On the Degree Resistance Distance of Unicyclic Graphs

Abstract

Let G be a connected graph with vertex set V( G ) . Then the degree resistance distance of G is defined as D R ( G )= { u,v }V( G ) ( d( u )+d( v ) )R( u,v ) , where d( u ) is the degree of the vertex u , and R( u,v ) is the degree resistance distance between u and v in graph G . A unicyclic graph is a connected graph with a unique cycle. In this paper, we characterize the unique graph with the third-maximum degree resistance distance among all unicyclic graphs with n vertices.

Share and Cite:

Wang, K. and Ning, W. (2024) On the Degree Resistance Distance of Unicyclic Graphs. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 12, 3679-3689. doi: 10.4236/jamp.2024.1211220.

1. Introduction

In this paper, a graph means a simple undirected graph. Let G=( V,E ) be a graph with n vertices and m edges. The degree of v in G , denoted by d G ( v ) , is equal to the number of vertices adjacent to v in G . The distance between two vertices u and v of G , denoted by d G ( u,v ) , is the length of a shortest path joining u and v in G . For notations and terminologies undefined here, the readers may refer to [1].

In theoretical chemistry, to correlate molecular structures with the physicochemical and bilogical properties of molecules, many topological indices have been introduced and investigated over the years. One of the most studied problems in chemical graph theory is to characterize extremal graphs with respect to certain topological indices among the set of all trees, unicyclic graphs, bicyclic graphs, tricyclic graphs, etc. The Wiener index, as the oldest and one of the most popular molecular structure descriptors [2] [3], is well correlated with many physical and chemical properties of a variety of classes of chemical compounds. This topological index was introduced in 1947 [4] and is defined as the sum of distances between all pairs of vertices, namely that

W( G )= { u,v }V( G ) d( u,v ).

For details on its mathematical properties, see the survey [5].

A modified version of the Wiener index, introduced by Dobrynin, Kochetova and Gutman [6], is the degree distance defined as

D( G )= { u,v }V( G ) ( d( u )+d( v ) )d( u,v ).

In 2006, Yuan and An [7] presented the maximum value of degree distance for unicyclic graphs. Later, Tomescu [8] determined the unicyclic and bicyclic graphs with minimum degree distance. Some further mathematical results on degree distance can be found in [9] [10]-[13].

Based on the theory of electrical networks, Klein and Randić [14] 1993 introduced a new distance function named resistance distance. They viewed a graph G as an electric network N such that each edge of G is assumed as a unit resistor. The resistance distance between two vertices u and v of G , denoted by R( u,v )=R( u,v|G ) , is defined as the effective resistance between the nodes u and v in N . This new kind of distance between vertices of a graph was eventually studied in detail [15]-[20]. By replacing the ordinary distance with resistance distance in the expression for the Wiener index, we can arrive at the Kirchhoff index

Kf( G )= { u,v }V( G ) R( u,v ),

which has been widely studied [19] [21]-[25].

In analogy with the degree distance of a graph, the degree resistance distance of a graph G was first proposed by Gutman, Feng and Yu [26] as

D R ( G )= { u,v }V( G ) ( d G ( u )+ d G ( v ) ) R G ( u,v ).

Palacios [27] named the same graph invariant “additive degree-Kirchhoff index”. In [26], some properties of D R -index are given, and the unicyclic graphs with minimum and second minimum D R -value are determined. Later, the unicyclic graphs with the maximum and the second-maximum D R -value are characterized in [28] [29]. Qi et al. [30] considered the maximum D R -value of n -vertex unicyclic graphs with a given maximum degree. The first three minimum D R -values among all cacti with n vertices and t cycles are completely determined in [31] [32].

To the best of our knowledge, the third-maximum value of degree resistance distance for unicyclic graphs has not been considered so far. We will solve it in this paper. Recall that a unicyclic graph is a connected graph with the same number of vertices and edges. Denote by U( n ) the set of all unicyclic graphs of order n . Let P n , C n and S n be the path, the cycle and the star on n vertices, respectively.

