What Is the Convenience of Treating a Wetland as an Agricultural Area?

Abstract

The Gelsari and Lentini marshes, in east-central Sicily, are wetland under heavy anthropogenic pressure. This area is regularly subjected to water withdrawals and agriculture is practiced. Periodic bird census activities had been conducted in this area between 2016 and 2022 with collected data being supplemented with the data from a previous survey conducted between 2010 and 2016. During the censuses, numerous photographs were collected, which were later used for counts. In total, 121 surveys were carried out, with visits occurring approximately 20 times per year, covering all seasons. The data collected, both from bibliography and unpublished observations, were organised in table. 120 species and subspecies have been reported, 41 of which are in Annex I of the Birds Directive. Between 2021 and 2022, a water column measurement was taken in a central area of the Lentini marsh and compared with rainfall data in the area. It was found that water removal, occurring in both marshes in different modes, produced different effects on habitat conservation. Of the two marshes, Lentini is the one in which the existing favorable conditions in its most depressed areas, located below sea level, have allowed for the adequate conservation of the wetland. This environmental improvement having occurred with respect to the previous period has restored to the marsh its historically recognized possibility of not drying up completely during the summer period, allowing permanence of numerous birds. The obtained results suggest total elimination of agriculture and discontinuation of water withdrawals in the Lentini marsh as well as regulation of withdrawals in the Gelsari marsh.

Share and Cite:

Pietro, R. , Ientile, R. and Sabella, G. (2024) What Is the Convenience of Treating a Wetland as an Agricultural Area?. Open Journal of Ecology, 14, 544-561. doi: 10.4236/oje.2024.146031.

1. Introduction

The conservation status of Mediterranean wetlands is worrying and subject to numerous environmental pressures; many wetlands are threatened by pollution, land consumption and invasive species. Their state of conservation is often totally inadequate, especially in Sicily [1] [2]. As a rule, the poor management of these environments affects the areas adjacent to them, which are affected by building settlements or human activities [3]. In Sicily, adequately protected wetlands, such as Vendicari or the Longarini and Cuba marshes, host very rich communities of birds; particularly, in these two areas, 251 [4] and 244 [5] species have been respectively recorded, which represent about 35 percent of all known species for the entire Italian territory [6].

The Gelsari and Lentini marshes represent a Sicilian wetland area, which in the past was among the most extensive ones, now reduced to an irregularly flooded area due to water drainage interventions intended for an agricultural use of the area. The income derived from these agricultural activities, which today are in part being abandoned, does not compensate for the costs required to keep some of its areas dry, all to the detriment of a wetland of potentially very high naturalistic value. Bird populations in the residual wetland have been periodically surveyed. In the same area, trends in water levels were also described by monitoring rainfall and forced water withdrawals. An update of ornithological research carried out between 2010 and 2016 is presented with this paper [7].

2. Study Area and State of Conservation

Gelsari and Lentini are two coastal brackish marshes in east-central Sicily, located geographically in the so-called “Plain of Catania”, the largest plain in Sicily (Figure 1); administratively they fall within the territories of Catania, Carlentini and Augusta. A large part of the northern depression, constituting the Lentini marsh, lies at an elevation below sea level.

Already in ancient times the landscape of this wetland, much larger and more pristine than today’s, must have struck the imagination of the inhabitants of Leontinoi, an important Greek colony located less than 10 km away, as appears proven by the vessel production, with depictions of waterfowl, preserved in the archaeological museum of Lentini [8]. Historically, these marshes are known for their vastness and ability to accommodate abundant avifauna; their wealth of fauna attracted nobles and royalty in the past and, among them, Frederick II of Swabia [9] [10].

Historical and scientific information on the area is scarce and found in various works, lacking a one monograph. Nonetheless, while the available picture is partial, it is sufficient to outline the great importance of the area.

Currently, the confines of these marshes cannot be traced in a definitive manner, as their width depends on the amount of water present. These are two natural depressions, located to the north and south, of the terminal stretch of the San Leonardo River; over time they have been reshaped by humans, through artificial channels, in order to convey their waters to two respective pumping stations, where they are raised to end up in the sea. For a more in-depth description of the site, see [7].

Figure 1. Localization of the study area and Special Protection Area ITA070029 (red section), with the portion covering the Gelsari and Lentini sloughs indicated (green background).

Since 2012, the Gelsari and Lentini marshes have been included in the Natura 2000 Network and are part of the Special Protection Area, codified ITA070029 (Figure 1). However, agricultural activities and water disposal by a Sicilian Region “reclamation” consortium persist; these are activities that pre-existed the establishment of the constraint, limiting or preventing the natural expression and evolution of the aquatic environment, from a floristic and faunal point of view. Recently, an additional impact factor has been added, consisting of a high-voltage power line, the route of which has, unjustifiably, involved the crossing of both marshes.

Compared to previous surveys [7], different environmental conditions have been found in the area. The Gelsari marsh, during the entire study period, was almost always dry as a result of the modernization and upgrading of the related water-supply plant. In the Lentini marsh, on the other hand, anthropogenic pressure was reduced following the abandonment of some areas, which were previously cultivated. In Lentini, water outcrops have been more permanently present, and in areas no longer subject to land clearing, significant vegetation cover has developed.

