1. Introduction
Let
and
be vector spaces on the same field
, and
. I use the notation
for all the norms on both
and
. In this paper, I investigate additive functional inequalities when
is a normed vector space and
is a Banach space.
In fact, when
is a complex normed space and
is a complex Banach space, I solve and prove the general Cauchy-Jensen stability for the following additive functional inequalities.
(1)
and
(2)
Final
(3)
Based on the general Cauchy-Jensen equations with the following 3k-variables.
(4)
(5)
(6)
Note: The
-functional inequality.
The study of the functional equation stability is originated from a question of S. M. Ulam [1] , concerning the stability of group homomorphisms. Let
be a group and let
be a metric group with metric
. Given
, there exists a
such that if
satisfies
for all
, then there is a homomorphism
with
for all
, if the answer is affirmative, I would say that equation of homomophism
is stable. The concept of stability for a functional equation arises when I replace a functional equation with an inequality which acts as a perturbation of the equation. Thus the stability question of functional equations is how do the solutions of the inequality differ from those of the given function equation? Hyers gave a first affirmative answer to the question of Ulam as follows:
In 1941, D. H. Hyers [2] , let
and let
be a mapping between Banach space such that
for all
and some
. It was shown that the limit
exists for all
and that
is that unique additive mapping satisfying
Next in 1978, Th. M. Rassias [3] provided a generalization of Hyers’ Theorem which allows the Cauchy difference to be unbounded:
Consider
to be two Banach spaces, and let
be a mapping such that
is continuous in t for each fixed x. Assume that there exist
and
such that
then there exists a unique linear
satisfies
Next J. M. Rassias [4] followed the spirit of the innovative approach of Th. M. Rassias for the unbounded Cauchy difference proved a similar stability theorem in which he replaced the factor
by
for
with
.
Next in 1992, a generalized of Rassias’ Theorem was obtained by Găvruta [5] Gilányi [6] and Fechner [7] , proving the Hyers-Ulam stability of the functional inequality.
Next is about the development of
-function inequalities of mathematicians in the world.
In 2020, Ly Van An studied the inequalities of the function on the group and the ring see [8]
(7)
and
(8)
Next, in 2020, Ly Van An continued to study additive
-functional inequality in complex Banach spaces see [9]
(9)
and
(10)
Next, in 2021, Ly Van An continued to study additive functional inequality investigated in non-Archimedean Banach spaces see [10]
(11)
and
(12)
Recently, Ly Van An continues to give the general Cauchy-Jensen see [11] functional equations after I study the
-function inequalities (1), (2) and (3) based on the functional Equations (4)-(6) on a complex Banach space. In this paper, Isolve and proved the
-function inequalities (1), (2) and (3) based on the functional Equations (4)-(6) on a complex Banach space, i.e. the
-functional inequalities with 3k variables. Under suitable assumptions on spaces
and
, I will prove that the mappings satisfy the (1), (2) and (3). Thus, the results in this paper are generalization of those in [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] .
To overcome the limitation on the number of variables in the classical Cauchy-Jensen p-function inequalities I introduce three general Cauchy-Jensen
-function inequalities with 3k-variables on complex Banach spaces to help math researchers in the space they navigate. To get the above idea, I rely on the thinking of world mathematicians, see [1] - [23] . First, I build the general Cauchy-Jensen equations, and then build the functional inequalities.
The paper is organized as follows: In the section preliminaries, I remind some basic notations such as: Cauchy equation, Cauchy-Jensen equation, Classical Cauchy-Jensen βj-functional equation and Classical Cauchy-Jensen βj-functional inequalities.
Section 3: The basis for building a solution for the Cauchy-Jensen
-function inequality.
Section 4: Establishing Solutions for general Cauchy-Jensen
-function inequalities.
Section 5: Establish Isomorphisms between Unital Banach Algebras.
2. Preliminaries
2.1. Solutions of the Equation
The functional equation
is called the Cauchy equation. In particular, every solution of the Cauchy equation is said to be an additive mapping.
