economic conditions, and geographical area. For example, Bartolini et al., in 2017, found a prevalence of 24.6% in Padua, Italy; Zhu et al., in 2012, reported 62.16% in China among patients with genital infections; and Gandji et al., in 2013, observed 38.6% prevalence among women in Cotonou [10]-[12]. In Burkina Faso, Djigma et al., in 2008, found a prevalence of 26.7%, while in Gabon, Kouegnignan et al., in 2015, reported an incidence of 68.5%, and Mokoko et al., in 2021, observed a prevalence of 64% in Pointe-Noire, Congo Brazzaville among infertile couples attending Louandjili Hospital [13]-[15]. The prevalences of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis also vary considerably. For example, in a tertiary hospital in China, 56.53% and 11.02% of outpatients in gynecology were infected, respectively [16]. Imudia et al., in a retrospective study on patients undergoing initial infertility evaluation, observed 20.1% and 1.3%, respectively [17]. In Italy, prevalences of 9.0% and 8.6% were reported among women of reproductive age [18]. In Mali, Guindo et al., in 2022, found prevalences of 53% and 6.1%, respectively [19], while in Cameroon, Thomas Djifack et al., in 2020, detected prevalences of 48.8% and 5.6%, respectively [1].

The pathologies caused by these bacteria often remain underdiagnosed due to the non-specific nature of their symptoms. In developing countries, these infections are poorly documented due to syndromic management, poor clinical presentations, and the lack of adequate laboratory infrastructure. Mycoplasmas, lacking a cell wall, escape the action of beta-lactam antibiotics. Antibiotics active and commonly used against these microorganisms mainly include tetracyclines, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones [20]. Antibiotic resistance in Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis is a concerning issue and poses a growing threat to reproductive health [21]. An increase in resistance of these mycoplasmas has been reported globally over the past twenty years, reaching 10% and 35%, respectively, for Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis to tetracyclines [22]-[24]. In France, a resistance rate of 5.0% to tetracycline for Mycoplasma hominis and 5.4% to levofloxacin for Ureaplasma urealyticum was reported in 2018 [25]. Additionally, a study in Douala revealed resistance of Ureaplasma urealyticum to clindamycin and Mycoplasma hominis to erythromycin and tetracycline [26].

In Congo, few studies on the prevalence and epidemiology of these infections have been conducted, so their consequences are likely underestimated in the population. César et al., in 2020, showed that sexually transmitted infections with Chlamydia and mycoplasmas were the most implicated in infertility among patients attending Louandili Hospital in Pointe-Noire [15]. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of genital mycoplasmas (Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum) isolated from our samples and to evaluate the sensitivity profile of these strains to commonly used antibiotics.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Period, Framework, and Patient Recruitment

This study was conducted in the laboratory of the Clinique Médico-Chirurgicale COGEMO in Brazzaville. It is a descriptive cross-sectional study carried out from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021. It included 162 sexually active women, followed in gynecology-obstetrics in various public and private hospitals and medical centers in the city of Brazzaville. The sample consisted of patients who came to the laboratory of the aforementioned clinic for medical tests prescribed by their attending physician.

Duplicate endocervical samples were collected and analyzed using the Mycoplasma AF Genital System kit (Liofilchem) for the culture and identification of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum, as well as to establish their sensitivity profiles to fluoroquinolones, macrolides, and tetracyclines. The main reasons for testing included couple infertility, leukorrhea, pelvic pain, miscarriages, abortions, and screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs).

A total of 162 sexually active patients aged 18 to 55 years were included in this study, after obtaining their informed voluntary consent. Women undergoing antibiotic therapy, menstruating during the study period, and those who did not give their consent were excluded. All patients in this study were from the city of Brazzaville from different neighborhoods.

The variables studied included symptoms and sociodemographic data, collected using a survey form. The recruitment of the study population was exhaustive. The observed prevalences were compared to those of other studies using a homogeneity test.

2.2. Methodology

Identification of mycoplasmas was carried out using ready-to-use liquid media containing urea and arginine, allowing titration and identification of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum. The commercial A.F. GENITAL SYSTEM kit from Diagnostic Liofilchem, comprising 24 wells, each containing a biochemical growth indicator substrate and antibiotics (selection markers), was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cultures with a titre of 105 colony-forming units (CFU) changed color.

Endocervical samples were collected using two sterile swabs provided in the sampling kits containing the transport and preservation medium (BD Universal Viral Transport for Viral, Chlamydia, Mycoplasma, and Ureaplasma specimens). These swabs were introduced into the fusiform cavity of the endocervix, rotated with a light and prolonged friction to capture the maximum cells, then discharged into the transport and preservation medium and transported to the laboratory at ambient temperature to be inoculated in the Mycoplasma A.F. GENITAL SYSTEM kit from Diagnostic Liofilchem according to the procedure indicated by the manufacturer.

