Application of Machine Learning in Electronic Device Fault Diagnosis ()
1. Introduction
Electronic devices have become an indispensable component of modern society, widely applied in industrial production, transportation, healthcare, communications, and various other fields. However, with the increasing complexity of electronic device functions and integration levels, fault diagnosis and maintenance face unprecedented challenges. Traditional fault diagnosis methods, such as expert systems and rule-based approaches, often struggle to handle large-scale, high-dimensional, and nonlinear fault data. In recent years, the rapid development of machine learning technology has provided new ideas and methods for solving this problem. As an important branch of artificial intelligence, machine learning can automatically construct fault diagnosis models by learning and extracting patterns from large amounts of historical data, achieving accurate identification and prediction of electronic device faults. Compared to traditional methods, machine learning has significant advantages in handling complex systems, adapting to dynamic environments, and continuous optimization. Zhang et al. conducted systematic research on the application of machine learning in intelligent manufacturing, highlighting its importance in fault diagnosis [1]. Wang et al. further explored methods and applications of deep learning in intelligent manufacturing, providing an important theoretical foundation for this research [2].
In the field of electronic device fault diagnosis, Lei et al. reviewed the current status and development trends of machine learning applications, emphasizing the importance of data-driven approaches [3]. Zhao et al. conducted in-depth research on deep learning applications in equipment health monitoring, proposing various innovative solutions [4]. Chen et al. focused on analyzing recent advances in convolutional neural networks for fault diagnosis, providing a reference for method selection in this study [5]. Li et al. proposed a cross-domain fault diagnosis method based on deep generative neural networks, significantly improving model generalization capability [6]. Jiang et al. developed multiscale convolutional neural networks for wind turbine gearbox fault diagnosis, achieving high-precision fault identification [7]. Recent studies indicate that the application of machine learning in electronic device fault diagnosis still faces numerous challenges. Zhang et al. (2017) pointed out that effectively integrating multi-source heterogeneous data for comprehensive diagnosis remains a key issue [8]. Baruch et al. emphasized the importance of improving model interpretability [9]. Liu et al. analyzed the application of artificial intelligence in rotating machinery fault diagnosis, highlighting the limitations of existing methods in practical engineering applications [10].
Based on the review and analysis of existing research, this paper presents the following innovations: 1) systematically analyzes the current status and development trends of machine learning applications in electronic device fault diagnosis; 2) thoroughly explores specific application methods of typical algorithms such as Support Vector Machines, Decision Trees, and Deep Learning in fault diagnosis; 3) explores dynamic maintenance decision-making methods based on reinforcement learning, providing new ideas for predictive maintenance.
2. Application of Machine Learning Algorithms in Electronic Device Fault Diagnosis
2.1. Application of Support Vector Machines in Fault Classification
Support Vector Machines (SVM), as a powerful supervised learning algorithm, has been widely applied in the field of electronic device fault diagnosis. The core idea of SVM is to construct an optimal separating hyperplane in high-dimensional feature space to achieve accurate classification of different fault categories. In electronic device fault diagnosis, SVM can effectively handle high-dimensional data and small sample problems, with advantages such as strong generalization ability and high classification accuracy. SVM can process nonlinearly separable fault data through kernel function techniques, with commonly used kernel functions including linear kernels, polynomial kernels, and radial basis function (RBF) kernels. In practical applications, researchers typically need to select appropriate kernel functions based on specific fault characteristics and data distribution and optimize SVM parameters through methods such as cross-validation to obtain the best classification effect. For example, in circuit board fault diagnosis, SVM can utilize multi-dimensional features such as voltage, current, and temperature to construct a multi-classification model, achieving accurate identification of various fault types such as short circuits, open circuits, and component aging. Figure 1 illustrates the classification principle of SVM in two-dimensional feature space. By introducing slack variables and penalty factors, SVM can also handle actual fault data with noise and outliers, improving model robustness. Additionally, combining feature selection and dimensionality reduction techniques, such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), can further enhance the efficiency and accuracy of SVM in high-dimensional fault data classification.
![]()
Figure 1. SVM classification in 2D feature space.