3. Material and Methods

Censuses of birds present in the Gelsari and Lentini wetland complex were conducted between October 2016 and September 2022. The visits were not conducted on a regular basis, but given the instability of the wetlands, brought about human activities and particularly water withdrawal, they were concentrated at times when water stagnation was present.

The census of birds in the wild was combined with a conspicuous collection of documentary images, acquired with a digital SLR camera. Subsequently, the photographic archive was consulted for further verification, identification, and recounting of individual species. A total of 121 surveys were carried out, with comprehensive censuses of aquatic species; there were approximately 20 visits per year, covering all seasons (37.2 percent in autumn, 17.3 percent in winter, 24.8 percent in spring, and 20.7 percent in summer).

Data taken from the bibliography and unpublished data are entered in Table 1, as described below. The species have been listed in the rows, or the subspecies, and reportings in the columns. The systematic order and nomenclature adopted are those proposed in the Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International [11]. The first column, if the species is cited in the literature, reports the references; the second and third columns report observations made between 2010 and 2016, taken from [7], and unpublished observations collected between 2016 and 2022, respectively. The values given for observations refer to the number of times the species was sighted, and the maximum number of individuals detected is given in parentheses. For the widespread species, values were not reported, but they were generically referred to as “Common”.

Table 1. Synoptic table of species sighted, compared with those sighted, in the same area, in an earlier period [7]. Historical and recent data, taken from the bibliography and censuses conducted, are listed. Total ascertained reports and maximum numbers of ascertained individuals are given for each species.

Scientific name

Common name

Historical sources

Sightings between 2010 (III) and 2016 (IX) De Pietro et al 2019

Sightings between 2016 (X) and 2022 (IX)

Cygnus olor

Mute Swan

[12] [13]



Cygnus cygnus

Whooper Swan

[12] [14]



Melanitta fusca

Velvet Scoter

[15]



Tadorna tadorna

Common Shelduck


8 (max. 24 ind.)

31 (70 ind.)

Aythya ferina

Common Pochard

[16][18]

-


1 (1 ind.)

Aythya nyroca

Ferruginous Duck

[16] [18] [19]

2 (max. 13 ind.)

2 (max. 9 ind.)

Aythya fuligula

Tufted Duck

[17]


1 (1 ind.)

Spatula querquedula

Garganey

[17] [19]

4 (max. 6 ind.)

11 (16 ind.)

Spatula clypeata

Northern Shoveler

[20] [21]

3 (max. 50 about)

9 (max. 15 ind.)

Mareca strepera

Gadwall

[22]

1 (2 ind.)

1 (1 ind.)

Mareca penelope

Eurasian Wigeon

[12] [18] [21]

1 (17 ind.)

11 (15 ind.)

Anas platyrhynchos

Mallard

[19] [20] [23]

10 (max. 5 ind.)

27 (max. 10 ind.)

Anas acuta

Northern Pintail

[12] [17]-[20]

1 (2 ind.)

17 (max. 117 ind.)

Anas crecca

Common Teal

[17] [18]

1 (2 ind.)

6 (max. 75 ind.)

Tachybaptus ruficollis

Little Grebe

[19] [20]

7 (max, 4)

19 (max. 9 ind.)

Podiceps cristatus

Great Crested Grebe

[24]

6 (max. 15 ind.)

1 (1 ind.)

Podiceps nigricollis

Black-necked Grebe

[23]

3 (max. 4 ind.)

8 (max. 5 ind.)

Phoenicopterus roseus

Greater Flamingo

[21]

2 (max. 6 ind.)

55 (max. 34 ind.)

Columba livia

Rock Dove


Max. 250 ind.

common

Columba palumbus

Common Woodpigeon


Max. 50 ind.

common

Streptopelia turtur

European Turtle-dove

[23]


1 (2 ind.)

Streptopelia decaocto

Eurasian Collared-dove


common

common

Apus pallidus

Pallid Swift


common

common

Apus apus

Common Swift


common

common

Gallinula chloropus

Common Moorhen


3 (max. 4 ind.)

9 (max. 10 ind.)

Fulica atra

Common Coot

[17] [21]

17 (max. 338 ind.)

13 (max. 142 ind.)

Ciconia ciconia

White Stork

[12]

32 (max. 73 ind.)

65 (max. 73 ind.)

Platalea leucorodia

Eurasian Spoonbill

[12] [21]

6 (max. 22 ind.)

12 (max. 2 ind.)

Plegadis falcinellus

Glossy Ibis

[21]

5 (max. 22 ind.)

20 (max. 43 ind.)

Ixobrychus minutus

Common Little Bittern

[20] [25]

1 (1 ind.)


Nycticorax nycticorax

Black-crowned Night-heron

[23]

1 (1 ind.)

2 (max. 9 ind.)

Ardeola ralloides

Squacco Heron

[18]

12 (max. 6 ind.)

10 (max. 8 ind.)

Bubulcus ibis

Cattle Egret


20 (max. 130 ind.), 1 in 1971 (Sorci et al. 1972)

47 (max. 138 ind.)

Ardea cinerea

Grey Heron

[13]

14 (max. 14 ind.)

