Monitoring and Data Analysis of Indoor Air Quality to Improve Ventilation

Abstract

This study conducts a thorough analysis of indoor air quality in Al-Baha Region, Saudi Arabia, utilizing data collected from seventy-two diverse locations. The investigation focuses on annual average key pollutants including CO2, PM2.5, PM10, TVOC, and HCOH. The study emphasizes the significance of understanding the spatial dynamics of indoor air quality for informed decision-making in public health and environmental management. The data analysis contributes valuable insights for researchers, policymakers, and the public, serving as a comprehensive resource for assessing and addressing potential health risks associated with indoor air pollutants. The results underscore the importance of implementing targeted strategies to improve ventilation, reduce pollutant sources, and enhance the overall quality of indoor environments in Al-Baha Region. The concentrations of CO2 ranged from 390 to 609 parts per million, PM2.5 varied between 3 and 26 micrograms per cubic meter, PM10 showed fluctuations within the range of 3 to 32 micrograms per cubic meter, TVOC exhibited values spanning from 0.04 to 0.8 per milligrams per cubic meter, and HCOH concentrations fluctuated between 0.009 and 0.1 milligrams per cubic meter. According to the standards, these observed values fall within the acceptable range. This study forms a solid foundation for future research initiatives and policy developments aimed at fostering healthier living conditions in the region. It highlights the need for proactive measures to create sustainable and optimal indoor environments that positively impact the well-being of residents in Al-Baha Region and similar geographic contexts.

Share and Cite:

El-Kawi, O. (2024) Monitoring and Data Analysis of Indoor Air Quality to Improve Ventilation. Open Access Library Journal, 11, 1-19. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1111804.

1. Introduction

Air pollution is a global crisis with limited solutions due to the presence of compounds in the atmosphere that affect the well-being of habitats or pose a threat to the ecosystem or objects [1]. Indoor air pollution is the third largest cause of air pollution worldwide after coal and photochemical smog [2]-[4]. Air pollution refers to changes in the composition of the air due to natural phenomena or human activities. The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that air pollution is a major health problem for citizens in developing countries [5] [6]. Increasing urbanization requires effective and reliable techniques for monitoring and controlling air quality [7]. The nature of the reported air has significant impacts on the environment and human health. Therefore, details of ambient emissions need to be estimated to incorporate prior knowledge in safety reporting of their environmental concentrations. Most urban areas were particularly quickly affected by air quality and energy shortage problems [8]. Air pollution continues to be a major public health problem worldwide. It has been linked to millions of deaths worldwide [9], three times more than other infectious diseases such as malaria, tuberculosis and AIDS. In general, air pollution is a complex mixture of gases and particles of different sizes [10]. It is known that particulate matter, particularly PM2.5 (diameter 2.5 micrometers or less), is responsible for the development of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases [11]. In addition, it has been found that higher exposure to PM2.5 leads to a significantly higher mortality rate [12]. As air quality deteriorates, it directly and indirectly impacts communities, economic growth and social well-being [13]. Therefore, it is important to gain a deeper and more accurate understanding of air pollution at the local level [14] [15]. Air quality analysis has become crucial to understanding the impact of air pollution on the environment and public health. As global concerns about air quality and its impacts continue to grow, comprehensive assessments of air quality data in specific regions have attracted significant attention. Over the years, the concept of smart and environmentally sustainable cities has become a hot topic [16]. The concept of smartness has become multidimensional and is not limited to the use of technology to manage urban systems. Adding the social and economic dimensions to smart cities helps researchers understand how policies can be made more citizen-centered [17] to create socially sustainable cities. Community participation in scientific research, also known as citizen science, is widely used in environmental monitoring [18]. In many recent studies, citizens have been increasingly involved in the scientific process due to several factors such as the easy availability of sensing devices and the emphasis on research for community benefit [19]. When it comes to air quality monitoring, most citizen science activities rely on participatory sensor research methods that use low-cost sensors to solve problems at the local level [20]-[22]. In recent years, several studies have conducted citizen science activities to improve people’s understanding of issues such as air quality, noise, etc. The citizen weather station data obtained from the weather stations set up by people in the United Kingdom was analyzed and it was observed that instrument biases affected the data [23]. Surveys are used to understand how communities and experts think about environmental issues and sensor data [24]. Another work conducted noise monitoring and highlighted the fact that noise monitoring conducted by citizens had similar accuracy to standard noise monitoring [25]. Al-Baha region is located in the southwest of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, as shown in Figure 1. It is known for its unique natural beauty and environmental diversity, but is no exception to the challenges posed by air pollution. This paper aims to analyze indoor air quality data in the Al-Baha region of Saudi Arabia by measuring and analyzing PM2.5, PM10, CO2, HCOH and TVOC concentrations at various seventy-two locations. Finally, the paper presents new diagrams for values and contours of these concentrations in Al-Baha region in Saudi Arabia.

