Study the Structural, Electronic, Optical Properties of CZTS Compound after Doping Ba at Zn Site and Si at Sn Site Using Density Functional Theory (DFT) ()
1. Introduction
Nowadays scientists and technologists have been replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy sources such as photovoltaic solar energy in order to deal with the discharge of greenhouse gases that resulting climate change on the earth [1]-[3] whereas photovoltaic conversion system provides renewable and eco-friendly energy [4]. Past few years CdTe [5], CIGS [5]-[7] and CZTS have gained interest as an application in photovoltaic solar cells and these materials have conversion power efficiency between 16% - 20% to date [4] [8] which making them conventional semiconductor materials. But the existence of harmful elements like In and Ga in CIGS has raised global concern and on the other hand, CZTS has been increased interest due to its low cost, non-toxic, eco-friendliness nature [9]-[13] and including application in solar cell [14] [15]. The CZTS thin films have a high level of optical absorption coefficient (>104 cm−1) [6] [7] [16] [17] as well as p-type conductivity and a direct band gap.
In 2010, Persson et al. investigated the electrical structures and optical features of Kesterite (KS) and Stannite (ST) types Cu2ZnSnS4 and Cu2ZnSnSe4 where they found direct band gap and high absorption coefficient (>104 cm−1) for KS-type using density functional theory [18]. In 2015, Kong et al. investigated the electronic and optical properties of Kesterite and Stannite Cu2ZnSnS4 using the DFT theory where they reported that the optical properties of CZTS weak dependency of Cu, Zn cation ordering and these materials have higher potentiality for photovoltaics due to their large light absorption coefficient [19]. In 2015, AN Rosli et al. suggested that the band structure of KS-Type CZTS where they found the band gap of KS-type CZTZ has been shown semiconductor nature [20]. Compared to the pristine structure, doping with different atoms is an appropriate approach to develop the physicochemical properties [21]. However, to convert light energy into photoelectricity and improve the photovoltaic solar cell’s properties, the p-n junction must be improved [22]. In 2020, N. Manavizadeh et al. investigated the effect of Bi-doping on CZTS using density functional theory, and they reported that the Bi-doped structure had a high absorption coefficient (>104 cm−1) in the visible region but the pure structure did not have this [23]. Using thermal evaporation method, M. Marzougiet et al. studied the structural, optical properties of Na-doping on CZTS and they found direct band gap with absorption coefficient in the UV-region at 5% Na-doping concentration on CZTS [24]. Using DFT, C. Tablero et al. studied the effect of the oxygen isoelectronic substitution in CZTS and they reported O-doped CZTS has an electrical structure that includes a sub-band towards the CB. This deeper band is comprised of the Sn-5s and O-2p orbitals [25].
The quantum mechanical approach enables us to make more accurate predictions regarding the behavior of particles when we attempt to interact with them. We are inspired to perform such a theoretical investigation utilizing the quantum mechanical approach based on DFT to analyze the structural, electronic and optical properties of the CZTS compounds. As far as we are aware, theoretical and experimental research has been done by single doping but double doping in CZTS compound and their structural, electronic and optical properties are still unknown to us. Therefore, we are interested to dope Ba at Zn-site and to dope Si at Sn-site resulting the Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 compound and to characterize the structural, electronic, and optical characteristics of Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 compounds using the DFT based calculation. Moreover, Ba and Si have been chosen for their semiconductor nature, which might increase the useability of the Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 compound as an absorber layer in solar cells.
2. Computational Details
To investigate the structural, electronic and optical properties of Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 (where x, y = 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00), the CASTEP (Cambridge Serial Total Energy Package, Material Studio 2017) code was used to execute quantum mechanical approach density functional theory (DFT) [26]-[29] simulation which was based on a nonlocal ultrasoft pseudopotential [30] that indicate the presence of firmly bonded core electrons and to illustrate the electron-ion interaction. To find the exchange correlation, the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) [31] form of the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) was used with a plane-wave cut-off energy of 500 eV to get comprehensive solution along with default medium level of self-consistent field (SCF) tolerance in the program [32]. To conduct the computation, we constructed a supercell measuring 2 × 1 × 1, and The BFGS algorithm [33] was employed to optimize the crystal structure through the minimization of both total energy and internal forces. The KS-type Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 compounds, where x and y represent doping concentration, have been studied using a Monkhorst Pack scheme [34]. The calculations were performed using a 2 × 4 × 2 k-point mesh size. We selected 1000 cycles, which is sufficient to optimize every structure. The structural parameters of the CZTS (pure and doped) were calculated using the Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS) algorithm with energy change per atom less than 2 × 10−5 eV, residual force less than 0.05 eV/Å, stress below 0.1GPa, and atom displacement during geometry optimization less than 0.002Å.