16 (max. 11 ind.)

Ardea purpurea

Purple Heron

[16][19]

-

3 (max. 2 ind.)

4 (max. 2 ind.)

Ardea alba

Great White Egret

[18] [19]

17 (max. 5 ind.)

5 (max. 1 ind.)

Egretta garzetta

Little Egret

[17]

40 (max. 77 ind.)

85 (max. 71 ind.)

Pelecanus onocrotalus

Great White Pelican

[26] [27]



Phalacrocorax carbo

Great Cormorant

[19] [27] [28]

2 (max. 3 ind.)

4 (max. 7 ind.)

Burhinus oedicnemus

Eurasian Thick-knee


2 (max. 2 ind.)

6 (max. 7 ind.)

Recurvirostra avosetta

Pied Avocet

[23]

1 (1 ind.)

6 (max. 6 ind.)

Himantopus himantopus

Black-winged Stilt

[17]

22 (max 72. ind.)

38 (max. 60 ind.)

Pluvialis squatarola

Grey Plover



2 (1 ind.)

Pluvialis apricaria

Eurasian Golden Plover

[17] [20] [21]

2 (max. 161 ind.)

1 (3 ind.)

Charadrius hiaticula

Common Ringed Plover



4 (max. 8 ind.)

Charadrius dubius

Little Ringed Plover


3 (max. 6 ind.)

16 (max. 10 ind.)

Vanellus vanellus

Northern Lapwing

[17]

7 (max. 80 ind. about)

24 (max. 371 ind.)

Numenius arquata

Eurasian Curlew

[13] [17]

1 (18 ind.)

1 (1 ind.)

Numenius arquata orientalis

Eurasian Curlew
(orientalis)



1 (2 ind.)

Limosa lapponica

Bar-tailed Godwit



3 (max. 2 ind.)

Limosa limosa

Black-tailed Godwit


2 (max. 2 ind.)

2 (max. 3 ind.)

Calidris pugnax

Ruff

[17]

10 (max. 16 ind.)

22 (max. 361 ind.)

Calidris ferruginea

Curlew Sandpiper


3 (max. 15 ind.)

4 (max. 14 ind.)

Calidris alpina

Dunlin

[17] [20]

3 (max. 28 ind.)

17 (max. 334 ind.)

Calidris minuta

Little Stint

[20]

3 (max. 10 ind.)

17 (max. 28 ind.)

Gallinago gallinago

Common Snipe


5 (max. 7 ind.)

17 (max. 46 ind.)

Lymnocryptes minimus

Jack Snipe



1 (2 ind.)

Actitis hypoleucos

Common Sandpiper

[24]

1 (1 ind.)

2 (1 ind.)

Tringa ochropus

Green Sandpiper

[17] [20] [21]

1 (1 ind.)

4 (1 ind.)

Tringa erythropus

Spotted Redshank

[17]

2 (max. 7 ind.)

10 (max. 14 ind.)

Tringa nebularia

Common Greenshank

[17]

14 (max. 21 ind.)

15 (max. 23 ind.)

Tringa totanus

Common Redshank

[17]

5 (1 ind.)

6 (max. 8 ind.)

Tringa glareola

Wood Sandpiper

[17]

8 (max. 70 ind. about)

17 (max. 25 ind.)

Tringa stagnatilis

Marsh Sandpiper

[17]


3 (max. 3 ind.)

Larus genei

Slender-billed Gull

[20]



Larus ridibundus

Black-headed Gull


18 (max. 1000 ind. about)

common

Larus melanocephalus

Mediterranean Gull



2 (1 ind.)

Larus fuscus

Lesser Black-backed Gull


1 (1 ind.)

2 (max. 2 ind.)

Larus michahellis

Yellow-legged Gull


4 (max. 50 ind. about)

6 (max. 60 ind.)

Gelochelidon nilotica

Common Gull-billed Tern


1 (1 ind.)


Chlidonias hybrida

Whiskered Tern


1 (1 ind.)

1 (1 ind.)

Chlidonias niger

Black Tern


1 (1 ind.)


Tyto alba

Common Barn-owl


3 (1 ind.)

1 (1 ind.)

Asio flammeus

Short-eared Owl


1 in 2.II.1942 (Ciaccio and Priolo 1997)


Pandion haliaetus

Osprey

[23] [29]

3 (1 ind.)

3 (1 ind.)

Circaetus gallicus

Short-toed Snake-eagle



3 (1 ind.)

Aquila fasciata

Bonelli’s Eagle



1 (1 ind.)

Hieraaetus pennatus

Booted Eagle


3 (1 ind.)

6 (max. 2 ind.)

Circus aeruginosus

Western Marsh-harrier

[19]

19 (max. 2 ind.)

44 (max. 3 ind.)

Circus macrourus

Pallid Harrier


1 (1 ind.)


Circus pygargus

Montagu’s Harrier



4 (1 ind.)

Milvus migrans

Black Kite



1 (1 ind.)

Buteo buteo

Eurasian Buzzard


25 (max. 3 ind.)

44 (max. 4 ind.)

Buteo rufinus

Long-legged Buzzard



1 (1 ind.)