This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce some transformations to compare the degree resistance distance of two graphs. In Section 3, we determine the unique graph with the third-maximum degree resistance distance among unicyclic graphs in U( n ) .

2. Lemmas

Let R G ( u,v ) denote the resistance distance between u and v in the graph G . It is known that R G ( u,v )= R G ( v,u ) and R G ( u,v )0 with equality if and only if u=v . For a vertex v in G , we define K f v ( G )= uV( G ) R G ( u,v ) and D v ( G )= uV( G ) d G ( u ) R G ( u,v ) .

For the sake of brevity, in the whole of our context, for any two vertices u,v of G (or G ), we let d( v )= d G ( v ) (or d ( v )= d G ( v ) ) and R( u,v )= R G ( u,v ) (or R ( u,v )= R G ( u,v ) ). In the following, we give some necessary lemmas that will be used to prove our main results.

Lemma 1 ([14]) Let G be a graph, x be a cut vertex of G and let u,v be vertices belonging to different components which arise upon deletion of x . Then R G ( u,v )= R G ( u,x )+ R G ( x,v ) .

Gutman et al. [26] presented the following exact formulas for cycles.

Lemma 2 ([26]) Let C k be a cycle with length k and v C k . Then Kf( C k )= k 3 k 12 , D R ( C k )= k 3 k 3 and K f v ( C k )= k 2 1 6 .

Definition 3 ([26]). Let v be a vertex of degree p+1 in a graph G , such that v v 1 ,v v 2 ,,v v p are pendant edges incident with v , and u is the neighbor of v distinct from v 1 , v 2 ,, v p . We form a graph G =σ( G,v ) by deleting the edges v v 1 ,v v 2 ,,v v p and adding new edges u v 1 ,u v 2 ,,u v p . We say that G is a σ -transform of the graph G (see Figure 1).

Lemma 4 ([26]) Let G =σ( G,v ) be a σ -transform of the graph G , d G ( u )1 . Then D R ( G ) D R ( G ) . Equality holds if and only if G is a star with v as its center.

Lemma 5 ([28]) Let G 0 be a connected graph with m 0 >1 edges, and u,vV( G 0 ) be two distinct vertices with the degree at least 3 in G 0 such that R( u,v )=l . Let P s = u 1 u 2 u s and P t = v 1 v 2 v t be two paths of order s1 and t1 , respectively. Let G s,t be the graph obtained from G 0 , P s and P t by adding edges u u 1 , v v 1 . Suppose that G s1,t+1 = G s,t u s u s1 + v t u s and G s+1,t1 = G s,t v t1 v t + u s v t . Then either D R ( G s,t )< D R ( G s1,t+1 ) or D R ( G s,t )< D R ( G s+1,t1 ) .

Remark 6. From the proof of Lemma 5, we know that the conditions d G 0 ( u ), d G 0 ( v ) 3 are not necessary. As long as G 0 is not a path, or G 0 is a path with max{ d G 0 ( u ), d G 0 ( v ) } 2 , the result in Lemma 5 always holds.

Figure 1. The σ -transform of the graph G .

Figure 2. Graphs G and G in Lemma 7.

We show in the following lemma that the result in Lemma 5 still holds if u and v are the same.

Lemma 7. Let G be a connected graph with a cut vertex u and d G ( u )3 . Let the paths P u = u 1 u 2 u t and P v = v 1 v 2 v s ( 1st ) be two connected components of Gu . Let G =G v s1 v s + u t v s (see Figure 2), where v 0 =u if s=1 . Then D R ( G )< D R ( G ) .