Figure 1. Location of Al-Baha Region in Saudi Arabia.

2. Research Area Overview and Data

The research area overview for the analysis of indoor air quality in Al-Baha Region, Saudi Arabia is a critical investigation into a matter of significant importance. The indoor air quality in any region directly impacts the health and well-being of its residents, making this an issue of paramount concern. In the case of Al-Baha Region, a comprehensive understanding of the state of indoor air quality is not only essential for improving the living conditions of the local population but also for implementing effective policies and interventions. The data collected for this analysis serves as a valuable resource, providing insights into the various factors influencing indoor air quality, including pollutants, climate, building structures, and human activities. Moreover, this research delves into the specifics of data analysis, shedding light on the methodologies and techniques employed to process and interpret the collected information. The findings of this study will not only contribute to our knowledge of indoor air quality in the region but also pave the way for informed decision-making and initiatives aimed at enhancing the overall quality of life for the residents of Al-Baha. The significance of this research is amplified by its potential to serve as a model for addressing indoor air quality concerns in similar regions, both in Saudi Arabia and around the world. This research is particularly relevant in the context of Saudi Arabia, given the varying climatic conditions and the rapid urbanization witnessed in recent years. Al-Baha Region, characterized by its unique topography and climate, presents a distinctive case study, offering valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities for improving indoor air quality in arid, mountainous environments. Data collection for this research involved gathering information from seventy-two distinct locations situated across Al-Baha Region in Saudi Arabia, as outlined in Table 1 and visually represented in Figure 2. The meticulous selection of these diverse locations ensures a comprehensive representation of the region’s indoor air quality landscape. The data collected from these sites encompasses a range of environmental factors, including concentrations of CO2, PM2.5, PM10, TVOCs, and formaldehyde (HCOH).

Table 1. Latitude and longitude of different measuring locations.

No.

Latitude

Longitude

No.

Latitude

Longitude

1

20.061

41.361

37

19.745

41.446

2

20.011

41.462

38

19.783

41.442

3

20.021

41.431

39

19.81

41.442

4

20.022

41.432

40

19.573

41.295

5

20.02

41.423

41

19.554

41.175

6

20.022

41.414

42

19.551

41.203

7

20.012

41.459

43

19.703

41.391

8

20.011

41.464

44

19.802

41.359

9

20.045

41.499

45

19.731

41.377

10

20.025

41.475

46

19.802

41.431

11

20.012

41.464

47

20.076

41.448

12

19.995

41.459

48

20.026

41.449

13

20.061

41.442

49

20.066

41.346

14

20.022

41.452

50

20.052

41.351

15

20.014

41.452

51

20.066

41.347

16

20.023

41.434

52

19.843

41.753

17

20.007

41.452

53

19.999

41.466

18

19.997

41.528

54

20.069

41.346

19

20.018

41.454

55

20.067

41.345

20

20.063

41.462

56

20.17

41.283

21

20.071

41.455

57

20.159

41.283

22

20.064

41.459

58

20.172

41.281

23

20.069

41.455

59

20.142

41.292

24

20.068

41.465

60

20.174

41.282

25

20

41

61

20.158

41.292

26

20.053

41.503

62

20.192

41.277

27

20.057

41.505

63

20.171

41.273

28

20.044

41.489

64

20.191

41.288

29

20.036

41.486

65

20.162

41.277

30

19.999

41.453

66

20.456

41.436

31

20.011

41.449

67

20.478

41.625

32

20.02

41.433

68

20.492

41.832

33

20.053

41.502

69

20.421

41.635

34

20.039

41.502

70

19.2

40.8

35

19.707

41.388

71

20.8

42.2

36

19.704

41.383

72

19.745

41.446

Figure 2. Different locations of measurement in Al-Baha Region.