In order to find the structural stability, the formation energy is obtained by using the formula [35]:
(1)
whereas
determined the ground state energy of the structures, ECu, EZn, EBa, ESn, ES determines the energy of Cu, Zn, Ba, Sn, Si, S atoms respectively.
To get optical properties, the complex dielectric function is represented as
(2)
The real portion of dielectric constant ε1(ω) affects light polarization and absorption within a material under external electric field impact. The imaginary portion of dielectric constant ε2(ω) represents the loss of molecular polarization due to variations in the external electric field. Dielectric function reveals solid’s band structure and spectral information [36].
Refractive index can be expressed as a frequency-dependent complex function,
(3)
where n(ω) represents the refractive index and k(ω) represents the extinction index. These values have been determined by analyzing the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric function, as mentioned previously [37].
3. Result and Discussion
3.1. Structural Properties
Figure 1. Optimized crystal structure of Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 compounds for different doping concentration (x, y).
In this study, all the structures of Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 compounds have been optimized to study different properties at low ground state energy to get a more stable form of the structures. According to optimized structures, it has been observed that KS-type (space group: I
#no: 82) pure and 100% doped (x, y = 1.00) CZTS compound with body centered tetragonal crystal structure. The optimized crystal structures of the Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 compounds have been depicted in Figure 1 in which the Wyckoff position of four Cu atoms are 2a and 2c location, of two Zn atom at 2d, of two Sn atoms at 2b, and of eight anions S atom at 8g for both pure and doped CZTS compound is comparable to C. Persson et al. [38]. The lattice parameters, cell volumes, ground state energy, and formation energy have been summarized in Table 1. The lattice parameter of KS-type Cu2ZnSnS4 (x, y = 0.00) structure are a = 5.47Å, b = 5.47 Å, and c = 10.94 Å in the present studied structural optimization [39]-[41]. It has been shown that for x, y = 0.00, the value of c/a > 2 which is similar to A. Ghosh et al. [42] but in experimental condition the value c/a < 2 due to Cu/Zn disorder [38]. With gradual increase in doping concentration, the effect of change in lattice parameters has been observed. Due to the increase in doping concentration, 0% and 100% doped structures have remained in the tetragonal crystal structure, but for 25%, 50%, and 75% doped structures, they have shown variations in deformation from their original crystal structure.
Table 1. Summarized lattice parameters, cell volumes, ground state energy, and formation energy of Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 compound after geometrical optimization using DFT based calculation.
Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 |
Phase |
Doping concentration (x, y) |
Lattice parameter (Å) |
Volume(Å3) |
Ground state of energy (eV) |
Formation Energy (eV) |
A |
b |
c |
KS |
0.00 |
5.47 |
5.47 |
10.94 |
654.60 |
−23496.35 |
−15.38 |
0.25 |
5.44 |
5.50 |
11.21 |
670.65 |
−22499.83 |
−17.72 |
0.50 |
5.42 |
5.56 |
11.29 |
680.83 |
−21503.75 |
−20.52 |
0.75 |
5.56 |
5.67 |
11.22 |
706.77 |
−20507.34 |
−22.98 |
1.00 |
5.62 |
5.62 |
11.43 |
723.26 |
−19591.08 |
−105.60 |
A lower formation energy indicates greater stability, and negative values suggest spontaneous formation which is given in Equation 1 [43]. The value of formation energies has been found in an increment nature with increasing doping concentration which reveals that the stability of the compound gradually increased with doping concentration.
For various cation (Cu, Zn, Ba, Sn, Si, S), distance from anion S for nearby cations are different. The average bond length of S-Cu, S-Zn, S-Ba, S-Sn, S-Si are gradually increased with doping concentration which is also presented in Table 2. The increment of bond length indicates that the atomic arrangement changes with increasing impurities. Electronic configuration changes electron-nuclei interactions which ultimately affect bond lengths.
Table 2. Summarized bond length of Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 compound after geometrical optimization using DFT based calculation.
Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 |
Bond |
Doping concentration (x, y) |
0.00 |
0.25 |
0.50 |
0.75 |
1.00 |
S-Cu |
2.32 |
2.34 |
2.36 |
2.40 |
2.42 |
S-Zn |
2.36 |
2.38 |
2.37 |
2.38 |
- |
S-Sn |
2.48 |
2.49 |
2.52 |
2.50 |
- |
S-Si |
- |
2.17 |
2.16 |
2.16 |
2.17 |
S-Ba |
- |
2.92 |
2.95 |
2.94 |
2.94 |
3.2 Electronic Properties
The band structures have been understandable for Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 compound with the symmetry point of Brillouin zone (𝐺 → 𝐹 → 𝑄 → 𝑍 → 𝐺) which is shown in Figure 2 for both pure and doped CZTS compounds. The Brillouin zone is a periodic representation of the structure of crystal in reciprocal space which is important for studying electronic band structures and predicting material properties [44]. The summarized band gap and their type in the studied compound has also been presented in Table 3.
Figure 2. Calculated band structures of Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 compound.
The Fermi levels (EF) have been depicted in Figure 2 for pure and doped structures. The band gaps are modified using a scissors operator based on experimental data because the GGA underestimates conduction band state energy and typically exceeds it [45] [46]. According to Figure 2, the concentrations of doping x, y = 0.00, 0.25, and 0.50 show that the conduction band minimum (CBM) and valence band maximum (VBM) are located at the “G” K-point. This indicates that the electronic band gap of these structures is direct. Whereas for doping concentration x, y = 0.75 and 1.00, the conduction band minimum (CBM) has been occurred at “G” K-point for doping concentration x, y = 0.75 and 1.00 and the valence band maximum (VBM) have been situated at “F” K-point and “Q” K-point for doping concentration x, y = 0.75 and 1.00 respectively which signified that the electronic band gaps have been shown indirect nature. This study has revealed that the band gap for pure structure is 0.157 eV which is relevant with reference value of 0.16 eV [47] from recent GGA-PBE calculation. The electronic band gaps have been shown to increase in nature with the gradual increment of doping concentration as depicted in Figure 3.
Table 3. Summarized bandgap (eV) and the nature of band of Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 compound.
Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 |
Doping concentration (x, y) |
Bandgap (eV) |
Bandgap type |
0.00 |
0.157 |
Direct |
0.25 |
0.337 |
Direct |
0.50 |
0.527 |
Direct |
0.75 |
0.782 |
Indirect |
1.00 |
1.117 |
Indirect |
Figure 3. The variation of energy gap that caused by Ba and Si concentration in Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4
A high DOS means more than one occupation state at a certain amount of energy. The total density of state (TDOS) and partial density of state (PDOS) have been described in Figure 4 for all the structures. In pure structures (at x, y = 0.00), the maximum valence band are constructed via hybridization of 3d state of Cu, 3d state of Zn and 3p state of S; whereas the minimum conduction band form from 3p state of S and 5s of Sn states [48].
After increasing impurities, it has been revealed that the VBMs (valance band maximum) are mainly formed from Cu-3d and the CBMs are constructed by S-3p. This means that the changing composition of quaternary structures from Zn to Ba and Sn to Si do not influence enough main feature of energy distributions of Cu-3d and S-3p. A structure must be categorized as a semiconductor if it has a fully occupied valence band and a maximum unoccupied conduction band.
Figure 4. Total and partial density of state of Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 compound for different doping concentration (x, y).
3.3 Optical Properties
The optical properties of a solid are directly influenced by the ground state electrical structure. Figure 5 and Figure 6 show the optical properties of pure and doped CZTS materials for photon energy up to 20 eV. It is obvious that all optical properties depend on photon frequency.
Absorption coefficients of Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 compounds have been observed in UV region and visible region as shown in Figure 5(a). The highest peaks have been placed at 9.8 eV, 9.6 eV, 8.31 eV, 8.6 eV, 8.9 eV for x, y = 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00 doping concentration, respectively. It has been observed that the major peaks have been shifted towards lower energies when doping concentrations have gradually increased. Absorption coefficient for all the structures has been observed with a larger value (>104 cm−1) [49].
Figure 5. Effect of variation of (a) absorption coefficient, (b) optical conductivity, and (c) reflectivity with the change of energy for Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 compound.
The optical conductivity spectrum refers to the amount of free charge carriers generated by bond breaking down during electron-photon interaction [50]. The optical conductivity has been depicted in Figure 5(b) for both pure and doped CZTS compound. The major peaks have been placed at 6.7 eV, 6.7 eV, 6.8 eV, 6.9 eV, 6.9 eV for x, y = 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00 doping concentration of Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 compounds, respectively. The OCs (optical conductivity) have been gradually decreasing with increasing doping concentration.