Upupa epops

Common Hoopoe


3 (1 ind.)

2 (1 ind.)

Merops apiaster

European Bee-eater


2 (1 ind.)

7 (max. 29 ind.)

Alcedo atthis

Common Kingfisher


1 (1 ind.)

3 (max. 2 ind.)

Falco tinnunculus

Common Kestrel


28 (max. 2 ind.)

33 (max. 2 ind.)

Falco vespertinus

Red-footed Falcon


1 (1 ind.)

1 (8 ind.)

Falco peregrinus

Peregrine Falcon



1 (1 ind.)

Pica pica

Eurasian Magpie


common

common

Corvus monedula

Eurasian Jackdaw


1 (2 ind.)


Corvus corone cornix

Carrion Crow


common

common

Calandrella brachydactyla

Greater Short-toed Lark


1 (5 ind.)


Alauda arvensis

Eurasian Skylark


common

5 (max. 20 ind.)

Galerida cristata

Crested Lark


common

common

Cisticola juncidis

Zitting Cisticola

[20]

common

common

Acrocephalus paludicola

Aquatic Warbler

[19]



Acrocephalus melanopogon

Moustached Warbler

[20]



Acrocephalus palustris

Marsh Warbler

[30]



Acrocephalus scirpaceus

Common Reed-warbler

[20]

common

common

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

Great Reed-warbler


1 (1 ind.)


Delichon urbicum

Northern House Martin


common

common

Hirundo rustica

Barn Swallow


common

common

Riparia riparia

Collared Sand Martin



2 (max. 4 ind.)

Phylloscopus collybita

Common Chiffchaff


common

8 (max. 2 ind.)

Sturnus vulgaris

Common Starling

[31]

max. c. 2000 ind.

10 (max. 500 ind.)

Sturnus unicolor

Spotless Starling


max. 200 ind.

3 (max. 15 ind.)

Erithacus rubecula

European Robin


common

1 (1 ind.)

Phoenicurus ochruros

Black Redstart


common

1 (1 ind.)

Saxicola torquatus

Common stonechat


common

common

Anthus pratensis

Meadow Pipit


common

1 (1 ind.)

Motacilla flava ssp.

Western Yellow Wagtail


common

common

Motacilla f. flava


1 (1 ind.)


Motacilla f. feldegg


1 (1 ind.)

1 ( 2 ind.)

Motacilla f. cinereocapilla



1 ( 2 ind.)

Motacilla alba

White Wagtail

[20]

common

common

Linaria cannabina

Common linnet


common

common

Carduelis carduelis

European Goldfinch


common

common

Emberiza calandra

Corn Bunting


common

common

A second table (Table 2) was also made, indicating, for each species, the phenological category and the framing in the regulatory and conservation fields. The phenological categories adopted, with the abbreviation used, are as follows: S = Sedentary; B = Breeding; W = Wintering; M = Migrant; A = Accidental; P = Presence (less than 10 records). Irr = Irregular.

In 2021 and 2022, in conjunction with the censuses, the water level of the Lentini marsh was surveyed; the measurements were taken in a channel, called “western low water”, at a point affecting the central portion of the marsh. The data was obtained with reference to a landmark surveyed altimetrically with a topographic instrument with GNSS receiver (Stonex S850+). In the analysis, the discrete point-type data related to the water column, surveyed in the field, were compared with rainfall data from some rainfall stations of the Sicilian Agrometeorological Information Service, which is part of the Sicilian Region’s Agricultural and Food Resources Department. The stations examined are those of Augusta, Catania and Lentini, which are those closest to the marsh (identified, respectively, by the geographical coordinates in decimal degrees 37.248625˚ 15.142567, 37.441788˚ 15.067711˚ and 37.350490˚ 14.908070˚). By constructing the relevant Thiessen polygons, it appears that the Lentini marsh is mainly influenced by the Catania rainfall station; it has been referred to in Figure 3 for the comparison of rainfall trends and water levels in the marsh.

Table 2. List of species. for each species the phenology and abundance, the inclusion in annex I of EU Directive 147/2009, the global and Italian status IUCN and the category of SPEC accordind to Birdlife International (2017) are indicated. S = Sedentary; B = Breeding; W = Wintering; M = Migrant; A = Accidental; P = Presence (Less 10records); I = Irregular.

Scientific name

Phenology and
abundance

Appendix
I EU
Directive 147/2009

Global status IUCN

Italian status IUCN (only nesting birds)