The strategic distribution of measuring points facilitates a thorough examination of the spatial variability of indoor air pollutants, providing valuable insights into potential sources and contributing factors. This extensive dataset serves as the foundation for the subsequent data analysis, enabling a detailed exploration of indoor air quality conditions and informing targeted strategies for improvement within the Al-Baha Region. Tables 2-6 present a comprehensive breakdown of the indoor air quality parameters, including CO2, PM2.5, PM10, TVOC, and HCOH concentrations, along with their respective indications [26]-[30].

Table 2. Concentration of CO2 and its indications in indoor air quality.

CO2 (ppm)

Air Quality

Less than 600

Excellent

600 - 800

Good

800 - 1000

Fair

1000 - 1500

Mediocre

Contaminated indoor air

Ventilation recommended

More than 1500

Bad

Heavy contaminated indoor air

Ventilation required

Table 3. Concentration of PM2.5 and its indications in indoor air quality.

PM2.5 (µg/m3)

Air Quality

0 - 12

Good

12 - 35

Moderate

35 - 55

Unhealthy for sensitive group

55 - 150

Unhealthy

150 - 250

Very unhealthy

More than 250

Hazardous

Table 4. Concentration of PM10 and its indications in indoor air quality.

PM10 (µg/m3)

Air Quality

0 - 55

Good

55 - 155

Moderate

155 - 255

Unhealthy for sensitive group

255 - 355

Unhealthy

355 - 425

Very unhealthy

More than 425

Hazardous

Table 5. Concentration of TVOC and its indications in indoor air quality.

TVOC (mg/m3)

Air Quality

Less than 0.3

Excellent

0.3 - 1

Good

1 - 3

Medium

3 - 10

Poor

More than 10

Bad

Table 6. Concentration of HCOH and its indications in indoor air quality.

HCOH (mg/m3)

Air Quality

Less than 0.3

Good

0.3 - 0.5

Medium

More than o.5

Bad

Figure 3 presents the DM73B TUYA WIFI multifunctional gas detector, a sophisticated device designed to monitor and assess various environmental parameters, offering a comprehensive 7-in-1 solution for indoor air quality. The inclusion of sensors for formaldehyde (HCHO), total volatile organic compounds (TVOC), particulate matter (PM2.5/PM10), carbon dioxide (CO2), temperature, and humidity is noteworthy. The LCD display provides a user-friendly interface for real-time data visualization, allowing users to easily track and interpret air quality metrics. This multifunctional gas detector serves as a valuable tool for both professionals and individuals concerned about the quality of the air they breathe indoors. The inclusion of WIFI connectivity enhances the device’s accessibility, enabling users to remotely monitor air quality and receive timely alerts. This feature is particularly beneficial for proactive measures and ensuring a prompt response to any fluctuations in the monitored parameters. The device’s ability to measure a diverse range of pollutants and environmental factors reflects a commitment to providing a holistic understanding of indoor air quality. This information is crucial for creating healthier indoor environments, especially considering the potential impact of pollutants on human health.

Figure 3. DM73B TUYA WIFI multifunctional gas detector.

3. Results and Discussion

In this section, the outcomes of investigation into indoor air quality in Al-Baha Region, Saudi Arabia. Through a comprehensive examination of key pollutants CO2, PM2.5, PM10, TVOC, and HCOH across seventy-two diverse locations are discussed. Figure 4 provides a clear and concise representation of the interplay between temperature and humidity across various locations in Al-Baha Region depending on the present measurement. The direct-fit lines for both temperatures, ranging from 17 to 32 degrees Celsius, and humidity, fluctuating between 51% and 68%, highlight a compelling relationship. The positive correlation between temperature and humidity is apparent from the upward trend of both fitted lines. As temperatures rise, there is a corresponding increase in humidity levels, and vice versa. This direct-fit underscores the dynamic balance between these two critical climatic factors in Al-Baha Region. This figure not only captures the quantitative aspects of temperature and humidity changes but also provides a visual tool *for easily identifying trends and potential outliers in different locations. Further investigations into the specific mechanisms influencing this relationship would contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the local climate dynamics in Al-Baha Region.