The following antibiotics were tested for their respective sensitivity on Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum: doxycycline (DOX), minocycline (MIN), ofloxacin (OFL), pefloxacin (PEP), clarithromycin (CLA), tetracycline (TET), clindamycin (CD), josamycin (JOS), and erythromycin (E).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Microsoft Office Excel 2016 software was used to create the database, and software for statistical SPSS (30.0) analyses. The results were expressed as counts and percentages for qualitative variables, or as means with their standard deviations for normally distributed quantitative variables, and medians with the first and third quartiles for skewed quantitative variables. The Chi-2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare and evaluate the association between study variables and the occurrence of infection with Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, and co-infections. The significance level was set at 0.05.

3. Results

The average age of the 162 included patients was 32 years, with a standard deviation of 6.97 (range: 18 to 55 years). Between January 2019 and December 2021, a total of 162 endocervical samples were analyzed. The results revealed 35 positive cases of genital mycoplasmas, indicating an overall prevalence of 21.6% (35/162). Ureaplasma urealyticum was identified alone in 10.5% of cases (17/162), Mycoplasma hominis in 3.1% (5/162), and a co-infection in 8.02% (13/162).

3.1. Ureaplasma urealyticum

Table 1 reveals that the most affected age group is 28 to 37 years. Formal employment is more common compared to other professional categories. Women in a relationship have a higher incidence than single women. Asymptomatic forms predominate over symptomatic forms. Women with a single partner have a higher incidence than those with multiple partners.

Table 1. Distribution of Ureaplasma urealyticum by age, profession, symptoms, marital status, contraceptive and number of partners.

Variables

Negative

Positive

OR [IC 95%]

p-value

N = 132

N = 30

Age (year), Avg ± sd

32.5 ± 6.86

30.8 ± 6.86

0.96 [0.91; 1.02]

0.216

age (year) range

1.000

18 - 27

35 (26.5%)

8 (26.7%)

0.96 [0.37; 2.53]

28 - 37

59 (44.7%)

14 (46.7%)

Ref.

38 - 47

34 (25.8%)

8 (26.7%)

0.99 [0.38; 2.60]

48 - 55

4 (3.03%)

0 (0.00%)

0.00 [0.00; .]

Profession

0.537

Non-formal employment

29 (22.0%)

4 (13.3%)

0.67 [0.20; 2.25]

Ref.

Formal employment

58 (43.9%)

12 (40.0%)

Ref.

0.403

pupil/student

9 (6.82%)

3 (10.0%)

1.61 [0.38; 6.85]

0.596

Unemployed

36 (27.3%)

11 (36.7%)

1.48 [0.59; 3.70]

0.188

Marital status

1.000

Single

5 (3.79%)

1 (3.33%)

Ref.

Couple

127 (96.2%)

29 (96.7%)

1.14 [0.13; 10.1]

Presence of symptoms

0.919

Asymptomatic

84 (63.6%)

20 (66.7%)

Ref.

Ref.

symptomatic

48 (36.4%)

10 (33.3%)

0.88 [0.38; 2.02]

0.769

Contraceptive

0.053

absence

128 (97.0%)

28 (93.3%)

Ref.

Implant

0 (0.00%)

2 (6.67%)

. [.; .]

IUD (Intrauterine device)

4 (3.03%)

0 (0.00%)

0.00 [0.00; .]

Maternity desire

107 (81.1%)

28 (93.3%)

3.27 [0.73; 14.6]

0.175

Number of partners

0.427

>1

28 (21.2%)

9 (30.0%)

Ref.

1

104 (78.8%)

21 (70.0%)

0.63 [0.26; 1.52]

3.2. Mycoplasma hominis

The profile of the patients is that of women aged 18 to 47 years, unemployed, and living in a relationship. Asymptomatic forms predominate over symptomatic forms. Monogamy appears to be a protective factor (p-value = 0.007, OR = 0.24), reducing the risk by 0.24, as indicated in Table 2.

Table 2. Distribution of Mycoplasma hominis by age, profession, symptoms, marital status, contraceptive and number of partners.

Variables

negative

positive

OR [IC 95%]

p-value

N = 144

N = 18

Age (year), Avg. ± sd.