2.2. Application of Decision Trees and Random Forests in Fault
Diagnosis
Decision trees and random forests, as intuitive and efficient machine learning algorithms, play important roles in electronic device fault diagnosis. Decision trees construct a tree-structured classification model by recursively partitioning the feature space. Each internal node represents a feature test, and each leaf node represents a fault category or diagnostic result [11]. The advantage of decision trees lies in their strong interpretability, allowing for an intuitive display of the fault diagnosis decision process, and facilitating engineer understanding and analysis. However, single decision trees are prone to overfitting problems, especially when dealing with high-dimensional and noisy fault data. To overcome this deficiency, the random forest algorithm emerged. Random forest is an ensemble learning method that improves diagnostic accuracy and robustness by constructing multiple decision trees and synthesizing their prediction results. In electronic device fault diagnosis, random forests can effectively handle multi-source heterogeneous data, such as sensor data, log information, and environmental parameters. Through feature importance analysis, random forests can also identify the most critical features for fault diagnosis, providing an important basis for fault cause analysis and preventive maintenance. In practical applications, model performance needs to be optimized by adjusting parameters such as the number of trees, tree depth, and node splitting criteria. Figure 2 shows a simplified decision tree structure for electronic device fault diagnosis.
![]()
Figure 2. Simplified decision tree for electronic device fault diagnosis.
As shown in Figure 2, the decision tree gradually narrows down the fault range through a series of decision nodes, ultimately arriving at a specific fault type.
2.3. Application of Deep Learning in Complex Fault Pattern
Recognition
As the complexity of electronic devices continues to increase, traditional machine learning methods face challenges in handling high-dimensional, nonlinear, and dynamically changing fault data. Deep learning, as a cutting-edge machine learning technology, demonstrates great potential in complex electronic device fault diagnosis with its powerful feature learning and pattern recognition capabilities. Deep learning models, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), and Deep Belief Networks (DBN), can automatically learn hierarchical feature representations from raw data without the need for manually designed feature extractors. In electronic device fault diagnosis, CNNs are commonly used to process image and signal data, such as thermal image analysis of circuit boards and fault identification of vibration signals. RNNs and their variants (such as LSTM and GRU) are suitable for processing time-series data and are capable of capturing dynamic features of fault development. The advantage of deep learning models lies in their ability to handle large-scale, multi-modal fault data and achieve end-to-end fault diagnosis. However, training deep learning models requires a large amount of labeled data, which may face challenges in practical engineering. To address this issue, researchers have proposed various methods, such as transfer learning, semi-supervised learning, and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), to reduce dependence on labeled data. Figure 3 shows an example of a deep learning architecture for electronic device fault diagnosis.
![]()
Figure 3. Deep learning architecture for electronic device fault diagnosis.
As shown in Figure 3, the deep learning architecture extracts fault features through multiple convolutional and pooling layers, then performs classification through fully connected layers, ultimately outputting fault diagnosis results.
3. Application of Machine Learning in Electronic Device Fault Prediction and Preventive Maintenance
3.1. Time Series Analysis-Based Fault Prediction Models
Time series analysis-based fault prediction models play a crucial role in the preventive maintenance of electronic devices. These models utilize historical operational data to capture trends and patterns in device performance over time, thereby predicting potential fault risks [12]. In practice, commonly used time series analysis techniques include Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) models, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, and Prophet. ARIMA models are suitable for processing stationary time series data and can effectively capture linear trends and seasonal patterns. LSTM, as a special type of recurrent neural network, can learn long-term dependencies and is particularly suitable for processing time series data with long-term trends and complex patterns. Prophet is a flexible time series prediction tool developed by Facebook that can automatically handle missing data and outliers while considering holiday effects. In electronic device fault prediction, these models typically take Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) as input, such as temperature, voltage fluctuations, and power consumption, to predict device status over a future period. By setting appropriate thresholds, potential risks can be identified before faults occur, allowing for preventive measures to be taken. Figure 4 shows the architecture of an LSTM-based electronic device fault prediction model.
![]()
Figure 4. LSTM-based fault prediction model for electronic devices.