Proof. Let d( v s1 )=a . Then a2 . Let A=V( G ){ v s1 , v s , u t } , B={ v s1 , v s , u t } , C={ u 1 , u 2 ,, u t1 } , D={ v 1 , v 2 ,, v s2 } . For the transformation from G to G , one has R( x,y )= R ( x,y ) for any x,yA , d( x )= d ( x ) , R ( x, v s1 )=R( x, v s1 ) and R ( x, u t )=R( x, u t ) for any xA . By the definition of the degree resistance distance, we get

D 1 = { x,y }A [ ( d ( x )+ d ( y ) ) R ( x,y )( d( x )+d( y ) )R( x,y ) ]=0,

D 2 = { x,y }B [ ( d ( x )+ d ( y ) ) R ( x,y )( d( x )+d( y ) )R( x,y ) ] =( d ( v s1 )+ d ( v s ) ) R ( v s1 , v s )( d( v s1 )+d( v s ) )R( v s1 , v s ) +( d ( v s1 )+ d ( u t ) ) R ( v s1 , u t )( d( v s1 )+d( u t ) )R( v s1 , u t ) +( d ( v s )+ d ( u t ) ) R ( v s , u t )( d( v s )+d( u t ) )R( v s , u t ) =a( t+s )( a+1 )+( a+1 )( s+t1 )( a+1 )( s+t1 )+32( t+s ) =( a2 )( t+s1 ) 0

and

D 3 = xA,yB [ ( d ( x )+ d ( y ) ) R ( x,y )( d( x )+d( y ) )R( x,y ) ] = xA [ ( d ( x )+ d ( v s1 ) ) R ( x, v s1 )( d( x )+d( v s1 ) )R( x, v s1 ) ] + xA [ ( d ( x )+ d ( v s ) ) R ( x, v s )( d( x )+d( v s ) )R( x, v s ) ] + xA [ ( d ( x )+ d ( u t ) ) R ( x, u t )( d( x )+d( u t ) )R( x, u t ) ] = xA [ ( d( x )+a1 )R( x, v s1 )( d( x )+a )R( x, v s1 ) ] + xA [ ( d( x )+1 ) R ( x, v s )( d( x )+1 )R( x, v s ) ] + xA [ ( d( x )+2 )R( x, u t )( d( x )+1 )R( x, u t ) ] = xA R( x, u t ) xA R( x, v s1 )+ xA ( d( x )+1 )( R ( x, v s )R( x, v s ) ) > xA ( d( x )+1 )( R ( x, v s )R( x, v s ) ) :=Γ.

If s2 , then C and

Γ= xC ( d( x )+1 )( R ( x, v s )R( x, v s ) )+ xD ( d( x )+1 )( R ( x, v s )R( x, v s ) ) + xA( CD ) ( d( x )+1 )( R ( x, v s )R( x, v s ) ) =3( ( t1 )( 2+t ) 2 ( t1 )( 2s+t ) 2 )+3( ( s2 )( 2t+s+1 ) 2 ( s2 )( s+1 ) 2 ) + xA( CD ) ( d( x )+1 )( R ( x, v s )R( x, v s ) ) =3s3t3+ xA( CD ) ( d( x )+1 )( R ( x, v s )R( x, v s ) ) >3s3t3+4( t+1s ) =ts+1 >0.

If s=1 , then D= and

Γ= xC ( d( x )+1 )( R ( x, v s )R( x, v s ) )+ xAC ( d( x )+1 )( R ( x, v s )R( x, v s ) ) =3( ( t1 )( 2+t ) 2 ( t1 )( 2+t ) 2 )+ xAC ( d( x )+1 )( R ( x, v s )R( x, v s ) ) = xAC ( d( x )+1 )( R ( x, v s )R( x, v s ) ) >2( t+1s ) >0.

Since D R ( G ) D R ( G )= D 1 + D 2 + D 3 , we have D R ( G ) D R ( G )>0 .

Let U( n,k ) be the set of all unicyclic graphs with order n and girth k , and P n k denote the graph obtained by identifying one end-vertex of P nk+1 with any vertex of C k . Let T( k,i,1 ) be the graph constructed from P k1 = v 1 v 2 v k1 by adding one pendant edge to the vertex v i ( 1ik2 ) and U( C l ;T( k,i,1 ) ) ( l3,1ik2,k+l=n+1 ) be the unicyclic graph obtained from a cycle C l by identifying v 1 of T( k,i,1 ) with a vertex of C l . Figure 3 illustrates the graphs P n 3 and U( C 3 ;T( n2,n4,1 ) ) .