Figure 4. Relation between temperature and humidity across various locations in Al-Baha Region for present work.

Figure 5 provides a valuable snapshot of indoor CO2 concentrations across 72 locations within the Al-Baha region through present work measurement. The depicted range from 390 to 609 parts per million (ppm) underscores the diversity in indoor air quality, highlighting variations that may be influenced by factors such as building design, ventilation, and human activities. The spatial distribution of indoor CO2 concentrations is a key insight for understanding the quality of the air in various settings, including homes, offices, and public spaces. The range observed suggests a spectrum of indoor environments, with some locations maintaining lower CO2 levels indicative of effective ventilation, while others experience higher concentrations possibly due to limited airflow or increased occupancy. The seventy-two locations coverage ensures a comprehensive assessment, capturing the nuances of indoor air quality across different types of buildings and land uses. This information is crucial for identifying areas where indoor air quality may need improvement and implementing targeted interventions to enhance ventilation and reduce CO2 levels. The figure serves as a valuable tool for both researchers and policymakers, providing a visual representation of the indoor CO2 landscape in the Al-Baha region. It prompts considerations for sustainable building practices, ventilation strategies, and public health interventions aimed at optimizing indoor air quality. In conclusion, the figure effectively communicates the variability in indoor CO2 concentrations, offering insights into the factors influencing air quality within diverse indoor environments. This understanding is instrumental for promoting healthier living and working conditions in Al-Baha region and can inform strategies for sustainable building design and indoor air quality management.

Figure 5. CO2 concentration in different locations for present work locations.

The contours of indoor CO2 concentrations in Al-Baha region are presented in Figure 6, offering a dynamic and insightful portrayal of the spatial distribution. The use of contours adds a layer of detail, allowing for a quick and comprehensive understanding of CO2 levels in various indoor environments.

The diverse range of contours captures the nuanced patterns of CO2 concentrations, highlighting areas with both lower and higher levels. This information is instrumental in identifying potential areas for improvement in indoor air quality and aids in the formulation of targeted strategies for ventilation and environmental management. The use of contours not only enhances visual clarity but also facilitates the identification of hotspots or areas requiring specific attention for mitigating elevated CO2 levels. This figure significantly contributes to our understanding of indoor air quality dynamics in Al-Baha region, utilizing contours to convey a spatial perspective on CO2 concentrations. It serves as an essential tool for informed decision-making and interventions aimed at fostering healthier indoor environments.

Figure 6. CO2 contours in different locations for present work locations.

A comprehensive overview of indoor PM2.5 concentrations across seventy-two locations in Al-Baha region is provided in Figure 7, revealing a range from 3 to 26 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3). This detailed representation offers valuable insights into the spatial distribution of fine particulate matter, a critical component of indoor air quality. The depicted range underscores the diversity in indoor environments, with some locations exhibiting lower PM2.5 concentrations indicative of effective air filtration and ventilation, while others experience higher levels possibly due to various indoor sources such as cooking, smoking, or insufficient ventilation. Indoor PM2.5 concentrations are of significant concern due to their association with respiratory and cardiovascular health issues. This figure provides insight into areas where indoor air quality needs improvement and guides efforts to improve ventilation, air filtration, and overall indoor environmental quality.

Figure 7. PM2.5 concentration in different locations for present work locations.

Figure 8 presents a compelling visualization of indoor PM2.5 concentration contours in Al-Baha region, offering a nuanced and spatially informed perspective on air quality. The use of contours provides a clear representation of PM2.5 distribution, revealing areas with varying levels of fine particulate matter within indoor environments. The contours highlight the diversity in PM2.5 concentrations across different locations, allowing for quick identification of areas with both lower and higher levels. This information is pivotal for understanding indoor air quality dynamics and tailoring strategies to mitigate particulate matter exposure. This figure significantly contributes to our understanding of indoor PM2.5 distribution, utilizing contours to provide a spatially rich depiction.