32.5 ± 6.77

30.0 ± 7.48

0.95 [0.88; 1.02]

0.198

age (year) range

0.657

18 - 27

37 (25.7%)

6 (33.3%)

1.81 [0.55; 6.02]

28 - 37

67 (46.5%)

6 (33.3%)

Ref.

38 - 47

36 (25.0%)

6 (33.3%)

1.86 [0.56; 6.19]

48 - 55

4 (2.78%)

0 (0.00%)

0.00 [0.00; .]

Profession

0.212

Non-formal employment

31 (21.5%)

2 (11.1%)

0.69 [0.13; 3.61]

Formal employment

64 (44.4%)

6 (33.3%)

Ref.

pupil/student

9 (6.25%)

3 (16.7%)

3.56 [0.75; 16.8]

Unemployed

40 (27.8%)

7 (38.9%)

1.87 [0.59; 5.95]

Marital status

0.513

Single

5 (3.47%)

1 (5.56%)

Ref.

Couple

139 (96.5%)

17 (94.4%)

0.61 [0.07; 5.55]

Presence of symptoms

1.000

Asymptomatic

92 (63.9%)

12 (66.7%)

Ref.

Ref.

symptomatic

52 (36.1%)

6 (33.3%)

0.88 [0.31; 2.50]

0.837

Contraceptive

1.000

absence

138 (95.8%)

18 (100%)

Ref.

Implant

2 (1.39%)

0 (0.00%)

0.00 [0.00; .]

IUD (Intrauterine device)

4 (2.78%)

0 (0.00%)

0.00 [0.00; .]

Maternity desire

103 (81.1%)

16 (94.1%)

3.73 [0.47; 29.5]

0.307

Number of partners

0.007

>1

28 (19.4%)

9 (50.0%)

Ref.

1

116 (80.6%)

9 (50.0%)

0.24 [0.09; 0.66]

3.3. Coinfection Mycoplasma hominis et Ureaplasma urealyticum

In Table 3, the prevalence of coinfected patients was 13/162, or 8.02%.

Table 3. Distribution of coinfections à Mycoplasma hominis et Ureaplasma urealyticum by age, profession, symptoms, marital status, contraceptive and number of partners.

Variables

Negative

Positive

OR [IC 95%]

p-value

N = 127

N = 13

Age (year), Moy ± sd

32.5 ± 6.93

28.8 ± 8.08

1.09 [1.19; 0.99]

0.133

age year range

0.360

18 - 27

35 (27.6%)

6 (46.2%)

Ref.

28 - 37

56 (44.1%)

3 (23.1%)

3.20 [0.75; 13.6]

38 - 47

32 (25.2%)

4 (30.8%)

1.37 [0.35; 5.31]

48 - 55

4 (3.15%)

0 (0.00%)

. [.; .]

Profession

0.222

Non-formal employment

29 (22.8%)

2 (15.4%)

Ref.

Formal employment

56 (44.1%)

4 (30.8%)

0.97 [0.17; 5.59]

pupil/student

9 (7.09%)

3 (23.1%)

0.21 [0.03; 1.44]

Unemployed

33 (26.0%)

4 (30.8%)

0.57 [0.10; 3.34]

Marital status

0.449

Single

5 (3.94%)

1 (7.69%)

Ref.

Couple

122 (96.1%)

12 (92.3%)

2.03 [0.22; 18.9]

Presence of symptoms

0.542

Asymptomatic

82 (64.6%)

10 (76.9%)

Ref.

symptomatic

45 (35.4%)

3 (23.1%)

1.83 [0.48; 6.99]

Contraceptive

1.000

absence

123 (96.9%)

13 (100%)

Ref.

IUD (Intrauterine device)

4 (3.15%)

0 (0.00%)

. [.; .]

Maternity desire

103 (81.1%)

12 (92.3%)

0.36 [0.04; 2.89]

0.464

Number of partners

0.013

>1

26 (20.5%)

7 (53.8%)

4.53 [1.40; 14.6]

1

101 (79.5%)

6 (46.2%)

Ref.

3.4. Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile in Relation to Mycoplasmas

The most commonly used families of antibiotics, such as fluoroquinolones and cyclins, have shown higher levels of resistance than those observed with the macrolide family (Table 4). The overall antibiotic susceptibility of mycoplasma showed high resistance to pefloxacin, erythromycin and tetracycline, as shown in Figure 1.

Table 4. Susceptibility of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis infections to antibiotics.