Chen et al. [28] characterized the unicyclic graphs with the maximum and the second-maximum D R -value. They also obtained the unique graph with maximum D R -value among U( n,l ) .

Theorem 8 ([28]) Let GU( n,l ) , then D R ( G ) l 3 1 3 ( 4n+3 ) l 2 +nl+ 2 3 n 3 1 3 n , the equality holds if and only if G P n l .

Theorem 9 ([28] [29]) Let GU( n ) be an arbitrary unicyclic graph, then D R ( G ) 2 n 3 3 28n 3 +18 , with the equality holds if and only if G P n 3 .

Theorem 10 (28) Let GU( n )( n6 ) be an arbitrary unicyclic graph, G P n 3 . Then D R ( G ) 2 n 3 3 40n 3 +28 , with the equality holds if and only if GU( C 3 ;T( n2,n4,1 ) ) .

Remark 11. From the proof of Theorem 8, we have max 4ln { D R ( P n l ) }= D R ( P n 4 ) .

3. The Third-Maximum Degree Resistance Distance of Unicyclic Graphs

In this section, we will determine the unique graph with the third-maximum degree resistance distance among U( n ) . Let P n 4 , G * and U( C 3 ;T( n2,i,1 ) ) ( 1in5 ) be depicted in Figure 4.

Figure 3. Graphs P n 3 and U( C 3 ;T( n2,n4,1 ) ) .

Figure 4. Graphs P n 4 , G and U( C 3 ;T( n2,i,1 ) ) .

Lemma 12. Suppose G is a graph in U( n ) having the third-maximum degree resistance distance, where n6 . Then G P n 4 , or G * , or U( C 3 ;T( n2,i,1 ) ) for some 1in5 .

Proof. Let l be the girth of G . By Theorem 8 and Remark 11, G P n 4 if l4 . Suppose l=3 and C=uv v 1 be the cycle of G . We show that G G * , or U( C 3 ;T( n2,i,1 ) ) , where 1in5 .

Let T v , T u and T v 1 be the components of G{ vu,v v 1 ,u v 1 } containing v , u and v 1 , respectively. If min{ | V( T u )| , |V( T v )| , |V( T v 1 ) | }2 , by Lemma 7, T v ( T v 1 , T u , resp.) is a path such that v ( v 1 , u , resp.) is a leaf in T v ( T v 1 , T u , resp.). By Lemma 5 and Remark 6, there is a graph G U( n )\{ P n 3 ,U( C 3 ;T( n2,n4,1 ) ) } with D R ( G )< D R ( G ) , a contradiction. Thus, min{ | V( T u )| , |V( T v )| , |V( T v 1 ) | }=1 . Without loss of generality, we suppose | V( T u ) |=1 , i.e., V( T u )={ u } .

By repeating the use of Lemmas 7, 5 and Remark 6, we have GU( C 3 ;T( n2,i,1 ) ) for some 1in5 if min{ | V( T v )| , |V( T v 1 ) | }=1 , and G G * if min{ | V( T v )| , |V( T v 1 ) | }2 .

Now we give our main result as follows.

Theorem 13. For graphs in U( n )\{ P n 3 ,U( C 3 ;T( n2,n4,1 ) ) } ( n6 ) , G * is the unique graph with maximum D R -value, where G * is depicted in Figure 4 and D R ( G * )= 2 n 3 3 50n 3 + 142 3 .

Proof. By Lemma 12, in order to prove this theorem, it suffices to show that D R ( G * )> D R ( P n 4 ) and D R ( G * )> D R ( U( C 3 ;T( n2,i,1 ) ) ) for each 1in5 . Let G=U( C 3 ;T( n2,n4,1 ) ) be depicted in Figure 3.

(1) By Theorems 10 and 8,

D R ( G ) D R ( P n 4 )=( 2 n 3 3 40n 3 +28 )( 2 n 3 3 53n 3 +48 )= 13n 3 20.