SPEC1 or SPEC2

Cygnus olor

P

no

LC

LC

no

Cygnus cygnus

A

yes

LC

no

no

Melanitta fusca

A

no

VU A2abcde

no

SPEC 1

Tadorna tadorna

W, M

no

LC

VU D1

no

Aythya ferina

M irr

no

VU A2abcde + 3bcde + 4abcde

VU D1

SPEC 1

Aythya nyroca

M irr, possible B

yes

NT

EN D

SPEC 1

Aythya fuligula

M, rare

no

LC

VU D

no

Spatula querquedula

M

no

LC

VU C2a(i); D1

no

Spatula clypeata

W rare, M

no

LC

VU D1

no

Mareca strepera

M, rare

no

LC

NT D1

no

Mareca penelope

M

no

LC

no

no

Anas platyrhynchos

S, B

no

LC

LC

no

Anas acuta

W rare, M

no

LC

no

no

Anas crecca

W rare, M

no

LC

EN D

no

Tachybaptus ruficollis

W, B

no

LC

LC

no

Podiceps cristatus

M irr

no

LC

LC

no

Podiceps nigricollis

M irr

no

LC

no

no

Phoenicopterus roseus

W irr, M irr

yes

LC

LC

no

Columba livia

S, B, common

no

DD

LC

no

Columba palumbus

S, B, common

no

LC

LC

no

Streptopelia turtur

M irr

no

VU A2bcde + 4bcde

LC

SPEC 1

Streptopelia decaocto

S common

no

LC

LC

no

Apus pallidus

B around, M common

no

LC

LC

no

Apus apus

B around, M common

no

LC

LC

no

Gallinula chloropus

S common

no

LC

LC

no

Fulica atra

M irr, B

no

LC

LC

no

Ciconia ciconia

S, B

yes

LC

LC

no

Platalea leucorodia

W irr, M irr

yes

LC

NT D1

no

Plegadis falcinellus

M irr

yes

LC

VU D

no

Ixobrychus minutus

M irr

yes

LC

VU C1

no

Nycticorax nycticorax

M irr

yes

LC

LC

no

Ardeola ralloides

M irr

yes

LC

NT D1

no

Bubulcus ibis

S common

no

LC

LC

no

Ardea cinerea

W irr, M irr

no

LC

LC

no

Ardea purpurea

M irr

yes

LC

LC

no

Ardea alba

W irr, M irr

yes

LC

NT D1

no

Egretta garzetta

W irr, M irr

yes

LC

LC

no

Pelecanus onocrotalus

A

yes

LC

no

no

Phalacrocorax carbo

M irr

no

LC

LC

no

Burhinus oedicnemus

M irr, possible B

yes

LC

LC

no

Recurvirostra avosetta

M irr

yes

LC

LC

no

Himantopus himantopus

M irr, B

yes

LC

LC

no

Pluvialis squatarola

P

no

LC

no

no

Pluvialis apricaria

W irr, M irr

yes

LC

no

no

Charadrius hiaticula

M irr

no

LC

no

no

Charadrius dubius

W irr, M irr

no

LC

LC

no

Vanellus vanellus

W irr, M irr

no

NT

LC

SPEC 1

Numenius arquata

M irr

yes

NT

no

SPEC 1

Limosa lapponica

W irr

yes

NT

no

SPEC 1

Limosa limosa

M irr

no

NT

EN D

SPEC 1

Calidris pugnax

M irr, W irr

no

LC

no

SPEC 2

Calidris ferruginea

M irr

no

LC

no

SPEC 1

Calidris alpina

W irr, M irr

no

LC

no

no

Calidris minuta

W irr, M irr

no

LC

no

no

Gallinago gallinago

W irr, M irr

no

LC

no

no

Lymnocryptes minimus

W irr

no

LC

no

no

Actitis hypoleucos

M irr

no

LC

NT D1

no

Tringa ochropus

M irr, W irr

no

LC

no

no

Tringa erythropus

M irr, W irr

no

LC

no

no

Tringa nebularia

M irr, W irr

no

LC

no

no

Tringa totanus

W irr, M irr

no

LC

LC

SPEC 2

Tringa glareola

M irr

yes

LC

no

no

Tringa stagnatilis

M irr

no

LC

no

no

Larus genei

P

yes

LC

NT D2

no

Larus ridibundus

W irr, M irr

no

LC

LC

no

Larus melanocephalus

M irr

yes

LC

NT D2

no

Larus fuscus

W irr

no

LC

no

no

Larus michahellis

S irr

no

LC

LC

no

Gelochelidon nilotica

M irr

yes

LC

NT

no

Chlidonias hybrida

M irr

yes

LC

VU D1

no

Chlidonias niger

M irr

yes

LC

CR C2a(ii)

no

Tyto alba

S, possible B

no

LC

LC

no

Asio flammeus

M irr

yes

LC

no

no

Pandion haliaetus

M irr

yes

LC

CR D

no

Circaetus gallicus

M irr

yes

LC

LC

no

Aquila fasciata

P

yes

LC

EN D

no

Hieraaetus pennatus

W irr, M irr

yes

LC

no

no

Circus aeruginosus

W irr, M irr

yes

LC

VU D1

no

Circus macrourus

M irr

yes

NT

no

SPEC 1

Circus pygargus

M irr

yes

LC

VU D1

no

Milvus migrans

M irr

yes

LC

LC

no

Buteo buteo

S, B

no

LC

LC

no

Buteo rufinus

P

yes

LC

no

no

Upupa epops

M, W irr

no

LC

LC

no

Merops apiaster

M common

no

LC

LC

no

Alcedo atthis

M irr

yes

LC

LC

no

Falco tinnunculus

S, B

no

LC

LC

no

Falco vespertinus

M irr

yes

NT

VU D

SPEC 1

Falco peregrinus

W irr

yes

LC

LC

no

Pica pica

S, B, common

no

LC

LC

no

Corvus monedula

S irr

no

LC

LC

no

Corvus corone cornix

S, B, common

no

LC

LC

no

Calandrella brachydactyla

B irr

yes

LC

NT A2b

no

Alauda arvensis

W, M, common

no

LC

NT A2b

no

Galerida cristata

S, B, common

no

LC

LC

no

Cisticola juncidis

S, B, common

no

LC

LC

no

Acrocephalus paludicola

A

yes

VU B2ab (i, ii, iii, iv, v)