Antibiotics

UU

MH

MH + UU

S

I

R

S

I

R

S

I

R

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

Fluoroquinolone

Pefloxacin

4 (23.53)

7 (41.18)

6 (35.29)

0(0)

1(20)

4(80)

4 (30.77)

2(15.38)

7 (53.85)

Ofloxacin

10 (58.82)

5 (29.41)

2 (11.77)

2(40)

1(20)

2(40)

6 (46.15)

2 (15.38)

5 (38.46)

Macrolides

Clarithromycin

10 (58.82)

5 (29.41)

2 (11.77)

3(60)

0(0)

2(40)

6 (58.46)

4 (30.77)

3 (20.77)

Clindamycin

9 (52.94)

5 (29.41)

3 (17.65)

1(20)

4(80)

0(0)

4 (30.77)

7 (53.85)

2 (15.38)

Erythromycin

7 (41.18)

5 (29.41)

5 (29.41)

0(0)

2(40)

3(60)

1 (7.70)

4 (30.77)

8 (61.54)

Josamicine

13 (76.47)

2 (11.77)

2 (11.77)

1(20)

4(80)

0(0)

6 (46.15)

7 (53.85)

0 (0)

Cycline

Tétracyclin

4 (23.53)

5 (29.41)

8 (47.06)

0(0)

2 (40)

3(60)

4 (30.77)

2(15.3)

7 (53.85)

Minocyclin

6 (36.29)

4 (23.53)

7 (41.18)

2(40)

3(60)

0(0)

10(76.92)

3 (23.08)

0(0)

Doxycyclin

9 (52.94)

6 (36.29)

2 (11.77)

0(0)

2(40)

3(60)

3 (23.08)

8 (61.54)

2 (15.38)

Figure 1. Overall sensitivity of genital mycoplasma to antibiotics (S = Sensitive, I = Intermediate, R = Resistant).

High levels of antibiotic resistance have been observed for Mycoplasma hominis and Mycoplasma hominis + Ureaplasma urealyticum co-infections. The following antibiotics show resistance rates for Mycoplasma hominis: pefloxacin (80%), erythromycin (60%), tetracycline (60%), and doxycycline (60%). Regarding Mycoplasma hominis + Ureaplasma urealyticum co-infections, the resistance rates are as follows: erythromycin (61.4%), pefloxacin (53.85%), and tetracycline (53.85%).

4. Discussion

This study aimed to determine the prevalence and antibiotic sensitivity profile of genital mycoplasma strains (Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis) isolated from samples collected from women consulting in gynecology-obstetrics. The study population comprised women living in urban areas of Brazzaville, of reproductive age, and sexually active. Detection, identification, and antibiotic sensitivity tests were carried out using the Mycoplasma AF Genital System kit from Liofilchem. This phenotypic diagnostic method is rapid and simple compared to conventional culture methods, which are often laborious and slow, and PCR, which is often inaccessible in developing countries.

Among the 162 women studied, 35 positive cases of mycoplasmas were documented: 10.49% (17/162) for Ureaplasma urealyticum, 3.08% (5/162) for Mycoplasma hominis, and 8.02% (13/162) for mixed infections (Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis). The results indicate a disproportionate incidence with a predominance of Ureaplasma urealyticum, followed by co-infections, and lastly, Mycoplasma hominis. These findings align with those of numerous authors who report a higher proportion of Ureaplasma urealyticum infections [27]-[29]. Several factors may explain this predominance of Ureaplasma urealyticum. Firstly, it is possible that this pathogen is more resilient or more adept at colonizing the female genital tract compared to Mycoplasma hominis. Additionally, sexual behaviors and healthcare practices may play a role in this high incidence. Co-infections, representing 8.02% of cases, demonstrate that patients can be simultaneously colonized by multiple mycoplasmas, complicating diagnosis and treatment. The coexistence of these pathogens could be due to environmental factors or common lifestyle habits favoring multiple colonizations.

The prevalences of genital mycoplasmas vary from country to country but share certain similarities: Ureaplasma urealyticum is more frequently isolated than Mycoplasma hominis, and both microorganisms are commonly isolated in sexually active individuals [8]. The colonization rate of Ureaplasma urealyticum in this population was 10.49%. This result differs from those observed by Baraika et al. (2020) in Gabon (64.7%), Mefo et al. (2023) in Cameroon (34.1%), and Bolti et al. (2022) in Chad (63.8%) [30]-[32]. The prevalence of Mycoplasma hominis in this study was 3.08%, a rate that differs from the results obtained by Baraika et al. (2020) in Gabon (22.7%), Mefo et al. (2023) in Cameroon (11.4%), and Bolti et al. (2022) in Chad (13.8%) [30]-[32]. Variations between results obtained in Congo, Gabon, and Cameroon may be attributed to differences in research methodologies, characteristics of the studied populations, or other contextual factors. Risky sexual behaviors and specific cultural practices may also play a role in the spread of these infections.