Figure 8. PM2.5 contours in different locations for present work locations.

In Figure 9, a comprehensive depiction of indoor PM10 concentrations across present work locations in Al-Baha region is presented, showcasing a concentration range from 3 to 32 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3). This detailed representation provides valuable insight into the spatial distribution of inhalable particulate matter, contributing to a nuanced understanding of indoor air quality. The observed range underscores the diversity of indoor environments, with some locations exhibiting lower PM10 concentrations indicative of effective air quality management, while others experience higher levels potentially influenced by various indoor sources such as dust, pollutants from combustion, or inadequate ventilation.

Figure 9. PM10 concentration in different locations for present work locations.

Figure 10 elegantly illustrates indoor PM10 concentration contours in Al-Baha region, providing a visually compelling representation of spatial variations in particulate matter. The use of contours enhances the clarity of the figure, allowing for a quick and insightful interpretation of PM10 distribution within indoor environments.

Figure 11 offers a comprehensive view of indoor Total Volatile Organic Compound (TVOC) concentrations across current locations in Al-Baha region, showcasing a concentration range from 0.04 to 0.8 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3). This detailed representation provides valuable insights into the spatial distribution of TVOCs, contributing to a nuanced understanding of indoor air quality. According to Table 5, these values are in an acceptable range of good air quality.

Figure 10. PM10 contours in different locations for present work locations.

Figure 11. TVOC concentration in different locations for present work locations.

A captivating visualization of indoor Total Volatile Organic Compound (TVOC) concentration contours in Al-Baha region is shown in Figure 12, offering a spatially nuanced perspective on indoor air quality. The contours provide a clear and insightful portrayal of the distribution of TVOCs, revealing areas with varying levels within indoor environments. The use of contours adds depth to the figure, facilitating the identification of regions with both lower and higher TVOC concentrations. This information is crucial for understanding indoor air quality dynamics and tailoring strategies to mitigate the presence of volatile organic compounds.

Figure 12. TVOC contours in different locations for present work locations.

Figure 13 provides a comprehensive overview of indoor formaldehyde (HCOH) concentrations across 72 locations in Al-Baha region, showcasing a concentration range from 0.009 to 0.1 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3). This detailed representation offers valuable insights into the spatial distribution of formaldehyde, contributing to a nuanced understanding of indoor air quality promoting healthier indoor environments and safeguarding the well-being of individuals in diverse indoor settings.

Figure 14 presents a visually compelling representation of indoor formaldehyde (HCOH) concentration contours in Al-Baha region, providing a nuanced insight into spatial variations of this volatile organic compound within indoor environments. The contours enhance the clarity of the figure, allowing for a quick and informed interpretation of formaldehyde distribution.

Figure 13. HCOH concentration in different locations for present work locations.

Figure 14. HCOH contours in different locations for present work locations.

4. Conclusion

The concentrations of CO2 ranged from 390 to 609 parts per million, PM2.5 varied between 3 and 26 micrograms per cubic meter, PM10 showed fluctuations within the range of 3 to 32 micrograms per cubic meter, TVOC exhibited values spanning from 0.04 to 0.8 per milligrams per cubic meter, and HCOH concentrations fluctuated between 0.009 and 0.1 milligrams per cubic meter. According to the standards outlined in Tables 2-6, these observed values fall within the acceptable range. The compliance of these measurements with established standards underscores the adherence to recognized benchmarks for indoor air quality, providing reassurance regarding the environmental conditions in the studied locations in conclusion, the data analysis of indoor air quality in Al-Baha Region, Saudi Arabia, has provided valuable insights into the spatial dynamics of various pollutants, including CO2, PM2.5, PM10, TVOCs, and formaldehyde. The comprehensive examination of seventy-two locations has allowed for a thorough assessment, revealing a diverse range of indoor air quality conditions. The findings highlight the significance of such studies in understanding the factors influencing indoor air quality, with the data serving as a crucial resource for researchers, policymakers, and the public. The use of contours in visual representations has enhanced our ability to grasp the spatial patterns of pollutant concentrations, enabling informed decision-making for interventions aimed at creating healthier indoor environments. This analysis contributes to the ongoing efforts to promote sustainable living conditions and underscores the importance of proactive measures in addressing potential health risks associated with indoor air pollutants. The data obtained fosters a deeper understanding of the nuances in air quality within Al-Baha Region, paving the way for targeted strategies to enhance ventilation, reduce pollutant sources, and ultimately improve the overall well-being of residents. As we move forward, this comprehensive analysis forms a solid foundation for future research endeavors and policy initiatives aimed at fostering a healthier and more sustainable indoor living environment in the Al-Baha Region and beyond.