no

SPEC 1

Acrocephalus melanopogon

P

yes

LC

CR D

no

Acrocephalus palustris

P

no

LC

LC

no

Acrocephalus scirpaceus

B, M, common

no

LC

LC

no

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

M

no

LC

NT A2b

no

Delichon urbicum

B around, M common

no

LC

NT A2b

SPEC 2

Hirundo rustica

B, M, common

no

LC

NT A2a-b

no

Riparia riparia

M

no

LC

VU A2b

no

Phylloscopus collybita

W, M, common

no

LC

LC

no

Sturnus vulgaris

W, M, common

no

LC

LC

no

Sturnus unicolor

S, B common

no

LC

LC

no

Erithacus rubecula

W, M

no

LC

LC

no

Phoenicurus ochruros

W, M

no

LC

LC

no

Saxicola torquatus

W, M

no

LC

EN A2b

no

Anthus pratensis

W, M

no

NT

no

SPEC 1

Motacilla flava ssp.

M, B irr

no

LC

LC

no

Motacilla alba

W, M

no

LC

LC

no

Linaria cannabina

S, B, common

no

LC

LC

SPEC 2

Carduelis carduelis

S, B, common

no

LC

LC

no

Emberiza calandra

S, B

no

LC

LC

SPEC 2

4. Results

Altogether, information was collected on 120 taxa, 116 species, and 4 subspecies. References were found in the literature on 56 species, in the following works: [12]-[31]. Comparison of the data collected in the three periods investigated shows 42 species reported in all three periods; 56 in historical period, 94 between 2010 and 2016, and 103 between 2016 and 2022; 9 species reported in historical period were not confirmed.

The distribution of birds in Gelsari and Lentini, between 2016 and 2022, was very heterogeneous. Waterfowl, which include the species of greatest conservation value, were found only in the Lentini marsh; the Gelsari marsh was practically deserted by waterfowl, having been rendered devoid of water outcrops.

Overall, the number of species reported over time is increasing; the continuation of censuses over the years has provided data on 9 new species, in addition to reconfirming presences already verified.

In many cases, the species reported are of significant conservation interest, being very rare or in steep decline in Europe. Specifically, the species of greatest interest are: 41 in Annex I of the Birds Directive; 18 SPEC 1 or 2, 4 VU according to IUCN global status; 3 CR, 5 EN, 12 VU, 1 NT according to IUCN status in Italy. Regarding phenology: 23 are breeding, 37 wintering; the remaining species are migratory, while 4 are of incidental occurrence, as they are very rare in southern Italy.

Among the species reported for the first time in the area, most notable in particular are the following Charadriformes: Limosa lapponica (Bar-tailed Godwit) (Figure 2) and Lymnocryptes minimus (Jack Snipe).

Figure 2. Many of the bird species present are of great interest for conservation. The photo shows a large flock of Calidris alpina (Dunlin) and some Limosa lapponica (Bar-tailed Godwit) specimens in the Lentini marsh, December 8, 2021.

Figure 3. The diagram shows daily rainfall data of the “Catania” rainfall station of the Sicilian Agrometeorological Information Service (green bar chart) and the point level measurements of the Lentini marsh carried out in the years 2021 and 2022 (blue triangular indicator) where the unnatural lowering in levels due to the water drainage are highlighted by a red arrow connecting the indicators.

An additional significant aspect, which had not become apparent with the first surveys, but which takes on an important dimension with these further surveys, is the presence of raptors; a total of 15 species appears in this new list, including Aquila fasciata (Bonelli’s Eagle) and Circaetus gallicus (Short-toed Snake Eagle), while recurring are the observations of Hieraaetus pennatus (Booted Eagle).

Water levels compared with rainfall trends, are shown in Figure 3. Analysis of the data, indicates that during the spring and summer periods, in which rainfall is reduced, the water level in the Lentini marsh, after a natural and gradual decrease from previous months, tends to remain at an almost stable level. In the years 2021 and 2022, the favorable conditions subsisting in the most depressed areas and the absence or reduction, compared to past years, of withdrawals by the “reclamation” consortium, allowed the marsh not to dry up completely in the summer period, as was the case in the past and as is documented in the literature [32] (Figure 4 and Figure 5).

Figure 4. Nesting of many bird species is linked to the permanence of water in spring and summer. Pantano Lentini, July 2022.

Figure 5. Permanence of water in mid-August 2022 in the Lentini marsh.

The diagram in Figure 3 also shows the natural level rise due to meteoric inputs and the sudden and unnatural lowering (shown by red arrows) as a result of the artificial water withdrawals carried out by the Consortium during rainy periods; about −0.5 m in January 2021, about −0.5 m between late October and early November 2021, and about −0.3 m between late November and early December 2022. It emerges that artificial water removal was carried out despite the absence of significant rainfall, and that the marsh was forced to lower water levels in autumn and winter than in summer.