The results of this study revealed no significant association between symptoms, profession, and infections with Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis. These observations are consistent with the results obtained by Diadhiou et al. (2019) in Dakar [33]. Several factors could explain this lack of significant association. Firstly, it is possible that infections with Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis are largely asymptomatic, complicating the identification of direct correlations with specific symptoms. Furthermore, the profession of the participants may not directly influence the incidence of these infections, which are primarily transmitted sexually. Additionally, these results suggest that risk factors commonly associated with other sexually transmitted infections, such as profession or the presence of specific symptoms, do not necessarily apply to infections with Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis. This observation underscores the importance of developing specific screening and treatment strategies for these pathogens, independently of traditional risk factors.

The results of this study show that the age group most affected by Ureaplasma urealyticum is between 28 and 37 years, with a prevalence of 8.66%, while women aged over 48 years are the least affected. Previous studies conducted by R. Ahounga et al. (2020), Wang et al. (2016), and Imudia et al. (2008) have also revealed a higher prevalence in the 26 to 39 age group. A common point among these studies is the higher colonization in women aged 25 to 35 years, probably due to high sexual activity and non-use of condoms. These behaviors can increase the risk of infection with Ureaplasma urealyticum. These results highlight the importance of targeting public health interventions and awareness campaigns towards sexually active young adults. Promoting condom use and safe sexual practices could reduce the prevalence of Ureaplasma urealyticum infections in this age group. Moreover, it would be beneficial to strengthen access to healthcare and screening services for this population to detect and treat infections at an early stage.

The incidence of Ureaplasma urealyticum is higher in pregnant and sexually active women, as demonstrated by Iwasaka and McCormack [34]-[35]. The majority of women in couples use few contraceptives, and having only one partner is a protective factor against these infections. Conversely, multiple sexual partners, age, and socio-economic status are major risk factors, increasing the chances of sexually transmitted infections with each new partner [5].

Our study revealed significant variability in the antimicrobial sensitivity profiles of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis strains isolated. The macrolide group showed higher sensitivity compared to cyclines and fluoroquinolones. The highest sensitivity for Ureaplasma urealyticum was observed with clarithromycin, josamycin, and ofloxacin, with a rate of 58.82%. This result aligns with those obtained by Bayraktar et al. (2010) [5], who also reported satisfactory results with clarithromycin and josamycin. For Mycoplasma hominis, clarithromycin exhibited high sensitivity at 60%, followed by ofloxacin and minocycline at 40%. Conversely, resistance of 60% and 80% was noted for doxycycline and pefloxacin, respectively. Notably, no resistance of Mycoplasma hominis strains to josamycin and clindamycin was observed. This finding is consistent with the results obtained by Min Young Lee et al. (2016), who showed that all Mycoplasma hominis strains were sensitive to josamycin [36]. This sensitivity of Mycoplasma hominis to josamycin and clindamycin could be explained by their recent and infrequent use, their specific mechanisms of action, the lack of bacterial population exposure to these antibiotics, and inherent genetic differences between bacterial strains.

Co-infections showed a high sensitivity of 76% to minocycline, but a high resistance to erythromycin of 61.28%, likely due to the presence of Mycoplasma hominis. Tetracycline and erythromycin also exhibited high resistance rates, ranging from 40% to 60% for mycoplasmas. These results diverge from those reported by Skiljevic et al. (2016) [24]. Several factors may explain these discrepancies. Firstly, there could be methodological differences between the studies, such as sampling techniques, analysis methods, or study populations. Geographical and socio-demographic variations can also influence sensitivity and resistance rates, as access to healthcare, antibiotic prescription practices, and sexual behaviors can vary significantly from one region to another. Additionally, the excessive and inappropriate use of antibiotics, particularly among children and pregnant women in certain African populations, can lead to acquired resistance and therapeutic failures, as demonstrated in a study of women in Bamako, Mali [19], and another study of pregnant women in Egypt [37]. This observation is supported by previous studies that have demonstrated that over-prescription of antibiotics is a key factor in the emergence of resistance. It is also important to consider the genetic mechanisms underlying the observed resistance. For example, some mycoplasmas acquire resistance to tetracycline via the Tet (M) mutation [38], which can explain the high resistance rates in this study.

Among all the tested isolates, overall resistance to fluoroquinolones ranged from 25.71% for ofloxacin to 40% for pefloxacin, which remains high. Conversely, the absence of resistance of Mycoplasma hominis isolates to josamycin and clindamycin, as well as the sensitivity of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum isolates to clarithromycin, demonstrate the good activity of these molecules against mycoplasmas. These results confirm that josamycin, clindamycin, and clarithromycin are important therapeutic agents for treating infections primarily caused by Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum.