Acknowledgment

I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my students Enad M. Alzahrani, Ahmed M. Merded, Ayman Saeed, Abdulla A. Abulla, Ali Mordy, Mohamed H. Alzahrani and Yazan Talal for their invaluable and dedicated assistance throughout the various research stages. Their commitment and support have significantly contributed to the success and progress of our research endeavor.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Parés, M.E., Garcia, D. and Vázquez-Gallego, F. (2020) Mapping Air Quality with a Mobile Crowdsourced Air Quality Monitoring System (C-AQM). The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 4, 685-690.
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xliii-b4-2020-685-2020
[2] Kumar, U.S. and Harinarayanan, P. (2021) An Analysis on the Implementation of Air Pollution Monitoring System. Proceedings of the International Conference on Systems, Energy & Environment (ICSEE) 2021, Kannur, 24 December 2020, 206-211.
[3] Metia, S., Ha, Q.P., Duc, H.N. and Scorgie, Y. (2020) Urban Air Pollution Estimation Using Unscented Kalman Filtered Inverse Modeling with Scaled Monitoring Data. Sustainable Cities and Society, 54, Article 101970.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101970
[4] Janarthanan, R., Partheeban, P., Somasundaram, K. and Navin Elamparithi, P. (2021) A Deep Learning Approach for Prediction of Air Quality Index in a Metropolitan City. Sustainable Cities and Society, 67, Article 102720.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102720
[5] Sánchez-Triana, E., et al. (2021) Environmental Degradation: Estimating the Health Effects of Ambient PM2.5 Air Pollution in Developing Countries. In: Shugart, H., et al. Eds., Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science, Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.559
[6] Gurjar, B.R., Molina, L.T. and Ojha, C.S.P. (2010) Air Pollution: Health and Environmental Impacts. CRC Press.
https://doi.org/10.1201/EBK1439809624
[7] Delucchi, M.A., Murphy, J.J. and McCubbin, D.R. (2002) The Health and Visibility Cost of Air Pollution: A Comparison of Estimation Methods. Journal of Environmental Management, 64, 139-152.
https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0515
[8] Alnajjar, H.Y.H. and Üçüncü, O. (2023) Removal Efficiency Prediction Model Based on the Artificial Neural Network for Pollution Prevention in Wastewater Treatment Plants. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, 41, 610-626.
https://doi.org/10.1108/agjsr-07-2022-0129
[9] Goyal, R. and Khare, M. (2010) Indoor Air Pollution and Health Effects. In: Gurjar, B.R., Molina, L.T. and Ojha, C.S.P., Eds., Air Pollution: Health and Environmental Impacts, CRC Press, 109-134.
[10] Payra, S., Gunwani, P. and Verma, S. (2022) Emission Sources of Particulate Matter. In: Sonwani, S. and Shukla, A., Eds., AirBorne Particulate Matter, Springer, 9-28.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5387-2_2
[11] Lamas, G.A., Bhatnagar, A., Jones, M.R., Mann, K.K., Nasir, K., Tellez‐Plaza, M., et al. (2023) Contaminant Metals as Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Journal of the American Heart Association, 12, e029852.
https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.123.029852
[12] Hung, N.T., Ting, H.W. and Chi, K.H. (2018) Evaluation of the Relative Health Risk Impact of Atmospheric PCDD/Fs in PM2.5 in Taiwan. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 18, 2591-2599.
https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2018.03.0094
[13] Yuan, L., Shin, K. and Managi, S. (2018) Subjective Well-Being and Environmental Quality: The Impact of Air Pollution and Green Coverage in China. Ecological Economics, 153, 124-138.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.033
[14] Mabahwi, N.A.B., Leh, O.L.H. and Omar, D. (2014) Human Health and Wellbeing: Human Health Effect of Air Pollution. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 221-229.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.056
[15] Mahajan, S. and Kumar, P. (2020) Evaluation of Low-Cost Sensors for Quantitative Personal Exposure Monitoring. Sustainable Cities and Society, 57, Article 102076.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102076