(2) Let A={ u, v 1 , v 2 ,, v n5 , v n3 } , B={ v, v n4 , v n2 } . For the transformation from G to G = G * , one has R( x,y )= R ( x,y ) for any x,yA , d( x )= d ( x ) , R ( x, v n4 )=R( x, v n4 ) and R ( x,v )=R( x,v ) for any xA . By the definition of the degree resistance distance, we get

D 1 := { x,y }A [ ( d( x )+d( y ) )R( x,y )( d ( x )+ d ( y ) ) R ( x,y ) ]=0,

D 2 := { x,y }B [ ( d( x )+d( y ) )R( x,y )( d ( x )+ d ( y ) ) R ( x,y ) ] =( d( v )+d( v n2 ) )R( v, v n2 )( d ( v )+ d ( v n2 ) ) R ( v, v n2 ) +( d( v )+d( v n4 ) )R( v, v n4 )( d ( v )+( d ( v n4 ) ) R ( v, v n4 ) +( d( v n4 )+d( v n2 ) )R( v n4 , v n2 )( d ( v n4 )+ d ( v n2 ) ) R ( v n4 , v n2 )

=3( n4+ 2 3 )4+5( n5+ 2 3 )5( n5+ 2 3 )+43( n4+ 2 3 ) =0

and

D 3 := xA,yB [ ( d( x )+d( y ) )R( x,y )( d ( x )+ d ( y ) ) R ( x,y ) ] = xA [ ( d( x )+d( v ) )R( x,v )( d ( x )+ d ( v ) ) R ( x,v ) ] + xA [ ( d( x )+d( v n4 ) )R( x, v n4 )( d ( x )+ d ( v n4 ) ) R ( x, v n4 ) ] + xA [ ( d( x )+d( v n2 ) )R( x, v n2 )( d ( x )+ d ( v n2 ) ) R ( x, v n2 ) ] = xA [ ( d( x )+2 )R( x,v )( d( x )+3 )R( x,v ) ] + xA [ ( d( x )+3 )R( x, v n4 )( d( x )+2 )R( x, v n4 ) ] + xA [ ( d( x )+1 )R( x, v n2 )( d( x )+1 ) R ( x, v n2 ) ] = xA R( x,v )+ xA R( x, v n4 )+ xA ( d( x )+1 )( R( x, v n2 ) R ( x, v n2 ) ) =( n 2 2 + 23n 6 9 )+( n 2 2 7n 2 + 20 3 )+[ ( 3 n 2 2 13n 2 +5 )( 3 n 2 2 19n 2 +22 ) ] = 10n 3 58 3 .

Thus, D R ( G ) D R ( G * )= D 1 + D 2 + D 3 = 10n 3 58 3 .

(3) Let A=V( G ){ v i , v n4 , v n2 } , B={ v i , v n4 , v n2 } . For the transformation from G to G =U( C 3 ;T( n2,i,1 ) ) , one has R( x,y )= R ( x,y ) for any x,yA , d( x )= d ( x ) , R ( x, v n4 )=R( x, v n4 ) and R ( x, v i )=R( x, v i ) for any xA . If i1 , then

D 1 := { x,y }A [ ( d( x )+d( y ) )R( x,y )( d ( x )+ d ( y ) ) R ( x,y ) ]=0,

D 2 := { x,y }B [ ( d( x )+d( y ) )R( x,y )( d ( x )+ d ( y ) ) R ( x,y ) ] =( d( v i )+d( v n2 ) )R( v i , v n2 )( d ( v i )+ d ( v n2 ) ) R ( v i , v n2 ) +( d( v i )+d( v n4 ) )R( v i , v n4 )( d ( v i )+( d ( v n4 ) ) R ( v i , v n4 ) +( d( v n4 )+d( v n2 ) )R( v n4 , v n2 )( d ( v n4 )+ d ( v n2 ) ) R ( v n4 , v n2 ) =3( n3i )4+5( n4i )5( n4i )+43( n3i ) =0,