5. Conclusions

The new surveys conducted in the Gelsari-Lentini wetland system confirm and consolidate the value of this site with regard to avifauna. Despite heavy anthropogenic pressure, the area plays an important naturalistic role internationally, with a high number of species that are rare in Europe. Further investigations over time will surely further enrich this already very significant picture. In this regard, it should be noted that during the drafting phase of this paper, the following additional species were observed for the first time in the Lentini marsh: Rallus aquaticus (Western Water Rail), repeatedly observed in June 2023 (breeding), Numenius phaeopus (Whimbrel), observed in mid-March 2023 and Grus grus (Common Crane), in migration in March 2023. In relation to the presence of birds of prey, at both Gelsari and Lentini marshes, in January 2023, was observed, wintering, Clanga pomarina (Lesser Spotted Eagle) and in the Lentini marsh, in December 2023, the presence of Accipiter nisus (Eurasian Sparrowhawk) was recorded.

In the course of this investigation, thanks to the surveys carried out, for a number of years it was possible to estimate on the present water column how much water withdrawal affects the basin and to define the periods in which this is exercised. From the analysis of the data and environmental monitoring related to the survey period, it emerges that the withdrawals are the greatest impact factor for the avifauna and that, if carried out in the summer period, they are capable of conditioning the permanence of water in the most depressed areas.

Stopping water withdrawals would immediately increase the international relevance of the Gelsari and Lentini marshes for bird conservation. Their positions, at the center of important migratory flows between Europe and Africa, together with the inherent capacities of wetland environments to host complex biological communities, make this site of high importance and require its management for naturalistic purposes, especially in the face of the very modest agropastoral value of the land and the high operating costs for water drainage. The data collected demonstrate the almost immediate ability of the avifauna to colonize the site and at the same time abandon it as a result of its drainage.

The contrasting trend between Gelsari and Lentini, indicates the two possible evolutions of the site: on the one hand, Lentini, demonstrates the resilience of the area; on the other hand, Gelsari shows the ability of man to totally inhibit the aquatic environment, causing its disappearance.

The highlighted ability of the Lentini marsh to maintain water even in the summer period deserves to be strictly protected, since it allows numerous species to be present or to reproduce, unlike in other Sicilian wetlands, which are naturally subject to complete drying up. The Lentini marsh, lying for the most part at an elevation below sea level, is replenished by rising waters; this phenomenon makes it better able to counteract artificial withdrawal activities, and for this reason, over time, it has preserved its more natural characteristics.

The results obtained indicate that for proper conservation of the wetland, it is certainly strategic and of primary importance to change the water management criteria of the marshes [33].

For the Lentini marsh, the elimination of agriculture would be imposed even in the northern parts, where it still continues to be practiced. It should be coupled with an area acquisition policy justified by comparing the very high environmental value of this marsh, the costs required to keep the water drainage and disposal system efficient, and the revenues from agriculture rendered irrational by the peculiar characteristics of the marsh.

While waiting for this to happen, water withdrawals should, however, cease, and, especially, peremptorily in spring and summer; they should be allowed only if the water level of the marsh should exceed a threshold to be established as “critical”. Furthermore, the project previsions, also recently put forward during the studied period, to enhance, as was the case for Gelsari, the hydro-swelling plant and make the water drainage system more efficient should be definitively abandoned.