5. Conclusions

This study reveals that Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum are common opportunistic pathogens in the female genital tract, presenting concerning antibiotic resistance rates. Mycoplasma hominis shows high resistance, necessitating continuous surveillance to adapt treatments and limit the spread of resistant strains. Ureaplasma urealyticum shows better sensitivity, although its prevalence remains notable. The variability in observed sensitivity profiles highlights the need for personalized therapeutic approaches, considering the specificities of local strains and prescription practices. Clindamycin, josamycin, and clarithromycin emerge as promising therapeutic options, although continuous monitoring is required to prevent the emergence of new resistances. The results underscore the importance of a proactive and informed approach, based on personalized therapeutic strategies guided by updated sensitivity data, to protect women’s reproductive health. Increased vigilance and continuous treatment adaptation are crucial to prevent severe complications and ensure effective management of genital infections.

In order to disseminate knowledge and awareness of women’s reproductive health, sexual and reproductive education needs to be strengthened, community awareness campaigns need to be conducted, the health system needs to be strengthened in the introduction of accessible diagnostic tools, community and religious leaders need to be involved, research and advocacy need to be supported with the aim of including reproductive health in national public health priorities, and a sufficient budget needs to be allocated for mass campaigns. Men also need to be involved to make them aware of their role in women’s reproductive health, particularly in terms of contraception and support during pregnancy and motherhood.

Financing

This study was not financed.

Data Availability

All data used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Consent

Informed consent was obtained for each participant or from a parent or guardian for underage participants.

Authors’ Contributions

MJSMB and JPSB carried out the analyses in collaboration with the technicians at the Clinique Medical Chirurgical COGEMO laboratory to obtain the results. ENNO, BNP, VVGN, FLM, MT and NN contributed to improving the manuscript. MJSB, ENNO and BMP participated in the revision of the research project.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the laboratory technicians at the Clinique Medical Chirurgical COGEMO in Brazzaville, Ms. KOUKIMINA Djenite; Mr. KABA Arnaud Guénolé and TOUNTONDELE Lucienne, who interviewed patients, took samples and carried out bacteriological analyses. We would also like to thank Mr. Ted MOUSSAKA; Dr. MOUSSOUNGOU Second Armand, technicians at the laboratory of the Clinique Medical Chirurgical COGEMO who took part in the bacteriological analyses and Dr. MOUSSOUNGOU Second Armand for improving the manuscript.

Abbreviations

S

Sensitivity

I

Intermediate

R

Resistant

U.U

Ureaplasma urealyticum

M.H

Mycoplasma hominis

Conflicts of Interest

The authors do not declare any conflict of interest.