[16] Bouzguenda, I., Alalouch, C. and Fava, N. (2019) Towards Smart Sustainable Cities: A Review of the Role Digital Citizen Participation Could Play in Advancing Social Sustainability. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, Article 101627.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101627
[17] Marsal-Llacuna, M. (2015) City Indicators on Social Sustainability as Standardization Technologies for Smarter (Citizen-Centered) Governance of Cities. Social Indicators Research, 128, 1193-1216.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1075-6
[18] Boakes, E.H., Gliozzo, G., Seymour, V., Harvey, M., Smith, C., Roy, D.B., et al. (2016) Patterns of Contribution to Citizen Science Biodiversity Projects Increase Understanding of Volunteers’ Recording Behaviour. Scientific Reports, 6, Article No. 33051.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33051
[19] English, P.B., Richardson, M.J. and Garzón-Galvis, C. (2018) From Crowdsourcing to Extreme Citizen Science: Participatory Research for Environmental Health. Annual Review of Public Health, 39, 335-350.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013702
[20] Budde, M., Schankin, A., Hoffmann, J., Danz, M., Riedel, T. and Beigl, M. (2017) Participatory Sensing or Participatory Nonsense? Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 1, Article No. 39.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3131900
[21] Farkas, K. (2020) Participatory Sensing Framework. In: Han, B., Tomer, V., Nguyen, T.A., Farmani, A. and Singh, P.K., Eds., Nanosensors for Smart Cities, Elsevier, 543-553.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819870-4.00031-1
[22] Dutta, P., Aoki, P.M., Kumar, N., Mainwaring, A., Myers, C., Willett, W., et al. (2009) Common Sense. Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Berkeley, 4-6 November 2009, 349-350.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1644038.1644095
[23] Bell, S., Cornford, D. and Bastin, L. (2015) How Good Are Citizen Weather Stations? Addressing a Biased Opinion. Weather, 70, 75-84.
https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.2316
[24] Jiang, Q., Bregt, A.K. and Kooistra, L. (2018) Formal and Informal Environmental Sensing Data and Integration Potential: Perceptions of Citizens and Experts. Science of the Total Environment, 619, 1133-1142.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.329
[25] D’Hondt, E., Stevens, M. and Jacobs, A. (2013) Participatory Noise Mapping Works! An Evaluation of Participatory Sensing as an Alternative to Standard Techniques for Environmental Monitoring. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 9, 681-694.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2012.09.002
[26] Du, C., Wang, S., Yu, M., Chiu, T., Wang, J., Chuang, P., et al. (2020) Effect of Ventilation Improvement during a Tuberculosis Outbreak in Underventilated University Buildings. Indoor Air, 30, 422-432.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12639
[27] Krawczyk, D.A., Rodero, A., Gładyszewska-Fiedoruk, K. and Gajewski, A. (2016) CO2 Concentration in Naturally Ventilated Classrooms Located in Different Climates—Measurements and Simulations. Energy and Buildings, 129, 491-498.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.08.003
[28] Branco, P.T.B.S., Alvim-Ferraz, M.C.M., Martins, F.G. and Sousa, S.I.V. (2019) Quantifying Indoor Air Quality Determinants in Urban and Rural Nursery and Primary Schools. Environmental Research, 176, Article 108534.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108534
[29] Batterman, S. and Peng, C. (1995) TVOC and CO2 Concentrations as Indicators in Indoor Air Quality Studies. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 56, 55-65.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15428119591017321
[30] Ścibor, M., Balcerzak, B., Galbarczyk, A., Targosz, N. and Jasienska, G. (2019) Are We Safe Inside? Indoor Air Quality in Relation to Outdoor Concentration of PM10 and PM2.5 and to Characteristics of Homes. Sustainable Cities and Society, 48, Article 101537.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101537

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.