Reflectivity always varies from 0 to 1. Absorption of light is closely related to reflectivity. The reflectivity has been presented in Figure 5(c) for both pure and doped CZTS compounds. It seems that the pure CZTS has the lowest reflectivity at visible and IR-region [51]. The IR and visible regions have lower reflectivity, while the UV region has better reflectivity. With the increment of doping concentration, the reflectivity has shown a lower value than pure CZTS.
Figure 6. Effect of variation of (a) dielectric function, (b) refractive index, and (c) loss function with the change of energy for Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 compound.
Figure 6(a) shows a real and imaginary part of the dielectric function plotted against energy for Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 compound. To understand how materials absorb electricity, it is necessary to know about the imaginary part of the dielectric function. The absorption of material is significant when the absorptive component of the electronic dielectric function ε2(ω) has a large value. The first threshold point has occurred at 0.09 eV, 0.13 eV, 0.21 eV, 0.54 eV,1.02 eV for x, y = 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1.00 doping concentration, respectively which means the threshold for direct optical transition between high valence and low conduction bands in this calculation and the principal peaks of imaginary part of the dielectric function have been observed at 6.52 eV, 6.50 eV, 6.15 eV, 5.65 eV, 5.62 eV for x, y = 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1.00 doping composition respectively which suggests that these materials could be applied as a UV-detector or LED detector [52]. Fig. 5(a) has shown differing minor peaks in the 0 - 20 eV energy range due to inter-band transitions between the valence and conduction bands. Real parts of dielectric functions could be determined using the Kramer-Kronig relationship [53]. The static dielectric function has occurred at 3.25 eV, 3.08 eV, 2.62 eV, 2.40 eV, 2.09 eV for x, y = 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00 doping concentration, respectively. The Penn relation (ε1(0) ≈ 1+(ħω/Eg)2) suggested that the static dielectric constant of a material decreases with an increase in bandgap, and vice versa [54]. The maximum peak has been found at 0 eV, 0 eV, 0 eV, 0.96 eV and 2.09 eV and real part of the dielectric function has become zero at 6.87eV, 7.12eV, 7.32eV, 7.57 eV, 7.53 eV for x, y = 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00 doping concentration, respectively. As energy increases, the dielectric function becomes negative, indicating that the medium fully reflects electromagnetic waves, which suggests its metallic nature.
The refractive function has been plotted against energy which is shown in Figure 6(b). The values of refractive index n (0) are 3.91, 3.65, 3.38, 3.04, 2.82 for x, y = 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, respectively. The peak value of refractive index was found in the visible region, and it gradually dropped with higher energy scales. Therefore, the refractive index has been decreased with increment of impurities.
The energy loss function spectrum peak indicates plasma resonance, a collective motion of particles, and its corresponding frequency is the plasma frequency [19]. Photon energy above the material bandgap drains compounds. Figure 6(c) has been presented that the plasmon peaks arises at 19.43 eV, 16.36 eV, 14.43 eV, 13.50 eV, 13.11 eV for increasing doping concentration.
4. Conclusion
In the present work, the structural, electronic, and optical properties of Cu2Zn1−xBaxSn1−ySiyS4 compounds have been studied using GGA-PBE functional via DFT analysis. The optimized structural calculation for pure and doped CZTS compound shows that pure and fully doped (x, y = 1) CZTS compound crystallized in tetragonal structure. There are some structural deviations from tetragonal structure in the case of doped structures for x, y = 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75. The change in lattice parameters due to doping has been shown for 0% and 100% doping concentration, the crystal structure remained the same that is tetragonal crystal structure. The electronic band gaps have been increased gradually with the increase of doping concentration in the CZTS compound. The highest band gap has been found for Cu2BaSiS4 by 1.117 eV for fully doped CZTS compound. The obtained results for band gap identified that the present studied CZTS compounds are potential candidate as semiconductor. For all the doping concentration, the absorption coefficient is high (>104 cm−1) in UV-region as result these structures might be used as an absorber layer in UV detector. All the structures have a photoconductive nature with minimal loss function, making them potentially suitable for application in optoelectronic devices (OE). Refractive index and reflectivity indicate significant photon energy loss, which can be enhanced by modifying experimental work. The studied compound is promising, and it should be realized experimentally to verify the theoretical observations.
Data Availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study. (The article describes entirely theoretical research.)