References

[1] Tadongfack, T.D., Nitcheu, I.L.S., Keubo, F.R.N., Mutarambirwa, H.D., Tedjieu, R.H., Tatang, C.T., et al. (2020) Epidemiology, Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Sexually Transmitted Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum Infections in Dschang, West Cameroon. Microbiology Research Journal International, 30, 19-29.[CrossRef
[2] Horner, P., Donders, G., Cusini, M., Gomberg, M., Jensen, J.S. and Unemo, M. (2018) Should We Be Testing for Urogenital Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma parvum and Ureaplasma urealyticum in Men and Women?—A Position Statement from the European sti Guidelines Editorial Board. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 32, 1845-1851.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Waites, K.B., Schelonka, R.L., Xiao, L., Grigsby, P.L. and Novy, M.J. (2009) Congenital and Opportunistic Infections: Ureaplasma Species and Mycoplasma hominis. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 14, 190-199.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Waites, K.B. and Xiao, L. (2015) Mycoplasmas and Ureaplasmas of Humans. Molecular Medical Microbiology, 3, 1587-1609.[CrossRef
[5] Bayraktar, M.R., Ozerol, I.H., Gucluer, N. and Celik, O. (2010) Prevalence and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum in Pregnant Women. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 14, e90-e95.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Clegg, A., Passey, M., Yoannes, M. and Michael, A. (1997) High Rates of Genital Mycoplasma Infection in the Highlands of Papua New Guinea Determined Both by Culture and by a Commercial Detection Kit. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 35, 197-200.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Patai, K., Szilágyi, G., Hubay, M., Szentmáriay, I.F. and Paulin, F. (2005) Severe Endometritis Caused by Genital Mycoplasmas after Caesarean Section. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 54, 1249-1250.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Cassell, G.H., Waites, K.B., Watson, H.L., Crouse, D.T. and Harasawa, R. (1993) Ureaplasma urealyticum Intrauterine Infection: Role in Prematurity and Disease in Newborns. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 6, 69-87.[CrossRef
[9] Kletzel, H.H., Rotem, R., Barg, M., Michaeli, J. and Reichman, O. (2018) Ureaplasma urealyticum: The Role as a Pathogen in Women’s Health, a Systematic Review. Current Infectious Disease Reports, 20, Article No. 33.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Bartolini, A., Scapaticci, M., Akkouche, W., Boldrin, C. and Rossi, L. (2017) Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Genital Mycoplasmas Detected by Mycoplasma IST 2 from Urogenital Samples in Padua, Italy, between January 2014 and December 2015. Microbiologia Medica, 32, Article No. 6503.[CrossRef
[11] Ling, Y., Wu, T., Hou, Y., Cheng, X., Zhu, C., Liu, J., et al. (2012) Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma Hominis in Chinese Women with Genital Infectious Diseases. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology, 78, 406-407.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Gandji, S., Bankole, H., Dougnon, T., Da Silva, J., Zannou, C. and Biaou, O. (2013) Survenue des obstructions tubaires chez les femmes à Cotonou (Bénin): Rôle des bactéries. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 7, 1338-1343.[CrossRef
[13] Djigma, F., Ouedraogo, C., Ouermi, D., Bisseye, C., Sagna, T., Zeba, M., et al. (2008 ) Co-Infection de Mycoplasma hominis et de Ureaplasma urealyticum chez les femmes séropositives au VIH à Ouagadougou. Sciences de la Santé. Sciences De La Santé, 31.
https://revuesciences-techniquesburkina.org/index.php/sciences_de_la_sante/article/view/241
[14] Kouegnigan Rerambiah, L., Ndong, J., Medzegue, S., Elisee-Ndam, M. and Djoba Siawaya, J.F. (2015) Genital Mycoplasma Infections and Their Resistance Phenotypes in an African Setting. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 34, 1087-1090.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Mokoko, J.C., Eouani, L.M.E., Buambo, G.R.J., Mpia, S.P., Itoua, C. and Iloki, L.H. (2021) Secondary Infertility of the Couple. Epidemiological and Clinical Aspects of Patients at the Loandjili General Hospital in Pointe Noire (Republic of Congo).
https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20210153030
[16] Zhang, W., Li, L., Zhang, X., Fang, H., Chen, H. and Rong, C. (2021) Infection Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance Levels in Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis in Gynecological Outpatients of a Tertiary Hospital in China from 2015 to 2018. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, 2021, Article ID: 8842267.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Imudia, A.N., Detti, L., Puscheck, E.E., Yelian, F.D. and Diamond, M.P. (2008) The Prevalence of Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis, Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infections, and the Rubella Status of Patients Undergoing an Initial Infertility Evaluation. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 25, 43-46.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Leli, C., Mencacci, A., Latino, M.A., Clerici, P., Rassu, M., Perito, S., et al. (2018) Prevalence of Cervical Colonization by Ureaplasma parvum, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis and Mycoplasma genitalium in Childbearing Age Women by a Commercially Available Multiplex Real-Time PCR: An Italian Observational Multicentre Study. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, 51, 220-225.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Guindo, I. (2022) Profil de résistance aux antibiotiques de Mycoplasma hominis et Ureaplasma urealyticum identifiés chez les femmes à Bamako, Mali. Revue Malienne d’Infectiologie et de Microbiologie, 17, 32-37.[CrossRef