As shown in Figure 4, the LSTM-based fault prediction model processes time series data through multiple LSTM layers, then performs feature fusion through fully connected layers, ultimately outputting fault prediction results.
3.2. Multi-Sensor Data Fusion for Preventive Maintenance
Strategies
In modern complex electronic devices, data from a single sensor is often insufficient to comprehensively reflect the device’s health status. Multi-sensor data fusion technology provides a more comprehensive and reliable preventive maintenance strategy by integrating information from different sources [13]. This approach not only improves the accuracy of fault diagnosis but also identifies potential fault patterns and correlations. In practice, commonly used data fusion methods include Dempster-Shafer evidence theory-based fusion, Kalman filtering, and deep learning-based multi-modal fusion. Dempster-Shafer theory is suitable for handling uncertain and conflicting information, capable of synthesizing judgment results from multiple expert systems or sensors. Kalman filtering excels at processing noisy time-series data, continuously optimizing state estimation through prediction and update steps. Deep learning-based methods, such as multi-modal deep neural networks, can automatically learn complex relationships between different sensor data, achieving end-to-end fault prediction. In electronic device preventive maintenance, multi-sensor data fusion strategies typically combine data from various sensors such as temperature, vibration, sound, and current to construct comprehensive health indicators. By continuously monitoring the changing trends of these indicators, potential fault risks can be identified in a timely manner, allowing for targeted maintenance plans to be formulated. Furthermore, data fusion can help identify faults or anomalies in the sensors themselves, improving the overall reliability of the system.
3.3. Reinforcement Learning-Based Dynamic Maintenance
Decision-Making
As the complexity of electronic device operating environments and tasks continues to increase, static maintenance strategies often struggle to adapt to variable real-world situations [14]. Reinforcement learning-based dynamic maintenance decision-making methods provide new ideas for solving this problem. Reinforcement learning learns optimal decision-making strategies through continuous interaction with the environment, capable of dynamically adjusting maintenance plans based on real-time device status and historical data. In electronic device preventive maintenance, commonly used reinforcement learning algorithms include Q-learning, Deep Q-Networks (DQN), and policy gradient methods. Q-learning is suitable for discrete state and action spaces, capable of learning optimal state-action value functions. DQN combines deep neural networks with Q-learning, which is capable of handling high-dimensional state spaces. Policy gradient methods directly learn parameterized policy functions, which are suitable for problems with continuous action spaces. In practical applications, reinforcement learning agents typically take inputs such as device health status, operating time, and environmental conditions, outputting maintenance decisions such as “continue operation,” “perform inspection,” or “immediate repair”. By setting reasonable reward functions, such as minimizing total maintenance costs or maximizing device availability, reinforcement learning algorithms can gradually optimize maintenance strategies. The advantage of this approach lies in its ability to adaptively balance maintenance costs and device reliability while considering long-term benefits. However, the application of reinforcement learning in practical engineering also faces challenges, such as low sample efficiency and difficulty in handling safety constraints. To address these issues, researchers have proposed various improvement methods, such as transfer learning, model-based reinforcement learning, and safe reinforcement learning, to enhance the practicality and reliability of algorithms.
4. Case Studies: Application of Machine Learning in Specific Electronic Device Fault Diagnosis
4.1. Printed Circuit Board (PCB) Defect Detection
As core components of electronic devices, the quality of Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs) directly affects the performance and reliability of the entire system. Traditional PCB defect detection methods, such as manual visual inspection and rule-based Automated Optical Inspection (AOI), often have limitations in handling complex and minute defects. Machine learning, especially deep learning technology, brings new solutions to PCB defect detection. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), due to their excellent performance in image processing, have become one of the primary methods for PCB defect detection. A typical CNN-based PCB defect detection system usually includes the following steps: First, high-resolution cameras capture PCB images; then, image preprocessing techniques enhance image quality, such as denoising and contrast enhancement; next, CNN models are used to perform feature extraction and classification on the preprocessed images, identifying various types of defects such as short circuits, open circuits, and missing components; finally, reports are generated based on the detection results, guiding subsequent repair or rework processes. Deep learning-based PCB defect detection methods can significantly improve detection accuracy and efficiency, especially in handling minute and complex defects. However, this approach also faces some challenges, such as the need for a large amount of labeled data for training and limited generalization ability for new or rare defects. To address these issues, researchers have proposed various improvement methods, such as using Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) to generate synthetic defect samples or adopting few-shot learning techniques to improve model generalization ability.