D 3 := xA [ ( d( x )+d( v i ) )R( x, v i )( d ( x )+ d ( v i ) ) R ( x, v i ) ] = xA [ ( d( x )+2 )R( x, v i )( d( x )+3 )R( x, v i ) ] = xA R( x, v i ) = i 2 +( n5 )i 3 n 2 21n+38 6 ,

D 4 := xA [ ( d( x )+d( v n4 ) )R( x, v n4 )( d ( x )+ d ( v n4 ) ) R ( x, v n4 ) ] = xA [ ( d( x )+3 )R( x, v n4 )( d( x )+2 )R( x, v n4 ) ] = xA R( x, v n4 ) = n 2 2 7n 2 + 19 3 +i

and

D 5 := xA [ ( d( x )+d( v n2 ) )R( x, v n2 )( d ( x )+ d ( v n2 ) ) R ( x, v n2 ) ] = xA [ ( d( x )+1 )R( x, v n2 )( d( x )+1 ) R ( x, v n2 ) ] = xA [ ( d( x )+1 )( R( x, v n2 ) R ( x, v n2 ) ) ] =( 3 n 2 2 13n 2 +3i+4 )( 3 n 2 2 +3 i 2 3ni+17i+12 17n 2 ) =3 i 2 14i+3ni+2n8.

Similarly, if i=1 , then D 1 =0 , D 2 =n5 , D 3 = 3 n 2 27n+74 6 , D 4 = n 2 2 7n 2 + 22 3 and D 5 =4n20 .

Let f( x )=4 x 2 +4nx18x+2n8 , 1in5 . Then

D R ( G ) D R ( U( C 3 ;T( n2,i,1 ) ) )= D 1 + D 2 + D 3 + D 4 + D 5 =f( i ) f( n5 ) =4n18.

Since min{ 13n 3 20, 10n 3 58 3 ,4n18 }= 10n 3 58 3 if n6 , we get D R ( G * )> D R ( P n 4 ) and D R ( G * )> D R ( U( C 3 ;T( n2,i,1 ) ) ) for each 1in5 . Moreover, by (2) and Theorem 10, D R ( G * )= D R ( U( C 3 ;T( n2,n4,1 ) ) )( 10n 3 58 3 ) = 2 n 3 3 40n 3 +28 10n 3 + 58 3 = 2 n 3 3 50n 3 + 142 3 .

4. Conclusion

In this paper, we completely characterized the unicyclic graphs with the third-maximum degree resistance distance. Some transformations for comparing the degree resistance distance of two graphs were introduced. This may help determine the maximum or minimum degree resistance distance for other classes of graphs. We will investigate these problems in our future studies.