The functional equations
(13)
(14)
(15)
is called the Cauchy-Jensen equation. In particular, every solution of the equation is said to be Cauchy-Jensen additive mapping and the functional equations
(16)
(17)
(18)
is called the Classical Cauchy-Jensen βj-functional equation. In particular, every solution of the βj-functional equation is said to be an additive mapping.
2.2. Solutions of the Functional Inequalities
The functional inequalities
(19)
(20)
(21)
is called the Classical Cauchy-Jensen βj-functional inequalities. In particular, every solution of the βj-functional inequalities is said to be an additive mapping.
3. Basis for Building Solutions for Cauchy-Jensen. P-Function Inequalities
Note Here I assume that
,
be real or complex vector spaces and
.
Lemma 1. Suppose that
,
be real or complex vector space. If the mapping
satisfies of the following functional inequalities
(22)
(23)
(24)
for all
, if and only the mappings
is additive.
Note: Here I prove (22) while (23) and (24) are completely similar proofs.
Proof. Assume that
satisfies (22).
I replace
by
in (22), I have
(25)
for all
. So
Hence
is Cauchy additive.
The remaining (23) and (24) are completely similar proofs. ¨
From the proof of the lemma, I have the following corollary:
Corollary 1. Suppose that
be real or complex vector space. If the mapping
satisfies the following functional equations
(26)
(27)
(28)
for all
, if and only the mappings
is additive.
4. Establishing Solutions for General Cauchy-Jensen
-Function Inequalities
Now, I first study the solutions of (1), (2) and (3). Note that for this
-function inequalities,
be real or complex vector space with norm
and that
is a Banach space with norm
. Under this setting, I can show that the mappings satisfying (1), (2) and (3) is additive.
Theorem 1. Suppose that
be a mapping. If there is a function
such that satisfying
(29)
and
(30)
for all
. Then there exists a unique additive mapping
such that
(31)
for all
.
Proof. I replace
by
in (29), I have
(32)
for all
. So
for all
. Hence
(33)
At here
(34)
and so there exists
such that
as
. Therefore so when I give
in (33), I have
(35)
for all nonnegative integers m and l with
and for all
. It follows (30) and (33) that the sequence
is a Cauchy sequence for all
. Since
is complete, the sequence
converges, one can define the mapping
by
for all
. By (30) and (29),
for all
. So
for all
.
By Corollary 1, the mapping
is additive mapping.
Now, let
be another generalized Cauchy-Jensen additive mapping satisfying (31). Then I have
(36)
which tends to zero as
for all
. So I can conclude that
for all
. This proves the uniqueness of
. ¨
Corollary 2. Suppose p and
be positive real numbers with
, and let
be a mapping such that
for all
. The there exists a unique additive mapping
such that
for all
.
Corollary 3. Suppose
and
be positive real numbers with
, and let
be a mapping such that
for all
. The there exists a unique additive mapping
such that
for all
.
Theorem 2. Suppose
be a mapping. If there is a function
such that satisfying
(37)
and
(38)
for all
.
Then there exists a unique additive mapping
such that
(39)
for all
.
Proof. I replace
by
in (37), I have
(40)
for all
. So
(41)
for all
. Hence
(42)
for all nonnegative integers m and l with
and for all
. It follows (38) and (42) that the sequence
is a Cauchy sequence for all
. Since
is complete, the sequence
converges. So one can define the mapping
by
for all
. The proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 1. ¨
Corollary 4. Suppose p and
be positive real numbers with
, and let
be a mapping such that
for all
. The there exists a unique additive mapping
such that
for all
.
Corollary 5. Let
and
be positive real numbers with
, and let
be a mapping such that
for all
. The there exists a unique additive mapping
such that
for all
.
Theorem 3. Let
be a mapping. If there is a function
such that satisfying
(43)
and
(44)
for all
.