4.2. Power Electronic Device Fault Diagnosis
Power electronic devices, such as frequency converters, inverters, and power supply modules, play crucial roles in modern industrial and energy systems. Faults in these devices not only lead to decreased system efficiency but may also trigger serious safety issues. Machine learning technology provides powerful tools for fault diagnosis of power electronic devices. Traditional machine learning methods such as Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Random Forests perform well in handling multi-class fault classification problems. For example, by analyzing device voltage and current waveforms and harmonic characteristics, SVM models can effectively distinguish between different types of faults such as open circuits, short circuits, and component aging. Deep learning methods, such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks and one-dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks (1D-CNN), are more suitable for processing time-series data, and capable of capturing dynamic features of fault development. In practical applications, researchers often adopt multi-model fusion approaches, combining the advantages of different algorithms to improve diagnostic accuracy and robustness. For instance, CNNs can be used to extract spatial features, LSTMs to capture temporal dependencies, and then fully connected layers for feature fusion and final classification. Moreover, the application of transfer learning techniques enables the construction of effective fault diagnosis models even with limited data, greatly enhancing the practicality of the method. However, power electronic device fault diagnosis still faces some challenges, such as how to handle situations where multiple faults occur simultaneously and how to adapt to feature drift caused by device aging and environmental changes. These issues provide directions for future research.
4.3. Communication Equipment Network Fault Prediction
With the rapid development of 5G and Internet of Things technologies, the complexity and scale of communication networks continue to increase, and traditional fault management methods struggle to meet high reliability and low latency requirements [15]. Machine learning, especially predictive analytics technology, provides new solutions for communication equipment network fault prediction. Time series analysis and anomaly detection algorithms play important roles in network traffic analysis and performance prediction. For example, models such as ARIMA and Prophet can be used to predict network traffic trends and early detection of potential congestion problems. Deep learning models, such as Graph Neural Networks (GNN), can effectively capture complex interactions between network topology structures and nodes, and are suitable for fault propagation analysis and prediction in large-scale networks. In practical applications, researchers often adopt multi-source data fusion approaches, comprehensively analyzing network device logs, performance indicators, configuration information, and external environmental data to construct comprehensive network health status assessment models. For instance, LSTM networks can be used to process time-series performance data, while GNNs analyze network topology structures, then attention mechanisms are used for feature fusion, ultimately outputting fault prediction results. This approach not only predicts fault risks for individual devices but also assesses the potential impact of faults on the entire network, providing decision support for network operation and maintenance personnel. However, communication network fault prediction also faces some challenges, such as how to handle large-scale, high-dimensional real-time data streams, and how to conduct effective data analysis while protecting user privacy. These issues require innovation in algorithm design, system architecture, and privacy protection technologies.
5. Conclusion
The application of machine learning technology in the field of electronic device fault diagnosis has demonstrated enormous potential and value. Through systematic analysis in this study, we can see that from traditional Support Vector Machines and decision trees to advanced deep learning and reinforcement learning algorithms, machine learning methods provide diverse solutions for electronic device fault diagnosis. These methods not only improve the accuracy and efficiency of fault diagnosis but also realize the transition from passive response to active prediction, paving new ways for preventive maintenance and reliability management of devices. In specific applications such as printed circuit board defect detection, power electronic device fault diagnosis, and communication network fault prediction, machine learning technology has shown strong adaptability and performance advantages. However, we should also recognize that the application of machine learning in electronic device fault diagnosis still faces some challenges, such as limitations in data quality and quantity, insufficient model interpretability, and how to handle dynamically changing environments. The application of machine learning in electronic device fault diagnosis is in a stage of rapid development. We have reason to believe that with continuous technological advancements and deepening cross-disciplinary collaboration, machine learning will bring revolutionary improvements to the reliability, safety, and efficiency of electronic devices, promoting the development of intelligent manufacturing and Industry 4.0.