Funding Statement

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11801568, 42272156).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Bondy, J.A. and Murty, U.S.R. (2008) Graph Theory. Springer.
[2] Gutman, I. and Furtula B. (2012) Distance in Molecular Graphs-Theory. University of Kragujevac.
[3] Gutman, I. and Furtula B. (2012) Distance in Molecular Graphs-Applications. University of Kragujevac.
[4] Wiener, H. (1947) Structural Determination of Paraffin Boiling Points. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 69, 17-20.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01193a005
[5] Dobrynin, A.A., Entringer, R. and Gutman, I. (2001) Wiener Index of Trees: Theory and Applications. Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 66, 211-249.
https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010767517079
[6] Dobrynin, A.A. and Kochetova, A.A. (1994) Degree Distance of a Graph: A Degree Analog of the Wiener Index. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 34, 1082-1086.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ci00021a008
[7] Hou, Y. and Chang, A. (2006) The Unicyclic Graphs with Maximum Degree Distance. Journal of Mathematical Study, 39, 18-24.
[8] Ioan Tomescu, A. (2008) Unicyclic and Bicyclic Graphs Having Minimum Degree Distance. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 156, 125-130.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2007.09.010
[9] Bucicovschi, O. and Cioabă, S.M. (2008) The Minimum Degree Distance of Graphs of Given Order and Size. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 156, 3518-3521.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2008.03.036
[10] Dankelmann, P., Gutman, I., Mukwembi, S. and Swart, H.C. (2009) On the Degree Distance of a Graph. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 157, 2773-2777.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2009.04.006
[11] Ilić, A., Stevanović, D., Feng, L., Yu, G. and Dankelmann, P. (2011) Degree Distance of Unicyclic and Bicyclic Graphs. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 159, 779-788.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2011.01.013
[12] Wang, H. and Kang, L. (2014) Further Properties on the Degree Distance of Graphs. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 31, 427-446.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-014-9757-6
[13] Weng, W.M. and Zhou, B. (2020) On Degree Distance of Hypergraphs. MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry, 84, 629-645.
[14] Klein, D.J. and Randić, M. (1993) Resistance Distance. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 12, 81-95.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01164627
[15] Babić, D., Klein, D.J., Lukovits, I., Nikolić, S. and Trinajstić, N. (2001) Resistance-Distance Matrix: A Computational Algorithm and Its Application. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 90, 166-176.
https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.10057
[16] Bapat, R.B., Gutmana, I. and Xiao, W. (2003) A Simple Method for Computing Resistance Distance. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A, 58, 494-498.
https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-2003-9-1003
[17] Zhou, B. and Trinajstić, N. (2008) On Resistance-Distance and Kirchhoff Index. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 46, 283-289.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-008-9459-3
[18] Xiao, W. and Gutman, I. (2003) Resistance Distance and Laplacian Spectrum. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 110, 284-289.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-003-0460-4
[19] Gao, X., Luo, Y. and Liu, W. (2011) Resistance Distances and the Kirchhoff Index in Cayley Graphs. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 159, 2050-2057.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2011.06.027
[20] Yang, Y. and Zhang, H. (2008) Some Rules on Resistance Distance with Applications. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 41, Article 445203.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/41/44/445203
[21] Arauz, C. (2012) The Kirchhoff Indexes of Some Composite Networks. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 160, 1429-1440.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2012.02.008
[22] Feng, L.H., Yu, G.H., Xu, K.X. and Jiang, Z.T. (2014) A Note on the Kirchhoff Index of Bicyclic Graphs. Ars Combinatoria, 114, 33-40.
[23] Gao, X., Luo, Y. and Liu, W. (2012) Kirchhoff Index in Line, Subdivision and Total Graphs of a Regular Graph. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 160, 560-565.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2011.11.011
[24] Wang, H.Z., Hua, H.B. and Wang, D.D. (2010) Cacti with Minimum, Second-Minimum, and Third-Minimum Kirchhoff Indices. Mathematical Communications, 15, 347-358.
[25] Zhou, B. and Trinajstić, N. (2008) The Kirchhoff Index and the Matching Number. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 109, 2978-2981.
https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.21915
[26] Gutman, I., Feng, L.H. and Yu, G.H. (2012) Degree Resistance Distance of Unicyclic Graphs. Transactions on Combinatorics, 1, 27-40.
[27] Palacios, J.L. (2013) Upper and Lower Bounds for the Additive Degree-Kirchhoff Index. MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry, 70, 651-655.
[28] Chen, S.B., Chen, Q., Cai, X. and Guo, Z.J. (2016) Maximal Degree Resistance Distance of Unicyclic Graphs. MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry, 75, 157-168.
[29] Tu, J., Du, J. and Su, G. (2015) The Unicyclic Graphs with Maximum Degree Resistance Distance. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 268, 859-864.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.06.063
[30] Qi, X.L., Du, Z.B. and Zhang, X.T. (2020) Extremal Properties of Kirchhoff Index and Degree Resistance Distance of Unicyclic Graphs. MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry, 84, 671-690.
[31] Du, J., Su, G., Tu, J. and Gutman, I. (2015) The Degree Resistance Distance of Cacti. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 188, 16-24.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2015.02.022
[32] Liu, J., Wang, W., Zhang, Y. and Pan, X. (2016) On Degree Resistance Distance of Cacti. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 203, 217-225.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2015.09.006

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.