With regard to the Gelsari marsh, on the other hand, strict regulation of withdrawals, respecting certain minimum criteria, would be appropriate to encourage the natural evolution of this environment, which could return, in a short time, to host a richer and more articulate flora and fauna than at present.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Mazzola, A., Bergamasco, A., Calvo, S., Caruso, G., Chemello, R., Colombo, F., Giaccone, G., Gianguzza, P., Guglielmo, L., Leonardi, M., Riggio, S., Sarà, G., Signa, G., Tomasello, A. and Vizzini, S. (2010) Sicilian Transitional Waters: Current Status and Future Development. Chemistry in Ecology, 26, 267-283.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02757541003627704
[2] La Mantia, T., Pasta, S. and Troia, A. (2022) Declino degli ambienti umidi in sicilia: Primo elenco delle zone scomparse. Il Naturalista Siciliano, 46, 159-202.
[3] Ferrarini, A., Gustin, M. and Celada, C. (2021) Twenty-Three Years of Land-Use Changes Induced Considerable Threats to the Main Wetlands of Sardinia and Sicily (Italy) along the Mediterranean Bird Flyways. Diversity, 13, Article No. 240.
https://doi.org/10.3390/d13060240
[4] Ientile, R. and Iapichino, C. (2010) Check-List degli uccelli della Riserva Naturale di Vendicari aggiornata al Dicembre 2009. In: Atti del ConvegnoLarea protetta di Vendicari”, Ente Fauna Siciliana, 287-298.
[5] Galasso, P., Cappuzzello, C., Gambino, E., Torre, G., Galasso, G. and Patti, N. (2021) Avifauna of “Sicilian Southeast Swamp Lakes” and Surroundings Areas (Ragusa and Syracuse, Sicily) with Commented Records of Interest. Biodiversity Journal, 12, 441-462.
https://doi.org/10.31396/Biodiv.Jour.2021.12.2.441.462
[6] Baccetti, N., Fracasso, G. and C.O.I. (2021) CISO-COI Check-List of Italian Birds-2020. Avocetta, 45, 21-85.
[7] De Pietro, R., Ientile, R., Puccia, S. and Sabella, G. (2019) Birds of Gelsari and Lentini Marshes, Special Protection Area for the Protection and Maintenance of Aquatic Avifauna in Central Mediterranean. Ocean and Coastal Management, 169, 96-103.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.12.010
[8] Frasca, M. (2023) Ai confini di Leontini—George Vallet 1922-2022. Atti della Giornata di Studi a cura di Giuseppe Immè.
[9] Ferrara, F. (1834) Storia Generale della Sicilia del professore Cav. A. F. Ferrara Sicilia Antica e Moderna Tomo VII. Palermo Presso Lorenzo Dato.
[10] Agnello, G. (1935) L’architettura Sveva in Sicilia. Edizioni Clio 2001.
[11] Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International (2020) Version 5.
http://datazone.birdlife.org/userfiles/file/Species/Taxonomy/HBW-BirdLife_Checklist_v5_Dec20.zip
[12] Massa, C. (1891) Gli uccelli della Sicilia. Il Naturalista siciliano, 10, 172-205.
[13] Zuccarello Patti, M. (1845) Osservazioni ornitologiche. Atti dellAccademia Gioenia di Scienze Naturali in Catania, 2, 323-335.
[14] Massa, C. (1890) Passaggio dei Cigni (Cygnus musicus) nel Pantano di Lentini (Siracusa). Agricoltura Calabro-sicula (Dicembre).
[15] Zuccarello Patti, M. (1856) L’Anitra fusca rinvenuta in Sicilia. Giornale del Gabinetto letterario dellAccademia Gioenia di Catania, 2, 33-34.
[16] Malherbe, A. (1843) Faune Ornithologique de la Sicile. Mem. Acad. Royale Metz. Typ. S. Lamort, Metz.
[17] Lilford, L. (1875) Cruise of the “Zara” R. Y. S., in the Mediterranean. London. Ibis, 17, 1-35.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1875.tb05963.x
[18] Bertuccio, B. (1896) La Caccia in Sicilia. Caccia e tiri, Anno 10, n. 444.
[19] Benoit, L. (1840) Ornitologia Siciliana. (Messina: Stamperia G. Fiumara).
[20] Priolo, A. and Di Palma, M.G. (1995) Catalogo della collezione ornitologica Angelo Priolo. Quaderni B.C.A. Sicilia, n. 19, 225 pp + 16 tav. a colori.
[21] Giglioli, H.E. (1890) Primo resoconto dei risultati dell’Inchiesta Ornitologica. Parte I. Avifauna Italica (1889). Parte II. Avifaune locali (1890). Le Monnier, Firenze.
https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.8360
[22] Dresser, H.E. (1871-1881) History of the Birds of Europe: Including All the Species Inhabiting the Western Palaearctic Region, Vol. 6. London.
https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.53765
[23] Doderlein, P. (1869-74) Avifauna del Modenese e della Sicilia. Giornale di Scienze Naturali ed Economiche, 5-10, 137-195, 187-236, 9-72, 40-124, 28-93, 35-71, 133-148.
[24] Di Palma, M.G., Catalisano, A., Lo Valvo, F. and Lo Verde, G. (1989) Catalogo della collezione ornitologica Antonio Trischitta. Quaderni B.C.A. Sicilia, 111 pp + 16 tav. a colori.
[25] Jany in Stresemann, E. (1943) Die Brutvogel des Sees von Lentini, Sizilien. Ornithology Monabste, 51, 116-122.
[26] Orlando, C. (1958) Nuove catture per la Sicilia di Pellicani (Pelecanus onocrotalus, Linnaeus). Rivista Italiana di Ornitologia, 28, 135-137.
[27] Ciaccio, A. and Priolo, A. (1997) Avifauna della foce del Simeto, del lago di Lentini e delle zone umide adiacenti (Sicilia, Italia). Il Naturalista Sicilano, 21, 309-413.
[28] Savi, P. (1873-1876) Ornitologia Italiana. Vols 1-3. Successori le Monnier, Firenze.
[29] Whitaker, J. (1905) The Birds of Tunisia. Porter, London.
[30] Arrigoni degli Oddi, E. (1929) Ornitologia italiana. Hoepli, Milano.
[31] Orlando, C. (1965) La presenza degli Storni a Palermo. Boll. Rotary Club, Palermo, (2045): 1-7.
[32] De Grazia, S. (1930) La bonifica agraria del pantano di Lentini 1925-1927. Catania: Tipografia Cav. Santi Monachini.
[33] De Pietro, R. and Duchi, A. (2022) Pantani Gelsari e Lentini (Sicilia, Italia). Potenziale polmone per l’anguilla europea (Anguilla anguilla L., 1758) nel Mediterraneo centrale: Una proposta di intervento. Italian Journal of Freshwater Ichtyology, 8, 33-40.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.