Then there exists a unique additive mapping
such that
(45)
for all
.
Proof. I replace
by
in (43), I have
(46)
for all
. So
(47)
for all
. ¨
The rest of the proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 1.
Corollary 6. Suppose p and
be positive real numbers with
, and let
be a mapping such that
for all
. The there exists a unique additive mapping
such that
for all
.
Corollary 7. Suppose
and
be positive real numbers with
, and let
be a mapping such that
for all
. The there exists a unique additive mapping
such that
for all
.
Theorem 4. Suppose
be a mapping. If there is a function
such that satisfying
(48)
and
(49)
for all
.
Then there exists a unique additive mapping
such that
(50)
for all
.
Proof. I replace
by
in (29), I have
(51)
for all
. So
for all
. The rest of the proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 1, Theorem 3. ¨
Corollary 8. Suppose p and
be positive real numbers with
, and let
be a mapping such that
for all
. The there exists a unique additive mapping
such that
for all
.
Corollary 9. Suppose
and
be positive real numbers with
, and let
be a mapping such that
for all
. The there exists a unique additive mapping
such that
for all
.
Theorem 5. Suppose
be a mapping. If there is a function
such that satisfying
(52)
and
(53)
for all
.
Then there exists a unique additive mapping
such that
(54)
for all
.
The rest of the proof is the same as in the proof of Theorem 4.
Corollary 10. Suppose p and
be positive real numbers with
, and let
be a mapping such that
for all
. The there exists a unique additive mapping
such that
for all
.
Suppose
and
be positive real numbers with
, and let
be a mapping such that
for all
. The there exists a unique additive mapping
such that
for all
.
Theorem 6. Let
be a mapping. If there is a function
such that satisfying
(55)
and
(56)
for all
.
Then there exists a unique additive mapping
such that
(57)
for all
.
Proof. The rest of the proof is the same as in the proof of Theorems 1 and 4. ¨
Corollary 11. Suppose p and
be positive real numbers with
, and let
be a mapping such that
for all
. The there exists a unique additive mapping
such that
for all
.
Corollary 12. Suppose
and
be positive real numbers with
, and let
be a mapping such that
for all
. The there exists a unique additive mapping
such that
for all
.
5. Isomorphisms between Unital Banach Algebras
Now, I first study the Isomorphisms between Unital Banach Algebras. Note that for this
-function inequalities,
be Unital Banach Algebras over a Field
with unit e and norm
and that
be Unital Banach Algebras over a Field
with unit e’ over a Field
.
Note: here I construct the isomorphism for the
-function inequality (3), the rest of the
-function inequalities (1) and (2) I prove exactly the same.
Theorem 7. Let
be a mapping if there is a function
such that satisfying
(58)
(59)
and
(60)
for all
,
. Then the mapping
is an isomorphism.
Proof. Let
in (58). By Theorem 6, there is a unique additive mapping
satisfying the additive mapping
is given by
(61)
for all
and satisfying
(62)
for all
.
By (58) and (60) I have
for all
and
.
So
So
for all
and
. Since
is additive,
for all
and for all
. Hence the additive mapping
is an
-linear mapping.
Since
is multiplicative,
(63)
for all
. By (60)
(64)
so by (63) and (64) I have
(65)
for all
. Therefore, the mapping
is an isomorphism, as desired. ¨
Corollary 13. Let p and
be positive real numbers with
, and let
be a mapping such that
(66)
for all
,
.
Then the mapping
is an isomorphism.
Corollary 14. Let
and
be positive real numbers with
, and let
be a mapping such that
(67)
for all
,
.
Then the mapping
is an isomorphism.
6. Conclusion
In this paper, I construct general Cauchy-Jensen
-function inequalities and give the conditions for the existence of solutions and from there, I construct them on complex Banach spaces. The aim is to improve the classical Cauchy-Jensen inequalities on the unlimited space of the number of variables. It is convenient for researchers in the field of Mathematics.