[20] Waites, K.B., Duffy, L.B., Bébéar, C.M., Matlow, A., Talkington, D.F., Kenny, G.E., et al. (2012) Standardized Methods and Quality Control Limits for Agar and Broth Microdilution Susceptibility Testing of Mycoplasma Pneumoniae, Mycoplasma hominis, and Ureaplasma urealyticum. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 50, 3542-3547.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Daniel Boda, A.C. (2024) An Overview Regarding the Relationship between Mollicutes, Infertility and Antibiotic Resistance (Review). Biomedical Reports.
https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/br.2024.1807
[22] Beeton, M.L. and Spiller, O.B. (2016) Antibiotic Resistance Amongureaplasma spp. Isolates: Cause for Concern? Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 72, 330-337.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Taylor-Robinson, D. (1997) Antibiotic Susceptibilities of Mycoplasmas and Treatment of Mycoplasmal Infections. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 40, 622-630.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Skiljevic, D., Mirkov, D. and Vukicevic, J. (2016) Prevalence and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum in Genital Samples Collected over 6 Years at a Serbian University Hospital. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology, 82, 37-41.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Bébéar, C., Berçot, B. and Dupin, N. (2018) Centre National de Référence des Infections Sexuellement Transmissibles bactériennes. Rapport Annuel d’activités, 1-107.
[26] Longdoh, N.A., Gregory, H.E., Djeumako, W.A., Nguedia, A.J., Francois-Xavier, M. and Tebit, K.E. (2018) The Occurrence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum in Pregnant Women in Three District Hospitals in Douala, Cameroon. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, 27, 1-11.[CrossRef
[27] Ahouga Voufo, R., Maïdadi, M.F., Mbah, E.C., Esemu, L.F., Fouodji, H.P., Molu, J.P., et al. (2020) STUDY on the Gender Prevalence and Sensitivity of Urogenital Mycoplasmas to Antibiotics in YAOUNDE, Cameroon. Scientific African, 8, e00372.[CrossRef
[28] Díaz, L., Cabrera, L.E., Fernández, T., Ibáñez, I., Torres, Y., Obregón, Y., et al. (2013) Frequency and Antimicrobial Sensitivity of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis in Patients with Vaginal Discharge. MEDICC Review, 15, 45-47.
[29] D’Inzeo, T., De Angelis, G., Fiori, B., Menchinelli, G., Liotti, F.M., Morandotti, G.A., et al. (2017) Comparison of Mycoplasma IES, Mycofast Revolution and Mycoplasma IST2 to Detect Genital Mycoplasmas in Clinical Samples. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 11, 98-101.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Baraïka, M.A., Onanga, R., Bivigou-Mboumba, B., Mabika-Mabika, A., Bisvigou, U.J., Ndouo, F.S.T., et al. (2020) Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile of Mycoplasma Hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum in Female Population, Gabon. Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology, 8, 28-32.
[31] Nda Mefo’o, J.P., Notio, R.F., Nkwele, F.M., Ngondi, G.D., Mengue, E.R., Malabo, E.N., et al. (2023) Antibiotics Resistance of Urogenital Mycoplasma in Sexually Active Women Attending Gynecologic Consultation in Douala (Cameroon). Advances in Microbiology, 13, 559-570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Bolti, M.A., Alio, H.M., Yakhoub, M.A., NadjiAdjim, N., Akouya, S.D., Allah-Siyangar, N., et al. (2022) Epidemiological Profile of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum Mycoplasmas at the University of N’Djamena Teaching Hospital (CHU-R). British Journal of Healthcare and Medical Research, 9, 88-97.
https://scholar.archive.org/work/qkam6ls57zhyjb547a77sjzltu/access/wayback/
https://doc-0g-30-docs.googleusercontent.com/docs/securesc/ha0ro937gcuc7l7deffksulhg5h7mbp1/8u7h4jm0jd156qi73uj9qj05eto5iprs/1656995850000/11966121852315336416/*/1RIZHbzijnrTkQ_ajY0q3dwTeliMMFe4h?e=download&uuid=64ed788f-c779-4182-8213-a38d567da3fd
[33] Diadhiou, M., Ba Diallo, A., Barry, M.S., Alavo, S.C., Mall, I., Gassama, O., et al. (2019) Prevalence and Risk Factors of Lower Reproductive Tract Infections in Symptomatic Women in Dakar, Senegal. Infectious Diseases: Research and Treatment, 12, 1178633719851825.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Iwasaka, T., Wada, T., Kidera, Y. and Sugimori, H. (1986) Hormonal Status and Mycoplasma Colonization in the Female Genital Tract. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 68, 263-266.
[35] Mccormack, W.M., Rosner, B., Alpert, S., Evrard, J.R., Crockett, V.A. and Zinner, S.H. (1986) Vaginal Colonization with Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 13, 67-70.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Lee, M.Y., Kim, M.H., Lee, W.I., Kang, S.Y. and Jeon, Y.L. (2016) Prevalence and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum in Pregnant Women. Yonsei Medical Journal, 57, 1271-1275.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Abdel Rahman, S.M. (2026) Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Genital Mycoplasmas among a Group of Pregnant Women. Alexandria Journal of Medicine, 52, 353-358.
https://www.ajol.info/index.php/bafm/article/view/150718
[38] Bébéar, C.M., de Barbeyrac, B., Pereyre, S. and Bébéar, C. (2007) Mycoplasmes et chlamydiae: Sensibilité et résistance aux antibiotiques. Revue Francophone des Laboratoires, 2007, 77-85.[CrossRef

Copyright © 2026 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.